fMRI and Wada
Lubdha M. Shah, MD
Key Facts
Wada
Wada test and intraoperative cortical stimulation have been considered gold standards for language representation
Catheter carotid angiography
Intracarotid administration of sodium amobarbital
Assess consequent cognitive deficit
Disadvantages: Invasive, expensive, nonlocalizing; equivocal results if patient is oversedated and cannot respond
Speech lateralization
Motor hemispheric localization
Memory
fMRI vs. Wada
Hemispheric language dominance shown to be consistent between the 2 modalities
High correlation between lateralization on fMRI and Wada testing
Many epileptologists now think that fMRI is adequate for language lateralization
In cases where fMRI results are divergent or activation is atypical or absent, Wada may be a helpful presurgical planning tool
Tasks
Word-generation task significantly more specific than semantic-decision task
Safe
Replicable
Provides more precise anatomic localization within a hemisphere
Memory
Memory task activation does not clearly predict postoperative memory impairment
Therefore, fMRI not a definite substitution for Wada test for overall hemispheric lateralization
(Left) Coronal PET demonstrates hypometabolism in bilateral mesial temporal lobes in this patient with intractable complex partial seizures. The left temporal lobe uptake is 5-10% decreased relative to the right . (Right) Coronal FLAIR MRI shows asymmetric volume loss and hyperintensity in the left mesial temporal lobe in comparison to the right .
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |