Chapter 38 Amman Bolia and Robert S.M. Davies Subintimal angioplasty (SIA) was first introduced in 1987 as a minimally invasive percutaneous technique for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).1 Early positive results led to use of the technique for the popliteal artery and trifurcation vessels as well, where it has proved to be invaluable as an alternative to surgical bypass for treating critical limb ischemia (CLI). Recent results indicate that SIA treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease for IC is durable,2–20 and in chronic CLI it has proved so useful that it has become the first-line treatment in many patients with this condition.21–35 The treatment has application in long superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal, and tibial occlusions and has the ability to reconstitute bifurcations and trifurcations36 that would otherwise not be possible. Long tibial occlusions extending down to the ankle and below have been treated in cases in which surgery would not be applicable. The technique has made its biggest impact in the treatment of CLI, where reported limb salvage rates are between 80% and 90%.25,28,29 In patients with IC, secondary patency rates of up to 64% at 5 years have been reported, close to those achieved by surgical bypass.2 1. Chronic femoropopliteal and tibial occlusions that have become hard, possibly calcified, thus making it impossible for the guidewire to be negotiated through an “intraluminal” approach. A subintimal dissection plane is relatively easy to create in these situations. 2. Long occlusions of the femoropopliteal and tibial arteries can be recanalized through a subintimal channel in cases where it would be difficult to maintain an intraluminal position of the guidewire. 3. An occlusion in an underlying diffusely diseased vessel would make it difficult for the guidewire to traverse the occlusion intraluminally, and hence is an indication for SIA. 4. Previously failed intraluminal attempts at angioplasty may be suitable for a subintimal approach. 5. Flush SFA occlusions in which there may be a very small stump or none at all. An intraluminal approach in these situations is difficult if not impossible. 6. Moderately calcified vessels, which are often difficult to treat by conventional angioplasty but are relatively easily managed with SIA because the wire follows the path of least resistance along the subintimal plane. 7. The presence of a large collateral vessel proximal to an occlusion that lacks a stump, which is necessary to engage the guidewire for transluminal angioplasty. This situation can be dealt with by creating a subintimal dissection above the collateral, thus avoiding persistent wire entry into the collateral. 8. When an arterial perforation occurs during attempted intraluminal crossing of an occlusion, subintimal dissection helps avoid the site of the perforation by negotiating the plane of dissection away from the site of the perforation.37,38 9. A common femoral occlusion that extends into the profunda and SFA. Recanalization of both these vessels may be achieved by the subintimal approach, thus reconstituting the bifurcation. 10. A popliteal occlusion that extends into the trifurcation vessels can be treated with SIA whereby the recanalization can be extended into all three runoff vessels, achieving a three-vessel runoff. 11. SIA has a role in recanalization of native SFA occlusions in patients who have undergone femoropopliteal bypass grafting that has subsequently occluded.39,40 Similarly, tibial occlusions can be recanalized after failure of a femorodistal bypass graft.41 In the case of a long femoropopliteal occlusion with concomitant trifurcation disease and a single vessel runoff, it is of vital importance for true-lumen reentry to occur in the patent crural vessel. This does not necessarily occur using the standard aforementioned technique, since the guidewire will have a natural tendency to take the path of least resistance—which does not always equate to the least-diseased crural vessel. In an attempt to address this potential complication, Spinosa et al. described subintimal arterial flossing with antegrade-retrograde intervention (SAFARI).42 This technique is described in depth elsewhere in the book. Percutaneous subintimal revascularization of chronically occluded femoropopliteal or crural vessels is associated with a reported failure rate of 10% to 20% (Table 38-1). The primary limitation is the failure to reenter the distal true lumen after crossing the occlusion subintimally. Furthermore, true-lumen reentry may be significantly remote from the level of patency, thereby unnecessarily extending the length of subintimal dissection beyond that of the occluded segment. Inadvertent lengthening of the lesion may itself cause complications including loss of patent branches and collaterals distal to the treated occlusion. TABLE 38-1 Summary Data for All Studies with Over 100 Limbs Treated with Subintimal Angioplasty
Subintimal Angioplasty
Clinical Relevance
Indications
Technique
Anatomy and Approach
Technical Aspects
Tibial Occlusions
Reentry Devices
Study
Study Type
No. of Patients
No. of SIAs
Disease Severity
Lesion Location
Technical Success
Stents Used
Primary Patency (Months)
Primary Assisted Patency (Months)
Secondary Patency (Months)
Limb Salvage (Months)
Survival (Months)
Bausback et al.12
Case note review
113
118
Claudication & CLI
Femoropopliteal
107 (91%)
Y
57% (12)
83% (12)
89% (12)
NA
NA
Siablis et al.11
Cohort
98
105
Claudication & CLI
Femoropopliteal
96 (91%)
Y
42% (24)
NA
NA
89% (36)
84% (36)
Sidhu et al.14
Case note review
120
128
Claudication & CLI
Femoropopliteal
117 (91%)
Y
NA
73% (12)
85% (12)
98% (12)
NA
Setacci et al.34
Cohort
145
145
CLI
Femoropopliteal
121 (83%)
Y
70% (12), 34% (36)
NA
77% (12), 43% (36)
88% (12), 49% (36)
NA
Sultan et al.35
Cohort
190
206
CLI
Infrainguinal
NA
Y
73% (60)
NA
NA
73% (60) amputation-free survival
79% (60)
Köcher et al.54
Case note review
123
133
Claudication & CLI
Femoropopliteal
115 (86%)
Y
58% (12), 50% (24)
NA
NA
81% (12) for CLI
NA
Marks et al.55
Cohort
108
116
NA
Femoropopliteal
99 (85%)
Y
59% (12) for technically successful procedures
NA
NA
NA
NA
Scott et al.15
Case note review
472
506
Claudication & CLI
Infrainguinal
439 (87%)
Y
45% (12)
NA
76% (12)
75% (36) for CLI
55% (36) for CLI; 84% (36) for claudication
Akesson et al.33
Case note review
181
193
>95% CLI
Infrainguinal
148 (77%)
Y
45% (12)
NA
NA
NA
62% patients died at a median of 17 (IQR 3-31) months after SIA
Scott et al.16
Case note review
104
105
Claudication & CLI
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access