Don t touch lesions

CHAPTER 4


“Don’t touch” lesions


Skeletal “don’t touch” lesions are those processes that are so radiographically characteristic that a biopsy or additional diagnostic tests are unnecessary. Not only does the biopsy result in unnecessary morbidity and cost, but in some instances a biopsy can be frankly misleading and lead to additional unnecessary surgery.


Most of our radiology training teaches us to give a differential diagnosis of a lesion, leaving it up to the clinician to decide between the various entities. For the don’t touch lesions, however, a differential list is inappropriate, because that often makes the next step on the decision tree a biopsy. Because a biopsy of these lesions is not required for a final diagnosis, a radiologic diagnosis should be made without a list of differential possibilities. Don’t touch lesions can be classified into three categories: (1) posttraumatic lesions, (2) normal variants, and (3) real but obviously benign lesions.



Posttraumatic lesions


Myositis ossificans is an example of a lesion on which a biopsy should not be performed because its aggressive histologic appearance can often mimic a sarcoma. Unfortunately, radical surgery has been performed based on the histologic appearance of myositis ossificans when the radiologic appearance was diagnostic. The typical radiologic appearance of myositis ossificans is circumferential calcification with a lucent center (Figure 4-1). This is often best appreciated on computed tomography (CT) examination (Figure 4-2). A malignant tumor that mimics myositis ossificans will have an ill-defined periphery and a calcified or ossific center (Figure 4-3). Periosteal reaction can be seen with myositis ossificans or with a tumor. Occasionally the peripheral calcification of myositis ossificans can be difficult to appreciate; in such cases a CT scan or delayed films a week or two later are recommended. Biopsy should be avoided when myositis ossificans is a clinical consideration. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in myositis ossificans can be misleading because the peripheral calcification may not be conspicuous and often has marked soft tissue edema surrounding it (Figure 4-4).






Another posttraumatic entity in which a biopsy can be misleading is an avulsion injury. These injuries can have an aggressive radiographic appearance, but because of their characteristic location at insertion sites (e.g., anteroinferior iliac spine or ischial tuberosity), they should be recognized as benign (Figures 4-5 and 4-6). Again, delayed films of several weeks will usually allow the problem case to become more radiographically and clinically clear. Biopsy can lead to the mistaken diagnosis of a sarcoma and should therefore be avoided. Any area that is undergoing healing can have a high nuclear-chromatin ratio and a high mitotic figure count, thereby occasionally simulating a malignancy.




A cortical desmoid is a process considered by many to be an avulsion off the medial supracondylar ridge of the distal femur. It occasionally simulates an aggressive lesion radiographically and on biopsy can look malignant.1 In many instances biopsy has led to amputation for this benign, radiographically characteristic lesion (Figures 4-7 and 4-8). Cortical desmoids occur only on the posteromedial epicondyle of the femur. They may or may not be associated with pain and can have increased radionuclide uptake on bone scan. They may or may not exhibit periosteal new bone and usually occur in young people. Biopsy should be avoided in all cases. They are often seen as incidental findings on MRI and have a characteristic appearance (Figure 4-9).





Trauma can lead to large cystic geodes or subchondral cysts near joints that can be mistaken for other lytic lesions, and thus a biopsy is performed. Although the biopsy specimen is not likely to mimic a malignant process, it is nevertheless avoidable. Because geodes from degenerative disease almost always are associated with additional findings, such as joint space narrowing, sclerosis, and osteophytes, a diagnosis should be made radiographically (Figures 4-10 and 4-11). However, on occasion the additional findings are subtle and can be missed (Figure 4-12). Geodes can also occur in the setting of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal disease (also known as CPPD or pseudogout), rheumatoid arthritis, and avascular necrosis.2





An entity that is often confused with metastatic disease to the spine is discogenic vertebral disease. It can mimic metastatic disease radiographically and clinically, and unless the radiologist is familiar with this process, it can lead to an unnecessary biopsy.3,4 Discogenic vertebral disease most often is sclerotic and focal (Figure 4-13). It is adjacent to an end-plate, and the associated disc space should be narrow. Osteophytosis is invariably present. It represents a variant of a Schmorl’s node and should not be confused with a metastatic focus. On occasion it can be lytic or even mixed lytic-sclerotic. The typical clinical presentation is a middle-aged woman with chronic low back pain. Old films often confirm the benign nature of this process. In the setting of disc space narrowing and osteophytosis, a biopsy of focal sclerosis adjacent to an end-plate should not be performed.



Occasionally a fracture will be the cause of extensive osteosclerosis and periostitis, which can mimic a primary bone tumor (Figure 4-14). Lack of immobilization can result in exuberant callus, which can be misinterpreted as aggressive periostitis or even tumor new bone. Biopsy results in such a case might resemble those of a malignant lesion. Therefore any case associated with trauma should be carefully reviewed for a fracture.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 17, 2016 | Posted by in MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING | Comments Off on Don t touch lesions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access