MASSIMO LAMPERTI

Overview

Despite well-established evidence on the use of ultrasound for placement of any vascular access,¹ a formal training program on how to perform ultrasound-guided vascular access (UGVA) and how to certify adequate competence has not been clearly defined.^2,3 According to recommendations by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, those involved in UGVA should undertake appropriate training to achieve competence.⁴ Defining a competent practitioner in objective terms is a difficult task. Recently, the American Society of Echocardiography declared that training in UGVA should include a minimum of 10 proctored procedures, but the learning curve needed to perform these procedures was not defined, nor was it specified who should be considered expert and supervise new users.⁵

Evidence-based guidelines for defining a common educational process and establishing credentialing for any type of UGVA that can be considered as a model for any kind of training course in UGVA were recently published by the World Conference on Vascular Access.⁶ The guidelines emphasized that the use of ultrasound reduces insertion-related complications, increases the success rate at first attempt, assists in selection of the correct vascular device according to safety, and enables preservation of veins.

Didactic education

Educational programs facilitate a reduction in delayed complications such as infection and thrombosis.^7,8 The didactic contents of UGVA courses should be specifically directed at how to perform UGVA. Clinicians’ knowledge of certain subject areas and competence in device insertion affect the rate of UGVA-related complications. The following topics should be discussed in formal educational training programs:

All didactic content should be included in a training manual so that trainees can read it before beginning the didactic portion of the training. A minimum of 6 to 8 hours of didactics has been suggested. Theoretic competence should then be evaluated with a multiple-choice test that has at least 100 questions. The trainee must pass the test with at least 70% correct answers before proceeding to hands-on training.⁶

Simulation training

Training laboratories should offer a variety of ultrasound machines to facilitate understanding of their basic functions such as depth, gain, and freeze (knobology). Training should start with examination of normal vascular anatomy in healthy volunteers and with hands-on simulation (models). Several inanimate models of vascular access are available. The best simulation model should not only include vessels but also mimic the normal body anatomy in terms of muscles, soft tissues, and bones. Inanimate animal models such as turkey breasts may be useful to demonstrate these anatomic findings. In the future, virtual simulators could be useful for measuring the correct hand-eye coordination of the trainee. Although it is not possible to include visualization of abnormal vascular anatomy in inanimate models, a collection of videos should be incorporated into the didactic material to show all significant abnormal findings during preliminary evaluation of the vessels before cannulation (e.g., intraluminal thrombosis, significant collapse of the internal jugular vein during inspiration). Trainees should complete 6 hours of hands-on training on normal human volunteers for detection of normal ultrasound anatomy and 4 hours of hands-on training on inanimate models.^2,6

Learning curves and training time

Related posts:

Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization Ultrasound-guided placement of inferior vena cava filters: (CONSULTANT-LEVEL EXAMINATION) Ultrasonography in circulatory failure Evaluation of right ventricular function in the intensive care unit by echocardiography: (CONSULTANT-LEVEL EXAMINATION) Procedural ultrasound for surgeons: (CONSULTANT-LEVEL EXAMINATION)

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join