Tumors of Renal Collecting Systems, Renal Pelvis, and Ureters

Hematuria evaluation remains a common problem, particularly in patients who smoke and are at risk for urothelial tumors. Lifetime surveillance of the urothelium is often required once urothelial cancer is diagnosed. Computed tomography urography (CTU) has exquisite sensitivity and specificity for identification of renal and urothelial lesions. The examination is well accepted by patients and physicians. Possible harms include radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. MR imaging is also an accurate test, but requires longer exam times, and may not demonstrate stones. We present the technical and interpretation skills required to use MR urography and CTU effectively.

Key points

  • Computed tomography (CT) urography is the single best examination for comprehensive evaluation of the upper urinary tract.

  • MR urography is an appropriate substitute for CT urography when there are contraindications to CT, including both ionizing radiation (young patients, pregnancy, serial examinations) and iodinated contrast (renal insufficiency, allergic reaction).

  • Because transitional cell carcinoma is so uncommon in young, nonsmoking patients, MR urography or ultrasound may serve as an appropriate screening study following a negative renal colic CT examination.


Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and computed tomography urography (CTU) are useful tools that provide a comprehensive assessment of the renal parenchyma, renal collecting systems, and ureters. Cystoscopy remains the reference standard for bladder evaluation, which is not discussed here. This article reviews the indications and optimal technique for MRU and CTU. The appearance of benign and malignant disease is also reviewed.


CTU has become the most frequently used screening test for upper urinary tract tumors because of its widespread availability, short imaging time, and high spatial resolution. It is the reference standard for evaluation of the upper urinary tract. Drawbacks include use of iodinated contrast, which can exacerbate renal insufficiency and cause allergic-type reactions. CTU also imparts a relatively high level of ionizing radiation exposure, which is undesirable in the setting of pregnancy, pediatric patients, and frequent imaging.

MRU has the benefits of improved soft tissue resolution, absence of ionizing radiation, and a greater safety profile for intravenous contrast agents due in part to lower doses relative to CTU. Disadvantages include long scan times, more limited availability, and difficulties due to imaging artifacts and respiratory motion. Diuretics are important adjuncts for the examination. Rarely, these may be associated with allergic reactions. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Contrast Manual version 10.3 reports screening for renal impairment is now optional when using a macrocyclic agent such as Gadavist (gadobutrol; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) or Dotarem (gadoterate meglumine; Guerbet, Villepinte, France).

Imaging techniques

Magnetic Resonance Urography

MRU can be performed on 1.5-T or 3.0-T systems using an identical protocol with similar results. The patient is placed in supine position with arms raised above the head if possible. External torso phased array coils are placed over the patient to cover the kidneys and bladder in a single field of view.

Adequate distention of the urinary tract is essential for evaluation of nonobstructed collecting systems. If contrast is to be administered, gadolinium chelates can cause paradoxic low signal intensity due to the T2* effect overcoming the effect of T1 shortening. This can be minimized by administration of diuretics, normal saline, or both. At our institution, 10 mg furosemide is administered intravenously 5 minutes before administration of contrast agent; 250 mL intravenous (IV) saline can be used in the setting of diuretic allergy or dehydration. If a bladder catheter is present, it is clamped before diuretic or fluid administration.

Sample protocols from our institution, including both contrast-enhanced and noncontrast MRU, are given in Tables 1 and 2 . Both protocols include axial and coronal single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) images and axial T1 in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted images of the abdomen, and an axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence of the bladder. In noncontrast technique, additional thick slab and 3-dimensional (3D) or thin-section highly T2-sensitive MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)-like sequences are acquired ( Fig. 1 ). If contrast is used, 0.1 mmol/kg is administered at 2 mL/s and 3D fat-saturated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) images are obtained at 40 seconds, 90 seconds, and 10 minutes, usually in the coronal projection. Fat saturation can be achieved with spectral fat suppression, or Dixon technique, the latter using the water-only reconstructed images. From the delayed sequence, an MIP (maximum intensity projection) is obtained, generating an IV pyelogram (IVP)-like image ( Fig. 2 ). Subtraction images also can be obtained. If the technologist notices a region with suboptimal imaging, additional images can be obtained. This is an advantage compared with CTU, in which each acquisition results in additional radiation exposure.

Table 1

Contrast-enhanced MR Urogram protocol

Coil: External Phased Array Torso
Plane Sequence Size/Gap (2D) or Slice/Interval (3D) in mm Region/Comment Matrix FOV cm TR ms TE ms
COR 2D T2 SSFSE 6/1 Abdomen and Pelvis (K, U, B) 288 × 248 40 × 40 507 80
AX 2D T2 FSE 6/1 Pelvis 265 × 217 21 × 21 4819 120
AX 2D T1 IP/OP 6/1 Abdomen 220 × 217 33 × 40 91 2.3/4.6
AX 2D T2 SSFSE 6/1 Abdomen 236 × 239 26 × 26 1299 80
3/1.5 Left Kidney
Single Phase
200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4.0
3/1.5 Right Kidney
Single Phase
200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
10 mg IV furosemide given slowly over 1 min prior to dynamic contrast enhanced sequences
COR 3D T1 mDIXON Dynamic 3/1.5 Abdomen and Pelvis
40 sec
90 sec
10 min
176 × 173 35 × 35 5.8 1.80/4
SAG 3D T1 mDIXON Post 3/1.5 Left Kidney
Single phase
200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
SAG 3D T1 mDIXON Post 3/1.5 Right Kidney
Single phase
200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
AX 3D T1 mDIXON Top 3/1.5 Single Phase
176 × 160 35 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
AX 3D T1 mDIXON Bottom 3/1.5 Single Phase
176 × 160 35 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
COR 3D T1 SPGR 3/1.5 Flip Angle = 40°
10 min delay
176 × 160 35 × 35 20 4.6

Scan time: 13 min

Total table time: 45 min

Abbreviations: AX, Axial; COR, Coronal; DYN, dynamic; LSAG, Left sagittal; mDIXON, T1 spoiled gradient recalled echo with 2 point Dixon technique; Pre, pre-contrast; Post, post-contrast; RSAG, Right sagittal; XL, extra large.

Table 2

Non-contrast MR Urogram protocol

Coil: External Phased Array Torso
Plane Sequence Size/Gap (2D) or Slice/Interval (3D) in mm Region/Comment Matrix FOV cm TR ms TE ms
10 mg IV furosemide given slowly over 1 min at beginning of examination
COR 2D T2 SSFSE 6/1 Abdomen and Pelvis (K, U, B) 288 × 248 40 × 40 507 80
SAG 3D T2 FSE 4/2 Pelvis 200 × 145 20 × 20 2000 200
AX 2D T2 SSFSE 5/1 Abdomen 236 × 239 26 × 26 1299 80
AX 2D T2 SSFSE 5/1 Pelvis 265 × 217 21 × 21 4819 120
3/1.5 Abdomen 176 × 160 35 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
2/1 Pelvis 176 × 160 35 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
SAG 2D T2 fs SSFSE 4/0.4 Left Kidney 200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4
SAG 2D T2 fs SSFSE 4/0.4 Right Kidney 200 × 210 30 × 31 5.9 1.8/4.0
AX DWI 5/0.5 Abdomen and Pelvis 104 × 121 31 × 37 1411 61
COR 3D T1 mDIXON 3/1.5 Abdomen and Pelvis 176 × 173 35 × 35 5.8 1.80/4
Thick Slab
40/0 MRCP-like 320 × 256 30 × 30 8000 800
2/1 MRCP-like 260 × 260 26 × 26 1024 600

Scan time: 11 min

Total table time: 30 min

Abbreviations: 2D, 2 Dimensional; 3D, 3 Dimensional; AX, Axial; COR, Coronal; DWI, Diffusion Weighted Images; FOV, Field of View; fs, Fat Suppressed; FSE, Fast Spin Echo; K, U, B, Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder; mDIXON, T1 spoiled gradient recalled echo with 2 point Dixon technique; MRCP, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography; RAD, Radial; SAG, Sagittal; SSFSE, Single Shot Fast Spin Echo; TE, Echo Time; TR, Repetition time.

Fig. 1

A 56-year-old female smoker with gross hematuria. ( A ) Slab T2-weighted image showing severe hydronephrosis and ureteral tortuosity. There is a rounded filling defect ( white arrowhead ) causing obstruction. At this point, the etiology of the filling defect is uncertain. ( B , C ) Coronal SSFSE ( B ) and postcontrast T1-weighted ( C ) images demonstrate an intermediate signal intensity enhancing right ureteral mass ( white arrows ). A stone would demonstrate low signal intensity on all pulse sequences. Note the crescentic areas of high signal intensity urine at the periphery of the lesion ( white arrowheads ). This is the MR imaging equivalent of the classic “goblet” sign from IVP. Pathology revealed papillary urothelial carcinoma.

Fig. 2

( A ) Coronal postcontrast T1-weighted image including the kidneys and bladder. The excreted contrast is uniform, without areas of T2* artifact. There is coverage of both kidneys, ureters, and bladder in the field of view. ( B ) Coronal MIP image demonstrates excellent visualization of the ureters.

Computed Tomography Urography

Most CTU protocols consist of 3 phases (unenhanced, nephrographic, and excretory). Unenhanced images are obtained of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (3-mm slice thickness, 3-mm gap); 100 mL iodinated contrast (Omnipaque 350 [iohexol], GE Healthcare Inc, Marlborough, MA or Isovue 370 [iopamidol], Bracco, Monroe Township, NJ) is then administered at 3 mL/s followed by 150 mL of 0.9 normal saline at the same rate via power injector. Nephrographic-phase images of the entire abdomen and pelvis are obtained at 100-second delay. Slice thickness is typically 3 mm, but the gap can be variable. Ten-minute delayed-phase images are obtained in the axial plane (3-mm slice thickness, 3-mm gap) of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. Coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images (2-mm thick, 2-mm gap) of all phases are obtained. Review of all planes is essential for detection of small urothelial lesions, particularly on the delayed-phase images. Furthermore, the delayed-phase images must be evaluated with appropriate window and level settings to detect subtle abnormalities that can be obscured by dense contrast. To reduce radiation dose, the split bolus technique optimizes contrast timing to obtain both nephrographic and excretory phases simultaneously in a single acquisition. Iterative reconstruction, low dose unenhanced scans, and dual energy strategies are other useful or promising techniques for dose reduction.


Indications for MRU and CTU include hematuria (both microscopic and macroscopic), urinary obstruction, evaluation for renal and urothelial neoplasms, and characterization of congenital abnormalities. As renal stones are the most common cause of hematuria, ultrasound or noncontrast CT are often the first tests obtained.

Both the ACR and the American Urologic Association (AUA) have generated recommendations for the evaluation of hematuria in adults, albeit with several important differences. Specifically, the AUA guidelines do not address radiation dose in young patients without significant risk factors or the cumulative radiation exposure of serial examinations. Summaries of the ACR and AUA recommendations are given in Boxes 1 and 2 .

Box 1

Summary of American College of Radiology recommendations

Data from ACR. ACR appropriateness criteria for hematuria. 2014. Available at: acsearch.acr.org/docs/69490/Narrative/ . Accessed April 2018.

  • Most adults with gross or persistent microscopic hematuria require urinary tract imaging. Urinary tract imaging is NOT recommended in the following subgroups: young female patients with cystitis, hematuria that resolves completely, recent infection or viral illness, vigorous exercise, or recent urologic procedures including catheterization.

  • When imaging of the urinary tract is warranted, computed tomography urography (CTU) is the preferred examination. CTU has largely replaced the traditional intravenous pyelogram for this indication.

  • MR imaging is an excellent technique to evaluate for renal masses and complex cysts. If there are contraindications to iodinated contrast, MR urography (MRU) is a good substitute examination, but is inferior to CTU in detection of stones and remains under investigation for detection of urothelial lesions.

  • Ultrasound is the first-line modality in patients with suspected renal parenchymal disease in setting of microscopic hematuria.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Mar 3, 2020 | Posted by in MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | Comments Off on Tumors of Renal Collecting Systems, Renal Pelvis, and Ureters
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes