APPROACH TO BONE AND SOFT TISSUE TUMORS AND TUMOR-LIKE CONDITIONS

Chapter 6 APPROACH TO BONE AND SOFT TISSUE TUMORS AND TUMOR-LIKE CONDITIONS



Evaluating bone and soft tissue tumors requires a multi-modality approach. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages, and a rational, tailored algorithm should be used. Reflexive, simultaneous ordering of all modalities when a lesion is found or clinically suspected should be discouraged.


Imaging techniques for patients with suspected soft tissue masses may be requested because of soft tissue abnormality palpated by the patient or physician or because of symptoms such as pain or other complaints with no detectable mass on physical examination. The type of imaging technique initially selected varies depending on the history and physical findings as well as the suspected location of the lesion.




MODALITIES





Ultrasound


Ultrasound is valuable in differentiating cystic from solid soft tissue lesions and has also been used to study vascularity of lesions (Figs. 6-1 and 6-2). For soft tissue prominence at a joint, ultrasound may offer a specific diagnosis (e.g., ganglion cyst and paralabral or parameniscal cyst; Fig. 6-3). However, ultrasound is not as useful for characterizing pathology or defining the extent of true soft tissue masses, except in situations in which lesion echogenicity (e.g., lipoma; Fig. 6-4) or morphology (e.g., nerve sheath tumor, Fig. 6-5) is specific.








Magnetic Resonance Imaging


When routine radiographic features of a bone lesion are indeterminate or when the lesion is more aggressive and considered to be potentially malignant, MRI is frequently required and is useful for characterization as well as staging. Soft tissue masses always require evaluation with CT or MRI. More commonly MRI is used unless there is calcification that CT could better characterize. Gadolinium contrast is useful for distinguishing cystic, myxoid, or necrotic components from solid regions; it is also useful when scanned in dynamic fashion rapidly after a bolus to characterize tumor vascularity. Although certain features on MRI can often be used to narrow the differential diagnosis for bone and soft tissue, it is unreliable for characterizing tissue type and is not even specific for distinguishing many benign from malignant lesions. Therefore, the radiologist should not become overconfident and should always keep in mind the limitations of each modality as well as the broad range of nontumors and tumor-like lesions that can simulate true neoplasms.


Even when MRI cannot characterize the type of lesion, it remains very useful for percutaneous biopsy and surgical planning. MRI is the technique of choice for evaluating and staging primary bone sarcomas, including neurovascular involvement. It is useful for determining tissue characteristics of a bone lesion, such as fat, hemorrhage, fibrous tissue, and fluid–fluid levels. Of course, patient size and clinical status as well as the presence of certain metallic or electrical implants may preclude the use of MRI.



Nuclear Medicine


Bone scan is predominantly useful for evaluation of multiplicity of lesions. However, if the primary lesion in question (or lesion detected with another modality) shows no increased uptake on bone scan, the scan should be considered of limited value for detecting other deposits. This is often the case with purely lytic metastases and myeloma (Fig. 6-6). On the other end of the spectrum, diffuse involvement (skeletal carcinomatosis), as seen in cases of metastatic prostate or breast carcinoma, can produce such generalized uptake that the bone scan looks relatively normal except for lack of uptake by the kidneys (described as a “superscan”). Bone scan is also very useful for detecting the metastatic lesions of osteosarcoma, which avidly concentrate radiotracer. Osteosarcoma tends to metastasize to lung, and bone scan can be helpful for surveillance of recurrence as well as distant metastases.



Another situation in which bone scan can be useful is the differentiation of a benign sclerotic focus, such as a bone island or fibrous dysplasia with little to no increased uptake, from a blastic metastasis, which has a high degree of uptake. For patients with ill-defined symptoms and normal radiographs, a radionuclide bone scan may be used to localize the abnormality. Following a positive bone scan, either MRI or CT may be selected to better define the nature of the lesion. Radionuclide studies are not indicated in most situations for evaluation of soft tissue masses. Techniques such as positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning have been used mainly for evaluation of metastatic disease and follow-up of treated lesions but show promise for identifying active areas of a tumor before biopsy (Fig. 6-7).






TUMOR-LIKE LESIONS (BONE OR SOFT TISSUE) ON IMAGING EXAMINATIONS


Some lesions can classically resemble tumors and should be considered before assigning a differential diagnosis. Alternate modalities may be needed to exclude these benign non-neoplastic entities. These entities include






GENERAL TIPS: BONE OR SOFT TISSUE TUMORS





Staging of Primary Musculoskeletal Tumors


Description of the imaging appearance of a bone or soft tissue tumor should include a description of local aggressiveness and extension into other compartments, such as from bone to adjacent muscles, from one fascial compartment to another, from anywhere into a neurovascular compartment, and distant metastases (Fig. 6-9 and Table 6-1). This information is combined with histologic aggressiveness (Grade 0: G0 = benign; Grade 1: G1 = low-grade malignant; Grade 2: G2 = high-grade malignant) to determine the overall stage (Table 6-2).



Table 6-1 Anatomic Compartments





















Intracompartmental (A) Extracompartmental (B)
Intraosseous Soft tissue extension
Intra-articular Soft tissue extension
Superficial to deep fascia Deep fascial extension
Paraosseous Intraosseous or extrafascial



From Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop 1980; 153:106–120.


Table 6-2 Surgical Stages of Sarcomas































Stage Grade Site
1A Low (G1) Intracompartmental (T1)
IB Low (G1) Extracompartmental (T2)
IIA High (G2) Intracompartmental (T1)
IIB High (G2) Extracompartmental (T2)
III Any (G) Any (T)
  Regional or distant metastasis  

From Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcomata. Clin Orthop 1980; 153:106–120.



GENERAL APPROACH TO BONE TUMORS


The following text provides the radiologist with a formula for determining whether a lesion is truly a tumor, whether the tumor is aggressive or nonaggressive, and basic principles for determining tissue type when possible.



PITFALLS AND PSEUDOTUMORS



Stress Fracture


It is not common for stress fractures to be confused with tumor, since the clinical context usually guides the referring doctor to request specifically to “rule out stress fracture.” Yet it continues to occur, as evidenced by fractures referred for biopsy. There are clearly situations in which the radiologist is more likely to confuse stress fracture with tumor. Biopsy of such a lesion can have devastating results, as in an erroneous pathologic diagnosis of osteosarcoma (due to mitoses and osteoid formation), so it is important to be aware of the following situations.


1. Elderly patient with an insufficiency fracture. Fracture should be considered in elderly osteoporotic patients who present with chronic pelvic/sacral pain (Fig. 6-10). Sacral stress fracture appears as sclerosis on radiographs and ill-defined edema on MRI, usually bilateral, often with abnormal T1 signal due to chronicity at presentation. CT is very useful for confirming subtle linear sclerosis or interruption of the sacral neural foramina at multiple sites in a vertical pattern. However, this can also be confirmed on MRI as a low-signal vertical line on T2-weighted images. Insufficiency fractures can occur in other locations in the pelvis and lower extremity (e.g., the supra-acetabular region), often incited by altered weight-bearing due to knee or hip arthroplasty or a painful condition. Resorption at the fracture site can also simulate a lytic metastasis.

2. Atypical location/orientation. Stress fractures can occur in unexpected locations (Fig. 6-11) related to particular activities (e.g., spine—ballet, gymnastics; distal humerus—pitching; distal radius—gymnastics, basketball; femur—gymnastics, jumping-planting leg; tarsal bones—running). The radiologist may not think of stress injury in these locations, and in some instances (tarsal bones, flat bones, spine) because of the small size of the bone or the lack of periosteum, the appearance may be atypical. Stress fractures in subchondral locations are often confused with avascular necrosis, such as spontaneous necrosis of the knee (SONK) or with transient osteoporosis of the hip, and can also be seen at the ankle. Occasionally, the orientation of the stress fracture causes confusion, such as in the tibia, where vertically oriented stress fractures are not uncommon (Fig. 6-12). Following axial images, the linear nature of the subcortical dark signal is evident.






Radiographs and CT may early reveal indeterminate or confusing findings, such as subtle periosteal reaction or an area of bone sclerosis. Given the clinical context, look closely for sclerosis to be primarily subcortical in location, with the fracture oriented perpendicular to the trabecular pattern. Bone scan shows a focus of markedly increased uptake, usually eccentric, but the pattern is nonspecific. MRI can confirm a suspected diagnosis, with a characteristic dark line on T1- and T2-weighted images extending from the cortex into the medullary cavity, surrounded by edema (see Fig. 6-12). Tumors, on the other hand, show a discrete lesion on MRI without the dark line.




Bone Island (Enostosis) Versus Blastic Tumor


Bone islands are essentially benign hamartomas consisting of a focus of cortical bone within medullary bone. They can simulate a solitary metastasis on radiographs. Bone islands are usually seen as solitary or scattered foci but are seen in greater numbers in tuberous sclerosis and sclerosing bone dysplasias. There are a few imaging features suggesting their benign etiology. First, the margins of bone islands classically “blend” with the adjacent trabeculae. Also, bone islands tend to be ovoid in shape; metastases tend not to be round (Fig. 6-14). These characteristics are not as comforting when reviewing an examination of a patient with a history of cancer. In this setting, a bone scan is very useful. Bone islands show minimal to no increased uptake, whereas, if large enough, a blastic metastasis should show intense uptake. In addition, bone scan can detect other lesions. CT may detect the trabecular blending better than bone scan, but it is not usually very useful. MRI can be useful because bone islands are typically monotonous black signal on all sequences, whereas metastatic lesions often contain some T2 hyperintensity and enhancement, even if blastic. PET scan could be useful, again, only if the lesion is large enough to detect. Like bone scan, if the PET scan is negative and the lesion is less than 1 cm, further workup (such as biopsy) may still be necessary.




Paget Disease


Paget disease deserves special mention in this chapter, not only because it can simulate tumor, but also because of its association with certain tumors. The disease usually affects people over age 50, but it can be seen in those in their late 30s. It can affect virtually any bone in the body but it favors the pelvis, proximal femur, sacrum, and spine. The disease passes through an early lytic phase and a late reparative phase. The early phase is characterized by well-defined regions of osteolysis. This has been described on radiographs as osteolysis circumscripta in the skull and a “blade of grass” appearance in long bones, the latter referring to a sharp, dagger-shaped lucency. The margin of osteolysis represents the advancing front of the process, which characteristically begins at the end of a bone with the exception of the tibia, where it may start at the tibial tuberosity. Eventually, the margin extends over a large area. If not recognized as such, early pagetoid bone can simulate a lytic tumor. MRI is very useful as a second modality because the involved bone does not show findings typical of tumor. Various MRI appearances have been described in part reflecting the phasic nature of the disease, but often the marrow shows some retained fat signal and/or mild diffuse edema. Bone scan is especially helpful for establishing the diagnosis because involved bone shows intense, geographic uptake of radiotracer along an entire bone or an extensive portion of the bone.


In the healing, or reparative, phase, bone is laid down appositionally (i.e., along the cortex) and within the medullary cavity, causing the bone to appear denser and forming the characteristic hallmarks of Paget disease: cortical thickening, trabecular coarsening, and an appearance of bone expansion. In its softened state, the deformities of Paget disease occur in affected bones owing to stresses from weight-bearing. This includes protrusio acetabuli and bowing of long bones, with a “shepherd’s crook deformity” of the proximal femur. Deformity at joints can cause osteoarthritis, and expansion of bone can result in narrowing of vascular and neural foramina.


Late involvement of Paget disease is characteristic on radiographs, with the hallmarks as above. However, in unclear cases, CT is useful to confirm the presence of cortical thickening and fat density in the marrow. Bone scan is quite specific, with geographic uptake as previously discussed. MRI often shows some fat in the underlying marrow. Secondary tumors can occur, and any focal lytic areas, cortical destruction, or soft tissue mass associated with pagetoid bone should be pursued (Fig. 6-15). Sarcomas, including osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and fibrosarcomas can occur and are very aggressive with a poor prognosis. Giant cell tumors can also occur and appear very similar, but usually without a significant soft tissue mass. Biopsy is needed to document histology of suspicious areas.






Pseudolesion/Red Marrow


Areas of normally sparce trabeculae can simulate a lytic lesion on radiographs and sometimes on CT (Fig. 6-18). Common locations are the greater tuberosity of the proximal humerus, the proximal femur (called Ward triangle), and the body of the calcaneus. If unclear, MRI can confirm the presence of fat or hematopoietic marrow within these regions.



On MRI, hematopoietic marrow is usually overlooked except when it is perceived on images from a certain sequence (e.g., STIR), when it is in an atypical location (as in the proximal radius), or when it is seen in older persons with heterogeneous replacement with fatty marrow. The key to recognizing hematopoietic marrow is signal and location.



Signal. Red marrow is intermediate on T2-weighted images, bright on STIR, and intermediate on T1-weighted images. The T1-weighted images are key. Since red marrow contains fat, it will be brighter than muscle (Fig. 6-19). A process such as tumor that replaces marrow would be expected to be relatively isointense to muscle (Fig. 6-20). This is the same principle as in MRI of the spine in which, if the marrow on T1-weighted images is darker than that of the disk, there should be concern for tumor infiltration. If there is a question, comparison of sequences acquired in-phase and out-of-phase can be very useful (Fig. 6-21). Similar to imaging of adrenal masses, this technique has the ability to detect small amounts of fat within a suspicious area of bone. Red marrow contains about half fat and half cellular hematopoietic components, which contain a large amount of water. On in-phase images, the signal from fat and water is additive; on out-of-phase images, the signal subtracts. If a voxel contains both fat and water, the signal decreases on out-of-phase images compared with in-phase images. Therefore, hematopoietic marrow drops in signal, usually more than 50%. Like tumor, purely fatty marrow does not drop in signal, so the other sequences must be taken into account. Severe anemias and treatment with marrow-stimulating agents can produce red marrow with a highly cellular nature (Fig. 6-22), but interspersed fat cells should still lead to the correct diagnosis on T1-weighted sequences and in-phase and out-of-phase imaging.

Location. Radiologists should be aware of the distribution of hematopoietic marrow and appearance in children and adults (Fig. 6-23). Distribution follows certain principles. Epiphyses and apophyses should contain fatty marrow once they are ossified (Fig. 6-24). Two exceptions are the humeral head, in which subchondral red marrow is common and can be extensive, and the femoral head, which is less common and usually limited to a thin rim of subchondral signal (see Fig. 6-21). This signal can persist into adulthood. Diaphyses typically lose their red marrow in childhood, but not always. The proximal metaphyses of the humerus and femur tend to maintain red marrow into old age. This is also seen in the pelvis, spine, ribs, clavicles, sternum, and skull. More hematopoietic marrow is seen in females, especially if obese (Box 6-1). Obviously, more red marrow will be seen in young patients, recognized as normal in the axial skeleton but often causing confusion in the peripheral extremities, where they are seen as small foci of hyperintensity at the wrist and ankle (Fig. 6-25). Prominent hematopoietic marrow can be seen in anemias and following certain treatments. Radiation therapy causes regression of red marrow in the field, with geographic fatty marrow distribution.







Jan 17, 2016 | Posted by in MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING | Comments Off on APPROACH TO BONE AND SOFT TISSUE TUMORS AND TUMOR-LIKE CONDITIONS

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access