Sino-Nasal, Oral, Larynx and Pharynx Cancers

Chapter 22 Sino-Nasal, Oral, Larynx and Pharynx Cancers




Chapter contents



Nasopharynx

















Nose and nasal cavity

















Paranasal sinus tumours
















Lip and oral cavity carcinoma
















Oropharyngeal carcinoma

















Larynx



















Hypopharyngeal carcinoma














Results


Further reading



Nasopharynx






Aetiology, pathology and lymphatic spread


Squamous cell carcinomas comprise the commonest histological type. They may be subdivided into well to poorly differentiated types, those with a heavy lymphatic infiltrate (‘lymphoepithelioma’), transitional cell tumours and keratinizing and non-keratinizing types. The WHO usefully classifies nasopharyngeal tumours as follows:













Type 1 Well-differentiated keratinizing type
Type 2 Moderately-differentiated non-keratinizing type
Type 3 Undifferentiated type typically with an extensive lymphocytic infiltrate.

The presence of keratin (i.e. type 1) is associated with local infiltration while type 3 tumours tend to disseminate widely.


NPC is associated with infection with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). EBV DNA is incorporated into the tumour genome. Antibodies to EBV (IgG and IgA) precede tumour development by several years and the antibody titer is correlated with tumour burden, remission and recurrence. A practical point is the detection of EBV genomic material in the biopsies from neck lymph node metastases from an apparent unknown primary may point to the origin in the nasopharynx. Infection with EBV is common and is the cause of glandular fever. In Hong Kong, almost all children aged 10 years have been infected by the virus. Even in Hong Kong, only a small minority develop NPC. Genetic and dietary factors seem important in tumour development. Searches for genes conferring susceptibility to NPC have focused on human leukocytes antigen (HLA) genes. The genes encode proteins required for viral lysis.


Three HLA alleles have a consistent association with an increased risk of NPC in South Chinese and other Asian populations. They are HLA-A2, B46 and B17. Dietary factors are also important, including eating salt dried fish (containing carcinogenic nitrosamines) and lack of fresh fruit and vegetables (lack of antioxidants).


While squamous cell carcinomas form the majority of nasopharyngeal cancers, other pathologies are recognized in this region. These include adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and lymphoma. Treatment may vary according to the tumour type according to the propensity for nodal spread and response to radiation, though the principles of technique as described here can still broadly be applied.


It is because of the rich lymphatic supply that these tumours commonly spread and, indeed, present with neck nodes. This spread may be bilateral but the distribution is dissimilar to other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and is reflected in the TNM classification outlined earlier. Seventy to 90% of cases have nodes at some point. Levels 1A/B are rarely involved while levels 2 and 5 (the post-cervical chain) can be considered the first echelon nodes for this tumour site.


Nasopharyngeal cancers have a high propensity for distal haematogenous spread and, as a consequence, distal failure. This is generally unlike other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas where locoregional control is the barrier to success (though the more aggressive treatments are starting to alter this pattern).





Treatment


The relative inaccessible nature of the primary tumour and frequent involvement of Rouviere’s node dictates that radiation therapy is the main modality for treatment. In addition and unlike other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, the presence of substantial neck nodes should not lead to initial surgical excision as they generally respond well to radiation therapy. Any nodes that have failed to respond adequately or at recurrence can, provided the primary disease is controlled, then be managed by an appropriate neck dissection.


Prior to radiation therapy, a thorough dental assessment is mandatory with essential treatment performed as necessary.


Small tumours of the nasopharynx can be adequately treated with radiation alone. However, the majority should, co-morbidity permitting, be managed with concurrent chemoradiation. The nasopharynx is the one head and neck site where concurrent chemoradiation has been more readily adopted internationally due in part to the intergroup 0099 study. This study compared concurrent chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone and showed a significant advantage in survival with the combined modality approach. The control arm was particularly inferior, however, when compared with other studies. Further studies and a recent meta-analysis specifically of nasopharyngeal cancers have, however, supported the concurrent chemoradiation approach. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may result in useful reduction of the primary and/or nodal disease. A major problem in delivering adjuvant chemotherapy is the poor compliance following definitive therapy. Research from Taiwan suggests that adjuvant treatment after concomitant chemoradiotherapy may only be necessary for patients with a high chance of developing metastatic disease. This includes patients with a single lymph node >6   cm, multiple nodes over >4   cm or supraclavicular nodes. The most frequently used regimen is cisplatin (100   mg/m2 or 20   mg/m2 for 5 days) plus 5-fluorouracil (400–100   mg/m2 daily by infusion for up to 4 days). This is repeated at 3–4 weekly intervals during radiotherapy.



Radiation technique (Figures evolve 22.3–22.8 image for NPC section)


The technique of Ho forms the basis of the 2-dimensional approach to treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment fields are precisely defined according to local staging. Determination of the primary clinical target volume is now very much individualized based on all clinical information available allowing for a more conformal 3-dimensional approach. The pattern of spread outlined earlier dictates that the whole cervical lymphatic chain should be outlined and treated as routine, though doses prescribed will be determined by whether they are overtly involved and proximal to the primary site or more distal and clinically uninvolved. In other words, even in early cases, at least prophylactic doses of radiation should be given to the nodes.


A full head and neck immobilization device is mandatory with the shoulders kept well down. A tongue depressor is frequently utilized but a drop in jaw position might negate the perceived benefits of this technique in sparing the oral cavity. A single shell is preferred throughout the treatment with the degree of neck extension optimized at the outset.


Except in the case of intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques, a multiple phase technique will be utilized to treat the primary disease and involved nodes using parallel-opposed fields. The lower cervical nodes will be treated by an anterior (or anterior-posterior (AP) depending on the location of nodes in the AP plane) field matched on preferably by the mono-isocentric technique. As a general rule, matching of fields should not occur at sites of gross disease but this may not be practical in nasopharyngeal cancers.


Where the primary tumour is relatively small (T1, T2), it might be practical to irradiate it as a final phase with a three-field technique thereby sparing some of the laterally placed normal structures from the maximum intended dose. Alternatively, and according to available expertise, intracavity, stereotactic radiosurgery or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may facilitate dose escalation at the site of gross disease with improved local control.



Complications


The significant volumes of normal tissue ordinarily irradiated can give rise to a range of long-term sequelae.


Irradiation of major aspects of the salivary tissue will lead to chronic xerostomia. The technique of IMRT may facilitate less of an impact here, though care will need to be taken in underdosing any adjacent diseased lymph nodes. In practice, it may be prudent to spare only the superficial parotid glands bilaterally even using IMRT.


High doses of radiation may be delivered to a substantial component of the mandible, particularly when using the parallel-opposed technique and where there are involved nodes. As a consequence, treatment risks osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and preventive measures beyond meticulous radiation technique should be adopted. Moreover, the proximity of the pterygoid muscles to the primary target volume will give rise to trismus and jaw exercises should be encouraged to minimize this.


Endocrine failure due to irradiation of the pituitary and thyroid glands, though relatively easy to treat, is a not uncommon outcome in long-term survivors and should be actively sought through routine testing in the follow up of these patients.


Advanced tumours with extension into the skull base introduce additional tissues exposed to the high doses of radiation that will be necessary to achieve local control. Aspects of the temporal lobes, optic nerves and chiasm, middle and inner ear will be irradiated and, as a consequence, are at risk of late neurological damage. The addition of chemotherapy may add to this toxicity. In all cases, the brainstem and spinal cord are organs of risk and prescribed doses should not exceed an agreed tolerance dose. The complex interrelationship with such a range of normal tissues mandates a meticulous radiation technique to minimize these complications. The technique of IMRT lends itself to such a site but does not obviate the need for precise target volume delineation. Results using IMRT demonstrate superior coverage of advanced tumours and an improvement in disease control.


The undifferentiated type of nasopharyngeal cancer is rather more radiosensitive and, as such, slightly lower doses may be delivered with a consequent lessening effect on late sequelae.




Nose and nasal cavity



Anatomy


The external nose is like the tip of an iceberg with a complex array of passageways and air cavities within it that form the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The hair-bearing entrance that forms the vestibule and the mucociliary escalator provides an important initial defence against the inhalation of germs (Figure 22.9).



The nasal vestibule lies within the aperture of the nostril. It is bounded laterally by cartilage that forms the nasal ala, medially by cartilage that forms the columella and inferiorly by the most anterior portion of the floor of the nose. Importantly, this area is lined by squamous epithelium as an extension from the outside skin.


The nasal cavity or nasal fossa proper lies between the maxillary sinus inferiorly and the eyes and ethmoidal sinus superiorly. It is divided into two by a midline cartilaginous septum.













Treatment (see Figures evolve 22.10–22.14 image)


Small tumours of the vestibule can be managed by either surgery or radiotherapy. The choice will in part be based on the expected cosmetic outcome.


More advanced tumours of the vestibule or those of the nasal fossa proper will usually require surgical clearance often followed by radiotherapy, especially if it is a squamous cell carcinoma in view of the propensity for bone invasion. Lymphomas and plasmacytomas can be managed by primary radiotherapy at appropriate doses with or without the addition of chemotherapy.


Inoperable nasal cavity tumours should be managed by combined chemoradiation according to the co-morbidity of the patient.



Radiotherapy technique


Tumours of the vestibule and low anterior nasal fossa tumours may be treated by a direct anterior appositional electron beam, implantation with iridium wires, direct lateral photons or an anterior oblique wedged pair field arrangement (Figure evolve 22.15 image). The choice will be dictated by the extent of the clinical target volume (CTV) and the physical constraints of the particular modality as well as local expertise. The relatively superficial nature of these tumours and the shape that presents dosimetry problems usually dictates the need for some bolus material on the skin surface when using external beam treatment. The facial lymphatics may be included as a separate target volume and treated prophylactically using separate electron fields.


More advanced tumours and those within the nasal fossa proper frequently require an approach similar to that used for maxillary sinus tumours. Here, a midline anterior and two lateral photons are used to cover adequately the defined target volume or ideally IMRT. The reader is referred to this later section for more details.


CT planning for all but the most superficial tumours facilitates accurate tumour definition and normal tissue avoidance. The true CTV may extend much more posteriorly than initially envisaged and therefore needs to be delineated with precision.


As with all head and neck tumours, good immobilization is required. A mouthbite is used to move the tongue away from the treatment volume. For superficial tumours treated by electrons, this may also facilitate the placement of lead material for shielding and wax bolus for the anterior wedge photon technique.





Paranasal sinus tumours



Anatomy (Figure 22.16)


The paranasal sinuses comprise four pairs of linked hollow cavities within the anterior and mid-portions of the skull that link to the nasal cavity. They are named according to the bone within which they lie. The purpose of the paranasal sinuses is to lighten the bone and give resonance to the voice.









Staging system for paranasal sinus tumours


The TNM system as described here is only applicable to maxillary sinus tumours. The ethmoidal sinuses are classified separately. There is no formal system that applies to tumours of the sphenoidal and frontal sinuses. The N component is as elsewhere for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.




























  Maxillary sinus Ethmoidal sinus
T1 Mucosa only One subsite
T2 Bone erosion/destruction (not posteriorly) Two subsites
T3 Bone erosion/destruction (if posteriorly), involvement of the subcutaneous tissues floor and medial wall of the orbit, pterygoid fossa and ethmoid sinus Involvement of the medial wall and floor of the orbit, maxillary sinus, cribriform plate
T4A Involvement of the anterior orbital contents, skin of the cheek, pterygoid plates, infra-temporal fossa, cribriform plate, sphenoidal or frontal sinuses As maxillary sinus
T4B Involvement of the orbital apex, dura, brain, middle cranial fossa, cranial nerves (excluding the second division of the Vth cranial nerve), nasopharynx or clivus As maxillary sinus

Though it does not form part of the TNM staging system, division of maxillary sinus lesions into those arising from the infrastructure, that is anteroinferiorly, from lesions arising from the suprastructure which lie superoposteriorly is potentially useful. This division arises from a theoretical line drawn from the medial canthus to the angle of the mandible in a lateral plane (Ohngren’s line) (Figure 22.17).




Mar 7, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Sino-Nasal, Oral, Larynx and Pharynx Cancers

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access