Optimizing the diagnostic information

1 Optimizing the diagnostic information





Technique


Ultrasound is devolving rapidly from radiology departments to other clinical environments, such as surgeries and clinics. The potential for ultrasound to be carried out by untrained personnel is therefore increasing. A lack of understanding by some has led to theoretical courses being considered as ‘training’. This is very far from the case, and possibly one of the most dangerous legacies of this rapidly developing type of service provision.


Whatever the limitations of your equipment, a comprehensive and properly executed technique is essential. This is not about taking pictures (unlike many other radiological imaging tests). It is about a comprehensive and confident evaluation of the organs (with representative images for audit and recording purposes). This can only be achieved with practical experience, closely supervised by qualified practitioners.


Knowing your own limitations, knowing when you have not been able to execute a satisfactory scan, and being able to request assistance from expert practitioners, is one of the most valuable lessons you will learn.


Although the dynamic nature of the scan is a huge advantage over other forms of imaging, the potential for misdiagnosis is significant. The skilled operator continuously adjusts his or her technique to obtain the maximum diagnostic information. In any abdominal ultrasound survey the operator assesses the limitations of the scan and the level of confidence with which pathology can be excluded or confirmed. The confidence limits help in determining the subsequent investigations and management of the patient.


It is important, too, to retain an open mind about the diagnosis when embarking on the scan; an operator who ‘decides’ the likely diagnosis on a clinical basis may sometimes be correct but, in trying to ‘fit’ the scan to match the symptoms, risks serious misdiagnosis.



Image Optimization


Misinterpretation of ultrasound images is a significant risk in ultrasound diagnosis. The skill of effective scanning lies in the operator’s ability to maximize the diagnostic information available, and in being able to properly interpret the appearances. This is dependent on:







There are numerous ways in which different manufacturers allow us to make compromises during the scanning process in order to maximize image quality and enhance diagnostic information.


The diagnostic quality of the image can be improved by:






Using tissue harmonics to reduce artefact (Fig. 1.5). This technique uses the second harmonic frequency using pulse inversion.1 This results in a higher signal to noise ratio, which demonstrates particular benefits in many difficult scanning situations, including obese or gassy abdomens.






The bottom line is, it is far better to have a scan performed properly on a low-tech piece of equipment by a knowledgeable and well-trained operator than to have a poorly performed scan on the latest high-tech machine (Fig. 1.6). A good operator will get the best out of even the lowliest scanning device and produce a result that will promote the correct patient management. A misleading result from a top-of-the-range scanner can be highly damaging and at best, delay the correct treatment or at worst promote incorrect management.



The operator should know the limitations of the scan in terms of equipment capabilities, operator skills, clinical problems and patient limitations, take those limitations into account and communicate them where necessary.



The use of doppler


Many pathological processes in the abdomen affect the haemodynamics of relevant organs and the judicial use of Doppler is an essential part of the diagnostic procedure. This is discussed in more detail in subsequent chapters.


Colour Doppler is used to assess the patency and direction of flow of vessels in the abdomen, to establish the vascularity of masses or lesions and to identify vascular disturbances such as stenoses. Flow information is colour coded (usually red towards and blue away from the transducer) and superimposed on the image. This gives the operator an immediate impression of a vascular ‘map’ of the area (Fig. 1.7). This Doppler information is obtained simultaneously, often from a relatively large area of the image, at the expense of the grey-scale image quality. The extra time taken to obtain the Doppler information for each line results in a reduction in frame rate and line density, which worsens as the colour Doppler area is enlarged. It is advisable, therefore, to use a compact colour ‘box’ to maintain image quality.



Power Doppler also superimposes Doppler information on the grey-scale image, but without any directional information. It displays only the amount of energy (Fig. 1.8). It has the advantage of a stronger signal, allowing identification of smaller vessels with lower velocity flow than colour Doppler. As it is less angle-dependent than colour Doppler it is particularly useful for vessels which run perpendicular to the beam – such as the inferior vena cava (IVC).



Pulsed Doppler uses pulses of Doppler from individual elements or small groups of elements within the array. This allows the operator to select a specific vessel, which has been identified on the grey-scale or colour Doppler image, from which to obtain a spectrum. This gives further information regarding the flow envelope, variance, velocity and downstream resistance of the blood flow (Fig. 1.9).




Getting the best out of doppler


Familiarity with Doppler controls is essential in order to avoid the pitfalls and increase confidence in the results. It is relatively straightforward to demonstrate flow in major vessels and to assess the relevant spectral waveform; most problems arise when trying to diagnose the lack of flow in a suspected thrombosed vessel, and in displaying low velocity flow in difficult-to-access vessels.


Doppler is known to produce false positive results for vessel occlusion (Fig. 1.10) and the operator must avoid the pitfalls. It is essential that the Doppler settings are sensitive enough to detect the velocity of flow in the vessel (Box 1.2). This means that the angle of insonation to the direction of flow must be as close to 0° as possible (i.e. the vessel must be flowing towards or away from the beam, not perpendicular to it), the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) must be set to detect slow flow and the Doppler gain must be turned up sufficiently.



Dec 26, 2015 | Posted by in GASTROINTESTINAL IMAGING | Comments Off on Optimizing the diagnostic information

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access