Testicular Carcinoma



Testicular Carcinoma


Todd M. Blodgett, MD

Alex Ryan, MD

Carl Fuhrman, MD









Graphic shows a large heterogeneous testicular mass image, compatible with testicular carcinoma.






Axial CECT shows a near water density mass in the right scrotum image, a nonspecific finding that was diagnosed as testicular carcinoma.


TERMINOLOGY


Abbreviations and Synonyms



  • Germ cell tumors (GCT): 95% of testicular carcinomas


  • Non-germ cell tumors also referred to as



    • Gonadal stromal tumors


    • Interstitial cell tumors


    • Sex cord tumors


Definitions



  • Germ cell tumors (GCT): Malignancy arising from germ cell elements



    • Seminomas


    • Teratoma/teratocarcinoma (embryonal cell)


    • Choriocarcinoma


  • Non-germ cell tumors: Neoplasm arising from non-germ cell elements



    • Leydig cell tumors (LCT): From interstitial cells


    • Sertoli cell tumors (SCT): From sustentacular cells lining seminiferous tubules


    • Granulosa cell tumors: Rare, benign tumors


    • Gonadoblastomas: Contain both stromal and germ cell elements


IMAGING FINDINGS


General Features



  • Best diagnostic clue: Palpable, intratesticular, homogeneous or mixed consistency hypoechoic mass on US


  • Location



    • Germ cell tumors



      • Local: Testis, epididymis, spermatic cord


      • Regional: Retroperitoneal lymph nodes


      • Distant: Supradiaphragmatic nodes or visceral sites


      • Most common site of recurrence is retroperitoneum


    • Non-germ cell tumors: 90% local (benign), 10% metastasize


    • Rarely bilateral


  • Size: > 5 cm indicates high stage disease


  • Morphology



    • Germ cell tumors: Solid mass with internal heterogeneity


    • Non-germ cell tumors: Round, lobulated, well-circumscribed mass




      • Teratoma and choriocarcinoma often demonstrate calcification, necrosis, hemorrhage, and cystic elements


Imaging Recommendations



  • Best imaging tool



    • Ultrasonography to localize mass and determine internal structure


    • CT or MR for initial staging



      • For stage I, GCT CXR may be used at diagnosis and for follow-up


    • FDG PET/CT: Restaging and response to therapy


  • Protocol advice



    • High frequency linear array US including both testes


CT Findings



  • CT indicated for staging of metastasis in retroperitoneum, lymph nodes, and mediastinum/lungs



    • Insensitive for undiagnosed testicular lesions


    • Especially useful when metastatic disease in thorax is suspected


  • Lymphoma and metastatic testicular cancer may have similar appearance



    • Obtain tissue sample from abnormal testicle


  • Lymph nodes



    • Typical locations for malignant involvement include left renal hilus and retrocaval area


    • Low attenuation, poorly enhancing nodes in these regions suspicious even when small


  • Residual low attenuation masses after treatment



    • Lesions > 3 cm 4 weeks after chemotherapy have 30% chance of harboring viable tumor


    • Surgical resection recommended > 3 cm


  • Recurrence most common in retroperitoneum; CT may identify “growing teratoma” syndrome


Nuclear Medicine Findings



  • Initial diagnosis



    • Limited data on FDG PET evaluation of malignant non-germ cell tumors is available


    • Sensitivity/specificity for seminoma



      • FDG PET: 100% and 80%


      • CT: 74% and 70%


    • SUV > 3 used as cutoff for suspicion of malignancy in primary testicular tumor


  • Staging



    • For initial staging of testicular germ cell tumors, FDG PET offers no statistical advantage over CT


    • FDG PET demonstrates positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% and 62% in differentiating tumor from non-tumor lesions in patients with non-seminomatous GCT



      • Negative FDG PET studies may not exclude presence of disease (due largely to presence of teratoma)


      • Residual masses with negative FDG PET usually still require surgical resection


      • Additional FDG PET exams are without benefit in cases of elevated tumor markers and tumor progression diagnosed by CT


    • FDG PET useful for identifying stage IIA in clinical stage I non-seminomatous GCT patients


  • Restaging



    • Anterior mediastinum: Normal thymic uptake may be mistaken for disease recurrence


    • Tumor marker elevation in the absence of CT changes should prompt PET scan for possibility of salvage surgery


    • Overall, FDG PET is the best predictor of viable seminoma in residual masses after chemotherapy



      • Also useful in non-seminomatous GCT patients


      • Masses with residual malignancy may appear negative on PET 10-14 days after chemotherapy (“stunned” tumor)


    • Post-therapy non-seminomatous GCT



      • Difficult to differentiate mature teratoma from necrosis or scar


      • Both entities have low FDG uptake


      • Non-standard dynamic imaging: Kinetic parameter for FDG transport in mature teratoma higher than those for necrosis/scar


    • Longitudinal follow-up required for late relapse patients, even with negative FDG PET scan



    • In complicated multiple-relapse seminoma patients, use of FDG PET has been shown to change decision on therapy in 57% of cases


  • Response to therapy



    • FDG PET is the modality of choice for determining therapeutic response/restaging in malignant germ cell tumors



      • Best predictor of viable residual seminoma in post-chemotherapy masses


    • Negative FDG PET excludes presence of viable tumor for lesions > 3 cm



      • Sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 96%


      • Compares to 74%, 70%, 34%, 92% for CT


      • Lesions < 3 cm: Sensitivity/specificity 25% and 100%


    • FDG PET predicts response to therapy of germ cell tumors



      • Mean SUV of nonresponders: 2.7


      • Mean SUV of responders: 1.8


      • PPV/NPV of FDG PET in patients with raised tumor markers and negative CT: 92% and 50%


      • PPV/NPV for patients with residual mass: 96% and 90%


DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS


Focal Orchitis



  • FDG uptake due to infection/inflammation


  • Presents with pain/tenderness

Sep 22, 2016 | Posted by in MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | Comments Off on Testicular Carcinoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access