36

Case 36



Indication: Resistance in the right breast.


History: Unremarkable.


Risk profile: No increased risk.


Age: 39 years.


image


Fig. 36.1 Sonography of the right breast. Panoramic view.


image


Clinical Findings


Segmental resistance in the lower outer quadrant of the right breast.


image


Fig. 36.2a,b Sonography.


image


Fig. 36.3a,b Conventional mammography, CC view [imaging not performed by authors].


image


Fig. 36.4a,b Conventional mammography, MLO view [imaging not performed by authors].


image


image


image


Fig. 36.5a–c Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts.


image


Fig. 36.6a–c Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts.


image


Fig. 36.7 Contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Maximum intensity projection.











image


Please characterize ultrasound, mammography, and MRI findings.


What is your preliminary diagnosis?


What are your next steps?


This case illustrates the imaging of a symptomatic woman with a palpable segmental resistance of the right breast.


Ultrasound


In the same area as the palpable segmental mass, US demonstrated multiple round lesions of varying sizes, all with homogeneous internal echo pattern and well-defined margins. There were linear hypoechoic structures surrounding each lesion, denoting their intraductal position. US BI-RADS right 3.


Mammography


Mammograms demonstrated bilaterally, mainly symmetric, inhomogeneous dense tissue, ACR type 3. Positioning of the right breast was inadequate, but round lesions were visible in the lower outer quadrant. There were no densities or architectural distortions. There were no calcifications. BI-RADS right 3/left 1. PGMI:CC view G (nipple not in profile); MLO view I (inadequate positioning of the entire right breast; parenchyma superimposed over the nipple).


MR Mammography


MRI showed multiple hyperintense round lesions in a segmental orientation in the right breast, consistent with ultrasound and clinical findings. Postcontrast images verified a marked enhancement of the milk duct walls in this area, while the intraductal lesions showed no contrast uptake. These lesions were hypointense in T2-weighted images.


In this case a signal-time curve analysis was not performed, because the intraductal lesions showed no enhancement. It seemed more relevant to perform an accurate analysis of the structures’ signal across the different sequences.


 






















 


Signal of the intraductal “lesions”


T1-weighted imaging


hyperintense


T2-weighted imaging


hypointense


Enhancement (intraductal)


none


Enhancement (duct wall)


strong


 


image Differential Diagnostic Considerations


Intraductal blood pooling (Tl signal↑, T2 signal ↓)? Intraductal milk retention?


Stenosing milk duct near the nipple? Focal inflammation?


A malignant tumor can be excluded (no enhancement of the intraductal structures, T2 signal ↓).


 






























BI-RADS Categorization


Clinical Findings


right 4


left 1


Ultrasound


right 3


left 1


Mammography


right 3


left 1


MR Mammography


right 3


left 1


BI-RADS Total


right 3


left 1


 


Procedure


US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology to identify the intraductal process in the lower outer quadrant of the right breast.


Cytology of the right breast


Eosinophilic protein-rich precipitate incorporating copious fat. Also, signs of a focal granulomatous inflammation.


Further procedure


At the express wish of the young patient, a wait-and-see approach was followed and follow-up sonography was performed at intervals of 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The patient declined repeat mammography to obtain better-quality images of the right breast. Finding after 20 weeks: Complete resorption of the intraductal fluid.


image


Fig. 36.8 Segmental distribution of the changes in panoramic view.


image


Fig. 36.9 Viscous fluid in aspirated specimen from the right breast.


Sep 3, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on 36

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access