Rectum



8.5: Rectum


Sumit Mukhopadhyay, Saugata Sen, Aditi Chandra, Argha Chatterjee, Priya Ghosh, Anisha Gehani



Embryology


Overview


Cloaca is the part of hindgut caudal to the attachment of the allantoic diverticulum. It divides into a broad anterior urogenital (vesicourethral and urogenital sinus) part and a narrow posterior anorectal compartment/primitive rectum, separated by the urorectal septum. This anorectal compartment gives rise to mid rectum and lower rectum and upper part of anal canal proximal to dentate line. The peritonealized upper part of rectum develops from hindgut proximal to cloaca. The distal most part of anal canal below the dentate line develops from invaginated ectoderm known as proctodeum (Fig. 8.5.1).


Image
Fig 8.5.1 Overview of embryonic development of rectum and anal canal.

Initially during development, the rectum is suspended from the posterior abdominal wall by a mesentery, along with the rest of the gut. After completion of rotation of the gut, rectal mesentery fuses with the posterior abdominal wall, majority of rectum becomes retroperitoneal and hindgut mesentery is seen as mesorectum. The artery of the hindgut is inferior mesenteric artery.


Radiological anatomy


General anatomy


Length

Anatomically, classically taken as 6 inches (approximately 15 cm), or beginning at the level of S3 vertebra. Surgically defined as 15–18 cm from anal verge (AV), thus anal canal and rectum are considered together for the purpose of surgical and radiological anatomy, though management differs in cases of rectal adenocarcinoma and anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Various trials on rectal cancer neoadjuvant therapy have taken different lengths of cut-off for rectal cancer starting from AV: 9 cm, 12 cm, 15 cm or 16 cm (Table 8.5.1).



TABLE 8.5.1


Length of Rectum

































Definition by Length
Anatomists: View 1 6 inches (15 cm)
Anatomists: View 2 Distal to S3 vertebra
Surgeons 15–18 cm from anal verge
Hwang MR et al. (2014) National Cancer Centre, Republic of Korea (3) 9 cm
Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04 (2013)(4) 12 cm
NASABP R-03 trial (5) 15 cm
Bosset J-F et al. (2006), multicentre trial: EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial no. 22921(6)
MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016 trial (7)
Sauer R et al. (2004), multicentre trial (8) 16 cm
Hofheinz R-D et al. (2012), German multicentre trial (9)

Upper limit/rectosigmoid junction

Rectum continues as sigmoid colon superiorly. The point of transition between rectum and sigmoid colon is controversial. Anatomically, this is the point where sigmoid mesocolon ends, appendices epiploicae are lost and taenia coli gradually converge and disappear. There is no single transition point between these features. These features are not visible to the radiologist/endoscopist as well. Several features defining rectosigmoid junction/transition are variously accepted by different radiologists:




  1. 1. 15 cm from AV.
  2. 2. The sigmoid take-off, or the sweep (Fig. 8.5.2): Mesorectum is fixed to the presacral fascia, while sigmoid colon is mobile owing to sigmoid mesocolon. There is a zone at which the fixed rectum gives way to the horizontally lying sigmoid colon, and the sigmoid colon sweeps away from the sacrum. This particular point is easily observed on imaging and considered as the rectosigmoid junction.
  3. 3. Change in vascularity (Fig. 8.5.3): The sigmoid sweep off zone also shows a change in vascularity. Below the sweep, rectum is supplied by superior rectal vessels, and the colonic segment above it is supplied by ‘spidery’ branches of sigmoid arteries.
  4. 4. Bony landmark (Fig. 8.5.4): The traditional anatomical landmark for the upper limit of rectum is the third sacral segment (S3). Some definitions also use sacral promontory as upper limit: Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, ASCRS guidelines. Even the second sacral segment has been used as a landmark in Japan and Netherlands.

Image
Fig 8.5.2 Sigmoid ‘take-off’ or sweep. In a patient with normal rectum, sigmoid sweep (yellow arrow) is seen on axial T2-weighted MR image as the point at which the fixed rectum (white star) gives way to the mobile sigmoid colon (red star) and considered as the rectosigmoid junction according to some radiologists.

Image
Fig 8.5.3 Change in vascularity between sigmoid colon and rectum. Sagittal T2-weighted MR image showing the segment proximal to the sigmoid sweep to be supplied by the ‘spidery’ sigmoid vessels (yellow arrows).

Image
Fig 8.5.4 Bony landmark for rectosigmoid junction. Sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows the traditional anatomical landmark for upper limit of rectum (yellow line) at the level of upper border of S3 vertebral segment (S3).

Lower limit (Fig. 8.5.5)

Rectum continues as anal canal, which opens to the exterior at AV (mucocutaneous junction). Anorectal junction (ARJ) is considered to be the point at which the angle of the long axis changes, and corresponds to the upper border of puborectalis muscle. The change in axis of anal canal and rectum is well visualized on sagittal MRI. Dentate line lies along the anal crypts (the openings of anal glands), and vertical folds called columns of Morgagni extend superiorly from the dentate line. Anatomists consider the dentate line to be the landmark for ARJ, but the dentate line lies distal to the puborectal sling, and this definition is not clinically relevant.


Image
Fig 8.5.5 Anal verge and anorectal junction. Sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows anal verge (white dotted line) and anorectal junction (yellow dotted line) in a normal rectum. Anorectal junction is the level where the long axis of anal canal and rectum changes.

Course and features

Anal canal is directed posteroinferiorly. At ARJ, the long axis of rectum changes so that it is directed anteroinferiorly. Mid rectum and upper rectum follow the sacral concavity, and the long axis of rectum is again directed posteroinferiorly. Upper rectum is frequently mobile and may not be in midline. Three incomplete folds consisting of mucosa, submucosa and circular muscles, named as Valves of Houston, are seen within the lumen of rectum during endoscopy, but these are not visualized radiologically. The middle valve is roughly at the level of anterior peritoneal reflection, and the superior most valve is at the level of rectosigmoid junction.


Divisions

Surgically and radiologically, rectum is divided into thirds: lower third, middle third and upper third (Table 8.5.2).



TABLE 8.5.2


Divisions of Rectum – Different Definitions
























Common Definition Used by Radiologists Alternate Definition Definition by LOREC
Low rectum 0–5 cm from anal verge 0–6 cm from anal verge Part of rectum lying distal to the proximal origin of levators at pelvic sidewall
Midrectum 5–10 cm from anal verge 7–11 cm from anal verge
Upper rectum 10–15 cm from anal verge 12–15 cm from anal verge

Most commonly, this division is according to distance or length from AV. Lower third is 0–5 cm, middle third is 5–10 cm, upper third is 10–15 cm from AV (Fig. 8.5.6).


Image
Fig 8.5.6 Divisions of rectum. Sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows upper (U), mid (M) and low (L) rectum according to curved distance from anal verge along the changing long axis.

Some radiologists define low rectum as 6 cm or less from AV, mid rectum as 7–11 cm and upper rectum as 12–15 cm. The justification of defining low rectum as 6 cm or less from the AV is that, management of most of the tumours at this location suffers from surgical challenges due to tapering of mesorectum and proximity of other pelvic structures. These tumours have a higher rate of CRM positivity, abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and permanent stoma, higher rates of recurrence and mortality, poor function of stoma after sphincter preservation.


Another way of defining low rectum, surgical management of which differs from the upper two-thirds, is the portion lying distal to the proximal origin of levators at pelvic side wall. This definition was provided by the English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (LOREC) and is best visualized in the coronal plane by a line joining proximal origins of levators at pelvic side walls (Fig. 8.5.7).


Image
Fig 8.5.7 Coronal T2-weighted MR image showing normal levator ani (arrows) and puborectalis (arrowheads). Alternative description of low rectum (L), according to LOREC (English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme), is the part of rectum distal to the line joining origins of levators at pelvic side walls (white dotted line).

ARJ is an important landmark in the management of rectal cancer. Distance between lower border of the tumour and ARJ is important for treatment planning. ARJ is defined as the point at which puborectalis fuses with the levator muscles, and the long axis of rectum changes from anteroinferior to posteroinferior at this point.


Anal canal: When separately considered

Its upper extent begins few centimetres above the dentate line, and its length varies from 2–5 cm from AV. Histologically the proximal end of the anal canal is the point at which the columnar epithelium of the rectum becomes the transitional epithelium. Anal canal mucosa has several longitudinal columns, known as anal columns, which end at the dentate line. Below the dentate line the mucosa is smooth and transitions into skin at AV. Approximately at the level of dentate line, the internal anal sphincter (IAS) ends, and the smooth mucosa leads to the intersphincteric plane, distal to which the external anal sphincter extends up to the AV (Fig. 8.5.8).


Image
Fig 8.5.8 Diagram of lower rectum and anal canal showing the anal columns, dentate line, anal verge, white line of Hilton and the relationship between anatomical and surgical anal canal.

Layers/histology (Fig. 8.5.9)





  • Mucosa: rectum and anal canal up to dentate line is lined by simple columnar epithelium. Tubular glands and crypts are present, lined by secretory and absorptive cells. Below the level of the dentate line, the mucosa is smooth nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelium, without sweat glands, sebaceous glands or hair follicles. Further below the white line of Hilton, the mucosa transforms to keratinized stratified epithelium with hair follicles. At the AV, this lining becomes continuous with the skin of the perineum. A term ‘ATZ’ or anal transitional zone is frequently used to describe the region located in the midanal canal containing variable transitional cells, with 4–5 layers of cuboidal cells. It is the zone of transition between colon-type mucosa above and squamous type epithelium below, and most anal cancers develop here. The lower end of ATZ usually coincides with the dentate line.
  • Lamina propria and muscularis mucosae.
  • Submucosa: consists of fat, within which nerves and capillaries are present.
  • Muscularis propria: inner continuous circular muscle fibres, and outer discontinuous vertically oriented bands of longitudinal muscle fibres. The two layers are separated by myenteric neural plexus.
  • Serosa: only seen in the upper rectum. Adventitia layer is seen in the mid rectum and lower rectum.

Image
Fig 8.5.9 Cross-section of rectal wall showing different layers.

Peritoneal covering


Upper third of rectum is anteriorly covered by peritoneum. Peritoneal covering gradually widens superiorly till it is covered by peritoneum on all sides at the level of sigmoid colon. The exact level of peritoneal reflection varies between individuals, and is quite often seen in axial and sagittal MRI. In axial T2-weighted MRI, a thin hypointense layer with V-shaped attachment to anterior rectal wall is seen representing the anterior peritoneal reflection. This is known as the ‘sea-gull’ sign.


Mesorectum and mesorectal fascia (Fig. 8.5.10): lower two-thirds are surrounded by extraperitoneal fat and connective tissue known as mesorectum, which contains lymph nodes, nerves and blood vessels (descending branches of superior rectal artery and corresponding veins). Mesorectal fat is contained within a thin layer of fascia, known as mesorectal fascia (MRF). MRF separates mesorectal fat from extra mesorectal tissues of the pelvis. A relatively avascular plane of areolar tissue lies between MRF and parietal pelvic fascia, facilitating surgery.




  • Anteriorly, MRF fuses with the remnant of urogenital septum, to form fascia of Denonvillier (rectovesical fascia) in males and rectovaginal septum in females. This septum can be followed inferiorly at its midline insertion onto the perineal body.
  • Anterosuperiorly, MRF ends at the level of anterior insertion of the peritoneum.
  • Posteriorly, almost the entire extent of MRF is anchored to the sacral concavity, but at superior extent it is no longer anchored, instead posteriorly surrounded by the mobile sigmoid mesentery containing sigmoid branches of inferior mesenteric artery and vein.
  • Inferiorly, MRF extends up to distal levator.

Image
Fig 8.5.10 Cross-sectional anatomy of rectum in MRI. Axial T2-weighted MR image showing normal layers of rectal wall from inside to outside: hypointense mucosa (yellow arrow), hyperintense submucosa (white star), hypointense muscularis (white arrow). Hyperintense mesorectal fat (F) is seen surrounding the rectum and mesorectal fascia (arrowheads) is seen as a circumferential hypointense border around it.

Importance: Assessment of structures within mesorectum is important for staging and prognostication of rectal cancer. Mesorectal node involvement is N disease. Tumour extension within mesorectal vessels is known as extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and is thought to be associated with higher chances of vascular dissemination and distant metastases. MRF forms the boundary of the surgical excision plane in total mesorectal excision (TME) – the standard surgery for rectal cancers at present.


Pelvic fascial planes


It is important to understand the various fascial reflections of the pelvis in order to understand pathways of disease spread. The plane between the MRF and the pelvic fascias is the surgical plane. Posteriorly, covering the sacrum, presacral venous plexus and hypogastric nerves, lies the presacral fascia. It fuses with MRF inferiorly at the level of levator ani muscle. The space between presacral fascia and MRF is known as the retrorectal/rectosacral/pelvirectal space, and that between the sacrum and presacral fascia is the presacral space. The presacral fascia continues laterally as the parietal pelvic fascia which covers the lateral pelvic wall. It has two lamellae which encase the pelvic visceral nerves as they course forward from the sacrum to the anterior pelvic organs. The rectosacral fascia/Waldeyer fascia, called as rectosacral ligament by anatomists, is a thickening arising from presacral fascia and running forward to meet the MRF. This divides the rectosacral space into a superior and an inferior compartment, communicating with each other.


In males, anteriorly, between the rectum and prostate-seminal vesicles, lies the rectoprostatic fascia/Denonvillier fascia. It is difficult to distinguish from the closely related MRF, and carries the hypogastric nerve and vascular branches to the prostate and male genital organs. In females, anterior to the MRF, lies the rectovaginal septum. According to most views, this septum consists of two layers. The anterior layer corresponds to Denonvillier fascia, and extends from the pelvic floor to the posterior wall of vagina and uterus. The posterior layer is in close relation to the MRF, runs from the pelvic diaphragm and ascends to the peritoneal reflection before fusing with the rectal wall. The lateral rectal ligaments are controversial structures as they are not visualized by imaging and may not carry important structures such as nerves and vessels. However, in some cases, the middle rectal artery may run through them and the accompanying lymphatics may provide a pathway between mesorectal and extra mesorectal lymph nodes.


Sphincters




  • Length of sphincter complex: 4 cm
  • IAS: the circular muscles of lower third of rectum condense to form internal sphincter, rectal longitudinal muscles fragment into the intersphincteric plane as fibroelastic strands.
  • External anal sphincter (EAS): the downward extension of the skeletal muscles of puborectalis.
  • The intersphincteric plane: The mesorectum tapers at the ARJ and a downward extension of the surgical dissection around MRF passes within the puborectalis sling into the intersphincteric space. The upper part of the EAS forms a circular ring of fibres while the lower end curves inward to lie below the lower end of the IAS. Submucosal apposition of the two sphincters in the lower anal canal gives rise to the palpable intersphincteric groove. In this region, the mucous membrane is firmly attached to the lower part of the IAS at the dentate line.

Levator/pelvic floor anatomy

In females, the pelvic floor may be considered to have three compartments, anterior compartment containing bladder and urethra, middle compartment containing the vagina and the posterior compartment containing the rectum. These compartments are supported by the endopelvic fascia and levator ani muscle. The levator ani has several compartments, of which the two most important ones are the iliococcygeus and puborectalis. The iliococcygeus starts as the same fibres as the EAS, and then fans out as a sheet to insert at the pelvic sidewall at the tendinous arch. Posteriorly these fibres fuse in the midline to form the levator plate/raphe. The pubococcygeus and puborectalis are considered together as pubovisceralis muscle. It inserts lateral to the symphysis pubis anteriorly, and forms a sling around the rectum, pulling it anteriorly. Components of the levator ani can be identified in T2-weighted MR images.


In males, there are two compartments, anterior containing bladder, urethra, prostate and seminal vesicles and the posterior compartment containing the rectum. Pubococcygeus consists of pubourethralis and puborectalis in males.


Image interpretation, normal lines and landmarks in T2-weighted MRI


In sagittal images, the pubococcygeal line is an important reference line, drawn from the inferior border of symphysis pubis to the last joint of the coccyx, representing the level of pelvic floor. The H line is drawn from the inferior aspect of the symphysis pubis to the posterior wall of the rectum at the level of ARJ. This represents the anteroposterior width of the levator hiatus, and upper limit of normal is 5 cm. The M line is the vertical descent of the levator hiatus, drawn as a perpendicular line dropped from the pubococcygeal line to the posteriormost aspect of the H line, and should measure maximum 2 cm. The angle of the levator plate and the pubococcygeal line is also measured. In axial images, the entire normal levator is of uniform thickness and homogeneous low signal intensity. Coronal images show intact iliococcygeus muscle which is convex upwards.


Nodal drainage pathway

The upper half of the anal canal proximal to the pectinate line, the IAS, the conjoint longitudinal coat and the rectum drain lymph upwards into the mesorectal nodes (Fig. 8.5.11) and then lymphatics follow the superior rectal artery into the inferior mesenteric group of lymph nodes. The lymph from these nodes is carried by the intestinal lymph trunk(s).


Image
Fig 8.5.11 Mesorectal nodes. Axial T2-weighted MR image shows normal mesorectal nodes (arrows) within the mesorectal fat.

Anal canal below the dentate line along with the EAS drains to the superficial inguinal nodes.


Lymphatic vessels also travel with the median sacral artery and drain the puborectalis muscle before finally joining the internal iliac lymph nodes. The internal iliac lymph nodes drain into pre-aortic and paraaortic (lumbar) lymph nodes and efferents from the nodes form the lumbar trunks. The intestinal trunks and the lumbar trunks enter the abdominal confluence of the lymph trunks at the level of the L1–L2 vertebrae, called the cisterna chyli, and then ascend as the thoracic duct. The pelvic lymph nodes lying outside the mesorectum are termed as ‘extra mesorectal lymph nodes’.


Vascular supply

Above the dentate line: blood supply is from the superior rectal artery, which originates from the inferior mesenteric artery, a branch of abdominal aorta. Superior rectal artery passes in the sigmoid mesocolon and divides into two branches behind the rectum at the level of S3 sacral segment. The superior rectal artery ends in the anal columns by forming a rich vascular plexus/anastomosis with the branches of inferior rectal artery. Blood returns via the superior rectal veins into the inferior mesenteric vein, which drains into the splenic vein and eventually into the portal venous system.


Below the dentate line, the inferior anal canal obtains its blood supply from the inferior rectal artery, which is a branch of internal pudendal artery, originating from the anterior division of internal iliac artery. Blood returns via the inferior rectal vein, which drains into internal pudendal veins, internal iliac veins and ultimately into the inferior vena cava (systemic circulation).


Thus anal canal is a site of portosystemic anastomosis. Due to the venous anastomoses that occur in the anal canal and the backup of blood flow into the rectal veins, haemorrhoids may be present in patients with portal hypertension.


A small part of muscular wall of rectum and anal canal is also supplied by median sacral artery, a direct branch of abdominal aorta arising at the bifurcation of aorta.


Nerve supply: The inferior hypogastric plexus lies laterally on the surface of MRF on both sides. It receives sympathetic nerve fibres from the superior hypogastric nerves and parasympathetic ‘nervi erigentes’ from the laterally situated sacral nerves (S2–S4). Laterally, inferior rectal branches of the pudendal nerves and internal pudendal arteries cross the ischio-anal fossa to supply the external sphincter and anal mucosa.


MRI anatomy

T2-weighted small FOV images reveal the layers of rectal wall and details of perirectal soft tissue and pelvic floor most accurately. For adequate assessment of the integrity and involvement of different layers, axial images are needed, which should be obtained perpendicular to the axis of the rectum in that segment. Angle of acquisition should be altered according to the change in axis of rectum (Fig. 8.5.12).


Image
Fig 8.5.12 Planning of axial MRI on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. Axial MR sections (boxes with blue lines) are planned perpendicular to the changing long axis of rectum, as seen in this sagittal T2-weighted MR image.

The layers of rectal wall from inside to outside are (Fig. 8.5.10):




  • Mucosa: innermost thin hypointense layer
  • Submucosa: middle hyperintense layer containing fat
  • Muscularis propria: outermost hypointense layer
  • Mesorectum and MRF:


    • Mesorectum consists of fat, appearing hyperintense in T2WI, and interspersed mesorectal lymph nodes (seen as small ovoid intermediate or low signal intensity structures), lymphatics and blood vessels (linear intermediate or low signal intensity structures). MRF appears as thin hypointense layer enveloping the mesorectal fat circumferentially. Anteriorly in the midline, fused with the MRF, a thick hypointense band is seen – this is a condensation of the rectogenital septum.

  • Anterior peritoneal reflection:


    • This appears as a thin hypointense layer reflecting from the anterior surface of upper third of rectum onto the dome of urinary bladder and seminal vesicles in males and posterior surface of uterus in females (Fig. 8.5.13).

Image
Fig 8.5.13 Anterior peritoneal reflection. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) T2-weighted MR image showing normal anterior peritoneal reflection (yellow arrows) as a thin hypointense line reflecting from the anterior wall of rectum to posterior wall of vagina in a female.

Endorectal ultrasonographic anatomy

When examining the anorectum with a radial scanning echoendoscope, the internal and EASs can be seen as two distinct rings. The inner hypoechoic ring of tissue represents the IAS the outer hyperechoic tissue ring represents the EAS. The thickness of normal IAS is 2–3 mm, and for EAS: 7–9 mm. The IAS becomes thicker and more hyperechoic with age, while the EAS tends to become thinner with age. Endoscopically, rectum begins at the dentate line and extends to 15–20 cm from the AV.


The normal five-layer appearance of rectal wall in EUS is as follows:




  • First layer, echogenic: interface between fluid in the lumen and the superficial mucosa
  • Second layer, echopoor: lamina propria and muscularis mucosa, or deep mucosa
  • Third layer, echogenic: submucosa and interface between submucosa and muscularis propria
  • Fourth layer, echopoor: muscularis propria; circular (4a) and longitudinal (4c) are not usually seen as separate layers
  • Fifth layer, echogenic: interface between serosa and surrounding adventitial tissue

Imaging techniques


Imaging in the rectum and anal canal region is mainly for staging of tumours. The most common neoplasm of this region is rectal cancer and preoperative imaging evaluation is required not only for staging early and advanced disease but also for assessing response to treatment and for surgical planning. The techniques described here will mainly pertain to rectal and anal neoplasms.


Plain radiograph


Plain radiographs have a limited role in the evaluation of rectal neoplasms. Primarily, it may be used as a modality in the emergency setting when patients come with constricting colorectal strictures causing large bowel obstruction. Radiographs of the abdomen in supine and erect positions are performed to look for features of bowel obstruction, air-fluid levels and free air under the domes of diaphragm in case of perforation, respectively.


Barium/gastrografin studies


Conventional luminal contrast study is now obsolete for diagnosis of tumours in the rectum and anal canal and have been replaced by cross-sectional imaging. Sinogram studies with diluted iodinated contrast have been performed to detect extent of rectal fistulae.


Endorectal ultrasound


Endorectal Ultrasound (ERUS) can differentiate between the layers of the rectal wall and helps detect and stage tumours within the different layers of the rectum. ERUS can view the rectal mucosa in 360 degrees. The layers visualized include rectal mucosa, muscularis mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria and area between the muscularis propria and perirectal fat.


The role of ERUS in rectum is primarily in staging and in posttreatment surveillance of rectal adenocarcinoma. Staging of early tumours requires an ERUS due to its superior diagnostic performance for differentiating T1 from T2 tumours in comparison to other cross-sectional imaging modalities like MRI.


As far as surveillance is concerned, endoscopy is mandated as it can detect early asymptomatic recurrences which improves overall survival (OS). This is substantiated by multiple recent meta-analyses in literature. Hence, even for patients on ‘watchful waiting’ as a treatment option after chemoradiotherapy, it is imperative to perform a DRE, EUS, CEA and correlate the findings with restaging MRI.


The various recommendations for postoperative surveillance for rectal cancer using endoscopy are enumerated in Table 8.5.3.



TABLE 8.5.3


The Various Recommendations for Postoperative Surveillance for Rectal Cancer Using Endoscopy














ASCO 2013 (42) Colonoscopy at 1 year, followed by every 5 years
ESMO rectal 2013 (43) Colonoscopy every 5 years up to age 75
NCCN 2018 (44) Colonoscopy at 1 year, repeat at 3 years, then every 5 years subsequently. If adenoma is found, repeat annually
USMSTF 2016 (45) Colonoscopy at 1 year, repeat at 3 years and then every 5 years.

ASCO: American society of clinical oncology; ESMO: European society for medical oncology; NCCN: National comprehensive cancer network; USMSTF: United States Multi-Society Task Force.


Drawbacks include heterogeneity in operator skill and operator dependency as well as inability to pass stenosing lesions. Poor depth of penetration of the probe results in reduced visualization of the mesorectal fat, limited assessment of pelvic side walls and EMVI and reduced diagnostic accuracy for asserting involvement of CRM.


Multidetector CT


Multidetector CT (MDCT) is the primary imaging modality used for rapid evaluation of not only bowel pathologies (luminal or mural) but also for evaluation of surrounding structures such as vessels, lymph nodes and mesentery. The ability to obtain high-quality clinical images through multiplanar reconstructions make it one of the most robust examinations for the initial evaluation of most bowel related pathologies.


A routine abdominal CT scan would include acquiring a noncontrast axial image, followed by a portal phase image (at 70–90 seconds). However, for more detailed evaluation of solid organs, a general imaging dataset would include an unenhanced CT, followed by arterial phase (20–30 seconds), portal venous phase (70–90 seconds) and a delayed phase at 3 minutes. Many centres around the world omit the noncontrast scan to reduce radiation exposure.


Lesions such as large tumours, pelvic nodes, collections and diverticulosis can be detected by contrast-enhanced CT. CT provides a more holistic evaluation and demonstrates possible complications of tumours such as obstruction, transition point and perforation that may not be clinically evident. However, accurate detection and staging of tumours in the rectum is better performed by MRI.


MRI


Like TRUS, MRI can depict the layers of the rectal wall with high resolution, especially when performed at 3 Tesla and with an endorectal coil. Although use of endorectal coils may provide improved diagnostic accuracy for T stage as compared with phased-array coils alone, it is known that endorectal coils increase patient discomfort and may account for increasing motion artifacts. Insertion of such coils is also not possible in case of stricturous lesions. Performance of high-resolution imaging using phased-array MRI coils at 1.5 or 3 Tesla, as was used in multicentre trials was excellent. MRI technique and image quality play a critical role in evaluation of rectal cancers, and accuracy is dependent on obtaining high-resolution images that are perpendicular to the plane of the tumour. Particular note is to be made whether the tumour is mucinous or nonmucinous as the former have worse prognosis and higher tendency to metastasize. For technical aspects of MRI, it is recommended by ESGAR that bowels and bladder are emptied. Rectal distension is not indicated as it stretches out the CRM. Minimum slice thickness for such scans is 3 mm. DWI is essential for both primary staging and restaging. Microenemas may be considered to remove air from the rectum and reduce artifacts in DXI sequence.


High-risk MRI features for distant metastases include EMVI, mesorectal tumour depth >5 mm, T4 stage, involved circumferential resection margin (CRM). In addition to initial staging prognostic features, MRI also helps in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy which is also an indicator of survival and chances of recurrence.


MRI is sensitive in detecting the presence of lymph nodes but remains nonspecific for differentiation malignant from benign nodes with high diagnostic certainty owing to the presence of micrometastasis even in small-sized nodes (up to 5 mm).


Contrast administration is not recommended.


Drawbacks of MRI include reduced diagnostic accuracy for identifying early rectal T1 and T2 tumours, and to sometimes differentiate T2 from early T3 lesions. Increased scan times in the elderly and cost may also be constraints in some settings.


CT colonography


Virtual colonoscopy can help in identifying primary and synchronous colonic lesions. CT Colonography (CTC) is beneficial after incomplete colonoscopy (due to nonpassable stricture) to evaluate the remainder of the colon. CTC is advocated as a screening test for colonic polyps and colon cancer in vulnerable populations. It has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 97% for detecting polyps >1 cm.


PET-CT


MRI scores over all modalities in the local staging of rectal neoplasms. The more common application of PET-CT is in identifying nodal and distant metastases in rectal adenocarcinoma, melanoma and lymphoma.


Limitations of PET include poor sensitivity in detecting small (<10 mm) colonic lesions and decreased fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake by mucinous tumours.


Summary of recommendations


Locoregional staging of rectal cancer




  • ERUS and high-resolution MRI for evaluating local extent of tumour.
  • ERUS is preferred for T1–T2 tumours while MRI performs better for tumours that are T3 and above.
  • High-resolution MRI with phased-array coil shows excellent performance for involvement of the CRM.
  • MRI holds advantages over ERUS for detection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes and superior perirectal lymph nodes.

Staging of other rectal neoplasm

For rectal melanoma, MRI may be performed along with a whole body PET-CT scan for regional and overall staging. Rectal lymphoma does not require local staging and a whole body PET-CT is generally acceptable as the imaging modality of choice.


Staging of anal cancer

MRI is the imaging modality of choice due to better delineation of the extent and involvement of the anal sphincters. The inguinal nodes are regional nodes in anal cancer and this region is covered in the scan.


Rectal pathologies


Rectal tumours


The most common rectal tumour is rectal cancer. It is also one of the most common malignant neoplasms and the second most frequent cancer occurring in the large bowel. Majority of the patients are in the fifth to seventh decade. However, the incidence of rectal cancer has been on a rise in the younger population. Adenocarcinoma is the commonest histopathologic type of rectal cancer.


Other than adenocarcinoma, several other neoplastic lesions also occur in the rectum, but are relatively uncommon (Table 8.5.4).



TABLE 8.5.4


WHO Classification of Tumours of the Colon and Rectum



























EPITHELIAL TUMOURS

Premalignant lesions



  • Adenoma

    1. 1) Tubular adenoma
    2. 2) Villous adenoma
    3. 3) Tubulovillous adenoma

  • Glandular intraepithelial neoplasia, low grade
  • Glandular intraepithelial neoplasia, high grade
SERRATED LESIONS

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp


Serrated polyposis


Traditional serrated adenoma

CARCINOMAS

Adenocarcinoma



  • Cribriform comedo-type adenocarcinoma
  • Medullary carcinoma
  • Micropapillary carcinoma
  • Colloid carcinoma
  • Serrated adenocarcinoma
  • Signet ring cell carcinoma

Adenosquamous carcinoma


Spindle cell carcinoma


Squamous cell carcinoma


Undifferentiated carcinoma

NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS

Neuroendocrine tumour G1 (NET G1)


Carcinoid


Neuroendocrine tumour G2 (NET G2)


Neuroendocrine carcinoma


Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma


Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma


Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma


Enterochromaffin cell (EC), serotonin-producing neuroendocrine tumour (NET)


L cell, Glucagon-like peptide-producing and PP/PYY-producing NETs

MESENCHYMAL TUMOURS

Leiomyoma


Lipoma


Angiosarcoma


Gastrointestinal stromal tumour, malignant


Kaposi sarcoma


Leiomyosarcoma


Schwannoma


Perineurioma


Ganglioneuroma


Granular cell tumour

MALIGNANT LYMPHOMAS

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma)


Mantle cell lymphoma


Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)


Burkitt lymphoma


B-cell lymphoma


unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma


Diagnosis, staging and management of rectal cancer

Diagnosis of rectal cancer begins with physical examination/DRE followed by colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy and biopsy from the mass (see figure below). If malignancy is confirmed on histopathological examination, imaging for staging is ordered (Fig. 8.5.14).


Image
Fig 8.5.14 Diagnostic algorithm of rectal cancer diagnosis.

MRI is the preferred method for locoregional staging. During staging of early tumours, ERUS also plays an important role. Majority of the guidelines (SAR and ESGAR) accept MRI as the modality of choice for locoregional staging and restaging after neoadjuvant treatment.


CT thorax and abdomen is performed for metastatic evaluation. PET-CT is not routinely recommended in metastatic evaluation. ESMO guidelines outline the following indications for PET-CT: (1) If carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) is high on presentation (2) Extensive EMVI.


MRI of the liver may be recommended to evaluate any suspicious or equivocal lesions that are detected on CT scan.


Therefore routinely pelvic MRI for locoregional evaluation and CT thorax and abdomen for metastatic evaluation is performed (Table 8.5.5).



TABLE 8.5.5


Imaging Recommendations for Rectal Cancer Staging





































Parameter Investigation of Choice Other Investigations
Tumour location DRE/sigmoidoscopy MRI
Tumour morphology Histopathology
Tumour (T) Staging–early ERUS MRI
Tumour (T) Staging–advanced MRI ERUS
Nodal staging MRI ERUS/CT
Sphincter involvement MRI DRE/ERUS
Metastatic evaluation CT PET-CT if EMVI/raised CEA
MRI – liver evaluation

Based on the investigations, the rectal cancer is staged according to the latest AJCC classification (Table 8.5.6).



TABLE 8.5.6


TNM Staging of Rectal Cancer













































PRIMARY TUMOUR (T)

T0


No evidence of primary tumour


Tis


Carcinoma in situ


T1


Tumour invades submucosa


T2


Tumour invades muscularis propria


T3


a


b


c


d


Tumour invades subserosal tissue and perirectal tissue


a <1 mm


b 1–5 mm


c >5–15 mm


d >15 mm


T4


a


b


Tumour invades peritoneum or other organs


Tumour penetrates visceral peritoneum


Tumour invades other adjacent organs or structures

REGIONAL LYMPH NODES (N)

NX


Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed


N0


No regional lymph node metastasis


N1


a


b


c


Regional lymph node metastasis (1–3 nodes)


1 lymph node


2–3 lymph nodes


Tumour deposits in subserosa, mesentery/nonperitonealized perirectal tissues (cannot be differentiated from nodes on imaging)


N2


a


b


Regional lymph node metastasis (>4 nodes)


4–6 node


>7 nodes

DISTANT METASTASES (M)

M0


No distant metastasis


M1


a


B


c


Distant metastasis


Metastasis in one (1) organ


Metastasis in more than one organ


Metastasis to the peritoneum with/without other organ involvement


Once the diagnosis is confirmed and staging investigations are completed, management is usually decided in multidisciplinary team meetings consisting of Surgeon, Radiation oncologist, Medical oncologist, Pathologist and Radiologist.


The treatment protocols differ in the United States and Europe (Fig. 8.5.15).


Image
Fig 8.5.15 Treatment algorithm of rectal cancer in USA and Europe.

The different types of rectal surgeries are enumerated in the Table 8.5.7 and depicted in Fig. 8.5.16.



TABLE 8.5.7


Different Types of Rectal Surgeries for Rectal Cancer























Types of Surgery Indication
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) T1(sm1)
Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) T1(sm2, sm3), T2, T3a, T3b
Post-CRT T3/T4
Low Anterior Resection (LAR) Tumours above anorectal junction
Abdomino-Perineal Excision (APE) Tumours below anorectal junction/levators not involved
Extra Levator Abdomino-Perineal Excision (ELAPE) Tumours below anorectal junction/levators involved

Image
Fig 8.5.16 Various surgical techniques used to treat rectal cancer. Red area – Tumour. Green line – structures removed during the surgery.
(A) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with resection of a tumour.
(B) Low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) with sigmoid colectomy.
(C) Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and TME, with resection of the sphincter complex.
(D) Intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection (APR) and TME.
(E) Extralevator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) and TME.

Concept of use of neoadjuvant short course RT, long course RT with chemotherapy and chemotherapy only is a rapidly evolving field. Radiologist should be aware of the protocol used in their institution.


A subset of patients (10%–23%) was found to have complete pathological response (pCR) in the postsurgical pathological specimen. There is significant evidence of prediction of pCR on presurgical MRI. Considering the ability of MRI in prediction of pCR, Prof. Habr-Gama and her group suggested the possibility of organ preservation in these patients. Hence ‘watch and wait’ policy came into vogue.


In the subgroup where MRI predicts complete response, surgery can be avoided and patients may be followed up every 8–12 weeks using DRE, proctoscopy/sigmoidoscopy and MRI. Both T2W and DWI are used in MRI for prediction of complete response as well as for follow-up for prediction of recurrence. Close follow using the above-mentioned protocol ensures early detection of recurrence and hence treatment. Thus, MRI plays an important role in personalized treatment of rectal cancer.


MRI imaging

MRI plays an important role in rectal cancer management: During initial staging MRI helps in:




  1. 1. Stratification of tumours so that locally advanced lesions are treated with neoadjuvant CRT before surgery and not so advanced lesions with upfront surgery.
  2. 2. Surgical planning.
  3. 3. Prognostication of tumours by identifying poor risk factors such as EMVI, MRF involvement and mucinous subtypes.

In restaging after NACT, MRI helps in:




  1. 1. Response evaluation
  2. 2. Surgical planning
  3. 3. Detecting complete tumour response
  4. 4. Follow-up of patients with nonsurgical treatment

Therefore good-quality high-resolution rectal MRI is required for accurate locoregional staging. Technique and protocol of MRI is summarized in the Tables 8.5.8 and 8.5.9.



TABLE 8.5.8


Technique of Rectal MRI

























Recommended Optional Not recommended

1.5T-3.0T magnet strength

Bowel preparation Endorectal coil

High resolution T2w sequences

Spasmolytic agents

Small FOV images


Axial and coronal images – parallel and perpendicular to the rectal tumour


For low rectal tumours coronal images –perpendicular to the anal canal

Endorectal filling with gel

Microenema

IV Gadolinium contrast


TABLE 8.5.9


MRI Protocol for Rectal Cancer

























































MRI Protocol
LARGE FOV FOR PELVIS SMALL FOV FOR RECTUM

T2 TSE Axial DWI Axial T2 TSE Sagittal T2 TSE Coronal T1 TSE Axial RESOLVE DWI Axial
TR (ms) 4500–5000 8800–13500 3500–5500 3000–6000 500–900 4500–6500
TE (ms) 85–100 75 80–100 80–100 12–24 55–60
FOV (mm × mm) 380 × 330 420 × 315 190 × 190 180 × 180 180 × 180 240 × 240
Slice thickness (mm) 5 5 3 3 3 3
B values NA 50,400,800 NA NA NA 50,400,800

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 15, 2026 | Posted by in OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY IMAGING | Comments Off on Rectum

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access