Diagnosis

The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolus (PE) can be difficult because of the wide range of presenting signs and symptoms as well as the limitations of available diagnostic tests. Although correct identification and prompt treatment can significantly improve mortality rates (from approximately 30% to 10%) and help prevent recurrence, treatment regimens also expose patients to potential harm.

It is important to understand the tests used to diagnose PE. The accuracy of any test depends not only on its sensitivity and specificity but also on pretest probabilities according to principles of Bayes’ theorem (i.e., a positive test result is more likely a true positive if pretest suspicion is high, but the likelihood dramatically drops if suspicion is low). Therefore referring physicians should perform patient risk stratification to assess the overall likelihood of PE before ordering an extensive workup using validated criteria, such as the Modified Wells Scoring System ( Table 7.1 ), which objectively assign points based on patient history, symptoms, and physical findings.

Patients are at greatest risk of a pulmonary embolus from immobilization, recent surgery, and hypercoagulable states. The chance of PE is also significantly increased with a history of prior PE and in the presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Among patients with symptomatic DVT, 30% to 50% result in a PE, and 70% to 90% of patients with PE have had a DVT. Pregnancy and hormone use are more moderate risk factors.

Chest radiographs are frequently ordered and often identify other causes for the patient’s symptoms. However, findings from a PE are highly variable ( Box 7.1 ). Serum D-dimer is sensitive but nonspecific. Doppler ultrasound is an excellent way to noninvasively diagnose venous thrombosis in the lower extremities, making it a frequent component in the workup of possible PE. Further testing beyond these examinations depends on the level of clinical suspicion.

The historical imaging gold standard, pulmonary angiography, is very rarely performed today. It is not only invasive but also requires significant facility resources and may not visualize chronic emboli. In recent years, multislice computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has become the dominant imaging tool for definitive PE diagnosis. As its use has dramatically escalated, there has been a corresponding significant increase in PE diagnosis. Despite this trend, mortality from PE has not substantially decreased, suggesting that many emboli now found are actually of little or no clinical significance. The potential risks of ionizing radiation exposure from this often-overutilized procedure have also been in the spotlight recently, and the scans themselves may be limited by insufficient contrast bolus density and patient motion. Some patients may not be able to undergo CTPA due to contraindications such as iodinated contrast allergy or poor renal function.

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images the vasculature without ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast. Obtaining diagnostic-quality images in a reasonable amount of time is a significant challenge associated with this modality, although many improvements have occurred in recent years. Some experienced centers now report excellent results, with only a small percentage of inadequate examinations. Demand will likely continue growing, in part because of American College of Radiology (ACR) Contrast Manual guideline changes in 2017 supporting the use of group II gadolinium-based contrast agents (e.g., gadoteridol [ProHance]) in cases of decreased renal function. However, at present, MRA is not routinely used in most practices.

Although technical advances have led to a marked increase in CTPA and MRA utilization, the nuclear medicine VQ lung scan remains an important tool. It is particularly useful in patients who cannot tolerate intravenous contrast, have renal dysfunction, or in whom an adequate CTPA or MRA examination could not be obtained. It frequently provides a definitive answer while minimizing radiation to the patient.

VQ interpretation may seem challenging at first and requires a solid understanding of lung anatomy and physiology as well as of standardized interpretation criteria. Imaging equipment and ventilation agents have improved over the years, and techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and single-photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) are reported to improve VQ accuracy. Although the general impression is that CTPA offers greater accuracy over VQ, investigations directly comparing CTPA and VQ have found little or no difference in accuracy or patient outcomes between the two.

Perfusion: Tc-99m MAA

Technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) is the only lung-perfusion agent clinically available in the United States. Radiolabeled particles must be larger than the red blood cells so that they will be trapped in the lungs on the first pass but should not be so large that they lodge centrally. Although MAA particles range in size from 5 to 100 μm, 60% to 80% of the particles are between 20 and 80 μm. Once in the lung, particles gradually degrade and are phagocytized with a biological half-life (T _½ ) of 2 to 3 hours.

Considerations for Tc-99m MAA particle administration are listed in Box 7.4 . In adults, 200,000 to 600,000 particles are typically used (100,000 minimum to maintain image quality). This obstructs only a small fraction of vessels and should result in no ill effects. However, in some situations, particle-number reduction is recommended to ensure safety. In children, modifications are usually done as a reflection of age or weight. In pregnancy, the particles are limited to the minimum. Particle numbers are also decreased in pulmonary hypertension and in right-to-left cardiac shunts. Although it may seem alarming that particles will occlude capillaries in the brain and other organs in such shunts, Tc-99m MAA has long been used to actually calculate cardiac shunts without significant problem.

Ventilation Agents

A comparison of ventilation radiopharmaceuticals is listed in Table 7.2 . Of these, two aerosols are the most commonly used currently: Tc-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99m DTPA) in the United States and Tc-99m Technegas (Cyclomedica) in Europe and Australia. Tc-99m Technegas images are generally superior; however, approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been delayed for years in the United States. Although krypton-81 (Kr-81) gas may be used in some sites outside the United States, Xe-133 is the only gas ventilation available currently for routine clinical use in the United States.

Xe-133

Gas ventilation agents disperse more easily in the lungs than Tc-99m DTPA aerosol, allowing for superior images in cases where airflow is abnormal. Xe-133 gas is fat soluble, moving from the lung into blood and tissues. As it recirculates, gas exchange allows rapid clearance from the body with a 30- to 45-second biologic T _½ . The ability to image washout significantly increases the sensitivity for air trapping in obstructive lung disease, improving overall examination specificity ( Fig. 7.5 ) . However, the low photopeak of 81 keV leads to lower-quality images from greater soft tissue attenuation and scatter. It is also sometimes difficult to tell if perfusion defects are matched because the views obtained before washout are limited. Because most PEs occur in the lower lobes, ventilation was usually done only posteriorly in the past, whereas perfusion could be visualized in multiple projections. The wide availability of two-headed cameras today has resulted in more flexibility, and some systems allow simultaneous imaging in the left posterior oblique (LPO) and right posterior oblique (RPO) projections, thereby visualizing three pleural surfaces of each lung . Rooms used for Xe-133 are equipped with a special xenon trap (a system of shielded charcoal filters and tubing that retains the gas until safely decayed), and scanning is performed in a negative-pressure room with a ventilation system that rapidly clears the radioactive gas to the outside.

Matched ventilation and perfusion defects on anterior and posterior Tc-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) aerosol (A) and Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) perfusion (B) images.

Tc-99m DTPA

Aerosolized Tc-99m DTPA has recently received FDA approval for clinical use after having been used by physicians “off-label” for decades. The liquid radiopharmaceutical is placed into a nebulizer, producing small particles ranging in size from 0.5 to 2 μm, which are normally able to travel to the lung periphery. However, in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or when patients cannot cooperate fully with technique, airway turbulence produces large airway deposition and central clumping. Not only does this limit peripheral visualization, but activity shine-through onto the subsequent perfusion scan can obscure perfusion defects ( Fig. 7.6 ).

Suboptimal Tc-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) distribution (A). Poor peripheral distribution can make it difficult to tell if perfusion defects are matched, and retained central radiotracer shine-through onto subsequent Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA; B) scans can obscure areas of abnormal decreased perfusion.

With time, Tc-99m DTPA is broken down in the lungs and absorbed, ultimately cleared by the kidneys. The biologic T _½ varies but has been estimated at 80 minutes (±20 minutes) in healthy nonsmokers. Clearances dramatically increase when alveolar membranes are damaged. In healthy smokers, the biologic T _½ is only 24 minutes (±9 minutes). Damage to the lungs from toxins or inflammatory processes like adult respiratory distress syndrome can be diagnosed by measuring abnormally rapid Tc-99m DTPA clearance rates.

Tc-99m Technegas

Tc-99m Technegas is an aerosolized suspension of solid carbon particles that are smaller than those of Tc-99m DTPA, small enough to behave as a gas in the lungs. Tc-99m pertechnetate is placed into the crucible of a dedicated machine and incinerated in the presence of 100% argon gas and carbon, resulting in a thin layer of metallic technetium encapsulating carbon particles typically 30 to 60 nm in size (reported range of 5–200 nm, with 80% being less than 100 nm). These particles easily travel to the lung periphery after only a couple inspirations. Images are generally superior to Tc-99m DTPA, with central bronchial clumping infrequently seen. Unlike the clearance seen with Tc-99m DTPA, these particles lodge in a stable distribution, allowing not only for multiview planar images (in the same projections as the perfusion) but for superior SPECT images as well ( Fig. 7.7 ).

Normal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) lung scan in coronal (top two rows), sagittal (middle two rows), and axial (bottom two rows) projections. Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA) perfusion ( top half of each row ) and Tc-99m Technegas ventilation images ( bottom half of each row ) show good detail, particularly in the medial lungs, which are difficult to see on planar images. Technegas stability in the lungs makes it superior to Tc-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) for SPECT, avoiding potential problems clearance might create when comparing defects.

Images courtesy of Khun Visith Keu, MD, Hôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé de Laval, Canada.

Radiation Exposure: VQ Versus CTPA

Newer low-dose CTPA techniques have generally reduced the radiation dose, narrowing the gap with VQ. Although the CTPA effective whole-body dose is sometimes as low as 2 to 3 mSv, significantly higher doses are often still used (3–9.0 mSv), and VQ doses, usually less than 1.5 mSv (1.1–2.0 mSv), still compare favorably. Given the radiation sensitivity of the breast, it may be most important to note that VQ results in a much lower breast dose of 0.8 mGy (0.2–1.2 mGy) as opposed to perhaps 5 mGy from CTPA (roughly 3–34 mGy in literature, depending on technique). In pregnancy, radiation doses to the fetus, although low, are reportedly higher from VQ compared with CTPA. However, fetal exposure may be comparable or even lower when using suggested VQ protocol modifications, such as low-dose perfusion only or 2-day protocols, where a perfusion scan is done on day 1 and the ventilation study is performed on day 2 only for those cases requiring it due to perfusion abnormalities. Radiopharmaceutical dosimetry is outlined in Appendix 1 .

Ventilation

Protocols for Tc-99m DTPA, Xe-133, and Tc-99m Technegas are outlined in Boxes 7.5, 7.6, and 7.7 , respectively. For all ventilation radiopharmaceuticals, patients breathe through a closed system, with a mask connected to the delivery device and the nose clamped. Only a fraction of the dose placed in the unit reaches the lungs. In the case of Tc-99m DTPA, only 0.5 to 1.0 mCi (18.5–37 MBq) is delivered to the lungs. Of the available agents, Tc-99m Technegas has the most rapid uptake, requiring only a few breaths.

Box 7.7

Tc-99m Technegas Ventilation Scintigraphy

SPECT, Single-photon emission computed tomography.

Patient Preparation

• 
  

  Chest radiograph within 24 hours

Dose Administration

• 500
  

  MBq (30 mCi) Tc-99m Technegas, range 400 to 900 MBq (10–25 mCi)

Dose Preparation

• 
  

  Power on dose generator, turn on argon supply, and then turn on regulator.

  
  
• 
  

  Wet crucible with ethanol, draw back excess, and insert wet crucible into machine.

  
  
• 
  

  Load Tc-99m pertechnetate dose into crucible with 1-cc syringe

  
  
• 
  

  (may repeat, after a simmer run to evaporate fluid in order to achieve desired dose).

  
  
• 
  

  Press start to ignite burn (raises temperature above 2700°C for 15 seconds).

  
  
• 
  

  Disconnect argon.

  
  
• 
  

  Administer within 10 minutes.

Instrumentation

• 
  

  Collimator: Low energy, parallel hole

  
  
• 
  

  Photopeak: 20% window centered at 140 keV

  
  
• 
  

  Matrix: Planar 256 × 256; SPECT 64 × 64 (can use 128 × 128)

Positioning

• 
  

  Place nose clamps and connect mouthpiece with patient supine/semisupine, in well-ventilated room, preferably apart from camera room to avoid contamination.

  
  
• 
  

  Patient breathes in for three to six respiratory cycles.

  
  
• 
  

  Five-second breath hold at end of each increases retention until 2 kcounts/min.

  
  
• 
  

  Center camera over chest.

Image Acquisition

• 
  

  Planar: Acquire posterior image for 250,000 to 500,000 counts; obtain other views for this time: anterior and posterior, anterior and posterior obliques, right and left lateral.

  
  
• 
  

  SPECT: 3 degrees/step, 64 steps/head, 10 seconds/view, 360 degrees total

  
  
• 
  

  Reconstruction: Ordered-subset expectation maximization; 8 iterations, 4 subsets

  
  
• 
  

  Postreconstruction filter: Three-dimensional (3-D) Butterworth; cutoff 0.8 cycles/cm, order 9

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related posts:

Radiopharmaceuticals Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging Molecular Imaging The Skeletal System Hepatic, Biliary, and Splenic Scintigraphy Inflammation and Infection

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join