Dynamic Study of White Matter Fiber Tracts After Traumatic Brain Injury

, Valery Kornienko1, Alexander Potapov2 and Igor Pronin3



(1)
Department of Neuroradiology, Burdenko Neurosurgery Intitute, Moscow, Russia

(2)
Department of Neurotrauma, Burdenko Neurosurgery Insitute, Moscow, Russia

(3)
Department of Neuroradiology, Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute, Moscow, Russia

 




Abstract

Chapter 4 is dedicated to dynamic structural changes of the white matter tracts examined by diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging on the model of diffuse axonal injury. The objectives of this research were to study the analysis results of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy for diagnosis and prognosis of severe diffuse axonal injury and to study the structure of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts in patients with different types of conscious impairments and mental and motor disorders in dynamics in different periods following diffuse axonal injury.

The new data on pathogenesis and dynamics of diffuse brain injury with quantitative and qualitative changes in the white matter fiber tracts have been obtained. It was demonstrated that diffuse axonal injury, being a trigger mechanism of fiber tract degeneration with their subsequent atrophy, may be regarded as a clinical model of multidimensional “split brain” with commissural, association, and projection white matter tract disturbances. The degree of primary damage of the projection, commissural, or association connections is determined in each specific case by predominant biomechanics of the linear, angular, and rotational impact.



4.1 Quantitative Evaluation of Corpus Callosum and Corticospinal Tract Condition in the Acute Period of TBI


Quantitative DT-MRI analysis was performed in 22 patients aged 9–54 years (average 25 years, 13 males, 11 females) and in 8 healthy volunteers (control group) aged 22–57 years (average 33 years, 5 males, 3 females). All 22 patients were in coma (GCS of 4–8, average 6) on admission to the Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute, which lasted 3–20 days (average 12 days). CT revealed signs of DAI in all patients (categories I–IV according to Marshall et al. 1991). The outcomes in 3 months after injury in the analyzed group were as follows: good recovery in 3 patients, moderate disability in 7, severe disability in 9, and vegetative state in 3. MRI studies for these 22 patients were performed within 2–17 days of TBI, average of 10 days. The selection criteria for MRI studies were as follows: stabilization of patient’s condition, normalization of intracranial pressure and hemodynamics, adequate ventilation, and absence of metallic implants.

No statistically significant differences were found in ADC and FA between the right and left sides in the control group (Table 4.1). For this reason, all bilateral measurements in the control subjects were averaged.


Table 4.1
Average ADC and FA values for the control group













































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Right

Left

p -value

CST at the level:

 PLIC

0.699 ± 0.05

0.716 ± 0.05

0.489

 Midbrain

0.779 ± 0.03

0.799 ± 0.09

0.571

 Pons

0.732 ± 0.1

0.711 ± 0.1

0.673

Genu of CC

0.852 ± 0.069

0.857 ± 0.07

0.885

Splenium of CC

0.791 ± 0.1

0.789 ± 0.1

0.973
 
FA values ± SD
 
Right

Left

p -value

CST at the level:

 PLIC

0.714 ± 0.02

0.695 ± 0.02

0.081

 Midbrain

0.717 ± 0.038

0.698 ± 0.049

0.451

 Pons

0.573 ± 0.04

0.553 ± 0.04

0.317

Genu of CC

0.755 ± 0.045

0.739 ± 0.045

0.526

Splenium of CC

0.787 ± 0.051

0.786 ± 0.051

0.965


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, CC corpus callosum, SD standard deviation

At the same time, average FA values in the control group along the corticospinal tracts at the level of pons were significantly lower compared to cerebral peduncles and internal capsule (Fig. 4.1).

A318877_1_En_4_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.1
Average fractional anisotropy values alongside the corticospinal tracts in healthy volunteers

The results of comparisons of bilateral ADC and FA values in seven patients without paresis are presented in Table 4.2.


Table 4.2
Comparison of bilateral average ADC and FA values in patients without paresis (n = 7)































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Right

Left

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.732 ± 0.047

0.761 ± 0.139

0.471

 Midbrain

0.761 ± 0.074

0.749 ± 0.09

0.75

 Pons

0.756 ± 0.06

0.724 ± 0.084

0.308
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Right

Left

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.638 ± 0.106

0.652 ±0.125

0.764

 Midbrain

0.622 ± 0.114

0.629 ± 0.085

0.857

 Pons

0.515 ± 0.085

0.501 ± 0.082

0.696


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, SD standard deviation

Table 4.2 shows that no statistically significant differences were noted for ADC and FA between the right and left sides along corticospinal tracts in patients without motor disturbances. Thus, they were also averaged. The average ADC and average FA values in this group were compared with those in the control group (Table 4.3).


Table 4.3
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in patients without paresis (n = 7) and in control group (n = 8)































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.708 ± 0.047

0.743 ±0.092

0.071

 Midbrain

0.789 ± 0.063

0.756 ±0.08

0.066

 Pons

0.722 ± 0.1

0.744 ± 0.07

0.131
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.704 ± 0.02

0.643 ± 0.111

0.041

 Midbrain

0.708 ± 0.044

0.625 ± 0.101

0.0007

 Pons

0.563 ± 0.04

0.510 ± 0.082

0.013


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of internal capsule, SD standard deviation

There was a statistically significant FA value reduction along the corticospinal tracts in patients without hemiparesis compared with the control group, but no differences were observed for ADC values in any region (Table 4.3).

A statistically significant FA reduction was found at the cerebral peduncle level (p < 0.05) in the homolateral to hemiparesis CST in patients with hemiparesis (n = 11) compared to the control group (Table 4.4).


Table 4.4
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in homolateral to hemiparesis side in patients (n = 11) and in control group (n = 8)































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.708 ± 0.047

0.733 ±0.049

0.088

 Midbrain

0.789 ± 0.063

0.785 ± 0.079

0.444

 Pons

0.722 ± 0.1

0.749 ± 0.101

0.249
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.704 ± 0.02

0.677 ± 0.092

0.296

 Midbrain

0.708 ± 0.044

0.666 ± 0.068

0.034

 Pons

0.563 ± 0.04

0.528 ± 0.111

0.192


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, SD standard deviation

Statistically significant differences were observed for FA in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) and peduncles and for ADC in PLIC on the contralateral to hemiparesis side of CST in patients with hemiparesis compared to the control group (Table 4.5).


Table 4.5
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in contralateral to hemiparesis side (n = 11) and in control group (n = 8)































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.708 ± 0.047

0.785 ±0.116

0.011

 Midbrain

0.789 ± 0.063

0.786 ± 0.055

0.450

 Pons

0.722 ± 0.1

0.753 ± 0.085

0.198
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.704 ± 0.02

0.590 ± 0.136

0.0065

 Midbrain

0.708 ± 0.044

0.585 ± 0.126

0.0011

 Pons

0.563 ± 0.04

0.509 ± 0.096

0.055


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, SD standard deviation

A statistically significant difference in FA values was found in the cerebral peduncles and PLIC between homolateral and contralateral sides in patients with hemiparesis (Table 4.6, Fig. 4.2).


Table 4.6
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in homo- and contralateral sides in 11 patients with hemiparesis































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Homolateral

Contralateral

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.733 ± 0.049

0.785 ±0.116

0.092

 Midbrain

0.785 ± 0.079

0.786 ± 0.055

0.486

 Pons

0.749 ± 0.101

0.753 ± 0.085

0.460
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Homolateral

Contralateral

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.677 ± 0.092

0.590 ± 0.136

0.046

 Midbrain

0.666 ± 0.068

0.585 ± 0.126

0.036

 Pons

0.528 ± 0.111

0.509 ± 0.096

0.355


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, SD standard deviation


A318877_1_En_4_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.2
Average fractional anisotropy values alongside the corticospinal tracts in patients with hemiparesis

A statistically significant FA reduction was noted in all regions of interest along the CSTs when comparing 4 patients with tetraparesis to the control group (Table 4.7).


Table 4.7
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in patients with tetraparesis (n = 4) and in control group (n = 8)































































 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.708 ± 0.047

0.699 ± 0.057

0.165

 Midbrain

0.789 ± 0.063

0.793 ± 0.094

0.704

 Pons

0.722 ± 0.1

0.668 ± 0.158

0.002
 
FA values ± SD

ROI

Control group

Patients

p -value

CST:
     

 PLIC

0.704 ± 0.02

0.634 ± 0.071

<0.00001

 Midbrain

0.708 ± 0.044

0.579 ± 0.151

<0.00001

 Pons

0.563 ± 0.04

0.477 ± 0.076

<0.00001


ROI region of interest, CST corticospinal tract, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, SD standard deviation

The study showed that FA values in the corpus callosum and along the corticospinal tracts as well as ADC values in the splenium of the corpus callosum significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with outcome in patients examined within 10–17 days after TBI (Table 4.8). However, there was no significant correlation between clinical outcome and diffusion parameters when patients were scanned 2–9 days following trauma.


Table 4.8
Correlation between averaged ADC and FA values and outcome (by GOS) in patients examined within 10–17 days after injury























































ADC values

R-value (Correlation coefficient)

p -value

PLIC

−0.068

0.749

Midbrain

−0.167

0.435

Pons

−0.213

0.317

Genu of CC

−0.141

0.512

Splenium of CC

−0.512

0.010

FA values

R-value (Correlation coefficient)

p -value

PLIC

0.660

0.0004

Midbrain

0.390

0.059

Pons

0.635

0.0008

Genu of CC

0.534

0.007

Splenium of CC

0.415

0.044


ROI region of interest, PLIC posterior limb of the internal capsule, CC corpus callosum, SD standard deviation

Comparisons of average ADC and FA values for the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum were performed in all groups of patients with DAI: with no paresis (7), with unilateral paresis (11), with tetraparesis (4), and in control group (8) (Table 4.9).


Table 4.9
Comparison of averaged ADC and FA values in the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum in patients with diffuse axonal injury and in control group









































































































































ROI

ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s
 
Control group

Without paresis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.855 ± 0.067

0.847 ± 0.226

0.449

Splenium of CC

0.790 ± 0.098

0.698 ± 0.092

0.0681
 
FA values ± SD
 
Control group

Without paresis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.748 ± 0.044

0.655 ± 0.075

0.0046

Splenium of CC

0.786 ± 0.049

0.639 ± 0.119

0.007
 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s
 
Control group

Hemiparesis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.855 ± 0.067

0.903 ± 0.158

0.081

Splenium of CC

0.790 ± 0.098

0.681 ± 0.148

0.018
 
FA values ± SD
 
Control group

Hemiparesis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.748 ± 0.044

0.625 ± 0.129

0.001

Splenium of CC

0.786 ± 0.049

0.604 ± 0.128

0.0001
 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s
 
Control group

Tetraparesis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.855 ± 0.067

0.948 ± 0.098

0.023

Splenium of CC

0.790 ± 0.098

0.700 ± 0.226

0.159
 
FA values ± SD
 
Control group

Tetraparesis

p -value

Genu of CC

0.748 ± 0.044

0.607 ± 0.090

0.0003

Splenium of CC

0.786 ± 0.049

0.532 ± 0.171

0.0003
 
ADC values × 10 −3 ± SD × 10 −3 , mm 2 /s
 
Control group

All patients

p -value

Genu of CC

0.855 ± 0.067

0.892 ± 0.156

0.287

Splenium of CC

0.790 ± 0.098

0.710 ± 0.137

0.034
 
FA values ± SD
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 23, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGICAL IMAGING | Comments Off on Dynamic Study of White Matter Fiber Tracts After Traumatic Brain Injury

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access