Acute Extremity DVT: Thrombectomy and Thrombolysis
Suresh Vedantham
Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs in approximately 300,000 persons per year in the United States alone (1). Because pulmonary embolism (PE) can be fatal, its prevention using anticoagulant therapy has been the mainstay of DVT therapy for nearly 50 years (2). However, anticoagulant drugs do not actively eliminate venous thrombus, so in many cases, their use is not sufficient to prevent serious DVT complications. Early thrombus progression occurs in a minority of anticoagulated DVT patients and can threaten life, limb, or organ function; prolong hospitalization; and exacerbate DVT symptoms such as limb pain, swelling, and ambulatory difficulties. Despite use of anticoagulant therapy, 25% to 50% of proximal DVT patients will develop significant quality of life (QOL) impairment from the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), a debilitating late DVT complication characterized by chronic leg fatigue or heaviness, swelling, pain, paresthesias, venous claudication, stasis dermatitis, and/or skin ulceration (3,4). PTS can also affect the upper extremity, particularly when the subclavian vein from the dominant arm is involved with
the initial DVT episode. The development of PTS is directly related to the continued presence of thrombus within the deep venous system during the initial weeks and months after DVT via at least two pathways: (a) residual thrombus physically blocks blood flow (“obstruction”) and (b) thrombosis stimulates inflammation, which directly damages the venous valves, causing valvular incompetence (“reflux”). When reflux and/or obstruction is present, ambulatory venous hypertension develops and ultimately leads to the edema, tissue hypoxia and injury, progressive calf pump dysfunction, subcutaneous fibrosis, and skin ulceration of PTS (5). It is therefore logical that rapid thrombus elimination and restoration of unobstructed deep venous flow using catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) should rapidly improve initial DVT symptoms and prevent late valvular reflux, venous obstruction, and PTS.
the initial DVT episode. The development of PTS is directly related to the continued presence of thrombus within the deep venous system during the initial weeks and months after DVT via at least two pathways: (a) residual thrombus physically blocks blood flow (“obstruction”) and (b) thrombosis stimulates inflammation, which directly damages the venous valves, causing valvular incompetence (“reflux”). When reflux and/or obstruction is present, ambulatory venous hypertension develops and ultimately leads to the edema, tissue hypoxia and injury, progressive calf pump dysfunction, subcutaneous fibrosis, and skin ulceration of PTS (5). It is therefore logical that rapid thrombus elimination and restoration of unobstructed deep venous flow using catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) should rapidly improve initial DVT symptoms and prevent late valvular reflux, venous obstruction, and PTS.
Indications
1. Urgent first-line CDT is performed as an adjunct to anticoagulant therapy to prevent life-, limb-, or organ-threatening complications of acute DVT.
a. In patients with acute limb-threatening circulatory compromise (i.e., phlegmasia cerulea dolens)
b. In patients with extensive inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis deemed to be at high risk for fatal PE
c. In patients with acute renal failure from thrombus extension into the suprarenal IVC and/or renal veins (6)
2. Nonurgent second-line CDT is performed for patients with symptomatic proximal DVT who exhibit clinical and/or anatomic progression of DVT on anticoagulant therapy.
a. Rapid iliocaval or subclavian/brachiocephalic thrombus extension
b. Exacerbation or persistence of major lower or upper extremity symptoms
c. Failure to experience sufficient symptom improvement to permit ambulation or normal arm function
3. Nonurgent first-line CDT may be performed as an adjunct to anticoagulant therapy to enable faster symptom relief and/or long-term prevention of PTS in patients with symptomatic, acute proximal DVT.
a. Patients with acute iliofemoral DVT (defined as DVT that involves the iliac vein and/or common femoral vein) are likely to be the best candidates for first-line CDT.
b. Patients with acute axillosubclavian DVT related to Paget-Schroetter syndrome also appear to be excellent candidates for a combined surgicalinterventional approach in which CDT-mediated thrombus removal is the first step.
Contraindications
1. Active internal bleeding
2. Recent (<3 months) gastrointestinal bleeding
3. Recent stroke (<6 months)
4. Intracranial or intraspinal bleeding, tumor, vascular malformation, or aneurysm
5. Severe liver dysfunction
6. Severe thrombocytopenia or other bleeding diathesis
7. Pregnancy
8. Severe uncontrolled hypertension
9. Recent (<10 days) major surgery, trauma, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, obstetric delivery, lithotripsy, or other major invasive procedure
10. Recent (<3 months) eye operation or hemorrhagic retinopathy
11. Bacterial endocarditis or acute bacterial septic thrombophlebitis
12. Moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction
13. Severe acute illness that precludes adequate sedation or proper positioning on the table.
14. Patients >70 years of age may be at higher risk of bleeding complications.
Preprocedure Preparation
1. Obtain clinical history and perform physical examination to confirm the presence of a symptom and/or clinical manifestation that merits aggressive therapy. Know the patient’s risk factors for bleeding complications, his or her baseline ambulatory status, and his or her life expectancy. Patients who are chronically nonambulatory or who have very short life expectancy may not experience meaningful benefits from CDT.
2. Review duplex venous ultrasound to confirm the diagnosis of DVT, evaluate the extent of thrombus, and plan the therapeutic approach. If needed, evaluation of central veins may be performed with computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance (MR) venography, or injection venography.
3. Laboratory evaluation: serum creatinine, hemoglobin (Hgb)/hematocrit (Hct), platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT). Pregnancy test should be performed in women of childbearing potential.
4. Provide a balanced discussion of the risks, benefits, alternatives to, and uncertainties surrounding CDT and obtain informed consent. Discuss the use of adjunctive measures such as angioplasty and stent placement to treat stenotic lesions that are uncovered.
5. For most patients, ensure that the INR is below 2.0 (preferably 1.5) before starting CDT and stop any irreversible anticoagulants at least 24 hours before CDT. These parameters can be modified for patients with severe clinical manifestations or for patients with renal dysfunction (the latter may require longer periods of oral anticoagulation cessation). If the patient has mild-to-moderate contrast allergy, premedicate with steroids and histamine antagonists (see Chapter 64).
6. In selected patients with lower extremity DVT, a retrievable IVC filter may be placed prior to starting CDT. Because PE rates are known to be low when infusion-first CDT (see “Complications” section) is used, IVC filter placement is probably unnecessary when this method is used (7,8). However, the need for IVC filter placement prior to single-session pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) therapy is unclear at present.
Procedure
1. Select a venous access site, ideally peripheral to the extent of the thrombus.
a. Usual sites for lower extremity DVT