Dysmorphism

, Jean-Philippe Bault2, Bernard Benoit3 and Gérard Couly4



(1)
Center of women and fetal imaging, Créteil, France

(2)
Center of fetal imaging Ambroise Paré, Les Mureaux, France

(3)
Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France

(4)
Department of maxillo-facial surgery, Necker Hospital, Paris, France

 




4.1 How to Define Objective Facial Dysmorphism


The study of fetal face anomalies using precise, reproducible, anthropometric criteria helps avoid the too-frequent subjectivity found in an approach that is not truly quantified. The discovery of dysmorphism and its characterization is one way that is frequently used to uncover various pathological fetal syndromes.


4.2 Tools for This Study


They were described in Chap. 1 and consist of:

Volume ultrasound images that enable:



  • Capturing rigorously strict views using multiple plane views and their orthogonality principle.


  • Demonstrative imagery with surface rendering modes


  • An evaluation of the bone structures with the “maximum” mode.

Thus, the study of the sagittal view, especially with a study of the facial angles, is a key moment in the study of the fetal profile, which is very often altered in cases of facial dysmorphism.

The axial view will contribute key information regarding the shape and size of the maxillary bones and particularly the mandible, and will, among other things, enable a precise measurement of the inter-orbital diameter.

The coronal view will, as shown in other chapters of this book, be an important tool to evaluate labioalveolar-palate defects.

A panel of measurements covers the various facial parameters.

For a clear presentation, we decided to subdivide the most common dysmorphic pathologies that impact the face into five categories:



  • Major chromosomal anomalies


  • Pathologies impacting primarily the upper face


  • Pathologies impacting primarily the mid-face


  • Pathologies impacting primarily the lower face


  • Unclassifiable pathologies


4.3 Dysmorphism of Major Chromosomal Anomalies


Screening for the major chromosomal anomalies currently depends on quality screening during the first trimester. In this chapter, we will identify the principal characteristics of the dysmorphism related to the major chromosomal anomalies.


4.3.1 Trisomy 21


There is frequently a delay in the ossification of the nose bones (Figs. 4.1 and 4.2), the forehead could be domed, sometimes with a prefrontal edema (Fig. 4.3), the features could appear flat without the upper facial angle truly being modified (Figs. 4.4 and 4.5a, b), the mouth is small, with corners that to not exceed the wings of the nose (Fig. 4.6a, b), the palpebral fissures are directed up and behind (Fig. 4.7), the ears are small and low (Fig. 4.8), and the tongue could be protrusive (Fig. 4.9).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.1
Nasal bone not visible at 13 GW (multiplanar view)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.2
Nasal bone not visible at 15 GW (multiplanar view)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.3
Prefrontal edema 22 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.4
Flat features


A427038_1_En_4_Fig5_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.5
(a) Increased upper facial angle 18 GW; (b) Normal facial angle at 22 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig6_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.6
Small mouth: (a) 22 GW; (b). 32 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig7_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.7
Palpebral fissures oriented up and back


A427038_1_En_4_Fig8_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.8
Small ear at 26 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig9_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.9
Protrusive tongue

Nevertheless, in a certain number of cases, the profile could appear normal (Fig. 4.10).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig10_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.10
Trisomy 21, normal profile


4.3.2 Trisomy 18


The diagnosis of this chromosomal anomaly is usually based on a collection of morphological anomalies.

In these case, the dysmorphism associates microretrognathia, sloping forehead, and small low ears. Cleft palate is frequent (cf. Clefts)

A427038_1_En_4_Fig11_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.11
Microretrognathia at 13GW (multiplanar image)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig12_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.12
Microretrognathia at 13GA, rendered image


A427038_1_En_4_Fig13_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.13
(a) Sloping forehead and (b) microretrognathia


A427038_1_En_4_Fig14_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.14
Small ear


4.3.3 Trisomy 13


Dysmorphism in the case of trisomy 13 is often very spectacular, covering a wide range of possibilities from a simple median incisor (Fig. 4.15) to cyclopia (Figs. 4.16 and 4.17), with a full range of intermediary aspects possible including more or less hypotelorism (Fig. 4.18), single nostrils (Figs. 4.18, 4.19, and 4.20). Clefting is found in 60–80 % of cases, and is both unilateral and bilateral. Median clefts are characteristic (Figs.4.21 and 4.22).

These anomalies are related to cerebral medial line anomalies (alobar, semi-lobar or lobar holoprosencephaly) that are present in 50 % of cases.

A427038_1_En_4_Fig15_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.15
Median incisor


A427038_1_En_4_Fig16_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.16
(a, b) Cyclopia, proboscis 13GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig17_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.17
Cyclopia, single nostril. 22 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig18_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.18
Hypotelorism, single nostril 13GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig19_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.19
Single nostril 13GW (multiplanar image)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig20_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.20
Single nostril 22 GW:(a): Render 3D, (b): 2D


A427038_1_En_4_Fig21_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.21
Median cleft 14 GW


A427038_1_En_4_Fig22_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.22
Various fetal facial dysmorphic features related to trisomy 13

Facial dysmorphism related to other chromosomal anomalies are often rougher, as seen in the below examples corresponding to:



  • A partial trisomy 8 with an everted lower lip, a round nose and retrognathia (Figs. 4.23 and 24).


  • Distal monosomy 6P, with related hypertelorism, very slight retrognathia, palpebral fissures oriented down and out, low-set ears (Fig. 4.25).


A427038_1_En_4_Fig23_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.23
Partial trisomy eight profile


A427038_1_En_4_Fig24_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.24
Partial trisomy eight (post-natal aspect)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig25_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.25
Distal monosomy 6p


4.4 Upper Face Pathologies



4.4.1 Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome


Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome results from a microdeletion, with an incidence of 1/50,000. The deletion occurs on the short arm of chromosome 4 at the 4p.16.3 region. This deletion is sporadic in the majority of cases. Research for this deletion should be signaled to geneticists when they test the amniotic fluid.

The dysmorphism is characteristic:



  • On the profile, the upper facial angle measurement is barely inferior to normal measurements. However, the glabella appears prominent with a frequently not very echogenic aspect (the prefrontal tissues), which results in a characteristic “Greek Helmet” look (Fig. 4.26).


  • The corners of the lips appear to be falling.


  • There can also be hypertelorism, dysplastic ears with periauricular tags, cleft lip or labio-alveolar-palatal clefting.


A427038_1_En_4_Fig26_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.26
“Greek Helmet” look

This dysmorphism occurs in a context of early IUGR with, in particular, severe microcephaly, mental retardation could be severe with walking and language acquisition occurring more or less late.


4.4.2 Craniostenosis


These anomalies, resulting from the premature fusing of one or several sutures, often lead to severe dysmorphism. The overall incidence is estimated at 1/2000 and around 100 different forms have been described. The role of an ultrasonographer consists of labeling as best as possible the type of anomaly and then looking for other markers to determine whether or not the craniostenosis is related to a syndrome. It is useful to remember that the first sign signaling craniostenosis could be an enlargement of a healthy contralateral suture.

Craniostenoses are classified based on the type of suture involved (Figs. 4.27, 4.28, 4.29, and 4.30).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig27_HTML.gif


Fig. 4.27
Classification of craniostenoses

Below are a few examples of an approach to these complex pathologies.

A427038_1_En_4_Fig28_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.28
Trigonocephaly (premature fusing of the metopic suture)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig29_HTML.gif


Fig. 4.29
“Cloverleaf” skull with intra cranial marks (premature fusing of coronal sutures)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig30_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.30
Asymmetric craniostenosis (premature fusing of a coronal suture)


4.4.2.1 Examples of Syndrome Craniostenosis



Crouzon syndrome

This syndrome results in the premature closing of the coronal sutures. Facial dysmorphism is characterized by branchycephaly, with a very domed appearance, frontal bumps, moderate hypoplasia of the mid-level face (Figs. 4.31, 4.32, 4.33, and 4.34), proptosis related to shallow orbits (Fig. 4.33), slight hypertelorism (Fig. 4.33), and a straight mandible (Figs. 4.33 and 4.34). Intelligence is generally normal. Complications such as atrophy of the optic nerves and deafness can occur if not caught and treated early. It is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder.

A427038_1_En_4_Fig31_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.31
Crouzon syndrome (multiplanar image)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig32_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.32
Crouzon syndrome: profile


A427038_1_En_4_Fig33_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.33
Crouzon syndrome: “render”


A427038_1_En_4_Fig34_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.34
Crouzon syndrome, with very wide metopic suture. (a) Maximum mode; (b) Post-natal


Apert syndrome

This results in the premature closing of the coronal sutures, with broad bone defects that can be seen on the median line between the two fontanels. Dysmorphism is characterized by branchycephaly, a very marked nasal bridge (Fig. 4.35), moderate mid-level face hypoplasia, hypertelorism and a prominent forehead. The hands show syndactyly that leaves the thumb free, producing “mitten” hands (Fig. 4.36), however syndactyly of the feet impacts all the toes.

A427038_1_En_4_Fig35_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.35
Apert syndrome: profile


A427038_1_En_4_Fig36_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.36
Apert syndrome: dysmorphism and syndactyly producing “mitten” hands


4.4.2.2 DiGeorge Syndrome


This syndrome is linked to a microdeletion at 22.q.1.1 and occurs at a frequency of 1/4000. Transmission is dominant; one parent is carrier of the deletion in 10–20 % of cases, most frequently this deletion is “de novo”.

The main markers are:



  • Conotruncal heart disorders (75 %) of cases


  • Hypoplasia or absence of the thymus (in 83 % of cases if there is a heart malformation, and in 31 % of cases if the deletion is isolated)


  • Palate defects (76 % of cases: submucosal cleft palate and cleft palate, velopharyngeal incompetence, etc.)


  • Renal anomalies (35 % of cases)


  • Limb anomalies (hyperlax hands or fingers, polydactyly)


  • A broad range of psycho-motor development anomalies (slow learning with IQ variations from normal to seriously retarded, psychiatric disorders in 10 % of cases).

The dysmorphism is very moderate, association a “tubular”-looking nose (Figs. 4.37, 4.38, and 4.39), a relatively narrow mouth (Fig. 4.39), and minimal external ear anomalies (Fig. 4.40).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig37_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.37
DiGeorge syndrome: multiplanar image, tubular nose (image B)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig38_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.38
DiGeorge syndrome: tubular nose, “render”


A427038_1_En_4_Fig39_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.39
DiGeorge syndrome: tubular nose, small mouth (Render HD-Live)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig40_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.40
DiGeorge syndrome: ear: excessively folded helix


4.4.2.3 Microcephaly


Microcephaly is a clearly defined biometric anomaly: the cranial circumference is smaller than −3 SD or Z-Score : −3. The frequency of 1/6200 to 1/8500 is certainly underestimated. It can be isolated, related to holoproscencephaly, or associated with chromosal anomalies, a number of genetic syndromes, and other morphological anomalies.

Three conditions are required to consider microcephaly:



  • The dating of the pregnancy and the biometric definition must be precise, and the measuring technique must be irreproachable.

When microcephaly is discovered, on must:



  • Correlate the cranial circumference with other biometric parameters.


  • Look for a vascular context.


  • Test for infections.


  • Do karyotype testing for a 4p- deletion


  • Do a family survey


  • Do a detailed ultrasound, particularly of the cerebral structures.

Dysmorphism primarily takes the form of a sloping forehead (Figs. 4.41, 4.42, and 4.43) and a disproportion between the size of the face and the skull (Figs. 4.42 and 4.43).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig41_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.41
Microcephaly: normal-sized face, sloping forehead


A427038_1_En_4_Fig42_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.42
Microcephaly: sloping forehead, narrow skull with retrognathia


A427038_1_En_4_Fig43_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.43
Microcephaly: “render”


4.5 Mid-Face Pathologies



4.5.1 Achondroplasia


Achondroplasia is the most frequent osteochondrodysplasia, with an estimated frequency between 1/15,000 and 1/26,000. It is related to a mutation of the FGFR3 gene. This bone pathology becomes apparent starting at 26 gestational weeks, the diagnosis most frequently made during the third trimester ultrasound showing very short limbs, in particular rhizomelia contrasting with macrocrania (very marked frontal bossing), and a relatively narrow thorax (Fig. 4.45). In addition to these markers, the ultrasound will show a characteristic appearance of the upper femoral metaphyses, which appear to be slender like “ice cream cones,” leading to an “opening” of the upper femoral angle (Fig. 4.44), short trident hands, and platyspondyly (Fig. 4.45).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig44_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.44
Achondroplasia: slender upper femoral metaphysis (2D and 3D)


A427038_1_En_4_Fig45_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.45
Achondroplasia: trident hand, narrow thorax, platyspondyly

Dysmorphism combines marked frontal bossing and a very “hollowed” nasal bridge with an abnormally closed upper facial angle (Figs. 4.46, 4.47, 4.48, and 4.49).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig46_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.46
Achondroplasia: multiplanar view


A427038_1_En_4_Fig47_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.47
Achondroplasia: closed upper facial angle


A427038_1_En_4_Fig48_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.48
Achondroplasia: dysmorphism “Render HD Live”


A427038_1_En_4_Fig49_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.49
Achondroplasia: dysmorphism “Render”


4.5.2 Maxillo-Facial Dysplasia: Binder Syndrome


This anomaly has an estimated incidence of 1/10,000, but is probably underestimated. A few family recurrences suggest autosomal recessive transmission or low-penetrating dominance. Binder-like dysmorphism can be found in cases of mothers taking phenytoin and anti-vitamin K type anticoagulants, or with lupus.

This sequence is considered to be an allelic variation of punctate chondrodysplasias.

Dysmorphism takes the form of a flattened midface that translates into an abnormally open upper facial angle, a short nose with a flattened root, a slightly protruding mandible, and a little developed upper maxilla (Figs. 4.50, 4.51, 4.52, 4.53, and 4.54). Tests should include karyotype, maternal blood test for lupus, a detailed ultrasound looking for punctate epiphyses (Figs. 4.55 and 4.56), a scan could be done to confirm the ultrasound results. Discovery of a brachytelephalangy would suggest a benign form of chondrodysplasia punctate (Fig. 4.57).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig50_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.50
Binder, multiplanar view


A427038_1_En_4_Fig51_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.51
Binder, open upper facial angle


A427038_1_En_4_Fig52_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.52
Binder, rendered mode


A427038_1_En_4_Fig53_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.53
Binder, Render HD-live mode


A427038_1_En_4_Fig54_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.54
Punctate calcifications: prenatal ultrasound and corresponding post-natal x-ray


A427038_1_En_4_Fig55_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.55
Punctate calcifications – post-natal appearance


A427038_1_En_4_Fig56_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.56
Brachytelephalangy: prenatal ultrasound appearance and corresponding post-natal x-ray


A427038_1_En_4_Fig57_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.57
Binder, post-natal appearance


4.5.3 Thanatophoric Dysplasia


This is the most frequent of fatal osteochondrodysplasias, with an estimated 1/20,000 to 1/60,000.

Currently, a diagnosis is made most often during the first trimester, although it could be made during the second trimester. It combines very short limbs with femurs shaped like old-fashioned telephone receivers, a narrow thorax that looks like a champagne cork on a sagittal view, platyspondyly with H-shaped vertebrae, and macrocrania. Hydramnios is common (Fig. 4.58).

Dysmorphism is marked by macrocrania, mid-face hypoplasia translated by a marked nasal bridge with a reduced upper facial angle (Figs. 4.59, 4.60, 4.61, and 4.62).

A427038_1_En_4_Fig58_HTML.gif


Fig. 4.58
Thanatophoric dysplasia: (a) narrow thorax. (b) short curved femur. (c) platyspondyly. (d) macrocrania


A427038_1_En_4_Fig59_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.59
Thanatophoric dysplasia: multiplanar view


A427038_1_En_4_Fig60_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.60
Thanatophoric dysplasia: reduced upper facial angle


A427038_1_En_4_Fig61_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.61
Rendered image of thanatophoric dysplasia


A427038_1_En_4_Fig62_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.62
HD live rendered image of thanatophoric dysplasia


4.5.4 Prader-Willi Syndrome


This rare syndrome affects between 1/10,000 and 1/25,000 births, its origin being a genetic deletion on the paternal chromosome 15 (at 15q11-q13). It is:



  • Either de novo


  • or part of a maternal uniparental disomy.

Prader-Willi syndrome is considered with the discovery of hydramnios and slow growth related to diminished active movements, fetal cardiac disorders, and genital anomalies, and a detailed study of the face could then support the hypothesis.

Dysmorphism in this syndrome is characterized by:



  • A thin, slightly turned up upper lip


  • Almond-shaped eyes, narrow forehead


  • A closed upper facial angle


A427038_1_En_4_Fig63_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.63
Prader-Willi Syndrome: closed upper facial angle, thin turned up upper lip


A427038_1_En_4_Fig64_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.64
Prader-Willi Syndrome: rendered image


4.5.5 Otopalatodigital Syndrome


This is a very rare syndrome (only around 30 cases recorded), two types of which are described: type 1 and type 2. This genetic disease results from mutations in the FLNA gene associated with skeletal dysplasia (curved long bones, limb anomalies, including fan-shaped toes, bent fingers, syndactyly, polydactyly, etc.), auditory deficit, and characteristic facial dysmorphism.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 13, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Dysmorphism

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access