Fluoroscopic Techniques/Procedural Pearls

Chapter 3 Fluoroscopic Techniques/Procedural Pearls



The following fluoroscopic techniques will help to optimize the visualization of key bony landmarks when positioning the needle to reach a specific target.


Note: Please see page ii for a list of anatomical terms/abbreviations used in this book.





Confirming the Level



Lumbosacral


For a patient with normal spinal segmentation, identify the level in the anteroposterior (AP) view by counting cephalad from the sacrum; this is similar to the process of reading an MRI. In up to 15% of the population,1 a transitional segment may occur. Transitional segments are typically described as involving the lumbarization of the first sacral segment or the sacralization of the fifth lumbar segment. Rarely patients will have six lumbar vertebrae, although some consider these to be lumbarized S1 segments, because an L6 spinal nerve is typically not described. In fact, one study showed that L6 segments do indeed behave like S1 segments; in patients with only four lumbar vertebrae, the inferior-most lumbar segment, L4, behaves like an L5.2 This suggests that extra or missing ribs may add to counting confusion. Similarly, some patients may have aberrant segmentation of the cervicothoracic junction, the thoracolumbar junction, or both. Therefore, if a transitional segment is suspected, an MRI scout image is recommended for the purpose of counting caudad from C2 to the lumbosacral junction.3


Ultimately, it is most important to correlate the patient’s clinical symptoms with the pathoanatomy visualized on the imaging that is obtained. Subsequently, images obtained during the procedure need be correlated with the same visualized pathoanatomy. For example, if a patient has right L5 or S1 symptoms and if the MRI suggests the sacralization of L5, an extrusion at L5-S1, and foraminal narrowing at L5, the key concept is to correlate the fluoroscopic lateral image with the sagittal MRI so that the proper levels are injected (Figure 3–5). Often practitioners will focus unnecessarily on the lumbar numbering (i.e., counting caudad from T12 rather than counting cephalad from the sacrum) instead of simply correlating the available imaging (i.e., the sagittal MRI and the lateral fluoroscopic imaging). It is imperative that the presence of the transitional segment is well communicated and documented so that all treating physicians are using the same terminology.






“True” Anteroposterior View


Each segment is not necessarily aligned with the others as a result of normal anatomy (i.e., lordosis, suboptimal positioning on the table), pathology (i.e., lateral or rotary scoliosis), or both. To optimize the efficiency and safety of a procedure, the proper obliquing and tilting of the C-arm to obtain a “true” AP view of the segment being investigated or treated is recommended. If the oblique adjustment of the C-arm is required to obtain a “true” AP view, geometry dictates that a similar adjustment will be required to obtain a “true” lateral view (see “True” Lateral View, later).




Tilt the C-Arm to Optimize the “True” Anteroposterior View


The vertebral body endplates, which are also known as the ring apophyses, cover both the superior and inferior horizontal surfaces of the vertebral body. The lining up of the vertebral body endplates is an important technique for obtaining a clear and direct view of the target region for many procedures. For example, when performing discography, the trajectory view requires direct parallel visualization of the endplates. This fluoroscopic view is obtained with the cephalad or caudad tilt of the C-arm image intensifier. This optimizes the superior endplate of the inferior vertebral body, which is visualized as a solid horizontal line rather than as an ellipse (Figure 3–8).




“True” Lateral View


Each segment is not necessarily aligned with the others as a result of normal anatomy (i.e., lordosis, suboptimal positioning on the table), pathology (i.e., lateral or rotary scoliosis), or both. To optimize the efficiency and safety of a procedure, the C-arm’s oblique and wig-wag (swivel) features should be used to obtain a “true” lateral view of the segment that is being investigated or treated.



Oblique the C-Arm to Optimize the “True” Lateral View


The C-arm should be obliqued 90 degrees from the angle at which the “true” AP view was obtained. The table may need to be laterally tilted to accommodate angles that cannot be obtained with the C-arm obliquity. When patients have multiple levels to be treated, the “true” lateral view should ideally be obtained for each respective level.


For the cervical spine, a “true” lateral view may be obtained by lining up the lateral masses. If the patient is prone or supine, this is accomplished with the use of the wig-wag, and it may require additional obliquing of the C-arm or the table. If the patient is in a side-lying position, this is accomplished by tilting and occasional additional obliquing. Sometimes each level must be lined up individually (Figure 3–9).



For the thoracic spine, a “true” lateral view may be obtained by lining up the ribs (Figure 3–10).



For a patient with scoliosis, the lateral view is obtained by obliquing the C-arm 90 degrees from the angle that was used to best visualize the AP view (Figure 3–11).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 23, 2015 | Posted by in INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Fluoroscopic Techniques/Procedural Pearls

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access