Chest

CHAPTER THREE Chest


The chest radiograph is one of the most commonly obtained examinations in pediatric imaging. It is also the examination most likely to be encountered by radiology residents, pediatric residents, general radiologists, and pediatricians. Therefore, topics such as chest imaging in neonates and the evaluation of suspected pneumonia are discussed in detail.



NEONATAL CHEST


Causes of respiratory distress in newborn infants can be divided into those that are secondary to diffuse pulmonary disease (medical causes) and those that are secondary to a space-occupying mass compressing the pulmonary parenchyma (surgical causes).



Diffuse Pulmonary Disease in the Newborn


Diffuse pulmonary disease causes respiratory distress much more commonly than surgical diseases, particularly in premature infants, who make up the majority of cases of respiratory distress in the newborn. A simple way to evaluate these patients and try to offer a limited differential diagnosis is to evaluate the lung volumes and to characterize the pulmonary opacities.


Lung volumes can be categorized as high, normal, or low. Normally, the apex of the dome of the diaphragm is expected to be at the level of approximately the tenth posterior rib. Lung opacity, if present, can be characterized as streaky, perihilar (central) densities that have a linear quality or as diffuse, granular opacities that have an almost sandlike character. Classically, cases fall into one of the following two categories: (1) cases with high lung volumes and streaky perihilar densities and (2) cases with low lung volumes and granular opacities (Table 3-1). This is more of a guideline, rather than a rule, because many neonates with diffuse pulmonary disease have normal lung volumes. The differential diagnosis for cases with high lung volumes and streaky perihilar densities includes meconium aspiration, transient tachypnea of the newborn, and neonatal pneumonia. Most of the neonates in this group are term. The differential for cases with low lung volumes and granular opacities includes surfactant deficiency and β-hemolytic streptococcal pneumonia. Most of these neonates are premature.


TABLE 3-1. Differential Diagnosis of Diffuse Pulmonary Disease in the Newborn









High lung volumes, streaky perihilar densities Low lung volumes, granular opacities










Surfactant-Deficient Disease


Surfactant-deficient disease (SDD; also referred to as respiratory distress syndrome or hyaline membrane disease) is a common disorder, with approximately 40,000 new cases annually in the United States. It is primarily a disease of premature infants, affecting up to 50% of them, and it is the most common cause of death in live newborns. SDD is related to the inability of premature type II pneumocytes to produce surfactant. Normally, surfactant coats the alveolar surfaces and decreases surface tension, allowing for the alveoli to remain open. As a result of the lack of surfactant, there is alveolar collapse, resulting in noncompliant lungs. The radiographic findings reflect these pathologic changes (Fig. 3-5A, B). Lung volumes are low. There are bilateral granular opacities that represent collapsed alveoli interspersed with open alveoli. Because the larger bronchi do not collapse, there are prominent air bronchograms. When the process is severe enough and the majority of alveoli are collapsed, there may be coalescence of the granular opacities, resulting in diffuse lung opacity. A normal film at 6 hours of age excludes the presence of SDD.




Surfactant Replacement Therapy


One of the therapies for SDD is surfactant administration. Surfactant can be administered via nebulized or aerosol forms. It is administered into the trachea via a catheter or an adapted endotracheal tube. The administration of surfactant in neonates with SDD has been shown to be associated with decreased oxygen and ventilator setting requirements, decreased air-block complications, decreased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and decreased death rate. However, there is an associated increased risk for development of patent ductus arteriosus and pulmonary hemorrhage, and there can be an acute desaturation episode in response to surfactant administration. Surfactant administration can be given on a rescue basis when premature neonates develop respiratory distress or can be given prophylactically in premature infants who are at risk. Prophylactic administration is commonly given immediately after birth and is becoming a more common practice. In response to surfactant administration, radiography may demonstrate complete, central, or asymmetric clearing of the findings of SDD (see Fig. 3-5). There is usually an increase in lung volumes. Neonates without radiographic findings of a response to surfactant have poorer prognoses than those who have radiographic evidence of a response. A pattern of alternating distended and collapsed acini may create a radiographic pattern of bubblelike lucencies that can mimic pulmonary interstitial emphysema. Knowledge of when surfactant has been administered is helpful in rendering accurate interpretation of chest radiographs taken in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).





Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Support Apparatus


One of the primary roles of chest radiography in the NICU is to monitor support apparatus. They include endotracheal tubes, enteric tubes, central venous lines, umbilical arterial and venous catheters, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) catheters. The radiographic evaluation of many of these tubes is the same as that seen in adults and is not discussed here. When evaluating the positions of endotracheal tubes in premature neonates, it is important to consider that the length of the entire trachea may be only about 1 cm. Keeping the endotracheal tube in the exact center of such a small trachea is an impossible task for caregivers, and phone calls and reports suggesting that the tube needs to be moved 2 mm proximally may be more annoying than helpful. Direct phone communication may be more appropriately reserved for times when the tube is in a main bronchus or above the thoracic inlet. There is an increased propensity to use esophageal intubation in neonates compared to its use in adults. Although it would seem that esophageal intubation would be incredibly obvious clinically, this is not always the case. I have seen cases in which a child has in retrospect been discovered to have been esophageally intubated for more than 24 hours. Therefore, the radiologist may be the first to recognize esophageal intubation. Obviously, when the course of the endotracheal tube does not overlie the path of the trachea, the use of esophageal intubation is fairly obvious. Other findings of esophageal intubation include a combination of low lung volumes, gas within the esophagus, and gaseous distention of the bowel (Fig. 3-7).




Umbilical Arterial and Venous Catheters


Umbilical arterial and venous catheters are commonly used in the NICU. Umbilical arterial catheters pass from the umbilicus inferiorly into the pelvis via the umbilical artery to the iliac artery. The catheters then turn cephalad within the aorta (see Fig. 3-5). These catheters can be associated with thrombosis of the aorta and its branches. Therefore, it is important to avoid positioning the catheter with the tip at the level of the branches of the aorta (celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries). There are two acceptable umbilical arterial catheter positions: high lines have their tips at the level of the descending thoracic aorta (T8-T10; see Fig. 3-9); low lines have their tips below the level of L3 (see Fig. 3-5). The catheter tip should not be positioned between T10 and L3 because of the risk for major arterial thrombosis. There is no clear consensus as to whether a high or a low umbilical artery catheter line is better, and both positions are still currently used.


image

FIGURE 3-9. ECMO catheter placement for meconium aspiration syndrome (same child as in Fig. 3-1). Note venous ECMO catheter (VC) has a radiopaque proximal portion and a lucent distal portion. The tip of the venous catheter is marked by a small radiopaque metallic marker (arrow) and is actually in the right atrium. Note the arterial ECMO catheter (AC) with tip in region of aortic arch. Also, note “high”-type umbilical arterial catheter with tip overlying descending aorta at the level of T8.


The pathway of the umbilical venous catheter is umbilical vein to left portal vein to ductus venosus to hepatic vein to inferior vena cava (Fig. 3-8). In contrast to umbilical arterial catheters, the course is in the superior direction from the level of the umbilicus. The ideal position of an umbilical venous catheter is with its tip at the junction of the right atrium and the inferior vena cava at the level of the hemidiaphragm (see Figs. 3-4, 3-5). The umbilical venous catheter may occasionally deflect into the portal venous system rather than passing into the ductus venosus. Complications of such positioning can include hepatic hematoma or abscess.




Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Children


One of the more common lines now seen in children, as in adults, is peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). In contrast to adults, in whom some of the PICCs can be as large as 6F, the PICC lines used in children, particularly infants, are often small in caliber (2F or 3F) so that they can be placed into their very small peripheral veins. These small caliber PICCs can be very difficult to see on chest radiography, so some of them must be filled with contrast to be accurately visualized. The tip of the PICC line that enters the child from the upper extremity or scalp should be positioned with the tip in the midlevel of the superior vena cava (see Fig. 3-27). It is essential that PICC lines not be left in place with the tip well into the right atrium. Particularly with the small-caliber lines, the atrium can be lacerated, leading to pericardial tamponade, free hemorrhage, or death. Many such cases have been reported nationally. Also, the PICC should not be too proximal in the superior vena cava because the distal portion of the line can flip from the superior vena cava into the contralateral brachiocephalic or jugular vein. At Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, the PICC lines are inserted in a dedicated interventional radiology suite by a team of nurses, with supervision by pediatric interventional radiologists. Ultrasound is often used to guide vein cannulation and certified Child Life Specialists coach most kids through the procedure without having to sedate them. Fluoroscopy is utilized at the end of the procedure to adjust and document tip position in the mid-superior vena cava.




EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION


ECMO is a last-resort therapy usually reserved for respiratory failure that has not responded to other treatments. ECMO is essentially a prolonged form of circulatory bypass of the lungs and is used only in patients who have reversible disease and a chance for survival. The majority of neonates who are treated with ECMO have respiratory failure as a result of meconium aspiration, persistent pulmonary hypertension (resulting from a variety of causes), severe congenital heart disease, or congenital diaphragmatic hernia. ECMO seems to be used less commonly now than it was in the 1990s.


There are two types of ECMO: arteriovenous and venovenous. In ateriovenous ECMO, the right common carotid artery and internal jugular veins are sacrificed. The arterial catheter is placed via the carotid and positioned with its tip overlying the aortic arch. The venous catheter is positioned with its tip over the right atrium (Fig. 3-9). One of the main roles of a chest radiograph of children on ECMO is to detect any potential migration of the catheters. Careful comparison with previous studies to make sure that the catheters are not coming out or moving too far in is critical. These patients have many bandages and other items covering the external portions of the catheters, so migration may be hard to detect on physical examination. Note that there are various radiographic appearances of the ECMO catheters. Some catheters end where the radiopaque portion of the tube ends, and others have a radiolucent portion with a small metallic marker at the tip (see Fig. 3-9). It is common to see white-out of the lungs soon after a patient is placed on ECMO as a result of decreased ventilator settings and third-space shifting of fluid (see Fig. 3-9). Patients on ECMO are anticoagulated and are therefore at risk for hemorrhage.





Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema


In patients with severe surfactant deficiency, ventilatory support can result in marked increases in alveolar pressure, leading to perforation of alveoli. The air that escapes into the adjacent interstitium and lymphatics is referred to as pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE). PIE appears on radiographs as bubblelike or linear lucencies and can be focal or diffuse (Fig. 3-10). The involved lung is usually noncompliant and is seen to have a static volume on multiple consecutive films. The finding is typically transient. The importance of detecting PIE is that it serves as a warning sign for other impending air-block complications such as pneumothorax, and its presence can influence caregivers in decisions such as switching from conventional to high-frequency ventilation.



It can be difficult to differentiate diffuse PIE from the bubblelike lucencies that are associated with developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. When encountering this scenario, the patient’s age can help to determine which is more likely. Most cases of PIE occur in the first week of life, a time at which bronchopulmonary dysplasia is very unlikely. In patients older than 2 weeks, bronchopulmonary dysplasia is more likely. Also, in patients who have undergone a series of daily films, PIE may be noted to occur abruptly, whereas bronchopulmonary dysplasia tends to occur gradually. As previously mentioned, SDD partially treated by surfactant replacement can cause a pattern of lucencies that may mimic PIE as well.


Rarely, PIE can persist and develop into an expansive, multicystic mass. The air cysts can become large enough to cause mediastinal shift and compromise pulmonary function. Often, the diagnosis is indicated by sequential radiography showing evolution of the cystic mass from original findings typical of PIE. In unclear cases, CT demonstrates that the air cysts are in the interstitial space by showing the bronchovascular bundles being positioned within the center of the air cysts. The bronchovascular bundles appear as linear or nodular densities in the center of the cysts.



Causes of Acute Diffuse Pulmonary Consolidation


Acute diffuse pulmonary consolidation is nonspecific in neonates, as it is in adults, and can represent blood, pus, or water. In the neonate, the specific considerations include edema, which may be secondary to the development of patent ductus arteriosus (Fig. 3-11); pulmonary hemorrhage, to which surfactant therapy predisposes; worsening surfactant deficiency (during the first several days of life but not later); or developing neonatal pneumonia (Table 3-2). Diffuse microatelectasis is another possibility because neonates have the propensity to artifactually demonstrate diffuse lung opacity on low lung volume films (expiratory technique; Fig. 3-12A. B); this should not be mistaken for another cause of consolidation. Such radiographs showing low lung volumes offer little information concerning the pulmonary status of the patient and should be repeated when clinically indicated.



TABLE 3-2. Causes of Acute Diffuse Pulmonary Consolidation in Neonates













Edema: patent ductus arteriosus
Hemorrhage
Diffuse microatelectasis: artifact
Worsening surfactant deficiency (only during first days of life)
Pneumonia



Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia


Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is also referred to as chronic lung disease of prematurity. It is a common complication seen in premature infants and is associated with significant morbidity rates. It is uncommon in children born at greater than 32 weeks of gestational age, but it occurs in more than 50% of premature infants born at less than 1000 g. BPD is the most common chronic lung disease of infancy.


BPD is related to injury to the lungs that is thought to result from some combination of mechanical ventilation and oxygen toxicity. Although four discrete and orderly stages of the development of BPD were originally described, they are not seen commonly and are probably not important to know. BPD typically occurs in a premature infant who requires prolonged ventilator support. At approximately the end of the second week of life, persistent hazy density appears throughout the lungs. Over the next weeks to months, a combination of coarse lung markings, bubblelike lucencies, and asymmetric aeration can develop (Fig. 3-13). Eventually, focal lucencies, coarse reticular densities, and bandlike opacities develop. In childhood survivors of BPD, many of these radiographic findings decrease in prominence over the years and only hyperaeration may persist. The radiographic findings may completely resolve. Clinically, many children with severe BPD during infancy may eventually improve to normal pulmonary function or may only have minor persistent problems such as exercise intolerance, predisposition to infection, or asthma.



Wilson-Mikity syndrome is a confusing and controversial term. It refers to the development of BPD in the absence of mechanical ventilation. Some people debate whether this disease exists, whereas others think it is a variant of BPD. Certainly, there are cases in which BPD findings develop with minimal ventilator support or develop earlier than is typically expected.



Focal Pulmonary Lesions in the Newborn


In contrast to diffuse pulmonary disease in newborns, focal masses can present with respiratory distress due to compression of otherwise normal lung. Most of these focal masses are related to congenital lung lesions. Congenital lung lesions may appear solid, as air-filled cysts, or mixed in appearance. The differential for a focal lung lesion can be separated on the basis of whether the lesion is lucent or solid appearing on chest radiography (Table 3-3). The most likely considerations for a lucent chest lesion in a newborn are congenital lobar emphysema, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, persistent pulmonary interstitial emphysema, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. CT may be helpful in differentiating among these lesions by demonstrating whether the abnormal lucency is related to air in distended alveoli, in the interstitium, or in abnormal cystic structures. Lesions that typically appear solid during the neonatal period include sequestration and bronchogenic cyst. Many of these lesions can present in children beyond the neonatal period, and those aspects of these entities are also discussed here.


TABLE 3-3. Focal Lung Lesions in Neonates on Radiography









Lucent Lesions Solid Lesions








The following sections are divided into specific congenital lesions. However, it has been increasingly recognized that there can be “mixed” lesions, which show characteristics of more than one type of lesions (see Fig. 3-16). The most common mixed lesions are those that show characteristics of both congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and sequestration.



It is also worth mentioning that there has been a change in the way these lesions present that is related to the increased use of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Historically, congenital lung lesions were identified only when the infant became symptomatic. Many, if not most, of the congenital lung lesions we currently see are picked up and followed through fetal life, with additional postnatal imaging obtained shortly after birth. A significant number of these children are asymptomatic. This has raised issues related to when and whether to perform surgical treatment in infants with asymptomatic lesions.


Dec 21, 2015 | Posted by in PEDIATRIC IMAGING | Comments Off on Chest

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access