Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Assessment and Differential Diagnosis

 

First decade, 1978–1987; 110 (12.8 %)

Second decade, 1988–1997; 376 (44.1 %)

Third decade, 1998–2007; 367 (43.1 %)

P value

Age (years)

46 ± 17

44 ± 15

45 ± 14

0.425

Male gender (%)

74

73

71

0.856

Familial IDCM (%)

12

18

15

0.197

Duration of HF (months ) [range]

2 [0–17]c

3 [0–13]e

0 [0–5]

<0.001 g

SBP (mmHg)

126 ± 14

124 ± 16e

127 ± 19

0.020

NYHA III–IV (%)

36c, d

23

25

0.029

Patients with previous episodes of HF (%)

87

79

66

<0.001

Anemiaa (%)

9

12

10

0.456

GFR ≤60 ml/min (%)

15

8

11

0.336

Sinus rhythm (%)

84

90

89

0.222

LBBB (%)

26

32

30

0.464

LVEF (%)

29 ± 9c

31 ± 11e

33 ± 11

<0.001

LVEDD-I (mm/m2)

39 ± 7c,d

37 ± 6e

34 ± 5

<0.001

LVEDV-I (ml/m2)

114 ± 60c

107 ± 41e

91 ± 34

<0.001

Restrictive filling pattern (%)
 
37e

17

<0.001 f

Moderate–severe MR (%)b
 
39

34

0.157f

Beta-blockers after first evaluation (%)

11c, d

82

86

<0.001

ACE inhibitors or ARBs after first evaluation (%)

34c, d

93

93

<0.001

Digitalis after first evaluation (%)

66c, d

79e

38

<0.001

Aldosterone antagonists after first evaluation (%)

8

5e

18

0.001

ICD implantation during follow-up (%)

1c, d

14

13

0.002

Time from diagnosis to implantation (months) [range]

268

129 [99–165]

22 [2–47]

<0.001 g

CRT implantation during follow-up (%)

0

6

6

0.301f

Time from diagnosis to implantation (months) [range]
 
151 [129–206]

23 [10–82]

<0.001 f, g


Bold data p values <0.05

ARBs angiotensin receptor blockers, BMI : body mass index, CRT cardiac resynchronization therapy, GFR glomerular filtration rate, HF heart failure, ICD implantable cardioverter defibrillator, IDCM idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, LBBB left bundle branch block, LVEDD-I indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEDV-I indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MR mitral regurgitation, SBP systolic blood pressure

aAnemia: hemoglobin <13 g/dl for males, <12 g/dl for females

bMR with a jet area >4 cm2 at color Doppler was classified as moderate or severe

c P < 0.05 between first and third decades

d P < 0.05 between first and second decades

e P < 0.05 between second and third decades

f P value computed only between second and third decades

gKruskal–Wallis p value





4.4 Diagnostic Criteria


After clinical suspicion or screening, DCM is diagnosed by demonstration at imaging (typically 2D echocardiography) of LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction after excluding specific causes sufficient to determine the degree of myocardial dysfunction and dilatation, such as systemic arterial hypertension (>160/100 mmHg), coronary heart disease (stenosis >50 % of the luminal diameter in a major branch), chronic excessive alcohol consumption (>100 g/day), rapid and sustained supraventricular arrhythmias, systemic diseases, pericardial diseases, congenital heart diseases, and cor pulmonale. Clinical examination, electrocardiography (ECG) and chest X-ray radiography are not specific for DCM, whereas on echocardiography, it is possible to evaluate disease criteria.

In 1999 a collaborative European study proposed a standardization of diagnostic criteria and methods of enrollment in familial DCM. Inclusion criteria were a LV ejection fraction (EF) <45 % documented at 2D echocardiography or angiography and/or a fractional shortening <25 % at M-mode echocardiography and an LV end-diastolic diameter >117 % of the predicted value corrected for age and body surface area (BSA). Familial DCM was diagnosed in the presence of two or more affected individuals in a single family or in the presence of a first-degree relative of a DCM patient, with well-documented, unexplained SD at <35 years of age. Moreover, major and minor criteria were formulated to distinguish affected, possibly affected, and nonaffected family members (Table 4.2) [5].


Table 4.2
Major and minor criteria for diagnosing DCM


































Major criteria

1

LVEF 45 % (>2 SD) and/or FS <25 % (>2 SD), as ascertained by echocardiography, radionuclide scanning or angiography

2

LVEDD >117 % of the predicted value corrected for age and body surface area, which corresponds to 2 SD of the predicted normal limit +5 %

Minor criteria

1

Unexplained supraventricular (atrial fibrillation or sustained arrhythmias) or ventricular arrhythmias, frequent (>1,000 . 24 h−1) or repetitive (three or more beats with >120 beats/min−1) before the age of 50

2

LVEDD >112 % of predicted value

3

Left ventricular dysfunction: LVEF <50 % or FS <28 %

4

Unexplained conduction disease: 2 or 3 atrioventricular conduction defects, complete LVBBB, sinus nodal dysfunction

5

Unexplained sudden death or stroke before 50 years of age

6

Segmental wall-motion abnormalities (<1 segment, or 1 if not previously present) in the absence of intraventricular conduction defect or ischemic heart disease


Adapted from Mestroni et al. [5]

DCM dilated cardiomyopathy, SD standard deviation, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, FS fractional shortening, LVBBB left ventricular bundle branch block


4.5 Prognostic Stratification and Therapy


Prognosis of patients with DCM has significantly improved compared to the past, when ~50 % of affected patients died within 2 years of diagnosis [6]. In the last decade, in particular, an 8-year survival rate of >85 % was estimated in DCM, with an incidence of fewer than two major events per 100 patients per year, significantly higher than in the previous two decades [3] (Table 4.3). Many factors contributed to the improvement during this time. First is earlier diagnosis, especially when the disease is diagnosed while still in the asymptomatic phase [7]. In this sense, familial screening is an important instrument for the early diagnosis of DCM in asymptomatic patients and can impact long-term survival [4]. Therefore, a systematic familial screening with clinical interview, physical examination, ECG, and echocardiography should be performed on all probands (even in sporadic cases) and their first-degree relatives from puberty to 50 years of age.


Table 4.3
Occurrence of major events in the study population according to decade of enrolment in the Heart Muscle Diseases Registry of Trieste















Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 14, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING | Comments Off on Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Assessment and Differential Diagnosis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
 
First decade, 1978–1987; 110 patients

Second decade, 1988–1997; 376 patients

Third decade, 1998–2007; 367 patients