Metastatic Lesions of the Bones
Todd M. Blodgett, MD
Alex Ryan, MD
Hesham Amr, MD
Key Facts
Terminology
-
Bone metastases, metastatic lesions to bone, secondary bone tumors
Imaging Findings
-
More than 80% of metastases to bone are located in axial skeleton where red marrow blood flow is high
-
Vertebrae, ribs, and hips
-
-
FDG PET generally ineffective for tumors that are not FDG avid
-
Prostate cancer, highly mucinous tumors, occasionally renal cell carcinoma
-
Also limited in some sclerotic metastases
-
-
o Reveals marrow lesions in FDG-avid disease prior to cortical effects (often before bone scan becomes positive)
-
CT may miss many early infiltrative or osteolytic lesions
-
CT has higher sensitivity for osteoblastic/sclerotic bone metastases
-
F-18 NaF PET: Excellent PET bone agent, currently not reimbursed by Medicare and most third party payers
Top Differential Diagnoses
-
Degenerative Processes, Arthropathies
-
Healing Fracture or Bone Injury
-
Iatrogenic: Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty
-
Physiologic Activity
-
Primary Bone Tumors
Pathology
-
Most common childhood primaries: Neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdosarcoma
TERMINOLOGY
Abbreviations and Synonyms
-
Bone metastases, metastatic lesions to bone, secondary bone tumors
-
Sclerotic/osteosclerotic metastases
-
Osteolytic metastases
-
Definitions
-
Malignant extension to bone, often by carcinoma, due to direct extension, retrograde venous flow, or hematogenous metastasis
IMAGING FINDINGS
General Features
-
Best diagnostic clue: Typical presentation includes scattered lesions in areas of osteoblastic or osteolytic activity
-
Location
-
Seeding occurs mostly in red marrow where blood flow is high
-
(80%) axial skeleton
-
Spine, pelvis, ribs, sternum, calvaria, proximal limb bones
-
Random distribution typical
-
More common proximally in long bones
-
-
Cortical involvement can occur secondary to direct invasion
-
-
Size: Ranges from small, solitary lesion to replacement of the entire marrow space
-
Morphology
-
Often infiltrating, elongated, or expansile
-
Focal or regional pattern more characteristic of fracture or arthropathy
-
May not be identifiable on CT
-
Imaging Recommendations
-
Best imaging tool
-
PET/CT very sensitive for detection of bone metastases
-
FDG PET sensitive for osteolytic lesions and CT sensitive for osteoblastic lesions
-
PET/CT more sensitive and specific than bone scan for delineation of disease and for surgical planning
-
-
Tc-99m whole body bone scan often used as initial screening due to low cost
-
Sensitivity 80-90%, better than plain radiograph or CT but nonspecific
-
More sensitive than FDG PET for osteoblastic lesions
-
Plain film correlation for further characterization/ambiguity; additional evaluation with CT or MR as necessary
-
-
-
Protocol advice
-
FDG PET/CT
-
Position arms above head for whole body scan
-
-
CT Findings
-
More sensitive for osteoblastic/sclerotic lesions
-
Insensitive for early infiltrative or osteolytic lesions
-
Early bone infiltration (before destruction) appears as increased attenuation of the normally fatty bone marrow
-
Increased attenuation of lesions generally correlates with lowered FDG uptake
-
Overall sensitivity for bone-seeking cancers: 71-100%
-
Spine
-
Posterior vertebral body almost always involved
-
80% also in anterior body
-
Enhancement often not detectable
-
Nuclear Medicine Findings
-
General applications
-
FDG PET/CT more sensitive and specific than bone scan
-
Earlier detection of FDG-avid osteolytic marrow lesions (before cortical changes become evident)
-
Reveals 75% more metastases from breast cancer and to long bones
-
Exceptions include primaries with low FDG avidity, which are typically osteoblastic
-
Osteoblastic metastases include prostate, highly mucinous tumors, and occasionally renal cell carcinoma
-
Sclerotic metastases may not be FDG avid
-
-
Prediction of bone metastasis in the absence of associated CT findings is hindered by false positives
-
Especially with solitary foci
-
PPV of lesions with negative CT and positive FDG PET: 61%
-
PPV of lesions positive on CT but negative on PET: 17%
-
-
PET/CT may be cost-effective following screening bone scan for more detailed evaluation of bone metastases
-
-
Restaging
-
Overall rate of detection of recurrence for FDG PET and CT separately were 47% and 96%
-
Following therapy, “flare” phenomenon may present
-
Treated lesions may have increased FDG uptake during healing and osteoblastic remodeling
-
Bone pain may increase as well
-
Typically arises 4-6 weeks post-therapy and resolves within 3-6 months
-
May show “mixed” response, with a variety of resolved, stable, and new lesions
-
-
-
Response to therapy
-
Reduction in SUV of metastatic bone lesions following therapy is highly predictive of response
-
Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) changes were a poor indicator of response duration
-
Possibly due to lack of volume change in treated lesions
-
-
-
Findings/anatomy
-
Most common finding: Scattered osseous lesions focused in regions of red marrow, i.e., axial and proximal appendicular skeleton
-
Solitary lesions more likely inflammatory or degenerative than metastatic
-
Linear uptake along ribs (single focus of activity in ribs more likely fracture)
-
Vertebral mets often asymmetric and not confined to endplate
-
Proximal long bone involvement more common; distal long bone mets seen in lung, thyroid, and renal cell carcinoma
-
-
PET can detect tumors confined to marrow space
-
May have no detectable cortical remodeling and thus not be seen on bone scan
-
Multiple myeloma, lymphoma, leukemia
-
-
Aggressive tumors with overwhelming osteolytic/osteoblastic activity may be photopenic
-
Renal cell carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, poorly differentiated anaplastic tumors
-
Occasionally lung, breast, neuroblastoma, myeloma
-
Lytic lesions may become photopenic following radiotherapy, often surrounded by reactive rim of activity
-
-
“Superscan” MDP bone scan
-
Diffusely increased activity due to disseminated bone lesions
-
May show relative absence of normal renal and soft tissue activity
-
Breast and prostate cancer most common causes
-
-
-
Findings by primary
-
Breast
-
FDG PET is sensitive for detection of predominantly osteolytic metastatic breast cancer
-
Decreased FDG uptake may be seen in sclerotic metastases
-
Treated, previously lytic metastases may have post-therapy sclerotic changes and lose FDG avidity
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
-
-

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

