Case 32
Indication: Screening.
History: Bilateral implants 13 years previously.
Risk profile: No increased risk.
Age: 53 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dda4a/dda4a89cbf45cdeaad8c3f8d54be61027bbe8d71" alt="image"
Clinical Findings
Clinical inspection unremarkable. Implants appear “close-fitting”; within the tissue bilaterally. No pathological findings on palpation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa468/aa468904d4efdbcea335b865da649bf013d430db" alt="image"
Fig. 32.1 Sonography, right breast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aae7/2aae79b9a2fe01ddbb950c6e5e6c7250dac06a72" alt="image"
Fig. 32.2 Sonography, left breast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71a3a/71a3a1fd5203665fa3fc4418772cd61caac5f367" alt="image"
Fig. 32.3a,b Digital mammography, MLO view.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8c22/c8c2227e9b321bcc917b5860bc9fc6f05cb8e653" alt="image"
Fig. 32.4a,b Contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/406ff/406ff267ca72babaf9b7379610d6eba65e6a36da" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2851/e2851b9f4669bce6921b35608779d8c553aff8e5" alt="image"
Fig. 32.5a–c MR mammography-prosthesis protocol.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f13/e4f137af462d6e67b04308a96efad0430b68c984" alt="image"
|
Please characterize ultrasound, mammography, and MRI findings.
What is your preliminary diagnosis?
What are your next steps? |