Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Adverse Cerebrovascular Events


Study

Approach

TAVI System

Mean age

Logistic EuroSCORE %

Periprocedure/30-day stroke %

30-day mortality

1-year stroke%

1-year survival

Piazza et al. [6]

Europe (51 sites)

n = 646

TF: 646

CoreValve®

TF: 81.0

TF: 23.1 ± 13.8

TF: 1.9

TF: 8.0

N/A

N/A

Rodés-Cabau et al. [7]

Canada (6 sites)

n = 339

TF: 162

TA: 177

Cribier-Edwards: 57

Edwards SAPIEN®: 275

Edwards SAPIEN XT®: 7

TF: 83

TA: 80

Overall: 27.7 ± 16.3

TF: 25.8 ± 14.9

TA: 29.4 ± 17.2

Overall: 2.3

TF: 3.0

TA: 1.7

Overall: 10.4

TF: 9.5

TA: 11.3

N/A

Overall: 76

TF: 75

TA: 78

Thomas et al. [7]

Europe (32 sites)

n = 1038

TF: 463

TA: 575

Edwards SAPIEN®

TF: 81.7

TA: 80.7

TF: 25.7 ± 14.5

TA: 29.1 ± 16.3

Overall: 2.5

TF: 2.4

TA: 2.6

Overall: 8.5

TF: 6.3

TA: 10.3

Overall: 5.5

Overall: 76.1

TF: 81.1

TA: 72.1

Eltchaninoff et al. [9]

France (16 sites)

n = 244

TF Edwards: 95

TA Edwards: 71

TF CoreValve®: 66

SC CoreValve®: 12

Edwards SAPIEN®: 166

CoreValve®: 78

Overall: 82.3

TF Edwards: 83.2

TA Edwards: 82.1

TF CoreValve®: 82.5

SC CoreValve®: 75.5

Overall: 25.6 ± 11.4

TF Edwards: 25.6 ± 11.3

TA Edwards: 26.8 ± 11.6

TF CoreValve®: 24.7 ± 11.2

SC CoreValve®: 24.6 ± 14.5

Overall: 3.6

TF Edwards: 4.2

TA Edwards: 2.8

TF CoreValve®: 4.5

SC CoreValve®: 0

Overall: 12.7

TF Edwards: 8.4

TA Edwards: 16.9

TF CoreValve®: 15.1

SC CoreValve®: 8.3

N/A

N/A

Zahn et al. [11]

Germany (22 sites)

n = 697

TF: 644

SC: 22

TA: 26

Tao: 5

Edwards SAPIEN®: 109

CoreValve®: 588

Overall: 81.4

Overall: 20.5 ± 13.2

Overall: 2.8

Overall: 12.4

N/A

N/A

Bosmans et al. [12]

Belgium (15 sites)

n = 328

TF/TA Edwards: 187

TF CoreValve®: 141

Edwards SAPIEN®: 187

CoreValve®: 141

Overall: 83

TF/TA Edwards: 83

TF CoreValve®: 82

Overall: 28 ± 16

TF/TA Edwards: 30 ± 16

TF CoreValve®: 25 ± 15

Overall: 5.0

TF/TA Edwards: 5.0

TF CoreValve®: 4.0

Overall: 11.0

TF/TA Edwards: 12.0

TF CoreValve®: 11.0

N/A

TF Edwards : 82

TF/TA Edwards: 63

TF CoreValve®: 79

Tamburino et al. [13]

Italy (14 sites)

n = 663

TF: 599

SC: 64

CoreValve®

Overall: 81

Overall: 23.0 ± 13.7

Overall: 1.2

Overall: 5.4

Overall: 2.5

Overall: 85

Moat et al. [14]

United Kingdom (25 sites)

N = 870

TF: 599

Other approaches: 271

Edwards SAPIEN®: 410

CoreValve®: 452

Overall: 81.9

TF: 81.7

Other routes: 82.3

CoreValve®: 81.3

Edwards: 82.6

Overall:

18.5 (11.7–27.9)

TF: 17.1 (11, 25.5)

Other routes:

21.4 (14.4, 33.6)

CoreValve®:

18.1 (11.1, 27.9)

Edwards:

18.5 (12.4, 27.7)

Overall: 4.1

TF: 4.0

Other routes: 4.1

CoreValve®: 4.0

Edwards: 4.2

Overall: 7.1

TF: 5.5

Other routes: 10.7

CoreValve®: 5.8

Edwards: 8.5

N/A

Overall: 78.6

TF: 81.5

Other routes: 72.3

CoreValve®: 78.3

Edwards: 79.4

Gilard et al. [15]

France (34 sites)

n = 3195

TF: 2361

TA: 567

SC: 184

Other approaches: 83

Edwards SAPIEN®: 2107

CoreValve®: 1043

Other systems : 45

Overall: 82.7

TF: 83

TA: 81.5

SC: 82.2

Edwards SAPIEN®: 82.9

CoreValve®: 82.3

Overall: 21.9 ± 14.3

TF: 21.2 ± 14.7

TA: 24.8 ± 14.7

SC: 20.3 ± 15.2

Edwards SAPIEN®: 22.2 ± 14.3

CoreValve®:

21.3 ± 14.3

Overall: 3.4

Overall: 9.7

TF: 8.5

TA: 13.9

SC: 10.1

Edwards SAPIEN®: 9.6

CoreValve®: 9.4

Overall: 4.1

Overall: 24.0

TF: 21.7

TA: 32.3

SC: 25.1

Edwards SAPIEN®: 24.0

CoreValve®: 23.7

Wendler [16]

Europe (94 sites)

n = 2600

TF Edwards: 1694

TA Edwards: 906

Edwards

SAPIEN XT®

TF: 81.9

TA: 80.2

TF: 19.9 ± 12.0

TA: 21.8 ± 13.8

TF: 2.3

TA: 2.1

TF: 4.3

TA: 9.9

NA

NA

Linke et al. [17]

Europe, Asia, South America (44 sites)

n = 1015

CoreValve®: 1015

CoreValve®

Overall: 81

Overall: 19.2 ± 12.4

Overall: 2.9

Overall: 4.5

NA

NA


TA transapical, TF transfemoral, SC subclavian, TAO transaortic




Table 20.2
VARC stroke definitions [15]







































Stroke diagnostic criteria

 Rapid onset of a focal or global neurological deficit with at least one of the following:

  Change in level of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one

  Side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopia, amaurosis fugax, or other neurological signs or

  Symptoms consistent with stroke

 Duration of a focal or global neurological deficit ≥24 h; OR <24 h, if therapeutic intervention(s) were performed (e.g., thrombolytic therapy or intracranial angioplasty); OR available neuroimaging documents a new hemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death

 No other readily identifiable nonstroke cause for the clinical presentation (e.g., brain tumor, trauma, infection, hypoglycemia, peripheral lesion, pharmacological influences)

 Confirmation of the diagnosis by at least one of the following:

  Neurology or neurosurgical specialist

Stroke definitions

 Transient ischemic attack:

  New focal neurological deficit with rapid symptom resolution (usually 1–2 h), always within 24 h

  Neuroimaging without tissue injury

 Stroke:

 (diagnosis as above, preferably with positive neuroimaging study)

  Minor—Modified Rankin score 2 at 30 and 90 days†

  Major—Modified Rankin score 2 at 30 and 90 days


Modified Rankin score assessments should be made by qualified individuals according to a certification process. If there is discordance between the 30 and 90 day Modified Rankin scores, a final determination of major versus minor stroke will be adjudicated by the neurology members of the clinical events committee


The PARTNER trial, to date, remains the only prospective randomized trial of TAVR. PARTNER included two differentiated cohorts of patients: (1) those considered to be nonoperable (i.e., comorbidities leading to a predicted risk of 50 % or more, of either death by 30 days after surgery or a serious irreversible morbidity; patients with comorbidities leading to a life expectancy <1 year were excluded, n = 358) [19] and (2) those considered to be at high surgical risk (i.e., predicted risk of operative mortality ≥15 % as determined by the trial site surgeon and cardiologist; guideline = STS score ≥10, n = 699) [20]. The Edwards SAPIEN valve was used in all cases. The PARTNER trial showed, in the nonoperable cohort, the superiority of TAVR vs. medical treatment with balloon aortic valvuloplasty [BAV] (mortality at 1-year follow-up of 30.7 % vs. 50 %, p < 0.001) and the non-inferiority of TAVR vs. SAVR in the high-risk cohort (mortality at 1-year follow-up of 24.2 % vs. 26.8 %, p = 0.44). However, the trial revealed a higher rate of cerebrovascular events in the TAVR group with respect to the medical treatment and SAVR groups. A summary of the results regarding the CVE in the PARTNER trial at 30-day and at 1-year follow-up is shown in Fig. 20.1.

A301676_1_En_20_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 20.1
Cerebrovascular events in the PARTNER trial at 30-day and at 1-year follow-up in the nonoperable cohort (a) and the high-risk cohort (b)

The incidence of late (>30 days) ischemic stroke after TAVR (~2 %/year) was similar to that observed after SAVR and medical treatment in a similar population of elderly and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, strongly suggesting the lack of a late prothrombotic effect associated with transcatheter valves [19, 20]. A substudy of the PARTNER trial showed that a higher atherosclerotic burden and previous CVE were the factors associated with late CVE after TAVR [21]. On the other hand, an excess of late hemorrhagic strokes was observed in the TAVR group compared with the medical treatment group in the PARTNER trial [22], highlighting the potential importance of excessive antithrombotic treatment to these late events after TAVR.



Cerebral Ischemic Defects Following TAVR


Clinically silent cerebrovascular injury resulting from TAVR has come to the fore following a series of studies evaluating cerebral ischemic events using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) (Table 20.3, Figs. 20.2 and 20.3). An initial study by Kahlert et al. [23] compared 32 patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR (22 with the Edwards SAPIEN valve [Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA] and 10 with the CoreValve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]) to historical SAVR controls (n = 21) (Table 20.3). Patients underwent DW MRI at baseline, a mean of 3.4 (2.5–4.4) days, and again at 3 months post-index procedure. All patients were assessed by an experienced neurologist using both the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Successful valve implantation was achieved in all TAVR patients with no obvious adverse neurologic event during the periprocedural period. No change was noted in the NIHSS scale or MMSE score of any of these patients. Repeat DW MRI post TAVR however demonstrated new hyperintense lesions in 86 % of the Edwards SAPIEN and 80 % of CoreValve TAVR patients. There were significantly fewer patients with new lesions in the control SAVR group (48 %, p = 0.016). These new lesions were typically identified in both hemispheres reflecting a probable embolic cause. Among individuals with new cerebral lesions, lesion size was significantly smaller in the TAVR groups compared with the SAVR patients. At 3 months, no new DW MRI findings or changes in clinical or neurocognitive testing were noted. Indeed, the authors reported that 80 % of post-TAVR lesions had no residual signal change on repeat DW MRI at the 3-month interval.


Table 20.3
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies post transcatheter aortic valve implantation










































































Study

n

Valve type

Approach

Ischemic defects

Median number of lesions

Cognitive/neurologic assessment

Cognitive/neurologic assessment results

Stroke

Kahlert et al. [23]

32

Edwards SAPIEN (n = 22)

CoreValve (n = 10)

TF

Edwards: 86 %

CoreValve: 80 %

Edwards: 4 (2.1–6.0)

CoreValve: 2.6 (0.3–4.9)

NIHSS, MMSE, mRS

No change

Overall: 0 %

Ghanem et al. [24]

22

CoreValve

TF

73 %

2.5 (1.0–5.5)

NIHSS, NSE

Neurologic impairment: 3 (10 %)

3.6 %

Rodés-Cabau et al. [26]

60

Edwards SAPIEN

TF (n = 29)

TA (n = 31)

TF: 66 %

TA: 71 %

Overall: 3 (2–8)

TF: 3 (1–7)

TA: 4 (2–9)

NIHSS, MMSE

No change

Overall: 3.3 %

TF: 1.6 %

TA: 1.6 %

Fairbairn et al. [27]

31

CoreValve

TF

77 %

2 (1–5)

NIHSS

No change

6.0 %

Arnold et al. [25]

25

Edwards SAPIEN

TA

68 %

N/A

Standardized clinical assessment

Neurologic impairment: 5 (20 %)

4.0 %


TA transapical, TF transfemoral, NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, mRS modified Rankin Scale, NSE neuron-specific enolase


A301676_1_En_20_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 20.2
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) images following transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA TAVI) in an 83-year-old patient showing multiple acute ischemic lesions in the left and right cerebellum (a, white arrows) and left frontal territory (b and c, white arrows) (Reproduced from Rodés-Cabau et al. with the permission of author and publisher)


A301676_1_En_20_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 20.3
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) images following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF TAVI) in an 86-year-old patient showing multiple acute ischemic lesions in the right cerebellum (a, white arrow), right occipital territory (b, white arrow), left frontal and right parietal territories (c, black arrows), and left and right frontal superior territories (d, white arrows) (Reproduced from Rodés-Cabau et al. with the permission of author and publisher)

Ghanem et al. [24] performed a pilot study involving 22 patients to prospectively assess clinically silent and overt cerebral embolic events in the setting of TF TAVR. Cerebral DW MRI was carried out before, within 3 days post and at 3 months after valve implantation. Three patients (10 %) had a new neurological abnormality on examination post TAVR, but symptoms resolved in two. At the time of the first post-TAVR neuroimaging study, 72.7 % of patients had new ischemic lesions compared to baseline.

It had been suggested that the transapical (TA) approach may potentially minimize cardioembolic event rates as this method minimizes the need for extensive catheter manipulation within the aortic arch. Arnold et al. [25] performed a similar assessment using cerebral DW MRI in 25 patients undergoing TA TAVR with the Edwards SAPIEN system. Valve implantation was successful in all patients; however, neurological abnormalities were evident post procedure on clinical examination in five patients, one of who developed a major stroke. Analysis of DW MRI revealed new embolic lesions in 68 % of the patients, with more than one lesion in the majority. In those patients with new lesions, the posterior circulation territory was involved in greater than 50 % of cases. Rodés-Cabau et al. [26] compared the incidence of acute cerebral ischemic injury in those undergoing TAVR (employing the Edwards SAPIEN or SAPIEN XT valve) via the TF and the TA approach. In this multicenter study, 60 patients (TF: 29, TA: 31) underwent cerebral DW MRI prior to and within 6 days following TAVR. Additional neurologic and cognitive evaluation was performed at the same intervals as neuroimaging, using the NIHSS and MMSE tests. One patient in each group had clinical evidence of a stroke within 24 h of valve insertion. Up to 68 % of patients had new ischemic lesions on DW MRI post TAVR with a median number of three lesions per patient (range 1–36). Of those with new lesions, 76 % were multiple and 73 and 66 % involved both cerebral hemispheres and circulation (anterior and posterior) territories, respectively. Of note, most (91 %) lesions were small (<1 cm). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the incidence of new ischemic lesions between the TF (66 %) and TA (71 %) approaches. Finally, no interval changes in NIHSS and MMSE test scores were recorded following TAVR.

Fairbairn et al. [27] examined quality of life data in addition to performing DW MRI pre and post TAVR with the CoreValve system in 31 AS patients. Two (6 %) patients were diagnosed clinically with stroke as a consequence of the procedure. DW MRI confirmed up to 26 new ischemic lesions in both of these. Overall, new cerebral ischemic lesions were seen in 24 (77 %) patients, with the infarcts distributed evenly between both hemispheres. The mean number of new lesions per patient was 4.2 ± 6.5 with a mean infarcted tissue volume of 2.05 ± 3.5 ml. The authors demonstrated that increasing age and aortic arch atheroma burden were independent predictors of new ischemic lesions post TAVR. General health status and quality of life improved at 30 days post TAVR with no functional cognitive decline recorded.

The significance of clinically silent cerebrovascular ischemic events post TAVR remains unclear. As detailed above DW MRI evaluation has shown that between 68 and 86 % of TAVR patients have evidence of acute ischemic insults [2327]. General population studies have found that the prevalence of silent brain infarcts increases with age and may be as high as 28 %, fivefold more common than stroke [2830]. Though the consequences of silent cerebral ischemia are not fully elucidated, they have been associated with visual defects, motor abnormalities, cognitive decline, and altered mood [31]. Further studies will have to elucidate the real clinical consequences of these DW MRI defects following TAVR procedures.


Pathophysiology of Cerebroembolic Events During TAVR (Box 20.1)



Box 20.1 Potential Etiologies of Cerebroembolic Events During TAVR






  • Aortic arch manipulation


  • Cerebral emboli (gaseous or thrombotic)


  • Showering of calcium during balloon aortic valvuloplasty


  • Balloon post-dilatation


  • Hypoperfusion


  • Atrial fibrillation


Aortic Arch Manipulation


Given the complexities of the TAVR procedure and the often coexistent multiple patient comorbidities, inadvertent cerebral embolization may result from a multitude of events. For instance, left heart catheterization alone via the TF approach, wherein a stenosed calcified aortic valve is crossed in its retrograde fashion, has been shown to result in frequent cerebroemboli [32]. Omran et al. [32] described the occurrence of clinically apparent stroke in 3 % and cerebral DW MRI changes consistent with acute ischemic lesions in 22 %, following retrograde AV crossing. Several studies employing cerebral DW MRI have shown asymptomatic ischemic lesions due to cardiac catheterization with an incidence ranging from 5 % to the 22 % of the aforementioned work [3234]. Clinically overt stroke has been reported in 0.44 % of patients undergoing PCI and was associated with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior stroke, or renal failure [35]. However, age has been shown to influence this rate with one study showing a more than doubling of the stroke rate in patients older than 80 years (0.58 % vs. 0.23 %, p < 0.001) [36]. Perhaps of even more relevance to TAVR are the associations between aortic atheroma, aortic scraping during catheter manipulation, and release of microemboli [3739]. Cerebral emboli may also be gaseous or originate from thrombi formed on the catheter or introducer sheath surface, in addition to displaced endovascular atheroma. The very large sheaths necessary for TAVR make smooth transitioning through the peripheral vasculature especially challenging. Furthermore, even with meticulous catheter preparation and flushing, air emboli are commonly observed using transesophageal echocardiography. A significant potential also exists with these catheters for air entrainment leading to large gaseous emboli [40].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 24, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Adverse Cerebrovascular Events

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access