Between Cardiac Electrical and Mechanical Activation Markers by Coupling Bidomain and Deformation Models

the material coordinates of the undeformed cardiac domain $$\widehat{\varOmega }$$, by $$\mathbf{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)^T$$ the spatial coordinates of the deformed cardiac domain $$\varOmega (t)$$ at time t, by $$\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{X},t)=\frac{\partial \mathbf{x}}{\partial {\mathbf {X}}}$$ the deformation gradient. The cardiac tissue is modeled as a nonlinear hyperelastic material satisfying the steady-state force equilibrium equation



$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{Div}({{\mathbf {F}}} {\mathbf {S}})=\mathbf{0}, \qquad \mathbf{X} \in \widehat{\varOmega }. \end{aligned}$$

(1)
The second Piola-Kirchoff stress tensor $$ \mathbf{S}=\mathbf{S}^{pas}+\mathbf{S}^{vol}+\mathbf{S}^{act}$$ is the sum of passive, volumetric and active components. The passive and volumetric components are defined as


$$ S_{ij}^{pas,vol}=\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{\partial W^{pas,vol}}{\partial E_{ij}}+\frac{\partial W^{pas,vol}}{\partial E_{ji}}\right) \quad i,j=1,2,3, $$
where $$\mathbf{E}=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{C}-\mathbf{I})$$ is the Green-Lagrange strain tensor, $$W^{pas}$$ is an exponential strain energy function modeling the myocardium as an orthotropic hyperelastic material (see [14]), and $$W^{vol}=K\left( J-1\right) ^2$$ is a volume change penalization term, with K a positive bulk modulus and $$J=det \mathbf{F}$$, added in order to model the myocardium as nearly incompressible.


  • (b) Mechanical Model of Active Tension. The active component $$\mathbf{S}^{act}$$ is given in terms of the active tension, that we assume developed along the myofiber direction only, $${\mathbf {S}}^{act}= T_a \frac{\widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l \otimes \widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l}{\widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l^T {\mathbf {C}}\, \widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l}$$, with $$\widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l$$ the fiber direction in the reference configuration and the biochemically generated active tension $$T_a=T_a \left( Ca_i, \lambda , \frac{d\lambda }{dt} \right) $$ is calcium, stretch ($$\lambda = \sqrt{\widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l^T{\mathbf {C}}\widehat{\mathbf{a}}_l}$$), and stretch-rate ($$\frac{d\lambda }{dt}$$) dependent, with the dynamics described by a system of ODEs proposed in Land et al. [21].


  • (c) Electrical Model of Cardiac Tissue: The Bidomain Model. We will use the following parabolic-elliptic formulation of the modified Bidomain model on the reference configuration $$\widehat{\varOmega }\times (0,T)$$,


    $$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} c_m J~ \frac{\partial \widehat{v}}{\partial t} - {\mathrm{Div}} ( J~\mathbf{F}^{-1} D_i \mathbf{F}^{-T} \mathrm{Grad}\,(\widehat{v}+\widehat{u}_e)) + J~i_{ion}(\widehat{v},\widehat{\mathbf{w}},\widehat{\mathbf{c}},\lambda ) = 0 \\ - {\mathrm{Div}}(J~\mathbf{F}^{-1} D_i \mathbf{F}^{-T} \mathrm{Grad}\,\widehat{v}) - {\mathrm{Div}}(J~\mathbf{F}^{-1} (D_i+D_e) \mathbf{F}^{-T} \mathrm{Grad}\,\widehat{u}_e) = J~\widehat{i}_{app}^e \\ \frac{\partial \widehat{\mathbf{w}}}{\partial t} - {\mathbf {R}}_w(\widehat{v},\widehat{\mathbf{w}}) = 0, \displaystyle \frac{\partial \widehat{\mathbf{c}}}{\partial t} - {\mathbf {R}}_c(\widehat{v},\widehat{\mathbf{w}},\widehat{\mathbf{c}}) = 0.\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$

    (2)
    for the transmembrane potential $$\widehat{v}$$ extracellular potential $$\widehat{u}_{e}$$ gating and ionic concentrations variables $$(\widehat{\mathbf{w}},\widehat{\mathbf{c}})$$. This system is completed by prescribing initial conditions, insulating boundary conditions, and applied current $$~\widehat{i}_{app}^e$$, see [11] for further details. The conductivity tensors are given by


    $$\begin{aligned} \begin{array} {ll} D_{i,e}(\mathbf{x})&= \sigma ^{i,e}_l~ \mathbf{a}_l(\mathbf{x}) \mathbf{a}_l^T(\mathbf{x}) + \sigma ^{i,e}_t ~\mathbf{a}_t(\mathbf{x}) \mathbf{a}_t^T(\mathbf{x})+ \sigma ^{i,e}_n~ \mathbf{a}_n(\mathbf{x}) \mathbf{a}_n^T(\mathbf{x}), \end{array} \end{aligned}$$

    (3)
    where $$\sigma ^{i,e}_l,~\sigma ^{i,e}_t,~\sigma ^{i,e}_n~$$ are the conductivity coefficients in the intra- and extracellular media measured along and across the fiber direction $$\mathbf{a}_l, \mathbf{a}_t, \mathbf{a}_n$$.


  • (d) Ionic Membrane Model and Stretch-Activated Channel Current. The functions $$I_{ion}(v,\mathbf{w},\mathbf{c},\lambda )$$ ($$i_{ion}=\chi I_{ion}$$), $$R_w(v,\mathbf{w})$$ and $$R_c(v,\mathbf{w},\mathbf{c})$$ in the Bidomain model (2) are given by the ionic membrane model by ten Tusscher et al. [28], available from the cellML depository (models.cellml.org/cellml). The ionic current is the sum $$I_{ion}(v,\mathbf{w},\mathbf{c},\lambda ) = I_{ion}^m(v,\mathbf{w},\mathbf{c}) + I_{SAC}$$ of the ionic term $$I_{ion}^m(v,\mathbf{w},\mathbf{c})$$ given by the ten Tusscher model and a stretch-activated channel current $$I_{SAC}$$. This last current is modeled as in [22] as the sum of non-specific and specific currents $$I_{SAC} = I_{SAC,n} + I_{Ko}$$.






      3 Methods


      Space Discretization. We discretize the cardiac domain with an hexahedral structured grid $$T_{h_m}$$ for the mechanical model (1) and $$T_{h_e}$$ for the electrical Bidomain model (2), where $$T_{h_e}$$ is a refinement of $$T_{h_m}$$, i.e. $$h_m$$ is an integer multiple of $$h_e$$. We then discretize all scalar and vector fields of both mechanical and electrical models by isoparametric $$Q_1$$ finite elements in space.

      Time Discretization. The time discretization is performed by a semi-implicit splitting method, where the electrical and mechanical time steps could be different. At each time step,

      (a)

      given $$v^n$$, $$w^n$$, $$c^n$$ at time $$t_n$$, solve the ODE system of the membrane model with a first order IMEX method to compute the new $$w^{n+1}$$, $$c^{n+1}$$.

       

      (b)

      given the calcium concentration $$Ca_i^{n+1}$$, which is included in the concentration variables $$c^{n+1}$$, solve the mechanical problems (1) and the active tension system to compute the new deformed coordinates $$\mathbf{x}^{n+1}$$, providing the new deformation gradient tensor $$\mathbf{F}_{n+1}$$.

       

      (c)

      given $$w^{n+1}$$, $$c^{n+1}$$, $$\mathbf{F}_{n+1}$$ and $$J_{n+1}=\det (\mathbf{F}_{n+1})$$, solve the Bidomain system (2) with a first order IMEX method and compute the new electric potentials $$v^{n+1},\ u_e^{n+1}$$ with an operator splitting method.

       

      We refer to [9] for more details.

      Computational Kernels. Due to the employed space and time discretization strategies, at each time step, the main computational efforts consist of:

      (i)

      solving the nonlinear system deriving from the discretization of the mechanical problem by a Newton-GMRES-Algebraic Multigrid method, see [10];

       

      (ii)

      solving the two linear systems associated with the elliptic and parabolic Bidomain equations using the Conjugate Gradient method preconditioned by a Multilevel Additive Schwarz preconditioner studied in [23]. Our parallel simulations have been performed on a Linux cluster using the parallel library PETSc [6] from the Argonne National Laboratory.

       
      Domain Geometry and Parameter Calibration. The cardiac domain $$\widehat{\varOmega }=\varOmega (0)$$ is the image of a cartesian slab using ellipsoidal coordinates, yielding a portion of truncated ellipsoid. The values of the orthotropic conductivity coefficients (see (3)) used in all the numerical tests are $$\sigma ^i_l=3$$, $$\sigma ^i_t=0.31525$$, $$\sigma ^i_n=0.031525$$, $$\sigma ^e_l=2$$, $$\sigma ^e_t=1.3514$$, $$\sigma ^i_n=0.6757$$, all expressed in $$\mathrm{m}\varOmega ^{-1}\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$$. The parameters of the orthotropic strain energy function are given in [14]. The bulk modulus is $$K=200\,\mathrm{kPa}$$.
    • Sep 14, 2016 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY IMAGING | Comments Off on Between Cardiac Electrical and Mechanical Activation Markers by Coupling Bidomain and Deformation Models

      Full access? Get Clinical Tree

      Get Clinical Tree app for offline access