Chapter 10 Scott M. Duncan and Timothy J. Amrhein 1. Which images are abnormal? Why? What is the diagnosis? 2. Normally, which MRI sequences have flow voids and which exhibit flow-related enhancement? 3. In cardiac imaging, what type of sequence is a “black blood” technique and what sequence is a “white blood” technique? 1. The bottom two images (Figs. 1C and 1D) are abnormal because there is signal within the superior sagittal sinus where there should normally be a flow void. 2. Generally speaking, spin echo sequences have flow voids within a vessel. Gradient-recalled echo sequences can have flow-related enhancement resulting in a bright vessel. 3. In cardiac imaging, the “black blood” occurs secondary to a flow void, thus the “black blood” technique is a spin echo sequence. The “bright blood” technique employs a gradient-recalled echo sequence to take advantage of flow-related enhancement. Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. The bright signal within the superior sagittal sinus in Figures 1C and 1D is abnormal as one should expect to identify a flow void in this vascular structure in spin echo imaging. When evaluating a spin echo sequence, always be sure to look for arterial and venous flow voids to exclude an unexpected thrombus. Perhaps one of the most confusing topics to understand as a novice to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation is the differentiation between flow voids and flow-related enhancement. When should vessels be black and when should they be bright? The answer is actually quite simple. Spin echo techniques result in flow voids, while gradient-recalled echo techniques result in flow-related enhancement. These are, of course, generalizations and there are exceptions to this rule (we will explore these later). However, in the majority of cases this simple generalization holds true. Cardiac MRI takes advantage of the distinct flow-related properties of these two magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to image the cardiovascular system. The generic descriptors “black blood” technique and “white blood” technique are the result of flow voids and flow-related enhancement, respectively. In other words, blood is dark in the “black blood” technique primarily as a result of the flow void phenomenon produced by a spin echo sequence. Conversely, blood is bright in the “white blood” technique, based on the flow-related enhancement found in a gradient-recalled echo sequence. Flow voids and flow-related enhancement are both based on the same “time-of-flight” phenomenon. The basis of this phenomenon is that flowing protons within blood do not experience the same radiofrequency (RF) pulses and magnetization as that of stationary protons. Thus, the signal obtained from flowing protons is different than that from stationary protons. Let’s begin with a discussion of spin echo imaging. Spin echo imaging uses two RF pulses to produce a signal. The first is a 90° pulse that tips the longitudinal magnetization into the transverse plane. Subsequently, a 180° pulse realigns the dephased spins in order to produce an echo. The proton must experience both RF pulses to create a signal. For example, if a moving proton is hit with the initial 90° RF pulse and then moves out of the imaging plane before the 180° RF pulse (thereby avoiding the 180° pulse), the dephased protons will not be refocused. This absence of refocusing means that all of the transverse magnetization will remain dephased and no signal will be obtained. Alternatively, if the proton is outside of the imaging slice when the 90° pulse is applied, but then moves into the slice when the 180° pulse is applied, the proton’s magnetization will be flipped 180° (reversed or “upside down”) in the longitudinal direction. In this scenario, there will be no transverse magnetization to provide a signal (as the initial 90° RF pulse was missed). In both of the provided scenarios, the result is absence of signal, or a flow void. While we may think of a flow void as a complete loss of signal, there is, in reality, a spectrum ranging from full normal signal to a complete signal void. The amount of signal void is dependent upon the velocity of the proton, the slice thickness, the time to echo (TE), and the course of the vessel. The greater the velocity of the proton, the quicker it will move out of the imaging slice and the less time it has to experience both the 90° and 180° RF pulses. Thinner slices mean that there are shorter required distances to traverse the imaging slice, thus less time to experience both RF pulses (and a greater likelihood of a flow void). Longer TEs mean that there is more time between the 90° and 180° RF pulses (remember that the 90° and 180° pulses are separated by TE). Therefore, there is more time for the moving protons (that have already experienced the initial 90° pulse) to be replaced with “new” protons that have not experienced the first RF pulse prior to signal acquisition. Thus, sequences with long TEs (such as T2 and proton density [PD] images) have the most prominent flow voids. This is an important point to remember. Intraluminal signal that is concerning for vascular thrombosis, when identified on a T1-weighted sequence (short TE), should be confirmed by comparing to the corresponding T2 or PD sequences as these are less sensitive to slow flow and more specific to the diagnosis of thrombosis. Finally, the course of the vessel also has implications for the presence or absence of a flow void. The time-of-flight phenomenon only applies to flow that is perpendicular to the imaging plane. When vessels take a course that is oblique or parallel to the imaging plane, the protons stay within the imaging slice for an extended period of time, increasing the probability that they both experience RF pulses and produce signal. Thus, if a vessel courses obliquely or parallel to the imaging plane, an intravascular signal may be seen despite normal flow within the vessel. Blood velocity within the arterial system is usually great enough to result in a complete intraluminal signal void regardless of the obliquity of the vessel (examples include the petrous internal carotid artery and the middle cerebral artery). Conversely, the relatively reduced venous velocity may not result in a complete signal void despite patency, especially if the vessel takes an oblique course. As a result, if intraluminal signal is identified within a vein on a spin echo sequence, the possibility of a thrombus should be raised, but should be confirmed with a more flow-sensitive sequence (such as phase contrast). In gradient-recalled imaging, the time-of-flight phenomenon has the opposite effect of that seen in spin echo sequences. Recall that in gradient-recalled echo sequences there is only one RF pulse, with phase refocusing dependent upon the application of a gradient. Additionally, the times to repetition (TRs) in gradient sequences are very short and are repeated multiple times. Thus, the proton’s longitudinal magnitude does not fully recover before the next RF pulse is applied. After several TRs are applied, the amount of longitudinal magnetization recovered reaches equilibrium with the amount of magnetization that is tipped into the transverse plane. This is called “saturation.” A flowing proton that is entering a slice has not experienced the multiple previous RF pulses and will produce more signal than the adjacent partially saturated nonmobile protons. This is the basis of “flow-related enhancement” (Fig. 1).1 Gradient-recalled echo images are often acquired via excitation of a three-dimensional (3D) “slab” of tissue, rather than excitation of multiple contiguous two-dimensional (2D) slices. With 3D acquisition, a proton must traverse the entire volume of excited tissue to escape the multiple repeated RF pulses, which means it must travel much further than with the contiguous single-slice 2D acquisition technique. This fact results in an effect termed the “entry slice phenomenon.” As flowing protons course antegrade through a vessel, they become more and more saturated by the RF excitation pulses sent into the 3D tissue slab. This results in progressive loss of signal within the downstream aspect of the vessel. The images therefore demonstrate bright signal within the vessel at the beginning of the tissue slab, progressive loss of intraluminal vascular signal over the course of the tissue slab, and the least amount of intraluminal signal at the end of the slab. The entry slice phenomenon is dependent upon the direction of flow within the vessel. For example, in the abdominal aorta there is brighter signal superiorly (since the flow courses superior to inferior), while the phenomenon results in brighter signal at the inferior aspect of the inferior vena cava (flow from inferior to superior). The flow-related enhancement will extend further into the imaged volume with higher velocities, with longer TRs, and with contiguous slices/slabs that are acquired countercurrent to flow. The time-of-flight phenomenon is the major determinant of vessel contrast in MRI. However, there are several additional factors that attenuate signal within flowing blood, thereby resulting in an accentuation of flow voids in spin echo sequences and a decrease in flow-related enhancement in gradient-recalled echo sequences. The application of a gradient results in dephasing of protons secondary to exposure to slightly different magnetic field strengths, which results in slightly different precession frequencies. This dephasing leads to signal cancellation and an overall decrease in signal. In order to correct for this signal loss, a bipolar gradient (two equal gradients with opposite polarity) can be applied, which will realign the dephased spins. Bipolar gradients work well for stationary protons, but are less successful in the case of mobile protons (such as in flowing blood). Flowing protons change their positions between the application of the two lobes of the bipolar gradient (i.e., the dephasing and rephasing lobes) and therefore do not experience equal and opposite gradients. This difference results in the accumulation of a net phase shift for the mobile protons. The amount of phase shift is dependent on the velocity of the mobile protons (a principle employed in phase-contrast imaging). According to the principle of laminar flow, velocities are not uniform throughout a vessel, with faster flow centrally and slower flow near the vessel wall. Therefore, intravascular protons will accumulate different amounts of phase and, when summed together, will result in signal cancellation and decreased or absent signal within the vessel. While this signal loss is tolerable for simple anatomic imaging applications, if the goal is an evaluation of the vasculature, the imaging quality can be improved via utilization of a correction technique called a flow compensation gradient or gradient moment nulling. A flow-compensated gradient is a second bipolar gradient that is a mirror image of the first gradient (i.e., the lobes are applied in the opposite order, negative then positive) When diagramed, it appears as a trilobed gradient since the negative lobes are applied back to back (Fig. 2). This technique causes mobile protons to acquire a phase shift that is equal and opposite to that acquired during the first bipolar gradient, which results in no net phase shift. Unfortunately, this compensation technique is only successful for flowing protons with a constant velocity. Higher order flow, such as pulsatility and jerk, can be compensated by larger, more complex gradient schemes, though these are rarely used.2 Additionally, areas of turbulence cannot be compensated for and always result in decreased signal. The tradeoff for the application of gradient moment nulling is that of additional scan time as the TE or TR must be lengthened to allow time for the second bipolar gradient to be inserted into the sequence. An additional way to compensate for flow-related dephasing is by shortening the TE or TR, which reduces the time that protons have to dephase before the signal is acquired. Cardiac imaging employs short TEs and TRs to help compensate for higher order flow without using more complex and time-consuming gradients. Portal vein thrombosis. The portal vein contains heterogeneous signal, is expanded, and lacks a normal flow void, findings that are consistent with portal vein thrombosis. Additionally, there are signs of portal hypertension, including marked splenomegaly. Glomus jugulare. The glomus tumors (paragangliomas) have a typical “salt and pepper” appearance, which can be identified on either T2-weighted or postcontrast T1-weighted images.3 The “salt” or white portion of the tumor is secondary to the marked enhancement (representing hypervascularity) of the lesion on postcontrast T1 images as well to as the high water content resulting in T2 hyperintensity. The “pepper” or black portions of the lesion are a result of prominent internal flow voids. Arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Identification of flow voids within a lesion can be useful for its characterization, providing clear evidence of hypervascularity and thereby narrowing the differential diagnostic possibilities. In Case 4, one notes that the flow voids (including those within the superior sagittal sinus) are more prominent on the T2-weighted image in comparison with the T1-weighted image. This occurs as a direct result of the longer TE (116 msec versus 15 msec on the T1-weighted image), which allows more time for the protons to leave the imaging plane and “escape” the 180° echo pulse. Remember, to acquire signal in a spin echo image, the proton must experience both the initial 90° excitation pulse and the 180° refocusing pulse. Furthermore, susceptibility artifacts will be more prominent with longer TEs as there is more time for T2* effects to degrade acquired signal. Sequences with longer TEs (usually T2) are therefore the most sensitive for the evaluation of flow voids and for determining vessel patency. Moyamoya disease. The term moyamoya
Flow-Related Contrast
CASE 1
ANSWERS
CASE 1
Diagnosis:
Physics Discussion
Vascular Contrast: Flow Voids and Flow-Related Enhancement
Gradient Moment Nulling
CASE 2
Diagnosis:
Discussion:
CASES 3 AND 4: COMPANION CASES
Case 3
Diagnosis:
Discussion:
Case 4
Diagnosis:
Physics Discussion
CASES 5 AND 6: COMPANION CASES
Case 5
Diagnosis:
Discussion:
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree