Branch Endograft Disconnection and Impending Type 3 Endoleak Post-EVAR

, Anna Maria Belli , Joo-Young Chun3, Raymond Chung3, Raj Das3, Andrew England4, Karen Flood5, Marie-France Giroux6, Richard G. McWilliams7, Robert Morgan3, Nik Papadakos3, Jai V. Patel8, Raf Patel , Uday Patel , Lakshmi Ratnam10  , Reddi Prasad Yadavali11 and John Rose12

(1)
Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
(2)
Department of Radiology, St. George’s Hospital and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 0RE, UK
(3)
Department of Radiology, St. George’s Hospital, London, UK
(4)
Department of Radiography, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
(5)
Department of Vascular Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
(6)
Department of Radiology, CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
(7)
Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
(8)
Department of Radiology, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
(9)
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, St. George’s Hospital and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, SW17 0QT London, UK
(10)
Department of Radiology, St. George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, SW17 0QT London, UK
(11)
Department of Radiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
(12)
Department of Interventional Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
 
 
Anna Maria Belli
 
Raf Patel
 
Uday Patel
 
Lakshmi Ratnam
Abstract
This case illustrates the importance of follow-up imaging post-EVAR to detect modular disconnection and describes the management in one such case.
Keywords
ComplicationsEVARModular disconnectionStent
Mar 20, 2016 | Posted by in INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Branch Endograft Disconnection and Impending Type 3 Endoleak Post-EVAR

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access