© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
Ramon Andrade de Mello, Álvaro Tavares and Giannis Mountzios (eds.)International Manual of Oncology Practice10.1007/978-3-319-21683-6_2424. Predictors of Oncologic Outcomes After Treatment of Urothelial Cancer
(1)
Department of Urology, University of California – Irvine, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 2100, Orange, CA 92868, USA
Keywords
Bladder cancerUpper tract urothelial cancerOncologic outcomesPrognosisAbbreviations
BC
Bladder cancer
BCG
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
BCRC
Bladder cancer research consortium
BMI
Body mass index
CIS
Carcinoma in situ
CSS
Cancer-specific survival
DFS
Disease-free survival
IBCC
International bladder cancer consortium
LN
Lymph node
LND
Lymph node dissection
LVI
Lympho-vascular invasion
RC
Radical cystectomy
RNU
Radical nephroureterectomy
SCC
Squamous cell carcinoma
TCC
Transitional cell carcinoma
TUR
Transurethral resection
UTUC
Upper tract urothelial cancer
24.1 Prognostic Factors After Treatment of Bladder Cancer
24.1.1 Introduction
Bladder cancer (BC) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States with approximately 74,690 new cases diagnosed in 2014 [1]. While the majority of non-muscle-invasive BC is typically managed by transurethral resection (TUR) followed by intravesical therapy, the standard treatment for patients with muscle-invasive BC is radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Despite the continuing advances in surgical procedures, morbidity and mortality rates remain unsatisfactory after RC for patients with muscle-invasive BC. Five-year disease free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) ranges between 50 % and 70 % after RC in this patient population [2–4]. Unsatisfactory outcomes after RC may be due to clinical understaging of disease, the presence of micrometastasis, or underutilization of systemic therapies [5, 6].
Clinico-pathological findings, such as tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and tumor grade have traditionally served as prognostic tools, providing estimates of oncologic and survival outcomes for patients with BC. Various nomograms and prognostic models have also been developed to incorporate several prognostic factors to provide individualized predictions of survival and disease recurrence for patients undergoing RC [7–9]. Furthermore, the use of biomolecular markers may have potential to further improve predictive models and help clinicians select patients who may be the best candidates for systemic therapies following RC [10, 11].
24.1.1.1 Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Clinico-pathological Prognostic Factors
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer may present as pTa, pT1, or carcinoma in situ (CIS) lesions with the majority of cases (70 %) being pTa disease [12]. Disease recurrence (50–80 % of pTa patients) and disease progression (10–30 % of pT1 and CIS patients) are the biggest threats for patients with non-muscle-invasive BC [12]. The most important clinico-pathological predictors for recurrence are multiplicity, tumor size, and rates of prior recurrences [12, 13]. The most useful predictors for progression are tumor grade, stage, and the presence of CIS, but these parameters also have some predictive value for disease recurrence as well [12, 13]. Sylvester and colleagues developed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring system using six factors to estimate probabilities of recurrence and progression and defined patient risk into categories of low, intermediate and high. The European Association of Urology has subsequently incorporated this scoring system into its guidelines and the EORTC system has been shown to be a useful tool for identifying high-risk patients with non-muscle-invasive BC [12, 14].
Transurethral Resection Quality
Another important prognostic factor for determining recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive BC is the quality of TUR [15, 16]. In up to 30 % of patients receiving a re-TUR for pT1 or high grade tumors, upstaging may occur [12, 16. Also, patients with high grade non-muscle-invasive BC have been shown to respond better to bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy following re-TUR [17]. In patients who develop residual tumors following initial resection, recurrence-free survival was significantly higher after 5 years follow-up in patients who received re-TUR (63 %) compared to those who underwent only one TUR (40 %) [18]. A complete TUR at the initial treatment or after disease recurrence is associated with a lower prevalence of residual tumors and higher rates of recurrence-free survival.
Perioperative Intravesical Therapy
Randomized clinical trials have shown that perioperative intravesical therapy after TUR for patients with non-muscle invasive BC is associated with decreased rates of disease recurrence [19]. Reduction in recurrence may be as high as 39 % compared to patients who undergo TUR alone, and it was estimated that the number needed to treat in order to prevent one recurrence was 8.5 patients. Side effects associated with intravesical chemotherapeutic agents such as epirubicin or mitomycin C are generally mild; however, it should be noted that such treatments are contraindicated in cases in which bladder perforation is suspected.
Intravesical therapy with BCG has been shown to be an effective treatment option associated with a 32 % reduction in disease recurrence [20]. Furthermore, intravesical BCG treatments have been shown to be superior to intravesical chemotherapy in randomized trials [21, 22]. Ten-year progression-free rates and disease-free survival are improved in patients receiving BCG intravesical therapy [23]. Despite the beneficial effects of BCG therapy in these patients, it may still be an underutilized resource for high-risk patients with non-muscle invasive BC [24].
Early Radical Cystectomy
Early RC is the treatment of choice for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC who fail BCG therapy or for patients with high risk of cancer progression [12, 13, 25]. Adverse prognostic factors such as micropapillary histology, concomitant CIS, high grade, solid architecture, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) are associated with high risk of progression [26–28]. For the vast majority of high-risk patients, treatment of TUR followed by adjuvant BCG may represent the most reasonable strategy with the option to perform RC early if progression is detected [12].
24.1.1.2 Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Lymph Node Status and Extent of Lymph Node Dissection
For patients undergoing RC for muscle-invasive BC, the most significant predictor of oncologic outcome is the extent of lymph node (LN) involvement [29]. Five-year survival rates are 20–35 % for patients with tumor metastasis to LNs [2–4. A more extensive list of LN-related prognostic factors reported to be predictors of outcomes includes the number of positive LNs, the extent of lymphadenectomy and number of nodes removed, and the LN density [29, 30–35]. While no well-defined guidelines for lymph node dissection (LND) during RC exist, numerous studies have suggested that extended LND is associated with better oncologic outcomes and lower risks of micrometastatic disease following RC [29, 30, 34, 36]. Furthermore, performing extended LND may provide more accurate staging. We are waiting for results of an important randomized trial that will tell us the optimal level of LND during RC in order to provide therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary risks.
Tumor Stage
The second most important predictor of oncologic outcomes after RC is tumor stage [2–4]. The determination of tumor stage may take place prior to RC by evaluating TUR pathology or radiographic images; however downstaging may occur in nearly one quarter of cases [6], and this can have significant implications on how patients are selected for neoadjuvant therapies. Multi-institutional studies have shown that primary pT stage has significant prognostic value in muscle-invasive BC. The 5-year DFS of patients with pT0 or pT1 stage is 80–90 % but those numbers drop to 20–40 % in patients with pT4 stage [2–4]. Higher stages are associated with high risk of recurrence and mortality and may benefit from adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Tumor Grade
While tumor grade has significant prognostic value in non-muscle invasive BC, it has not been shown to be a powerful predictor of oncologic outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder as nearly all patients undergoing RC will have high-grade disease [29]. Nevertheless, several grading systems have been developed to provide simple and reproducible tools for clinical use [37, 38].
Lymphovascular Invasion
The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in RC specimens has been shown to correlate with aggressiveness of BC and shown to be a prognostic predictor of oncologic outcomes independent of lymph node involvement [39–42]. In addition to transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), LVI is a prognostic factor after RC in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the bladder [43]. The presence of LVI may be a valuable prognostic tool when selecting patients undergoing RC for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Nomogram as Outcome Prediction Models
The integration of several prognostic factors into nomograms has been shown to provide more accurate prognoses than grade and stage alone in patients with BC [7, 8]. The International Bladder Cancer Consortium (IBCC) Nomogram incorporates prognostic factors such as age, grade, stage, LN status, and histological cancer type into the nomogram in order to calculate the risk of disease recurrence after RC. It has been shown to have a predictive accuracy of 75 %. The Bladder Cancer Research Consortium (BCRC) Nomogram was similarly developed to predict oncologic outcomes after RC and incorporates grade, stage, LVI, presence of CIS, as well as use of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments [8]. Both of these nomograms have been externally validated and shown to be useful tools for patient counseling and selection for adjuvant therapies [44].
Molecular Biomarkers for Predicting Oncologic Outcomes
The integration of molecular biomarkers with existing nomograms improves the prognostic value and predictive accuracy of those nomograms [45–47]. Increased expression of several molecular biomarkers involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and angiogenesis have been extensively studied and shown to be associated with advanced stage, grade, LVI, LN metastasis, DFS, and CSS in patients with BC [29, 48–52]. Furthermore, the assessment of multiple biomarkers or panels of biomarkers have been shown to be more accurate than assessments of individual biomarkers [45–47]. Evaluation of these biomarkers in patients being treated by RC has been shown to have significant prognostic value in terms of disease recurrence and progression and may be a useful predictor of upstaging in patients undergoing RC [53–55]. Importantly, panels of biomarkers may prove to be the most useful tool in identifying the most appropriate candidates for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
24.2 Prognostic Factors After Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
24.2.1 Introduction
Upper tract urothelial cancers (UTUC) are rare compared to bladder tumors, accounting for only 5 % of urothelial cancers [1]. Small, low grade UTUC can be treated endoscopically. However, the gold standard treatment for UTUC in patients with a healthy contralateral kidney remains radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) [56, 57]. Unfortunately, oncologic outcomes in patients with invasive UTUC remain unsatisfactory despite continuing advancements in surgical techniques and adjuvant chemotherapies [58]. Due to the rarity of UTUC, studying prognostic factors and predictors of outcomes remains challenging; however, large multi-center collaborations focusing on outcomes of UTUC after RNU have provided insight into several clinico-pathological prognostic factors [57]. These predictors of oncologic zoutcomes may help in clinical decision making and tailoring of treatments for patients with UTUC.
Prognostic factors such as lymphovascular invasion (LVI), sessile tumor architecture, concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), and a history of bladder CIS have been identified for patients with UTUC, but there still exists controversy regarding the prognostic value of factors like tumor location and tumor necrosis. While there does not exist a well-defined template for lymph node dissection (LND) for UTUC, LND may have significant prognostic value, provide better disease staging, and help identify candidates for adjuvant systemic therapy.
24.2.1.1 Clinical Prognostic Factors
Age and Gender
Age and gender do not appear to have a significant impact on outcomes of UTUC after RNU. While older patients have been shown to have lower DFS and CSS after RNU, these differences are unlikely to be due to differences in the biological behavior of UTUC [59]. In fact, it has been shown that elderly patients may be successfully cured of UTUC with RNU, so aggressive surgical treatment should be considered in this patient population [60]. Similarly, gender does not seem to affect the behavior of UTUC or oncologic outcomes after RNU [61].
Obesity
Obesity appears to be an independent predictor of patient outcomes in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC. Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 was shown to adversely affect both 5-year DFS and CSS rates compared to patients with normal BMI (<25) [62].
Hydronephrosis
Evaluation for hydronephrosis has been shown to be a valuable step in assessing the extent of disease in patients with UTUC. The presence of hydronephrosis is associated with advanced disease and overall poorer oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing RNU [63, 64]. Using hydronephrosis as a prognostic factor, patients can be identified as having higher risk of non-organ confined disease and selected for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapies.
24.2.1.2 Pathological Prognostic Factors
Tumor Stage
The most important predictor of oncologic outcomes in patients with UTUC remains the tumor stage. Increasing pathological stage is associated with greater potential for metastatic disease and lower DFS and CSS [57]. In fact, for patients with stage T4 UTUC, the 5-year DFS drops to less than 5 %. Chemotherapy combined with aggressive RNU may represent the best treatment option for patients with high stage disease in order to provide some improvement in prognosis [65].
Tumor Grade
Tumor grade is also an important prognostic factor and predictor of DFS and CSS in patients with UTUC, and has been shown to be one of the most useful parameters in treatment decision-making [57]. The majority of patients with UTUC will have high-grade tumors at the time of RNU; however, grade was the most important prognostic factor in preoperative nomogram for detection of non-organ confined UTUC [66]. The nomogram can be used for patient counseling, guiding the extent of LND during RNU, or selection of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients.
Lymph Node Status and Extent of Lymph Node Dissection
Lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in UTUC and has been shown to predict DFS and CSS [57, 67, 68]. Patients with positive LN status have significantly worse outcomes after RNU compared to patients with negative LNs. Approximately 20–25 % of patients with UTUC may have positive LNs at the time of RNU [57, 68]. In addition, higher stage tumors were found to have higher probability of LN metastasis [68]. Therefore, LND in patients with higher stage tumors may help with treatment decision-making and selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. The extent of LND may be associated with better oncologic outcomes. According to Roscigno and colleagues, a minimum of eight removed LNs may be needed during LND to provide adequate information regarding LN status [69, 70]. Despite these findings, LND is only performed in about half of RNU cases for UTUC in academic institutions [67]. Prospective clinical trials are needed to help create standardized guidelines and templates for LND during RNU for UTUC.
Lymphovascular Invasion
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been shown to be an important predictor of oncologic outcomes in UTUC, and it is an independent predictor of DFS and CSS [57, 71, 72]. LVI is found in approximately 25 % of RNU specimens in patients with high stage or high grade UTUC. Incorporating LVI into a predictive model with conventional pathological findings, such as tumor stage and grade, significantly improves the accuracy of outcome prediction [71]. Therefore, it is important to consider LVI status when assessing risk for recurrence or tumor progression.
Tumor Architecture
A number of other pathological factors have been shown to have significant prognostic value in UTUC. Sessile tumor architecture has been shown to be an independent predictor of oncologic outcomes after RNU and associated with tumor aggressiveness when compared to papillary architecture [57, 73, 74].
Carcinoma In Situ
Tumor Necrosis
Tumor Location
Tumor location may have a significant impact on oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RNU. Some evidence suggests that tumors located at the ureteroenteric junction may be associated with more aggressive features and poor outcomes; however, these findings are still debatable [79]. Additional studies are needed to validate these findings before tumor necrosis and tumor location can be used as prognostic factors to guide treatment decisions after RNU.
Nomograms for UTUC
The combination of several prognostic factors may help improve prediction of oncologic outcomes after RNU in patients with UTUC. Recent multi-institutional collaboration studies have generated nomogram models to predict outcomes based on multiple clinico-pathological factors [66, 80–82]. These nomograms have been shown to accurately predict DFS and CSS in patients with low or high-grade disease. Furthermore, nomograms may be seamlessly integrated into clinical practice as tools for patient counseling, scheduling patient follow-ups, and selecting patients for multimodal therapies.
Future Prognostic Markers of UTUC
Despite the growing body of evidence supporting the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapies in the management of UTUC, few patients undergoing RNU receive perioperative therapies [83, 84]. The use of biomarkers beside clinico-pathological prognostic factors will play an increasingly important role in guiding clinical decision-making and the selection of candidates for adjuvant therapies. Similar to studies on molecular biomarkers of BC, several studies are ongoing to identify molecular biomarkers that have significant prognostic value for UTUC [85–87]. The development of improved predictive models incorporating biomarkers may improve the accuracy of current prognostic models and lead to individualized multimodal treatment strategies for patients and improved oncologic outcomes for patients with UTUC.