Normal Mitral Valve Anatomy and Measurements

Chapter 5 Normal Mitral Valve Anatomy and Measurements



The complexity of the mitral valve is such that two-dimensional (2D) imaging does not adequately describe its anatomy and function. Indeed, the mitral valve apparatus is a dynamic three-dimensional (3D) structure composed of the saddle-shaped annulus; two asymmetric leaflets; multiple chordae tendineae of various lengths, thicknesses, and points of attachment; the left ventricular wall and the attached papillary muscles; and parts of the left atrium (Figure 5-1). During normal function, this array of parts constantly shifts in a complex but defined pattern. Normal alignment of all aspects of this biologic machine is required to avoid dysfunction. Therefore, full understanding of the mitral valve anatomy is not ascertained without 3D imaging. Real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) gives echocardiographers a rapid and easily accessible method of identifying the entire mitral valve apparatus in most patients. As a prominent structure in the posterior left heart, the mitral valve often can be displayed in 3D using either a transthoracic approach or a transesophageal approach. Furthermore, detailed volumetric and positional analysis of the various mitral valve components often is possible (Table 5-1). RT3DE, however, is a novel modality, and its use in mastering the analysis of the intricate mitral valve requires a substantial time commitment. This chapter highlights the use of RT3DE in imaging the normal mitral valve, demonstrating usual transthoracic and transesophageal views for each of its components. It also provides an overview of typical 3D quantitative analyses of the size and position of the mitral valve structures.



Table 5-1 Key Normal Measurements Obtained by Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Each Mitral Valve Structure













































































































































































Key Measurements Normal Values Reference
Mitral Valve Annulus
Anteroposterior dimension 30.8 ± 4.4 mm Sonne et al7
  24 ± 1 mm Kwan et al41
Commissural dimension 35.1 ± 4.9 mm Sonne et al7
  28 ± 1 mm Kwan et al41
Circumference 10.5 ± 1.4 mm Sonne et al7
  10.0 ± 0.8 mm Watanabe et al40
Height 4.3 ± 2.1 mm Sonne et al7
  3.0 ± 1.0 mm Flachskampf et al12
  4.5 ± 1.1 mm Watanabe et al40
Area/BSA (end diastole) 4.6 ± 1.3 cm2/m2 Qin et al10
  5.9 ± 1.2 cm2/m2 Flachskampf et al12
Area/BSA (mid systole) 5.1 ± 0.8 cm2/m2 Sonne et al7
Area/BSA (end systole) 3.8 ± 1.1 cm2/m2 Qin et al10
Area change 23.8% ± 5.1% Flachskampf et al12
  15% ± 16% Qin et al10
Linear systolic motion 16 ± 3 mm Qin et al10
  10 ± 3 mm Flachskampf et al12
Mitral Valve Leaflets
Volume 4.5 ± 0.7 cm3 Limbu et al28
Maximum tenting height 5.3 ± 2.4 mm Sonne et al7
  3.1 ± 1.2 mm Watanabe et al40
  5 ± 0.2 mm Kalyanasundaram et al5
Mean tenting height 1.9 ± 1.5 mm Sonne et al7
  0.7 ± 0.5 mm Watanabe et al40
Tenting volume 1.5 ± 0.9 cm3 Sonne et al7
  0.45 ± 0.29 cm3 Watanabe et al40
Papillary Muscles (Indexed to BSA)
AL papillary to annular distance 21.0 ± 5.8 mm/m2 Sonne et al7
PM papillary to annular distance 22.3 ± 5.6 mm/m2 Sonne et al7
Interpapillary muscle angle 17.6 ± 9.1 degrees/m2 Sonne et al7
Interpapillary distance 10.5 ± 3.3 mm/m2 Sonne et al7
Left Ventricle
End-systolic volume 43.7 ± 10.7 mL Chukwu et al56
  59 ± 18 mL Corsi et al69
  43 ± 18 mL Zeidan et al70
  47 ± 6 mL Nosir et al71
End-diastolic volume 115 ± 22.6 mL Chukwu et al56
  143 ± 30 mL Corsi et al69
  108 ± 32 mL Zeidan et al70
  113 ± 16 mL Nosir et al71
Left Atrium
End-diastolic volume 48.9 ± 25.1 cm3 Azar et al68
End-systolic volume 62.3 ± 17.2 cm3 Azar et al68

In some cases, values vary due to technique and studied population.


AL, anterolateral; BSA, body surface area; PM, posteromedial.



Mitral Valve Annulus


3DE has increased the understanding of the anatomy of the mitral valve annulus more than that of any other structure in the heart. 3D reconstructions identified the mitral valve annulus as a hyperbolic paraboloid or a saddle-shaped structure with curved planes parallel to the anteroposterior axis opening upward and orthogonal curved planes that open downward (Figure 5-2).1 This complex shape is not appreciated on 2D imaging, which tends to simplify the annulus as a planar ring. In fact, the anterior and posterior portions of the mitral valve annulus are about 5 mm higher than the medial and lateral commissural points.1 This height, along with the commissural diameter (the distance between the two low points) and the anteroposterior diameter (the distance between the two high points), can be easily measured with 3D imaging. The nonplanar shape of the mitral valve annulus is very important in reducing leaflet stress, which is increased when the annulus flattens.2 As such, the hyperbolic paraboloid annular shape with a height/commissural width ratio of 15% to 20% is preserved in many mammalian species, including humans.24



RT3DE is fundamental to clarifying annular geometry. In fact, obtaining accurate annular dimensions is best done with 3D datasets because 2DE underestimates these values by 6% to 14%.5 The mitral valve annulus is best seen using the large-sector (3D full volume) and wide-sector focused (3D zoom) formats. In particular, computer remodeling from large-sector datasets can quickly measure and display these changes without requiring the time-consuming reconstructions from multiple 2D images. 3D volume data can be obtained from either transthoracic or transesophageal exams. These models are obtained offline by tracing the mitral valve annulus contours in relation to other structures (such as the papillary muscles and aortic valve) in several 3D views (Figure 5-3). From these computer renditions, several annular dimensions, including circumference, anteroposterior (high-point) dimension, commissural (low-point) dimension, height, and annular area, can be measured (Figure 5-4).6




Recognizing the mitral valve annulus as a nonplanar structure is very important to understanding mitral valve function. For example, the complex shape of the mitral valve annulus has led to the overdiagnosis of mitral valve prolapse with 2DE. In certain 2D views, particularly the apical four-chamber view, which shows the mitral valve annulus in mediolateral directions, the leaflets appear to be on the atrial side of the mitral valve annulus, when, in fact, they are still inferior to the high anterior and posterior points. In 2DE imaging without fully realizing the nonplanarity of the mitral valve annulus, this normal anatomy can be mischaracterized as mitral valve prolapse.1


RT3DE has also shown that annular area significantly depends on body size and height.7 The normal diastolic mitral valve area (which is a projection onto the least squares plane) is 5 to 6.5 cm2 (indexed to body service area).8 The mitral valve annulus, however, is a dynamic structure whose complex motion throughout the cardiac cycle has not been fully ascertained.911 On the basis of early studies in 3DE from 2D renditions, it was believed that the mitral valve area decreases during systole by up to 24%, which is thought to occur as the anterior and lateral high points move closer together, increasing the height and eccentricity of the annulus.8,12 In addition to a decrease in annular area, there is a significant apical displacement of the annulus during systole, with an average annular motion of 16 ± 3 mm in normal hearts.10


Recent investigations using RT3DE with volumetric reconstructions have further characterized this motion in both normal ventricles and those with cardiomyopathy. In disease states, the shape and dynamic function of the mitral valve can change dramatically. For example, in dilated cardiomyopathy, especially with functional mitral regurgitation, the annulus flattens, dilates, and becomes more circular.8 These annuli also demonstrate less dynamic variability. During systole, they may have less change in height and diameter, leading to a smaller change in the projected valve area.12,13 Most significantly, those with cardiomyopathy have less apical excursion during systole. In fact, the degree of annular displacement correlates well with ejection fraction; a linear motion less than 12 mm accurately identifies those with an ejection fraction less than 50%.10



Mitral Valve Leaflets


Like the annulus, the attached mitral valve leaflets are 3D dynamic structures. The anterior leaflet covers two thirds of the orifice and is attached to the part of anterior annulus adjacent to the aortic valve near the right fibrous trigone, aortic-mitral fibrosa, and left fibrous trigone (Figure 5-5). The posterior leaflet, although smaller, covering only one third of the mitral orifice, is semicircular in shape and borders most of the annulus from one commissure to the other.6 Figure 5-5 shows the mitral valve leaflets and related cardiac structures as seen from the left atrium (the surgeon’s view) and the left ventricle. Each leaflet is composed of three scallops. Scallops A1 and P1 are the most lateral, located near the left atrial appendage; the middle scallops, A2 and P2, are the most posterior; and A3 and P3 are the most medial.



With 3DE, all six scallops of the mitral valve leaflets can be clearly visualized from either the left atrium or the left ventricle. These views can be obtained offline from cropping 3D full-volume (large-sector) datasets, which can be obtained by either a transthoracic or a transesophageal approach (Figure 5-6 and Video 5-1). During transesophageal exams, the 3D zoom (wide-sector focused) format also is helpful, especially to obtain real-time information on leaflet function during surgery or catheter procedures. In this case, the images are obtained by identifying the entire mitral valve on orthogonal biplane 2D images. The resulting 3D zoom display is rotated with the aortic valve in the 12 o’clock position to obtain the surgeon’s view from the left atrium. In this view, normal systolic bulging of the central part of the anterior leaflet can be visualized. When this image is flipped 180 degrees, the leaflet scallops are displayed as viewed from the left ventricle (Figure 5-7). In transthoracic exams, similarly detailed 3D images also can be obtained. Figure 5-8 demonstrates how clearly the mitral valve leaflets can be displayed from a 3D full-volume dataset acquired during a transthoracic exam. In this case, the image is rotated and the vertical axis is cropped from the atrial side to obtain the surgeon’s view. By flipping the image 180 degrees and cropping from the ventricular side, the valve leaflets can be seen as viewed from the apex in relation to the commissures and papillary muscles.



Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 14, 2016 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY IMAGING | Comments Off on Normal Mitral Valve Anatomy and Measurements

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access