Radiation Protection During CT-Guided Interventions



Fig. 3.1
Distribution of dose within a patient undergoing an angiographic procedure using a PA projection



A162170_1_En_3_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 3.2
Distribution of dose within a patient undergoing a CT procedure. (a) Small patient, (b) large patient


During CT-guided interventions, the entrance air kerma rate (EAKR) is approximately equal to the CTDI100 1 rate for a typical patient [1]. However, manufacturers typically display the CTDIvol rate or accumulated CTDIvol, not CTDI100, on the scanner. Based on the relationship between CTDI100 and CTDIvol, the EAKR for a typical patient is equal to approximately 0.6 × CTDIvol [2]. Typical entrance air kerma rates during CT-guided interventions range from 1.5 to 8 mGy/s, depending on the operating mode and scanner hardware. If we consider an EAKR of 5 mGy/s, 400 s of imaging would be required to reach an ESAK of 2,000 mGy (2 Gy). While the ESAK is not equal to the actual skin dose, it is a reasonable quantity to use for monitoring the progress of a procedure. Also, the ratio of the EAKR to the CTDI rate will vary with patient size and beam width [1]. Tables 3.1 and 3.2 provide some helpful information regarding radiation dose to the patient during CT-guided interventions.


Table 3.1
Variations in ESAK rate in CT with changes in kVp and mA

























kVp

Adjustment factor
 

80

0.4

ESAK changes linearly with mA. Doubling the mA doubles ESAK, halving the mA halves the ESAK for the same time

100

0.7

120

1.0

140

1.4


For example, if changing from 120 kVp, 50 mA to 80 kVp, 90 mA the dose would change from the typical rate (5 mGy/s) to 5 mGy/s × 0.4 × 90/50 = 3.6 mGy/s



Table 3.2
CT fluoroscopy time required to reach specific skin dose levels










































   
Time to reach threshold (s)

kVp

mA

1,000 mGy

2,000 mGy

80

75

435

869

80

100

328

656

80

150

195

392

120

50

184

357

120

100

86

173


Data adapted from Nawfel et al. [3]. A 20 cm PMMA phantom was used in this study



Operator Dose in CT-Guided Interventions


Operators face unique radiation protection challenges when working with CT. In angiography, exposure to intense backscattered radiation can be avoided by maintaining the x-ray tube beneath the patient table or by standing by the image receptor end of the C-arm when using oblique or lateral projections. In CT, some exposure to backscattered radiation is unavoidable, as the x-ray tube is not stationary but instead rotates around the patient. In addition, the intensity of stray radiation in CT is higher by approximately a factor of 10 compared to the angiography lab.


Protection of the Patient


Interventional CT procedures utilize a different workflow from diagnostic CT procedures. A typical procedure involves the acquisition of high-quality planning data, followed by the biopsy procedure and its associated scans, and often ends with the acquisition of another set of high-quality post-procedure data. The technical factors used during the different phases of the procedure should be tailored to the goals of each individual phase. In particular, the biopsy portion of the procedure should use lower techniques than the pre- and post-procedure scans. This is especially important considering the fact that the patient is likely to be scanned multiple times at the same location. The use of excessive technical factors for the biopsy phase may put the patient at risk for deterministic radiation injuries such as erythema or epilation [4]. High-contrast anatomical landmarks can be used to navigate on the biopsy scans, or an external electromagnetic guidance system can be used in conjunction with the planning data to guide the intervention.


Appropriate Technical Factors for CT-Guided Interventions


The key to maintaining appropriate patient doses during CT-guided interventions is the selection of appropriate technical factors. A CT-guided intervention is not a diagnostic imaging procedure. While high-quality pre-procedure planning data and post-procedure assessment data may be needed, the CT guidance for the actual procedure can in most cases be performed with greatly reduced technical factors (Table 3.3) [5]. Externally placed markers and internal landmarks can be used for navigation. In addition, some modern ultrasound systems offer navigation options that fuse the ultrasound images with prior CT images, and several companies manufacture guidance systems that use prior CT images for navigation.


Table 3.3
Typical technical factors for CT examinations



























Procedure

kVp

mAs

CTDIvol a(mGy)

Scanlength (cm)

Number of scansin same location

Effectivedose (mSv)

Diagnostic abdomen CT

120

200

15

40

One

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 24, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Radiation Protection During CT-Guided Interventions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access