different system functions, and acoustic/elastic transfer functions,
that generate the received voltages,
, where

(10.1)
Equation (10.1) can be used to obtain these system functions experimentally if we measure the received voltages in a calibration setup and have explicit models for the acoustic/elastic transfer functions in that setup. The calibration setups we will use for immersion and contact tests are shown in Fig. 10.1, where a 2-D or linear array is placed parallel to a plane reflecting interface and the reflection of the waves generated by driving a single element of the array is received by a single receiving element. A more detailed description of the setup geometry is shown in Fig. 10.2 for a pair of sending and receiving rectangular elements.

Fig. 10.1
Calibration setups for obtaining the system functions a for an immersion test, and b for a contact test

Fig. 10.2
A calibration setup geometry involving two rectangular array elements and a parallel plane reflecting interface
Consider first an immersion setup. Our starting point in this case is the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld model for an element, Eq. (6.21), where the velocity is assumed to be constant over the face of the driving element, i.e. we will use a piston model . The pressure due to the waves generated by the driving element at a point
in the fluid at the location of the reflecting interface is given as


(10.2)
where
is the area of the transmitting element, the distance from a point
on the sending element to a point
on the reflecting interface is
,
is the wave number for the fluid, and
is the density of the fluid. If we assume the reflector is far enough away from the element so that
then we can approximate this distance as
(paraxial approximation) and we find







![$$r\cong D+\left[ {{(\tilde{x}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{(\tilde{y}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}} \right]/2D$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_IEq13.gif)
![$$p({{x}_{\text{l}}},{{y}_{\text{l}}},D,\omega )=\frac{-\text{i}\omega {{\rho }_{1}}{{v}_{0}}(\omega )\exp (\text{i}kD)}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}\int_{{{S}_{\text{t}}}}{\left[ \text{i}k\frac{{{(\tilde{x}-{{x}_{\text{l}}})}^{2}}+{{(\tilde{y}-{{y}_{\text{l}}})}^{2}}}{2D} \right]}\,\text{d}\tilde{x}\,\text{d}\tilde{y}.$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ3.gif)
(10.3)
If we assume we can treat the interactions of these incident waves with the reflecting interface as a quasi-plane wave interaction at normal incidence, then pressure in the reflected wave at the interface,
, is


(10.4)
where
is the plane wave reflection coefficient at normal incidence (based on a pressure ratio) and
are the density and compressional wave speed for the fluid and reflecting solid, respectively. The normal velocity,
, at the interface in the
-direction (directed towards the receiving element, see Fig. 10.2) is also given by the plane wave relationship





(10.5)
Using this velocity field as specified on the entire interface, we can again use the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral to obtain the pressure,
, of the reflected waves at a point
on the plane of the receiving element:



(10.6)
Applying the paraxial approximation to the distance
then gives


(10.7)
If the driving and receiving elements are separated by the distances
in the
directions, respectively, then



(10.8)
![$$ \begin{matrix} {{p}_{\text{g}}}({{x}_{\text{g}}},{{y}_{\text{g}}},D,\omega )=\frac{-\text{i}k{{R}_{12}}\exp \text{(i}kD)}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{[p({{x}_{l}},{{y}_{l}},D,\omega )}}\\ \left. \exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D} \right) \right]\text{d}{{x}_{l}}\text{d}{{y}_{l}}\\\end{matrix}. $$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ9.gif)
(10.9)
If we assume the incident wave interactions with the receiving transducer can be treated approximately as plane wave interactions, an assumption that is likely satisfied for the setup of Fig. 10.2, we can take the blocked force ,
, at the receiving element to be simply twice the force exerted on the element by the incident waves [Schmerr-Song] and we have

![$$\begin{matrix}{{F}_{\text{B}}}(\omega )=2\int_{{{S}_{\text{r}}}}{{{p}_{\text{g}}}({{x}_{\text{g}}},{{y}_{\text{g}}},D,\omega )\,\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}}} \\=\frac{-2\text{i}k{{R}_{12}}\exp \,(\text{i}kD)}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}\int_{{{S}_{\text{r}}}}{\left\{ \int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\left[ p({{x}_{l}},{{y}_{l}},D,\omega ) \right.}} \right.} \\\left. \left. \exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D} \right) \right]\text{d}{{x}_{l}}\text{d}{{y}_{l}} \right\}\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}} \\\end{matrix},$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ10.gif)
(10.10)
where
is the receiving area. Placing Eq. (10.3) into this result then gives

![$$ \begin{aligned} {{F}_{\text{B}}}(\omega)&=\displaystyle\frac{-2\text{i}k{{R}_{12}}\exp (2\text{i}kD)}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}\displaystyle\frac{-\text{i}k{{\rho}_{1}}{{c}_{p1}}{{v}_{0}}(\omega )}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}\int_{{{S}_{\text{r}}}}\\ & \quad\;{\left[ \int_{-\infty }^{+\infty}{\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty } {\left[ \int_{{{S}_{\text{t}}}}{\left[\exp \left(\text{i}k\frac{{{(\tilde{x}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{(\tilde{y}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D}\right) \right.} \right.}} \right.}\\ &\quad \left. \left. \left. \exp \left(\text{i}k\displaystyle\frac{{{({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D}\right) \right]\text{d}\tilde{x}\text{d}\tilde{y}\right]\text{d}{{x}_{l}}\text{d}{{y}_{l}}\right]\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}}. \end{aligned} $$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ11.gif)
(10.11)
Since the acoustic/elastic transfer function,
, for the immersion case is defined as
, this transfer function is


![$$\begin{matrix}{{t}_{\text{A}}}(\omega )=2{{R}_{12}}{{\left[ \frac{-\text{i}k\exp \,(\text{i}kD)}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D} \right]}^{2}}\frac{1}{{{S}_{\text{t}}}}\int_{{{S}_{\text{r}}}}{\left[ \int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\left[ \int_{{{S}_{\text{t}}}}{\left[ \exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{(\tilde{x}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{(\tilde{y}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D} \right) \right.} \right.}} \right.} \\\left. \left. \left. \exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}}-{{x}_{l}})}^{2}}+{{({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}}-{{y}_{l}})}^{2}}}{2D} \right) \right]\text{d}\tilde{x}\text{d}\tilde{y} \right]\text{d}{{x}_{l}}\text{d}{{y}_{l}} \right]\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}} \\\end{matrix}.$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ12.gif)
(10.12)
Now, consider the integrals in Eq. (10.12) over the interface, i.e.

(10.13)
Both integrals appearing in Eq. (10.13) can be performed exactly since we have [Schmerr, Schmerr-Song]:



(10.15)
![$$\begin{array}{ll}{t_{\text{A}}}(\omega ) = 2{R_{12}}\frac{{ - {\text{i}}k\exp\;(2{\text{i}}kD)}}{{4{{\pi}}D{S_{\text{t}}}}}\int_{{S_{\text{r}}}}\left[{\int_{{S_{\text{t}}}} {\exp \left({{\text{i}}k\frac{{{{({x_{\text{g}}} + {d_x})}^2} +{{({y_{\text{g}}} + {d_y})}^2}}}{{2D}}} \right)\exp \left({{\text{i}}k\frac{{{{\tilde x}^2} + {{\tilde y}^2}}}{{2D}}}\right)} } \right.\\[8pt] \left. \exp \left( { - {\text{i}}k\frac{{{{(\tilde x +{x_{\text{g}}} + {d_x})}^2}}}{{4D}}} \right)\exp \left( { -{\text{i}}k\frac{{{{(\tilde y + {y_{\text{g}}} +{d_y})}^2}}}{{4D}}} \right){\text{d}}\tilde x{\text{d}}\tilde y\right]{\text{d}}{x_{\text{g}}}{\text{d}}{y_{\text{g}}}\end{array}.$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ16.gif)
(10.16)
When the exponential terms in Eq. (10.16) are combined, this equation simplifies to
![$$\begin{matrix} {{t}_{\text{A}}}(\omega )=2{{R}_{12}}\frac{-\text{i}k\exp \,(2\text{i}kD)}{4\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D{{S}_{\text{t}}}}\int_{{{S}_{\text{r}}}}{\left[ \int_{{{S}_{\text{t}}}}{\exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{[\tilde{x}-({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}})]}^{2}}}{4D} \right)} \right.} \\ \left. \exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{[\tilde{y}-({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}})]}^{2}}}{4D} \right)\text{d}\tilde{x}\text{d}\tilde{y} \right]\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}} \\ \end{matrix}.$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ17.gif)
(10.17)
Since we are assuming that both the transmitting and receiving elements are of lengths
in the
directions, respectively, Eq. (10.17) can be rewritten more explicitly as


![$$\begin{matrix} {{t}_{\text{A}}}(\omega )=2{{R}_{12}}\frac{-\text{i}k\exp (2\text{i}kD)}{4\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D{{S}_{\text{t}}}}\left[ \int_{-{{l}_{x}}/2}^{{{l}_{x}}/2}{\int_{-{{l}_{x}}/2}^{{{l}_{x}}/2}{\exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{[\tilde{x}-({{x}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{x}})]}^{2}}}{4D} \right)\text{d}{{x}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}\tilde{x}}} \right] \\ \left[ \int_{-{{l}_{y}}/2}^{{{l}_{y}}/2}{\int_{-{{l}_{y}}/2}^{{{l}_{y}}/2}{\exp \left( \text{i}k\frac{{{[\tilde{y}-({{y}_{\text{g}}}+{{d}_{y}})]}^{2}}}{4D} \right)\text{d}{{y}_{\text{g}}}\text{d}\tilde{y}}} \right] \\ \end{matrix}.$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ18.gif)
(10.18)
Consider now the first double integral in Eq. (10.18) and make the change of variable from
to t, where

![$$t=\sqrt{\tfrac{k}{2\text{ }\!\!\pi\!\!\text{ }D}}\,[\tilde{x}-({{x}_{g}}+{{d}_{x}})].$$](/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/A314073_1_En_10_Chapter_Equ19.gif)
(10.19)
Then we have

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

