14 Developmental Venous Anomaly


14 Developmental Venous Anomaly

Emilio P. Supsupin Jr.

14.1 Introduction

Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are the most common vascular anomalies of the brain. They are most often discovered incidentally given the widespread use of MRI. Although they are rarely symptomatic, hemorrhage may occur, which was erroneously attributed to the DVA prior to the advent of MRI. It is now known that an associated cavernous malformation is the likely culprit for cerebral hemorrhage. Therefore, when hemorrhagic complications are encountered in the context of a known DVA, a thorough search for an associated cerebral cavernous malformation must be undertaken. The epidemiology, pathology, characteristic imaging features, and pertinent clinical issues including workup and management of DVAs are addressed.

14.2 Case Presentation

A 29-year-old Hispanic woman presented to a primary care clinic complaining of burning sensation to the right side of her head. The patient had no associated symptoms such as headaches, vision changes, or other neurologic complaints. On examination, she was neurologically intact. The patient was referred to our outpatient imaging facility.

14.3 Imaging Analysis

14.3.1 Imaging Findings

Initial postcontrast CT showed linear enhancing structures in the right frontal lobe (▶ Fig. 14.1). The smaller enhancing structures represented by dilated small veins are radially arranged and converge centripetally and drain into a larger venous structure (the “collector vein”; see ▶ Fig. 14.2). This pattern, described as the “caput medusae,” is the characteristic appearance of a DVA.

Fig. 14.1 Axial contrast-enhanced CT.
Fig. 14.2 (a) Postcontrast MRI depicting enhancing linear and curvilinear structures (i.e., dilated medullary venous radicles) converging into the collector vein (white arrow). There is normal intervening brain parenchyma between the dilated medullary veins. (b) Catheter angiogram demonstrating the caput medusae and collector vein (white arrow) with deep venous drainage into the Galenic system (black arrow). Medullary veins depend on the collector vein as they have lost their normal connections to the brain surface or ependyma. 1

No additional imaging was recommended in this case.

14.3.2 Impression

Typical developmental venous anomaly, also known as venous angioma.

14.4 Clinical Evaluation

No follow-up is recommended for an incidental, asymptomatic DVA without associated cavernous malformation.

14.5 Differential Diagnosis

None. The classic caput medusae pattern is diagnostic of a DVA. 2

14.5.1 Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Pearls

  • The caput medusae pattern is virtually diagnostic of a DVA. 2

  • DVAs are frequently incidental findings that are asymptomatic and follow a benign clinical course. 3

  • Prior to the advent of MRI, hemorrhage may have been wrongly attributed to DVAs. An associated vascular anomaly, most commonly a cavernous malformation, must be sought when hemorrhagic complications are seen.

  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) allows better visualization of DVAs without requiring contrast media 4 , 5 (▶ Fig. 14.3).

Fig. 14.3 Diagnostic value of SWI with its increased sensitivity in detecting DVAs (vs. other pulse sequences). Note that the collector vein (arrows) and draining venous radicles are much better visualized on SWI (a). These structures are barely visible on T1- and T2-weighted images (b, c), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (d), and Gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences (e). Although contrast-enhanced CT or MRI has been traditionally used as the gold standard in diagnosis, the increased sensitivity of SWI in detecting DVAs practically obviates the need for intravenous contrast.
Fig. 14.4 Companion case 1. Axial noncontrast head CT shows right parietal hemorrhage.

14.6 Essential Imaging Facts about DVAs

  • Perfusion imaging and pathophysiology:

    • Perfusion imaging allows qualitative and quantitative assessment of the flow characteristics throughout DVAs. 6

    • Venous congestion pattern is seen in larger DVAs with increased cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and mean transit time. 1 , 6 , 7

    • Abnormal perfusion parameters in some DVAs may indicate that they have less robust venous drainage capacity in comparison to normal brain. 7 , 8

    • DVAs may remain completely asymptomatic, suggesting that the diminished venous capacity is still sufficient to accommodate the physiologic needs of the territory drained. 8

    • Most importantly, the DVA drains normal brain and large venous infarctions often result from their surgical disruption. 7 Therefore, careful planning is needed when surgical intervention involves the territory of a DVA (i.e., cavernous malformation resection). 7

    • The term cerebral “developmental venous anomaly” was coined by Lasjaunias et al, 9 and it is recognized as a distinct clinical, radiological, and pathological entity. 10 , 11

    • DVA is a specific type of malformation of intracranial blood vessels that is composed exclusively of venous structures. 2 , 10 , 12

  • Conventional catheter angiography:

    • The diagnosis of DVAs has been historically based on their classic appearance on cerebral angiography. 1 , 13 , 14 “Caput medusae” describes a drainage pattern in which a myriad of small veins arising at the periphery converge into a larger central vein (the “collector vein”). 2 The collector vein follows a transcerebral course to reach a cortical surface, where it ascends to empty into larger cortical veins or a dural sinus. 2 , 14 Alternatively, the collector vein may drain into a subependymal vein in the wall of a lateral ventricle. 2

    • On angiogram, the dilated veins appear on the venous phase, and the collector vein persistently opacifies until the late venous phase. 11 , 14 , 15 DVA shows a normal circulation time and a normal arterial phase. 16

    • The majority of DVAs drain into the superficial venous system (70%), followed by deep drainage (20%), and less commonly a combination of both superficial and deep drainage. 9 , 11 , 17 They drain normal cerebral tissue within a functionally normal arterial territory. 9 , 16

    • Most importantly, DVAs are associated with absence of a venous pathway that would normally drain the territory. 9 , 16 , 18

  • On contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, DVAs appear as numerous linear and/or punctate enhancing foci converging on a well-delineated tubular collector. 1 , 7 , 11

14.7 Companion Cases

14.7.1 Companion Case 1

A 37-year-old man presented to the emergency center (EC) with headaches. On examination, the patient was neurologically intact with no focal deficits.

Imaging Findings

Initial noncontrast head CT in the EC revealed an acute parenchymal hematoma in the right parietal lobe with localized surrounding edema.

Additional Imaging in Companion Case 1

Further workup was undertaken to elucidate any underlying vascular etiology for the right parietal lobe hematoma. CT angiogram (CTA; ▶ Fig. 14.5a), MRI (▶ Fig. 14.5b), and catheter angiogram (▶ Fig. 14.6 and ▶ Fig. 14.7) were negative. However, an incidental DVA was found in the left frontal lobe, which did not have any associated parenchymal abnormality.

Fig. 14.5 Companion case 1. CTA (a) and postcontrast T1-weighted image from the brain MRI (b) show the classic “caput medusae” appearance of a DVA. There are multiple, radially arranged dilated small veins (arrowheads) that converge centripetally into the collector vein (arrows). Parenchymal hematoma is indicated by the asterisk.
Fig. 14.6 (a–c) Catheter angiogram from companion case 1 (lateral view of left internal carotid artery injection) showing opacification of the collector vein (arrows) during the early, mid, and late venous phases of injection. The collector vein appears in the early venous phase and is persistently opacified until the late venous phase. There are no enlarged feeding arteries. Circulation time is normal with no evidence of arteriovenous shunting.
Fig. 14.7 Companion case 1. Venous phase angiogram shows classic caput medusae pattern in a DVA with multiple small dilated veins (circle) converging centripetally into the collector vein (arrow).

Follow-up Imaging in Companion Case 1
Fig. 14.8 Companion case 1. Follow-up MRI was performed to ensure normal evolution of the hematoma. GRE sequence (a) depicting hypointense signal (circle) in the previous hemorrhage bed, reflecting hemosiderin staining. There is surrounding gliosis represented by T2 signal hyperintensities on FLAIR sequence (arrows in b). In this case, DVA was incidentally found and was unrelated to the patient’s clinical presentation. In this fairly young patient without prior neurologic symptoms and no history of coagulopathy, drug abuse, or evidence of vasculitis on angiogram, the most likely cause of symptomatic hemorrhage in the right parietal lobe was believed to be either a cavernous malformation or small arteriovenous malformation (AVM) that bled and was subsequently obliterated.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jun 28, 2020 | Posted by in NEUROLOGICAL IMAGING | Comments Off on 14 Developmental Venous Anomaly
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes