The AC transformer

Chapter 14 The AC transformer






14.3 The ideal transformer


Let us start by defining this device:




There is, of course, no such thing as the ideal (or perfect) transformer, although real transformers with efficiencies of 98% or more are not uncommon. Although not a practical reality, the concept of the ideal transformer is a useful one in that it simplifies the mathematics which can be used to describe the behaviour of transformers.


Consider such an ideal transformer, shown in Figure 14.1, where two isolated sets of windings share a common core – there are a number of other configurations of core and windings but the one shown in Figure 14.1 is the simplest. The input or primary side of the transformer consists of np turns around the core and has an alternating voltage VP across it. The output or secondary side of the transformer consists of ns turns and has a voltage Vs induced in it. This is a case of mutual induction, as discussed in Section 10.7. The sequence of events is as follows:



image

Figure 14.1 An ‘ideal’ transformer showing the core and the primary and secondary windings. In practice, the core is laminated, as shown in Figure 14.2. As there are more turns on the secondary winding than on the primary winding, this is a step-up transformer. The symbol for a step-up transformer is also shown. See text for details.


As already mentioned in the introduction to this chapter, an AC supply is essential for the operation of the transformer since no EMF will be generated in the secondary if the magnetic flux is constant (Faraday’s first law).


The purpose of the soft iron core is to contain all the magnetic flux within it so that the magnetic flux linkage between the primary and the secondary is as near perfect as possible. The core is able to do this because of its strong induced magnetism, resulting from its high magnetic permeability (see Table 14.1).


Table 14.1 A summary of the losses associated with a particular transformer
























TRANSFORMER LOSS COMMENTS
Copper losses Caused by the resistance of the copper windings. Also known as I2R losses
Iron losses Losses produced in the transformer core
Imperfect magnetic flux linkage Very small loss flux
Eddy currents Caused by electromagnetic induction within the core of the transformer – reduced by core lamination
Hysteresis Caused by the work required to move the magnetic domains – reduced by the appropriate choice of core material (e.g. stalloy)
Regulation (a consequence of all the above losses) Output voltage decreases with increased current load because of the increased losses due to the resistance of the windings

The mathematics of the ideal transformer are relatively simple if we first consider the effect of the magnetic flux on a single turn of wire around the core. Since we are assuming that the transformer is ideal, there is no magnetic flux loss and the EMF induced is independent of the position of the wire. Thus, the same voltage will be induced in each turn of the primary and in each turn of the secondary. If we call this voltage v, then we can say that the total primary voltage is the voltage in each turn multiplied by the number of turns. Thus:



image



Similarly, for the secondary:



image



Thus, we can combine the two equations above to get:



image



By cross-multiplying this equation, we get the formula:



Equation 14.1 image



Note: This equation is true for either peak or root mean square (RMS) values of the voltage, provided Vs and Vp are both expressed in the same units.


The ratio Vs/Vp is known as the voltage gain of the transformer. This is greater than unity for a step-up transformer and less than unity for a step-down transformer.


The ratio ns/npis known as the turns ratio of the transformer. Again, if this is greater than unity, we have a step-up transformer and if it is less than unity, we have a step-down transformer.


If we have a transformer with a turns ratio of 200:1, we know that there are 200 times as many turns on the secondary as on the primary and that the voltage across the secondary is 200 times that of the primary.


The current flowing in the secondary of the transformer may be calculated from the power in the primary winding and secondary winding (for simplicity, in the following discussion, RMS values are assumed). In the ideal transformer, the power in the primary and the power in the secondary are equal. Thus:



image



From Equation 14.1 we know:



image



Thus, for an ideal transformer, we can say:



Equation 14.2 image




14.4 Faraday’s laws and lenz’s law applied to transformers


We have already considered Faraday’s laws of electromagnetic induction (Sect. 10.4) and Lenz’s law (Sect. 10.5) and we can now look at how these are applied to transformers.


As discussed in the previous section, there is a changing magnetic flux produced by the alternating supply connected to the primary and, since this is linked to both the primary and secondary windings, by Faraday’s laws, an EMF is produced in each of the windings. Assuming we have an ideal transformer, the magnitude of the EMF in each turn of the primary winding is equal to the magnitude of the EMF in each turn of the secondary.


Lenz’s law may be used to determine the direction of the induced current in the secondary. As it acts to oppose the changing magnetic flux, it will be in the opposite direction to (180° out of phase with) the current in the primary. The eddy currents induced in the core (these will be discussed later in this chapter, as they are part of the transformer ‘losses’) will also be in the opposite direction to the primary current.


Mar 6, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on The AC transformer

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access