73

Case 73



Indication: Screening.


History: Unremarkable.


Risk profile: No increased risk.


Age: 44 years.


image


Clinical Findings


Normal.


image


Fig. 73.1 Ultrasound.


image


Fig. 73.2 Color-coded Doppler sonography


image


Fig. 73.3a,b Digital mammography, CC view.


image


Fig. 73.4a,b Digital mammography, MLO view.


image


image


Fig. 73.5a–c Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts.


image


Fig. 73.6 Contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Maximum intensity projection.


image


Fig. 73.7a–c Enlarged view of lesion; signal-to-time curves.











image


Please characterize ultrasound, mammography, and MRI findings.


What is your preliminary diagnosis?


What are your next steps?


This case demonstrates the imaging in a screening situation of a young asymptomatic woman without increased risk profile.


Ultrasound


Within the upper inner quadrant of the left breast between the ventral edge of the parenchyma and the subcutaneous fatty tissue, ultrasound showed an irregular, hypoechoic lesion measuring 8 mm with inhomogeneous echo texture. There were signs of a slight distortion of ligamental structures. Moreover, the lesion showed marked internal signal increase in color-coded duplex sonography. US BI-RADS 4.


Mammography


Mammography showed bilaterally symmetric, extremely dense parenchyma, ACR type 4. Under these limiting conditions, there were no unusual findings, particularly in the inner quadrants of the left breast (the area of the sonographic findings). No densities, no lesions, no architectural distortions, and no microcalcifications were detected. BI-RADS right 1/left 1. PGMI: CC view P; MLO view G (inframammary fold).


MR Mammography


MRI depicted a single, ill-defined hypervascularized lesion in the upper inner quadrant of the left breast, consistent with the sonographic findings. There was a slight central reduction of signal and overall inhomogeneous enhancement (ring enhancement? septations?). The signal-time curves were non-specific.


MRI Artifact Category: 1


MRI Density Type: 1


 








































MRM score


Finding


Points


Shape


irregular


1


Border


ill-defined


1


CM Distribution


inhomogeneous


1


Initial Signal Intensity Increase


strong


2


Post-initial Signal Intensity Character


plateau


1


MRI score (points)


 


6


MRI BI-RADS


 


5


 


image Differential Diagnosis


Carcinoma, focal adenosis, papilloma, adenoma.


 






























BI-RADS Categorization


Clinical Findings


right 1


left 1


Ultrasound


right 1


left 4


Mammography


right 1


left 1


MR Mammography


right 1


left 5


BI-RADS Total


right 1


left 5


 


Procedure


Histopathological investigation with US-guided core biopsy (Fig. 73.8).


Histopathology


Fibrocystic mastopathy. Ductal hyperplasia. Focal apocrine metaplasia. No malignancy.


Procedure


With regard to the possibility of an inaccurate biopsy (sampling error), an additional biopsy was performed, this time an MR-guided vacuum biopsy, for further histological analysis (Fig. 73.9).


Histopathology


Fibrocystic mastopathy. Sclerosing adenosis with ductal and lobular hyperplasia. No malignancy. (Histopathological double reading.)


image


Fig. 73.8a,b US-guided core biopsy (pre-fire, post-fire)


image


Fig. 73.9a–d MR-guided vacuum biopsy (precontrast, subtraction after contrast administration, T1-weighted image after biopsy, and documentation of complete removal of the lesion after further contrast administration.


Sep 3, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on 73

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access