Calcifications: Amorphous/Indistinct Microcalcifications

17Calcifications: Amorphous/Indistinct Microcalcifications


Case 17.1: Skin Powder/Deodorant


Case History

A 48-year-old woman presents with new densities on her right mammogram.


Physical Examination

• Normal exam


Mammogram

Calcifications (Figs. 17.1 and 17.2)


• Type: amorphous/indistinct


• Distribution: grouped/clustered


image


Fig 17.1 (A) Right CC mammogram. In the outer breast, multiple amorphous densities were present (circle). These densities could only be identified on this view. (B) Enlargement of circled densities in A.


image


Fig 17.2 Right CC spot magnification mammogram. The patient returned 5 days later, and the densities are no longer present.


Pathology

• Deodorant material on skin


Management

• BI-RADS assessment category 2, benign finding



Pearls and Pitfalls


• This case is an example of the appearance of skin powder. Various creams, powders, tattoos, and aluminum deodorants can produce densities that may appear to represent intraparenchymal calcifications. When the densities are extremely small and visible on only one view, this etiology should be considered.


Suggested Reading

Bartton JW III, Kornguth PJ. Mammographic deodorant and powder artifact: is there confusion with malignant microcalcifications? Breast Dis 1990;3:121–126


Pamilo M, Soiva M, Suramo I. New artifacts simulating malignant microcalcifications in mammography. Breast Dis 1989;1:321–327


Case 17.2: Fibrocystic Change


Case History

A 64-year-old woman presents with new calcifications on her screening mammogram.


Physical Examination

• Normal exam


Mammogram

Calcifications (Fig. 17.3)


• Type: amorphous/indistinct


• Distribution: grouped/clustered


image


Fig 17.3 In the upper outer quadrant of the right breast, there is a cluster of indistinct amorphous calcifications (circle). (A) Right MLO magnification mammogram. (B) Enlargement of circled calcifications in A. (C) Right CC magnification mammogram.


Ultrasound

Low Frequency


Frequency


• 7 MHz (Fig. 17.4)


image


Fig 17.4 Right radial low-frequency breast sonogram. The calcifications (arrows) identified in Fig. 17.3 were localized sonographically. Lower-frequency sonography is generally more helpful when the breast tissue is extremely attenuating. In this case of fibroadenomatous hyperplasia, the lower frequency demonstrates that there is no mass in the area of the calcifications. Only benign-appearing hyperechoic tissue is present.


High Frequency (Fig. 17.5)


Frequency


• 10 MHz


image


Fig 17.5 Right radial high-frequency breast sonogram. When using the higher frequency, the area of calcification heavily shadows due to the highly attenuating fibrous tissue. The shadowing prevents one from differentiating attenuating benign tissue from malignant tissue.


Pathology

• Fibroadenomatoid hyperplasia


Management

• BI-RADS assessment category 4, suspicious abnormality; biopsy should be considered.



Pearls and Pitfalls


• These amorphous calcifications are moderately suspicious. Conditions that may produce these calcifications include fibrocystic changes, fibroadenomas, fat necrosis, and intraductal carcinoma.


• Fibrosis highly attenuates sound and commonly produces focal shadowing. To differentiate diffuse fibrosis from a focal malignant mass, one should utilize a lower frequency. A lower frequency may penetrate the tissue and demonstrate either the presence of a mass or the presence of benign tissue.


Suggested Reading

Kamal M, Evans AJ, Denley H, Pinder SE, Ellis IO. Fibroadenomatoid hyperplasia: a cause of suspicious microcalcification on mammographic screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1331–1334


Case 17.3: Fibrocystic Change


Case History

A 49-year-old woman presents with left breast calcifications that are new since her previous screening mammogram 4 years ago.


Physical Examination

• Normal exam


Mammogram

Calcifications (Figs. 17.6 and 17.7)


• Type: amorphous/indistinct


• Distribution: segmental


image


Fig 17.6 Amorphous calcifications are present throughout the entire left upper outer quadrant. (A) Left MLO mammogram. (B) Left CC mammogram. (C) Left LM magnification mammogram. (D) Enlargement of calcifications in C.


image


Fig 17.7 Specimen radiograph from percutaneous mammographically guided stereotactic core biopsy. Most of the cores exhibit amorphous calcifications.


Pathology

Atypical ductal hyperplasia; both the percutaneous core biopsy and the partial mastectomy specimens demonstrated atypical duct epithelial hyperplasia without evidence of in situ or invasive carcinoma.


Management

• BI-RADS assessment category 4, suspicious; biopsy should be considered.



Pearls and Pitfalls


• Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is commonly associated with biopsied calcifications. If the sampled tissue only demonstrates ADH, reexcision of the tissue is recommended. About 50% of percutaneous biopsies showing only ADH are associated with malignancy after subsequent surgical excision. Larger tissue core sampling devices appear to reduce the chance of inadequate sampling to 10 to 20%.


Suggested Reading

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 24, 2015 | Posted by in BREAST IMAGING | Comments Off on Calcifications: Amorphous/Indistinct Microcalcifications

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access