Recent advances in radiography



1.25: Recent advances in radiography


Alex Fernandus D, Binit Sureka, Pushpinder Singh Khera




You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.


B. Fuller



Digital radiography


Digital radiography (DR) is a projection (2D) X-ray imaging technique that uses digital imaging technology in which the analogue signal acquired from the patient is transformed into a digital form, transferred to a computer and processed for digital display. Additionally, they can also be digitally stored, retrieved and communicated for fast distribution (e.g. picture archiving and communication system, hospital information system [HIS], radiology information system [RIS]).


In contrast to conventional screen–film practices, DR uses digital detectors which can either be direct or indirect X-ray convertors. Direct detectors directly convert the X-ray signal into electric charges that can be further processed for transformation into a digital image, whereas in indirect detectors, the X-ray signal is first converted into visible light photons and then the light photons are converted into electric charges. In general, digital detectors consist of three distinct components: X-ray capture element, coupling element and collection element (see Fig. 1.25.1). Table 1.25.1 shows the common elements of DR detectors.


Image
Fig. 1.25.1 Common elements of digital detectors. Source: (Taken and modified from Samei E, Peck DJ. Hendee’s Physics of Medical Imaging, 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2019).


TABLE 1.25.1


Common Elements of Digital Radiography Detectors


































Detector Technology Typical Capture Element Typical Coupling Element Collection Element X-ray Conversion Type
Computed radiography Photostimulable phosphor (e.g. BaFBr) Laser-prompted photostimulable light guide Photomultiplier tube; signal digitization Indirect
CCD/CMOS-based CsI or G2O2S phosphor Lens or fibre-optic taper CCD or CMOS Indirect
Indirect flat panel CsI or G2O2S phosphor Contact layer Photodiode/TFT array Indirect
Direct flat panel a-Se or CdZnTl None TFT array Direct

Modified from Samei E, Peck DJ. Hendee’s physics of medical imaging. John Wiley & Sons; 2019 Apr 23. p. 234–236, 244, 261–262.


CCD, charge-coupled device; CMOS, complementary metal-oxide semiconductor; TFT, thin-film transistor.


Some of the advantages of digital detectors over conventional analogue systems include wide dynamic range, increased dose efficiency, reduced patient exposure, image postprocessing and electronic storage, retrieval and distribution. Other advancements include but not limited to photon-counting detectors (PCDs), tomosynthesis, dual-energy imaging, computer-aided detection and diagnosis, automatic image stitching, mobile DR, wireless flat-panel detectors (FPDs), mobile computed radiography (CR) and new structured phosphors in computer radiography, which are discussed in the following subsections.


Photon counting system


One of the advancements in the digital imaging systems include photon counting receptors which interact with incident photons one by one and detect each photon (a count), and the specific energy range within each photon can be identified (energy discriminated count).


In comparison with the conventional energy-integrating detectors (EIDs) that work in a current mode (integrate deposited energies from all photons), PCDs are operated in a pulse mode based on single event in which each photon interaction with the detector can be processed and registered individually (count individual photons while measuring energy information).


Each of the registered photon gives rise to an electrical pulse in the detector read-out electronics with respect to time, and the height of each pulse is proportional to the individual photon energy. The detector counts only the number of pulses with a height larger than a preset threshold, thereby eliminating electronic noises (that are present below the threshold). By setting more than one threshold, the registered photons can be sorted into several energy bins on the basis of their energy range (see Figs 1.25.2 and 1.25.3).


Image
Fig. 1.25.2 Illustration of operating principle of a photon-counting detector. Source: (Modified from M. Willemink, M. Persson, A. Pourmorteza et al. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects, Radiology 289(2):293–312).

Image
Fig. 1.25.3 Measured X-ray spectrum divided into a number of energy bins in an energy-resolving photon-counting detector. Source: (Modified from M. Willemink, M. Persson, A. Pourmorteza et al. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects, Radiology 289(2):293–312).

The PCD systems have been developed with the capture elements such as gas, scintillator or semiconductor material mediums and coupled to a collection element through which the detected X-ray signal is either directly or indirectly measured in terms of electric charges and used for further process and analysis of the acquired signal.


In a semiconductor-based PCD (direct detector) currently used in the field of X-ray imaging, a large voltage is applied on it, and when an incident X-ray is absorbed in the semiconductor, a cloud of positive and negative charges are generated and collected by the electrodes connected to an electronic read-out circuit (see Fig. 1.25.4).


Image
Fig. 1.25.4 Direct conversion of X-rays into electrical signal in a semiconductor-based photon-counting detector. Source: (Modified from M. Willemink, M. Persson, A. Pourmorteza et al. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects, Radiology 289(2):293–312).

Semiconductors made up of silicon (Si, Z = 14) is typically used for lower X-ray energies due to its low absorption efficiency in lower energy ranges (e.g. Si-strip detectors are used in PCD-based mammography systems with scanning multislit geometry – see Figs 1.25.5 and 1.25.6).


Image
Fig. 1.25.5 Multislit scanning technology used in Philips MicroDose. Source: (Courtesy of Philips. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/22209950/photon-counting-technology-philips-healthcare).

Image
Fig. 1.25.6 Crystalline silicon strip detectors with edge-on geometry in which X-ray photons generates a cloud of electron–hole pairs that create a short electrical signal. Source: (Courtesy of Philips. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/22209950/photon-counting-technology-philips-healthcare).

For higher X-ray energies, more X-ray absorbing capture elements have been developed and are clinically used due to their higher absorption efficiency, namely, cadmium telluride (CdTe, Z = 48/52) and cadmium zinc telluride (CZT, Z = 48/30/52). The thicknesses of the X-ray-absorbing crystals may be increased to attain greater absorption efficiency.


Some of the benefits of PCDs over the conventional EIDs include reduced electronic noises, higher contrast-to-noise ratio, improved dose efficiency and simultaneous multienergy imaging. The scope of PCDs is currently studied and being developed and is hoped to be clinically available in the future (e.g. photon-counting multienergy CT).


Tomosynthesis


Tomosynthesis is an advanced cross-sectional digital imaging technique developed from conventional tomography that can remove overlying structures and reveal anatomical structures present at different depths or planes inside the patient.


In digital tomosynthesis (DT), the X-ray tube is moved around the patient’s anatomical region of interest, with a limited number of projection angles (limited angular range), in a continuous or discrete (“step and shoot”) manner. The detector could be stationary or dynamic depending upon the system (see Figs 1.25.7 and 1.25.8).


Image
Fig. 1.25.7 Illustration of the basic principle of digital tomosynthesis performed with flat-panel detector in digital radiography. θ = sweep angle. In both wall standing acquisition (A) and table acquisition (B), the X-ray tube moves across a stationary detector with multiple beam projections. Source: (H. Machida, T. Yuhara, T. Mori, E. Ueno, Y. Moribe, J. Sabol. Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis. RadioGraphics 30 (2) (2010) 549–562).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 25, 2024 | Posted by in CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING | Comments Off on Recent advances in radiography

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access