Central Architectural Distortion

23 Central Architectural Distortion


Case 23.1: Sclerosing Adenosis


Case History

A 71-year-old woman presents for screening mammogram.


Mammogram

• Architectural distortion (Fig. 23.1)


Physical Examination

• Normal exam


image


Fig. 23.1 In the upper outer quadrant of the right breast, there is architectural distortion (square). Focal increased density was demonstrated only on the CC view. (A) Right MLO mammogram. (B) Left MLO mammogram. (C) Right CC mammogram. (D) Left CC mammogram. (E) Right CC spot compression mammogram.


Ultrasound

Low Frequency (Fig. 23.2)


Frequency


• 7 MHz


Mass


• Margin: ill defined


• Echogenicity: hypoechoic


• Retrotumoral acoustic appearance: posterior shadowing distal to mass


• Shape: irregular


image


Fig. 23.2 Right antiradial breast sonogram. With lower frequency, the mammographic architectural distortion is an irregular hypoechoic mass with posterior acoustic shadowing.


High Frequency (Fig. 23.3)


Frequency


• 10 MHz


High-Frequency Findings


This case illustrates that weaker penetration with higher frequency causes increased shadowing with benign masses as well as malignant ones. In this case, lower frequency is more useful than high frequency to identify the location of the mass.


image


Fig. 23.3 Right antiradial breast sonogram. Higher-frequency examination produces extensive shadowing. The mass identified in Fig. 23.2 is hidden in the area of shadowing.


Pathology

• Sclerosing adenosis


Management

• BI-RADS assessment category 4, suspicious; biopsy should be considered.



Pearls and Pitfalls


• Sclerosing adenosis is present in 3.1% of breasts. This lesion may present as a palpable mass and is occasionally associated with tenderness.


• Mammographically, sclerosing adenosis produces architectural distortion with or without a focal mass and may simulate malignancy.


• Sonographically, sclerosing adenosis is an irregular hypoechoic mass that cannot be differentiated from malignancy.


Suggested Reading

Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching Atlas of Mammography. 3rd ed. New York: Thieme; 2001:2–3, 197


Tavassoli FA. Pathology of the Breast. 2nd ed. Stamford Appleton & Lange; 1999 130–133


Case 23.2: Radial Scar


Case History

A 58-year-old woman presents for screening mammogram.


Physical Examination

• Normal exam


Mammogram

• Architectural distortion (Fig. 23.4)


image


Fig. 23.4 In the left upper outer quadrant, there is a spiculated density on the MLO view, which is less apparent on the CC view. Area of architectural distortion is surrounded by a square. (A) Left MLO mammogram. (B) Left CC mammogram. (C) Left MLO spot compression mammogram. (D) Left CC spot compression mammogram.


Ultrasound

Frequency


• 7 MHz


Mass (Fig. 23.5)


• Margin: ill defined


• Echogenicity: hypoechoic


• Retrotumoral acoustic appearance severe shadowing, mass partially obscured


• Shape: irregular


image


Fig. 23.5 In the left upper outer quadrant, the mammographic architectural distortion corresponds to a lesion exhibiting severe shadowing. The lesion appears wide in the radial view (A) and narrow in the antiradial view (B). This extreme discrepancy in appearance is characteristic of either posttraumatic or radial scars. (A) Left radial breast sonogram. (B) Left antiradial breast sonogram.


Pathology

• Radial sclerosing lesion (radial scar)


Management

• BI-RADS assessment category 4, suspicious; biopsy should be considered.



Pearls and Pitfalls


• Clinically, radial scars are generally not palpable.


• Mammographically, radial scars commonly exhibit thin radiating lines without a central dense mass. The abnormality commonly changes appearance from one projection to another.


• Sonographically, radial scars are similar in appearance to surgically produced scars. Radial scars exhibit a large hypoechoic or shadowing area in one view and a thin abnormality in the orthogonal view. The sonographic appearance should not prevent biopsy and excision of this lesion because about one third of radial scars are associated with ductal carcinoma in situ or tubular carcinoma.


Suggested Reading

Evans AJ, Wilson ARM, Blamey RW, Robertson JFR, Ellis IO, Elston CW. Atlas of Breast Disease Management. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:94–97


Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching Atlas of Mammography. 3rd ed. New York: Thieme; 2001:93–96, 102–106


Case 23.3: Infiltrating Ductal


Case History

A 63-year-old woman presents with a palpable lump in the left breast.


Mammogram

Mass (Fig. 23.6)


• Margin: spiculated


• Shape: irregular


• Density: equal density


• Architectural distortion


Physical Examination

• Right breast normal


• Left breast palpable mass in upper outer quadrant


image


Fig. 23.6 In the upper outer left breast, there is a spiculated mass. (A) Right MLO mammogram. (B) Left MLO mammogram. (C) Right CC mammogram. (D) Left CC mammogram. (E) Left MLO spot compression mammogram. (F) Left CC spot compression mammogram.


Ultrasound

Frequency


• 7 MHz


Mass (Fig. 23.7)


• Margin: ill defined


• Echogenicity: hypoechoic


• Retrotumoral acoustic appearance severe shadowing, mass partially obscured


• Shape: irregular

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 24, 2015 | Posted by in BREAST IMAGING | Comments Off on Central Architectural Distortion

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access