Real-time grayscale and color Doppler US is a useful, rapid, and portable imaging modality used to evaluate both the arterial and venous systems of the upper extremity. Arterial interrogation may be performed to assess for suspected limb ischemia, arterial stenosis, or patency of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula or graft. Assessment of the integrity of the venous side of the dialysis graft or fistula is also important, as is evaluation of thrombosis or compression of upper extremity veins. US can investigate flow hemodynamics along with vessel lumen and wall morphology. It is, however, operator dependent, does not fully evaluate upper extremity arterial inflow and central thoracic venous anatomy, and is limited in spatial display.1 CTA is a widely available technique that may be performed on all existing multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners (4 through 320 channels) to assess upper extremity vasculature. An excellent review on state-of-the-art techniques and clinical applications of CTA in the upper extremity by Hellinger et al. proposes four upper extremity CTA protocols: Aortic Arch with Upper Extremity Runoff, Upper Extremity Runoff, Upper Extremity Indirect CT Venography (CTV), and Upper Extremity Direct CTV based upon different clinical indications.1 This review highlights the various clinical scenarios in which CTA is useful and provides the technical parameters for acquisition, which are beyond the scope of this chapter. Contrast-enhanced MRA is a rapid noninvasive imaging technique that aids in treatment planning and preoperative mapping of various vascular disorders of the upper extremity.2 It evaluates vascular integrity and patency, which may be compromised in cases of trauma, atherosclerosis, vasculitis, and malignancy. MRA not only defines the site, degree, and extent of stenosis or occlusion but also demonstrates collateral pathways in these processes. Advantages of contrast-enhanced MRA in the upper extremity include its noninvasive nature, lack of flow artifact, multiangular projection capability, and ability to delineate the small vessels of the hand. Limitations of this imaging technique in the upper extremity include limited coverage of 40 to 50 cm, variable circulation time among individuals, and overlapping of the arteries and veins in the hand.2 Other considerations include the effects of partial volume averaging and susceptibility artifacts, which may lead to an overestimation of stenosis in small blood vessels. Conventional angiography is the gold standard for vascular imaging of the upper extremity, but it is an invasive procedure and is currently reserved for situations in which clinical questions remain despite information provided by the above-described noninvasive imaging modalities. It may also be used as the primary diagnostic modality when direct hemodynamic analysis is required for treatment planning or when there is intent to perform endovascular intervention in one combined procedure.1
Vascular Anatomy of the Upper Extremity
Vascular Imaging of the Upper Extremity
Vascular Anatomy of the Upper Extremity
WordPress theme by UFO themes