, Joon Woo Lee1 and Jong Won Kwon2



(1)
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Kyonggi-do, Republic of Korea

(2)
Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

 




Abstract

Some spinal disorders may be confused with other conditions presenting with similar imaging findings. This can be a cause of misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. In this chapter, we will present practical tips useful in the differentiation and correct diagnosis of 20 pairs of spinal disorders with similar imaging features.


Some spinal disorders may be confused with other conditions presenting with similar imaging findings. This can be a cause of misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. In this chapter, we will present practical tips useful in the differentiation and correct diagnosis of 20 pairs of spinal disorders with similar imaging features.


19.1 Introduction


Confusing spinal disorders are not uncommonly encountered in daily routine practice; reliably differentiating between real lesions and mimics, tumors and non-tumoral masses, as well as benign and malignant lesions is often challenging. For example, a herniated disk can mimic an epidural tumor such as a schwannoma, especially if the herniated disk is sequestered away from the parent disk and shows high T2-weighted signal with enhancement. Nonetheless, there are often useful imaging clues that allow for differentiation of these conditions.

In this chapter, we will describe practical tips helpful in the accurate diagnosis of the following potentially confusing spinal disorders: herniated disk versus schwannoma, spondylolytic versus degenerative spondylolisthesis, focal red marrow versus metastasis, postoperative scar versus recurrent disc herniation, benign osteoporotic vertebral fracture versus malignant vertebral fracture, os odontoideum versus odontoid process fracture, neurofibromatosis type 1 versus type 2, infectious spondylitis versus Modic type 1 endplate degenerative change, spinal cord herniation versus intradural arachnoid cyst, spinal arteriovenous fistula versus hypervascular tumor with intratumoral shunt, ankylosing spondylitis versus diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, pyogenic spondylitis versus tuberculous spondylitis, spinal cord tumor versus nonneoplastic myelopathy, acute transverse myelitis versus multiple sclerosis, ependymoma versus astrocytoma, schwannoma versus meningioma, chordoma versus giant cell tumor, vertebral hemangioma versus Paget’s disease, sacroiliitis of spondyloarthropathy versus osteitis condensans ilii, as well as sacral insufficiency fracture versus sacral osteomyelitis.


19.2 Herniated Disk (Sequestration) Versus Schwannoma

































 
Herniated disk (sequestration) (Fig. a, b)

Schwannoma (Fig. c, d)

Similarities

Epidural mass

Can be similar signal on T2-weighted image (high or low signal in both)

Can be enhanced

Differences

Peripheral enhancement (with inner T2-low-signal area)

Homogeneous enhancement

Inner low signal on T2-weighted image (common)

Peripheral enhancement (with inner T2-high signal)

Radial tear or protrusion in the near side of parent intervertebral disk

High signal on T2-weighted image (common)

Dumbbell shape, bone erosion


A307381_1_En_19_Figa_HTML.jpg


19.3 Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
































 
Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis (Fig. a, b)

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (Fig. c, d)

Similarities

Anterior displacement of vertebral body compared with vertebral body below

Foraminal stenosis

Differences

Central canal widening

Central canal narrowing

Non-displaced spinous process

Anteriorly displaced spinous process

Defect pars interarticularis

Intact pars interarticularis

Most common in L5–S1

Most common in L4–5


A307381_1_En_19_Figb_HTML.jpg


19.4 Focal Red Marrow Versus Metastasis































 
Focal red marrow (Fig. a, b)

Focal metastasis (Fig. c, d)

Similarities

Focal nodule

Lower signal on T1-weighted image than that of surrounding fatty marrow

Enhancement

Differences

Isointense or slightly hyperintense to the intervertebral disk on T1-weighted images

Hypointense to the intervertebral disk on T1-weighted images

Bright central area on T1-weighted images

No central fatty area

Patchy enhancement

Strong enhancement


A307381_1_En_19_Figc_HTML.jpg


19.5 Postoperative Scar Versus Recurrent Disk Herniation






























 
Postoperative scar (Fig. a, b)

Recurrent disk herniation (Fig. c, d)

Similarities

Space occupying lesion in the epidural space

Differences

Retraction of adjacent structures

Displaces or compresses adjacent structures

Homogeneous enhancement

Peripheral or no enhancement

Ill-defined margins

Well-defined margins

Discontinuity from the parent disk

Continuity with the parent disk


A307381_1_En_19_Figd_HTML.jpg


19.6 Benign Vertebral Fracture Versus Malignant Vertebral Fracture


























 
Benign vertebral fracture (Fig. a, b)

Malignant vertebral fracture (Fig. c, d)

Similarities

Vertebral compression or burst fracture without history of trauma or with minimal trauma

Differences

Preservation of normal bone marrow signal in the fractured vertebra

Bone marrow signal change involving the whole vertebral body

Mild low signal change in the vertebral body on T1-weighted images

Marked low T1 signal change in the vertebral body on T1-weighted images

Less intense bone marrow enhancement

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 28, 2017 | Posted by in NEUROLOGICAL IMAGING | Comments Off on

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access