Therapy of Cutaneous Lymphoma


Criteria

Description

Clinical criteria

Patches and plaques plus lesions in a non-sun-exposed location, size/shape variation of lesions, and poikiloderma; 1 point for 1 factor, 2 points for 2 or more factors

Histopathologic criteria

Superficial lymphoid infiltrate present plus epidermotropism without spongiosis and lymphoid atypia (1 point for 1 factor, 2 points for 2 factors)

Molecular-biological criteria

Clonal TCR gene rearrangement is present

Immunopathologic criteria

Fewer than 50 % of the T cells express CD2, CD3, or CD5, <10 % of the T cells express CD7, and there is discordance of epidermal and dermal cells with expression of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7 (1 point for any of these present)


Source: Adapted from Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, Willemze R, Kim Y, Knobler R, et al. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood 2007;110: 1713–22



MF has its own unique staging system (Table 2) [14]. Thirty percent, 35, 20, and 15 % of patients present with T1, T2, T3, or T4 disease, respectively.


Table 2
Mycosis fungoides TNM classification and staging system for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma


















































































T (skin) classification

T1

Limited patch or plaque on <10 % of the skin surface

T2

Generalized patch or plaque on >10 % of the skin surface involved

T3

Tumorous skin involvement

T4

Erythroderma

N (lymph nodes) classification

N0

No clinically abnormal lymph nodes

N1

Clinically abnormal lymph nodes with histopathology Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN0-2

N2

Histopathology Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN3

N3

Histopathology Dutch grades 3–4 or NCI LN4

M (visceral organs) classification

M0

No visceral involvement

M1

Visceral involvement

B (blood) classification

B0

No significant blood involvement with ≤5 % Sézary cells

B1

Low blood tumor burden

B2

High blood tumor burden with positive clone plus one of the following: ≥1,000/μL Sézary cells, CD4/CD8 ≥ 10, CD4+CD7− cells ≥40 %, or CD4+CD26− cells ≥30 %

Clinical stage

IA

T1N0M0B0-1

IB

T2N0M0B0-1

IIA

T1-2N1-N2B0-1

IIB

T3N0-2M0B0-1

IIIA

T4N0-2M0B0

IIIB

T4N0-2M0B1

IVA1

T1-4N0-2M0B2

IVA2

T1-4N3M0B0-2

IVB

T1-4N0-3M1B0-2


LN0 no atypical lymphocytes; LN3 aggregates of atypical lymphocytes; nodal architecture Preserved; LN4 partial/complete effacement of nodal architecture by atypical lymphocytes or frankly neoplastic cells

Source: Adapted from Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, Willemze R, Kim Y, Knobler R, et al. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood 2007;110: 1713–22

Early-stage (IA–IIA) MF has a favorable prognosis with a median survival of 13 years [12] and is generally treated with skin-directed therapies, including topical corticosteroids, topical chemotherapeutic agents (nitrogen mustard and carmustine), topical retinoids (stage IA only), RT (local electron-beam RT for unilesional or total skin electron-beam RT for more extensive and progressive skin disease), and phototherapy using ultraviolet B (UVB) or psoralen + ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA). No specific treatment is preferred over the others; however, trying a different regimen is recommended on progression after initial treatment. In a study of 103 patients randomized to a combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine) and 30 Gy of total skin electron-beam therapy (TSEBT) vs. sequential topical therapy, there was no significant difference in disease-free or overall survival [15]. Because of the morbidity of TSEBT, it is generally reserved for progressive lesions or thicker tumor plaques.

Patients with more advanced MF (stage IIB–IV) have a worse prognosis, with an overall survival rate of 3.5–4 years for stage IIB–III and 1.5 years for stage IV and require more aggressive treatment regimens [12].

Limited stage IIB disease can be treated with a combination of local RT to the tumors with other topical agents applied to adjacent plaques or systemic therapy, while more extensive stage IIB and IIIA disease can be treated with systemic retinoids, interferon, histone deacetylase inhibitors, Denileukin diftitox, systemic chemotherapy, and TSEBT. Generally TSEBT is only used in stage IIB disease, because patients with more advanced disease may suffer severe desquamation after doses as low as 4 Gy.

Stage IIIB and IV requires systemic therapy to target malignant cells in the blood and may include extracorporeal photochemotherapy, systemic retinoids, interferon, histone deacetylase inhibitors, Denileukin diftitox, methotrexate, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. These systemic agents can be combined with skin-directed therapies.



Table 3
Acronyms






















Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 18, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Therapy of Cutaneous Lymphoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access

NHL

non-hodgkin lymphoma

PCTCL

primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

PCBCL

primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma

LDH

lactate dehydrogenase

CT

computed tomography

PET