52

Case 52



Indication: Monitoring following earlier breast cancer.


History: Breast conservation therapy of left breast 4 years previously relapse 2 years previously.


Risk profile: Increased by earlier incidence of breast cancer.


Age: 49 years.


image


Clinical Findings


Changes in the left breast due to treatment. Unremarkable scar. No other unusual findings.


Ultrasound (not shown)


Changes in the left breast due to treatment. No abnormalities.


image


Fig. 52.1 a,b Digital mammography, MLO view.


image


image


Fig. 52.2a–c Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts.


image


image


Fig. 52.3a–c Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breasts.


image


Fig. 52.4 Contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Maximum intensity projection.


image


Fig. 52.5a,b Signal-to-time curves.











image


Please characterize mammography and MRI findings.


What is your preliminary diagnosis?


What are your next steps?



These are the imaging studies of a patient being monitored after breast conservation therapy. The patient’s risk profile is considered to be high because she did not undergo mastectomy even after suffering a relapse.


Ultrasound


In the left breast, the only changes observed were related to the earlier treatment for breast cancer. Ultrasound did not show any echo patterns consistent with the enhancement seen in MRI. US BI-RADS right 1/left 2.


Mammography


Mammograms showed an extremely dense parenchymal pattern, ACR type 4. Under these limiting conditions, there were no suspicious findings in the right breast. The left breast showed treatment-induced changes including marked architectural distortions, extending from behind the nipple to the chest wall. There were no signs of lesions or tumor recurrence. Mammograms depicted no microcalcifications. (BI-RADS right 1/left 3) PGMI classification was omitted due to earlier breast conservation therapy of the left breast.


MR Mammography


MRI depicted a linear enhancement close to the chest wall in the imaging slice directly inferior to the nipple. The signal curve in this region showed a strong initial increase of about 100% and a postinitial plateau. The MRI slice directly through the nipple line was normal.


The patient’s history of previous carcinoma and breast conservation therapy, and no mastectomy after tumor relapse, meant that the probability of the linear enhancement seen in MRI representing tumor recurrence was high.


MRI Artifact Category:


2 MRI Density Type: 1


 








































MRM score


Finding


Points


Shape


linear


1


Border


ill-defined


1


CM Distribution


homogenous


0


Initial Signal Intensity Increase


strong


2


Post-initial Signal Intensity Character


plateau


1


MRI score (points)


 


5


MRI BI-RADS


 


4


 


image Differential Diagnostic Considerations


Tumor recurrence, focal mastitis, fat necrosis.


 






























BI-RADS Categorization


Clinical Findings


right 1


left 1


Ultrasound


right 1


left 1


Mammography


right 1


left 3


MR Mammography


right 1


left 4


BI-RADS Total


right 1


left 4


 


Procedure


MR-guided percutaneous biopsy of the circumscribed enhancement near the chest wall in the left breast.


However, the patient declined this intervention and instead follow-up MR mammography was performed 6 months later.


Follow-up MRI after 6 months


The previously seen linear enhancement in the left breast close to the chest wall was not reproduced to the same extent (Fig. 52.6).


image


Fig. 52.6 Single-slice subtraction image from the follow-up MRI six months later showing residual contrast uptake (arrow). Enhancement of the nipple (asterisk).


Sep 3, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on 52

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access