Traumatic Disorders

R.-J. Schroeder, M. Lorenz, J. Jerosch, and J. Maeurer


2    Traumatic Disorders


Fractures


Definition


A fracture is a complete or incomplete break in a bone, with or without dislocation, following direct or indirect trauma or in the absence of trauma.


Pathology


Image macroscopic:



–   disruption in cortical and/or cancellous bone


–   varus/valgus malalignment


–   bone marrow contusion


–   associated soft tissue injury


Image microscopic:



–   edema


–   hemorrhage


–   cortical disruption


–   trabecular disruption


–   compressed trabecular bone


–   periosteal tear


–   cartilage defects/disruption


Open/Closed Fractures


Image soft tissue damage:



–   closed fracture


–   grade I open fracture: destruction of soft tissue (due to cartilage fragments) from inside


–   grade II open fracture: destruction of soft tissue from outside


–   grade III open fracture: extensive soft tissue destruction involving skin, muscle, vessels, and/or nerves


Fracture Types


Image complete fractures:



–   chisel fracture


–   transverse fracture


–   oblique fracture


–   bending fracture


–   torsion or spiral fracture


–   segmental fracture (blow to larger surface area)


–   defect fracture


–   comminuted fracture (more than six fragments)


Image incomplete fractures:



–   infraction


–   fissure


–   occult fracture


–   bone bruise


–   greenstick fracture


Clinical Signs


Image Deformity


Image abnormal mobility


Image crepitation


Image functional loss


Image localized spontaneous pain, tenderness, pain with movement


Image local swelling


Image local bruising


Diagnostic Evaluation


Image (→ method of choice for detecting fractures)


Image localization and extent of fracture


Image fracture type (according to AO classification, if possible)


Image joint involvement


Image fragment (dis)location:



–   axially


–   laterally


–   longitudinally with/without contracture


–   peripherally


Image (→ supplementary method, depending on the physician’s preference)


Image joint effusion


Image hematomas


Image associated injury to ligaments, tendons, muscles, menisci, joint capsules


Image functional test (abnormal mobility, instability)


Image fracture diagnosis (gap width, joint surface involvement, signs of consolidation)


Image (→ complementary method of choice)


Image optimized fracture typing (preferably according to AO classification)


Image exact determination of localization and extent of fracture


Image longitudinal displacement and degree of malrotation, comparing sides


Image joint involvement


Image associated soft tissue damage


Image fragment (dis)placement


Image number and size of fragments


Image intra-articular loose bodies



Keywords


knee joint, conventional radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging


Image (→ complementary method)


Image occult fractures


Image detection/confirmation of fatigue breaks and stress fractures


Image osteochondral fractures/dissection


Image cartilage damage


Image intra-articular loose bodies


Image associated soft tissue damage (tendons, muscles, collateral ligaments, cruciate ligaments, patella retinaculae, menisci)


Image effusion, hematoma


Image functional test


Fracture Causes


Traumatic Fractures



Keywords


knee joint, traumatic fracture, bone marrow hematoma, bone bruise


Definition


A traumatic fracture is a complete or incomplete break in a bone with or without dislocation, caused by one-time excessive stress on its physiological elasticity from a direct or indirect blow.


Role of Imaging



Image demonstrate anatomy of bony and soft tissue structures


Image demonstrate full extent of cortical and cancellous bone fractures and soft tissue damage


Image demonstrate fragment shape, position and localization, intrarticular loose bodies, and articular surface involvement


Image demonstrate relationship of injured bony and soft tissue structures to one another


Image demonstrate local or systemic processes causing bone destruction and soft tissue infiltration


Pathology


Image macroscopic:



–   disruption in cortical and/or cancellous bone


–   varus/valgus malalignment


–   bone marrow contusion


–   associated soft tissue injury


Image microscopic:



–   edema


–   hemorrhage


–   trabecular disruption


–   compressed trabecular bone


–   periosteal tear


–   cartilage defects/disruption


Fracture Localization


Image distal femur:



–   extra-articular metaphyseal


–   partially/completely intra-articular


–   wedge fracture


–   simple/multifragmentary


–   unicondylar/bicondylar


Image proximal tibia:



–   extra-articular metaphyseal


–   partially/completely intra-articular


–   split/depression fracture


Image patella:



–   differential diagnosis (DD) bipartite/tripartite patella (congenital, asymptomatic, predominantly among men, unilateral in 50%, craniolateral in three-quarters of cases, otherwise lateral or cranial, no hematoma/edema, no bone bruise)


Tibial Plateau Fracture Classification (Based on Mueller)


Image grade I: undisplaced vertical or wedgeshaped fracture


Image grade II: central depression of medial or lateral joint surface


Image grade III: vertical or wedgeshaped fracture with central depression of medial or lateral joint surface and proximal fibula fracture


Image grade IV: comminuted fracture involving medial and lateral joint surface and proximal fibula fracture


Tibial Plateau Fracture Classification (Based on Hohl)


Image grade I: undisplaced vertical sagittal fracture


Image grade II: central depression of medial or lateral joint surface


Image grade III: displaced vertical sagittal fracture with central depression of medial or lateral joint surface and sometimes proximal fibular head fracture


Image grade IV: displaced entirely medial joint surface depression without comminution


Image grade V: undisplaced vertical coronal anterior or posterior fracture without depression


Image grade VI: comminuted fracture involving medial and lateral joint surfaces and possibly fibular head fracture


Clinical Signs


Image Deformity


Image abnormal mobility


Image crepitation


Image functional loss


Image local spontaneous pain, tenderness, and pain with movement


Image local swelling


Image local hematoma


Diagnostic Evaluation (Figs. 2.12.6)


Image (→ method of choice)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   anteroposterior (AP) projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   almost entirely replaced by multislice CT and two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2-D/3-D) reconstructions


–   maybe indicated for postoperative surveillance (position, “knitting together” of bones) if more extensive metal implants are causing artifacts in CT


Findings


Image Path of fracture lines


Image fracture localization and extent


Image fragment (dis)placement


Image number of fragments


Image fracture type (according to AO classification, if possible)


Image joint involvement



Image


Fig. 2.1 a–e Image Complex lateral tibial plateau fracture (left side).


a, b  AP projection and lateral view. Conventional radiography demonstrates a complex lateral tibial plateau fracture on the left side with involvement of the tibial plateau (arrow), split fracture (arrowheads; type II based on Moore/B3 in AO classification) and dorsal displacement (small arrows in b).


c  Axial CT demonstrates full extent of lateral infraction of the tibial plateau (arrow).


d  Split fracture documented in coronal 2-D reconstruction (arrow tips).


e  After osteosynthesis using plates (arrow-heads) and screws (small arrows) the tibial plateau is completely reduced (large arrow).



Image


Fig. 2.2 a–f Image Lateral tibial plateau fracture.


a, b  Radiography projection in two planes of a lateral tibial plateau fracture ascending to medial (small arrows) involving the intercondylar eminence (arrow-head), and exhibiting a tibial plateau depression (dotted arrow) corresponding to a type II fracture (based on Moore).


c, d  Coronal two-dimensional CT reconstructions.


e, f  A three-dimensional CT reconstruction facilitates operation planning and shows clearly the extent of articular surface involvement (arrowheads), degree of depression, and fragment position, especially at the intercondylar eminence (large arrow).



Image


Fig. 2.3 a–f Image Complex tibial plateau fracture.


a, b  AP and lateral projections. Even conventional radiographic projections allow detection of a complex tibial plateau fracture with lateral plateau depression (arrows) following dislocation of the knee joint.


c, d  2-D reconstruction of the CT data set enables exact classification as a type IV fracture (based on Moore) with a lateral tibial plateau depression (arrows).


e, f  3-D reconstruction offers a better view of the overall situation and extent of the lateral depression (arrow), thus providing the surgeon with valuable additional information.




Image


Image


Fig. 2.5 a–i Image Complex comminuted fracture of the tibial plateau.


a, b  AP and lateral projections show a complex comminuted fracture of the tibial plateau with extensive involvement of the articular surface (small arrows), separation of the intercondylar eminence (large arrow) from the shaft (arrowhead) and separation of both condyles (striped arrow) as in a type V fracture (based on Moore).


c, d  2-D reconstruction, in the coronal and sagittal planes, allows an exact depiction of the overall situation.


e–i  3-D reconstructions, in particular, provide important additional information for surgical planning. Joint fragments (small arrows), the shaft fracture (arrowheads), separation of the condyles (striped arrow), and the separation (large arrow) of the intercondylar eminence are clearly visible here in their relation to one another.



Image


Fig. 2.6 a–i Image Avulsion of the cruciate ligament and fracture of the tibial plateau.


a, b  This AP radiograph shows a bony avulsion of the anterior cruciate ligament (large arrow), lateral projection additionally shows a displaced fracture of the dorsal tibial plateau (small arrows).


c  Using MRI a T1 SE sequence shows the small bony fragment from the tibial avulsion of the anterior cruciate ligament and a surrounding hypointense bone bruise.


d, e  2-D CT reconstructions in the sagittal and coronal planes are best suited for showing the extent of the fracture of the dorsal tibial plateau as well as fragment position (small arrows).


f, g  This also applies to the corresponding planes on the T1 SE sequence.


h, i  3-D reconstruction can optimize the overall view, demonstrating the extent of fracture (bold arrow) of the posterolateral tibial plateau and the intercondylar eminence fragment (dotted arrow).


Image (→ complementary method, not clinically relevant for fracture diagnosis)


Recommended Imaging Planes


Image suprapatellar longitudinal and transverse scan


Image infrapatellar longitudinal scan


Image medial and lateral imaging plane


Image posterior longitudinal plane


Findings


Image effusion


Image associated injury to ligaments, tendons, muscles, menisci, joint capsule


Image functional test (abnormal mobility, instability)


Image fracture diagnosis (gap width, joint surface irregularity, signs of consolidation)


Image (→ complementary method of choice)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image standard CT:



–   slice thickness: 1–2 mm


–   table increment: 1–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction: if joint surface involvement, subtraction of unfractured bones for an unobstructed view of position of fractured articular surface


Image (multislice) spiral CT:



–   slice thickness: 0.5–2 mm


–   table increment: 2–5 mm/rotation


–   increment: 0.5–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction: if joint surface involvement, subtraction of unfractured bones for an unobstructed view of position of fractured articular surface


Findings


Image exact determination of localization and extent of fracture


Image longitudinal displacement and degree of malrotation, comparing sides


Image joint involvement


Image number and size of fragments


Image fragment (dis)placement


Image intra-articular loose bodies


Image optimized fracture typing (preferably according to AO classification)


Image (→ complementary method, especially for occult fractures, DD bipartite/tripartite patella vs. fracture)


Recommended Sequences


Image fat-suppressed sequences whenever possible (with the exception of plain T1-weighted [T1] sequence)


Image coronal plain short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence


Image sagittal and possibly coronal plain T1 and T2-weighted (T2) turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences (depending on clinical question)


Image axial (patellar chondral surface) and/or coronal or sagittal plain fat-saturated, proton density-weighted spin-echo (PD SE) or fat-saturated 2-D or 3-D gradient-echo (GE) sequences for cartilage imaging


Image possibly 15–20° angled T1 sequences parallel to the course of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) (preferably following administration of a contrast agent if contrast enhancement used in exam)


Image possibly angled T1 sequences parallel to the course of the suspected ruptured tendon


Image possible contrast enhancement:


Image to identify fracture gap



–   with osteochondral fragments for demonstrating the extent and degree of perfusion/tissue viability


–   to better differentiate between traumatic and inflammatory lesions


–   postsurgery to differentiate between ligament replacement and granulation tissue or between traumatic and postoperative scarring and granulation tissue


Findings


Image general:



–   cartilage, bone, or osteochondral fractures


–   determination of fracture age


–   cartilage damage


–   detection of earlier occult fractures (possibly more than one year old)


–   pseudarthrosis


–   lateral contusion zone with medial ligament lesion


–   medial contusion zone with lateral ligament lesion


–   posterolateral contusion zone with ACL lesion (recognizable for up to three-quarters of a year, localization always epimetaphyseal)


–   potential simulation of bone bruise by nonfatty areas in the bone marrow


–   potential fracture simulation by incomplete ossification of the epiphyseal plate


–   possible simulation of traumatic lesions by benign (nonossifying fibroma, fibrous cortical defect, benign fibrous histiocytoma, cysts, giant cell tumor) or malignant tumors


Image plain T1 SE sequence:



–   hypointense fracture gap or pseudarthrosis


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of an osteochondral fragment/surrounding sclerotic margin/osteochondral defect


Image plain STIR/T2-weighted (T2) SE sequence:



–   hyperintense fracture gap or pseudarthrosis


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hyperintense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hyperintense edematous osteochondral fragment/osteochondral lesion


–   hypointense demonstration of sclerotic osteochondral fragment/surrounding reactive sclerotic margin


Image contrast-enhanced T1 SE sequence (preferably fat saturated):



–   hypointense fracture gap, hyperintense/hypointense pseudarthrosis (depending on extent of granulation tissue and sclerosis)


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hyperintense or hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hyperintense to hypointense demonstration of osteochondral fragment


–   hypointense demonstration of sclerotic margin/osteochondral lesion


Image fat-saturated PD 2-D GE/3-D GE sequences:



–   hyperintense areas of cartilage damage


Basic Treatment Strategies



Image conservative or operative treatment depending on fracture type


Image especially with joint involvement: open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)


Pathologic Fracture


Definition


A pathologic fracture is a complete or incomplete disruption in continuity of bone with local or diffuse pathologic osseous changes. Fracture mayoccur without trauma or as the result of insignificant trauma with or without dislocation.


The cause of fracture may be a result of benign or malignant processes.



Keywords


knee joint, pathologic fracture, spontaneous fracture, insufficiency fracture, osteolysis


Pathology


Image macroscopic:



–   disruption in cortical and/or cancellous bone


–   destruction of bone surrounding the fracture


–   dislocation, varus/valgus malalignment


–   bone marrow hematoma


–   associated soft tissue injury


–   soft tissue changes related to local destructive bone processes


Image microscopic:



–   edema


–   hemorrhage


–   trabecular disruption/compressed trabecular bone


–   absence of callus formation


–   bone and soft tissue changes related to local destructive bone processes


–   traumatic and nontraumatic uninterrupted or interrupted periosteal reaction


–   cartilage defects


Role of Imaging



Image demonstration of full extent of cortical and cancellous fractures as well as injury to soft tissue structures


Image demonstration of fragment shape, position, and localization


Image demonstration of joint and joint surface involvement


Image evaluation of local (in)stability


Image demonstration of full extent of intraosseous and extraosseous pathologic processes


Image relation to surrounding vessel–nerve structures


Image signs of additional tumor manifestations


Clinical Signs


Image deformity


Image abnormal mobility


Image crepitation


Image functional loss


Image localized spontaneous pain, tenderness, pain with movement


Image local swelling


Image local bruising


Image local soft tissue changes associated with local destructive processes of the bone or underlying systemic disease


Diagnostic Evaluation


Image (→ method of choice)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   AP projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   almost entirely replaced by multislice CT and 2-D/3-D reconstructions


–   at most may be indicated for postoperative surveillance (position, integration) if extensive metal implants are causing artifacts in CT


Findings


Image path of fracture lines


Image fracture localization and extent


Image fragment (dis)placement


Image number of fragments


Image fracture type (preferably according to AO classification)


Image joint involvement


Image local destructive bone processes


Image thickening of soft tissue


Image systemic changes in bone structure (e.g., osteoporosis)


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Planes


Image suprapatellar longitudinal and transverse scan


Image infrapatellar longitudinal scan


Image medial and lateral imaging plane


Image posterior longitudinal plane


Findings


Image effusion


Image associated injury to ligaments, tendons, muscles, menisci, joint capsule


Image functional test (abnormal mobility, instability)


Image fracture diagnosis (gap width, joint surface involvement, signs of consolidation)


Image cortical destruction


Image soft tissue masses/infiltration


Image associated soft tissue reaction


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image standard CT:



–   slice thickness: 1–2 mm


–   table increment: 1–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction for complete imaging of destruction or masses


Image (multislice) spiral CT:



–   slice thickness: 0.5–2 mm


–   table increment: 2–5 mm/rotation


–   increment: 0.5–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction for complete imaging of destruction or masses


Findings


Image exact determination of localization and extent of fracture


Image joint involvement


Image number and size of fragments


Image fragment (dis)placement


Image intra-articular loose bodies


Image optimized fracture typing (preferably according to AO classification)


Image local bone destruction associated with underlying disease


Image soft tissue involvement associated with local destructive bone processes


Image systemic changes to bone structure (e.g., osteoporosis)


Image longitudinal displacement and degree of malrotation, comparing sides


Image (→ complementary method of choice)


Recommended Sequences


Image fat-suppressed sequences should be used whenever possible (with the exception of plain T1 sequence)


Image coronal STIR sequence


Image plain sagittal T2 TSE sequences


Image plain sagittal or coronal T1 SE sequences (depending on clinical question)


Image contrast-enhanced axial and sagittal and/or coronal T1 SE sequences (depending on clinical question) to identify fracture gap and intramedullary or extramedullary tumor infiltration


Image if needed, contrast-enhanced opposed-phase sequences to identify further tumor manifestations in the axial skeleton


Findings


Image plain T1 SE sequence:



–   hypointense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense and/or hyperintense intramedullary and extramedullary connective tissue tumor


Image plain STIR/T2 SE sequence:



–   hyperintense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hyperintense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense and/or hyperintense intramedullary and extramedullary connective tissue tumor


Image contrast-enhanced T1 SE sequence (fat saturated except with lipomatous tumors):



–   hypointense fracture line


–   patchy, poorly demarcated hyperintense to hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense intramedullary and extramedullary connective tissue tumor (depending on tumor perfusion)


–   contrast-enhanced opposed-phase sequences of axial skeleton:


–   hyperintense demonstration of additional tumor manifestations


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image planar (whole body) and/or SPECT (spot imaging) skeletal nuclear medicine


Image administration of 550–750 MBq or 7.4–11.1 MBq/kg 99mTc-MDP per i.v.


Findings


Image demonstration of extent of local tumor infiltration


Image increased uptake at sites of additional tumor manifestations in the skeletal system


Basic Treatment Strategies



Benign processes


Image single or (possibly) two-session removal and reconstruction using autograft or allograft


Joint preservation


Image compound osteosynthesis


Joint replacement


Image total knee endoprosthesis


Image allograft reconstruction


Image composite allograft reconstruction


Fatigue Fracture, Stress Fracture


Definition


A complete or incomplete disruption in continuity of a healthy bone resulting from repetitive overuse with or without dislocation is known as a fatigue fracture or stress fracture.


Pathology


Image macroscopic:



–   disruption in cortical and/or cancellous bone


–   endosteal and periosteal new bone formation


–   bone marrow hematoma


–   associated reactive soft tissue changes


Image microscopic:



–   microfractures


–   imbalance in osteoblastic and osteoclastic cell activity


–   osteoclastic resorption zones with areas of new lamellar bone formation


–   edema


–   hemorrhage


–   trabecular disruption/compressed trabecular bone


–   reactive soft tissue changes related to local bone processes


–   cartilage defects


Clinical Signs


Image pain at rest, pain with excessive activity (e.g., long-distance runners)


Image localized spontaneous pain, tenderness, pain with movement


Image local swelling


Image functional loss


Image other fracture signs generally mild if present at all


Image often no symptoms


Image often low body weight (especially among women)



Keywords


knee joint, stress fracture, fatigue fracture, bone marrow edema


Role of Imaging



Image primary detection of stress fracture


Image demonstration of full extent of fracture or area of bone transformation


Image demonstration of fragment position


Image demonstration of articular surface involvement and cartilage lesions


Image demonstration of possible soft tissue injury


Image demonstration of additionally overloaded osseous structures at risk for fracture as well as soft tissue structures demonstrating inflammatory reactive processes or at risk of rupture


Image evaluation of local (in)stability


Diagnostic Evaluation


Image (→ method of choice)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   AP projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   almost entirely replaced by multislice CT and 2-D/3-D reconstructions and MRI


Findings


Image mild or early-stage fracture:



–   minimal surrounding soft tissue edema possible


–   increased cortical transparency and blurriness


–   positive scintigram


Image moderate or later-stage fracture:



–   lamellar periosteal reaction


–   bone marrow edema


–   positive MRI


Image severe or late-stage fracture:



–   ossifying periostitis (reactive apposition of osteosclerotic lamellar bone)


–   endosteal thickening


–   poorly defined, sclerotic, linear condensation of cancellous and cortical bone along the fracture line


–   surrounding soft tissue edema or hematoma


–   positive radiograph


Basic Treatment Strategies



Image Without dislocation


Image relatively early physical therapy


Image temporary immobilization


Image possible temporary orthosis


Image possible temporary orthopedic shoes


Image possible short-term calcium and vitamin D supplements


With dislocation


Image reduction


Image fixation


Image (→ complementary method)


Findings


Image no diagnostic value


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image standard CT (no longer up-to-date):



–   slice thickness: 1–2 mm


–   table increment: 1–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction generally of little use given lacking dislocation


Image (multislice) spiral CT, possibly in addition to MRI:



–   slice thickness: 0.5–2 mm


–   table increment: 2–5 mm/rotation


–   increment: 0.5–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction of little use given lacking dislocation


Findings


Image detection and demonstration of fracture line


Image demonstration of surrounding reactive sclerotic zone


Image (→ complementary method of choice)


Recommended Sequences


Image fat-suppressed sequences should be used whenever possible (with the exception of plain T1 sequence)


Image coronal STIR sequence


Image plain sagittal T2 TSE sequences


Image plain axial, sagittal, and/or coronal T1 SE sequences (according to clinical question) depending on suspected fracture localization


Image contrast-enhanced imaging to identify fracture gap and potential intramedullary/extramedullary tumor infiltration or osteomyelitis


MRI Classification Based on the Cincinnati Knee Rating System


Image grade I:



–   hyperintense on STIR images


–   unremarkable on T1 sequences


–   involving marrow cavity only


Image grade II:



–   hyperintense on STIR images


–   hypointenseon T1 sequences


–   involving marrow cavity only


Image grade III:



–   hyperintense on STIR images


–   hypointenseon T1 sequences


–   involving marrow cavity and cortical bone


Image grade IV:



–   hyperintense on STIR images


–   hypointense on T1 sequences


–   involving marrow cavity, cortical bone, and cartilage


Findings


Image plain T1 SE sequence:



–   hypointense fracture gap, if detectable


–   patchy, poorly defined hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cancellous and cortical sclerosis


–   hypointense demonstration of surrounding soft tissue edema/hematoma (the latter depending on hemorrhage age)


Image plain STIR/T2 SE sequence:



–   hyperintense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly defined hyperintense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cancellous and cortical sclerosis


–   hypointense demonstration of surrounding soft tissue edema/hematoma (the latter depending on hemorrhage age)


Image contrast-enhanced T1 SE sequence (preferably fat saturated):



–   hypointense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly defined hyperintense to hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cancellous and cortical sclerosis


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image planar (whole body) and/or SPECT (spot imaging) skeletal nuclear medicine


Image administration of 550–750 MBq or 7.4–11.1 MBq/kg 99m Tc-MDP per i.v.


Findings


Image increased uptake at fracture sites even in the earliest stages


Chondral and Osteochondral Fractures


Definition


Chondral and osteochondral fractures involve traumatic damage to the cartilage and the subchondral bone, caused by excessive shearing and/or rotational forces, and may be associated with the formation of loose intra-articular osteochondral fragments.


Pathology


Image traumatic chondral, cortical, and cancellous fragment separation


Image compression, impaction, and/or cancellous subchondral fracture with intact cartilage


Image isolated traumatic cartilage damage


Image surrounding bone marrow edema/hematoma


Stages (Based on A. Greenspan)


Image stage I:



–   undisplaced subchondral bone fragment


Image stage II:



–   undisplaced cartilage and subchondral bone fragment


Image stage III:



–   displaced cartilage, undisplaced subchondral bone fragment


Image stage IV:



–   displaced cartilage and bone fragment


Clinical Signs


Image pain at rest, weight-bearing pain


Image nonspecific pain and limited function


Image joint obstruction


Image hemarthrosis/joint effusion


Diagnostic Evaluation


Image (→ initial method)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   AP projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   almost entirely replaced by multislice CT and MRI


Findings


Image disruption/irregularity in cortical bone


Image subchondral condensation of bone


Image partial or complete fragment separation


Image displaced osteochondral fragment/intra-articular loose bodies


Image empty osteochondral lesion


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Planes


Image suprapatellar longitudinal and transverse scan


Image infrapatellar longitudinal scan


Image medial and lateral imaging plane


Image posterior longitudinal plane


Findings


Image joint effusion


Image associated reaction in surrounding soft tissues (low to high echogenicity possible)


Image demonstration of irregularity in cortical bone or empty osteochondral lesion


Image often fruitless however


Image (→ complementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image standard CT:



–   slice thickness: 1–2 mm


–   table increment: 1–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction


Image (multislice) spiral CT:



–   slice thickness: 0.5–2 mm


–   table increment: 2–5 mm/rotation


–   increment: 0.5–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction


Findings


Image subchondral sclerosis


Image subchondral impaction of bone


Image empty osteochondral lesion


Image loose intra-articular osseous bodies


Image localization of the defect and fragments


Image (→ complementary method of choice)


Recommended Sequences


Image coronal STIR sequence


Image plain sagittal T2 TSE sequences


Image plain axial, sagittal, and/or coronal T1 SE sequences (according to clinical question) depending on presumed fracture localization


Image (fat-saturated) PD or 2-D GE/3-D GE sequences to demonstrate cartilage


Image contrast-enhanced imaging for evaluation of perfusion and demonstration of fracture gap


Findings


Image plain T1 SE sequence:



–   hypointense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly defined hypointense subchondral bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cortical and cancellous sclerosis


–   hypointense demonstration of fragment


Image plain STIR/T2 SE sequence:



–   hyperintense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly defined hyperintense subchondral bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cortical and cancellous sclerosis


–   hypointense demonstration of fragment


Image T1 SE sequence after administering a contrast agent (preferably fat saturated):



–   hypointense fracture gap


–   patchy, poorly defined hyperintense to hypointense bone bruise (bone marrow hematoma/bone marrow edema)


–   hypointense demonstration of cortical and cancellous sclerosis


–   hypointense to hyperintense demonstration of fragment depending on perfusion conditions


Image PD/GE sequences (preferably fat saturated):



–   demonstration of cartilage damage



Keywords


knee joint, osteochondral fracture, flake fracture, cartilage lesion, bone marrow edema


Role of Imaging



Image demonstration of entire region of detachment and fragment size


Image demonstration of detachment site localization


Image demonstration of fragment displacement and intra-articular localization


Image demonstration of perfusion in the area of detachment


Image demonstration of surrounding osseous reaction and ligament condition


Basic Treatment Strategies



Without dislocation


Image temporary immobilization


Image possible relief of affected segment with a brace


With dislocation


Image arthroscopic or open reduction of the fragment


Image osteochondral cylinder transplantation (OCT)


Occult Fracture, Bone Bruise


Definition


An occult fracture is a subchondral bone contusion caused by trauma, which can only be identified by means of MRI.



Keywords


knee joint, bone marrow edema, bone bruise, occult fracture


Pathology


Image macroscopic:



–   disruption in cancellous bone


–   associated soft tissue injury


–   bone marrow hematoma/edema


–   epimetaphyseal localization


–   localization more often lateral than medial


–   often associated with contralateral collateral ligament injury


–   posterolateral bone bruise of tibial plateau often with ACL rupture


–   detectable up to 3/4 of a year post trauma


Image microscopic:



–   edema


–   hemorrhage


–   no cortical disruption


–   trabecular disruption


–   compressed trabecular bone


–   periosteal tear


–   cartilage defects/disruption


Common Localizations


Image anterior femoral condyle/anterior tibial plateau with PCL rupture


Image posterior femoral condyle/posterolateral tibial plateau with ACL rupture


Image medial dorsal patella/lateral femoral condyle with patella dislocation


Role of Imaging



Image primary detection of fracture


Image extent of bone bruise


Image demonstration of potential cartilage damage


Image exclusion of (previously unnoticed) cortical disruption


Image demonstration of possible, associated soft tissue damage


Clinical Signs


Image localized tenderness


Image localized pain with movement


Image local swelling


Image joint effusion


Diagnostic Evaluation (Fig. 2.7)


Image (→ to exclude fracture)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   AP projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   not indicated


Findings


Image generally does not assist in diagnosis


Image local thickening due to swelling/effusion


Image


Findings


Image does not yield any diagnostic clues


Image (→ not very helpful, supplementary method)


Recommended Imaging Mode


Image standard CT:



–   slice thickness: 1–2 mm


–   table increment: 1–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction generally of little use given lacking dislocation


Image (multislice) spiral CT:



–   slice thickness: 0.5–2 mm


–   table increment: 2–5 mm/rotation


–   increment: 0.5–2 mm


–   2-D reconstruction (sagittal and coronal): 1–2 mm slice thickness


–   3-D reconstruction generally of little use given lacking dislocation


Findings


Image joint effusion


Image hypodense edema/hematoma


Image generally does not assist in diagnosis


Image (→ procedure of choice for exact diagnosis)


Recommended Sequences


Image STIR sequence


Image plain T2 TSE sequences


Image plain T1 SE sequences


Image contrast-enhanced imaging only for excluding inflammatory or malignant lesions


Findings


Image general:



–   differentiation between linear (previously undetected, undisplaced fracture with risk of dislocation) and purely diffuse (without recognizable fracture line demarcation) contusion


–   depending on severity of primary fracture, detection of bone bruise up to two or even (rarely) nine months later


Image plain T1 SE sequence:



–   inhomogeneously structured, irregular, and poorly demarcated (linear in occult fractures), hypointensity near the epimetaphyseal cortical bone


Image plain STIR/T2 SE sequence:



–   inhomogeneously structured, irregular, and poorly demarcated (linear in occult fractures), hyperintensity (edema) to hypointensity (blood) near the epimetaphyseal cortical bone


Image contrast-enhanced T1 SE sequence (preferably fat saturated):



–   marked inhomogeneous enhancement, except at fracture line



Image


Fig. 2.7a,b Image Partially occult tibial plateau fracture.


a  A conventional AP radiographic image can barely allow evaluation, of a partially, occult right lateral paramedian tibial plateau fracture (arrow).


b  On a coronal T2 FR-FSE sequence the full extent of the fracture can now be seen running through the entire lateral tibial plateau and involving the intercondylar eminence (long arrow) with surrounding contusion (bone bruise, arrowhead).


Possible Classifications


Image Mink, Deutsch 1989:



–   a bone bruise, like a stress fracture, belongs to a subgroup of occult fractures


Image Lynch et al. 1989:



–   bone marrow contusion without (type 1) or with (type 2) disruption in cortical bone


Image Vellet et al. 1991:



–   “reticular bone bruise” (= netlike alterations on MR views without subchondral involvement) or


–   “geographic bone bruise” (=foci of discretely altered signal intensity involving subchondral bone) depending on contusion pattern and localization


Image Detmer 1986:


Image grade I: bone edema (increased signal intensity on T2 MRI sequences)


Image grade II: periosteal inflammation or edema


Image grade III: additional involvement of muscle


DD-Important Note


Image hematopoietic bone marrow: hypointense on T1 views, discretely hyperintense on T2 sequences


Image unclosed epiphyseal plate: intermediary signal on T1 views, slightly hyperintense on T2 sequences, mostly sharply contoured without surrounding blurry area


Image fibrous cortical defect, nonossifying fibroma: eccentric, clearly demarcated, involving cortical bone, often sclerotic margin (hypointense on T1 and T2 sequences), no contrast enhancement


Basic Treatment Strategies



Image possible temporary immobilization depending on clinical symptoms


Osteochondritis Dissecans


Definition


Osteochondritis dissecans describes the tendency of cartilage and/or bone fragments (usually elliptical in shape) to separate from a circumscribed area of subchondral osteonecrosis, causing an osteochondral defect and the formation of an intra-articular loose body. Disease etiology remains uncertain, though trauma, microembolisms, and constitutional factors have been suggested. There is no sex predilection. Traumatic causes are more often found among younger patients active in sports. Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) is more often found among older, women patients and is frequently associated with cartilage or meniscal lesions and joint effusion.


Pathology


Image may be similar to osteonecrosis depending on stage


Image osteonecrosis found more frequently among women (75%), older ages, combined with cartilage/meniscal lesions and joint effusion


Stages


(Modified Based on J. Kramer et al.)


Image stage I:



–   subchondral edema, nonspecific


Image stage II (undisplaced cartilage and bone fragment):



–   demarcated by narrow sclerotic margin


–   possible limited bone marrow changes next to demarcation


Image stage III (undisplaced cartilage and bone fragment):



–   fibrovascular scar within sclerotic border


–   separation beginning near the edges


–   sometimes cyst formation in adjacent bone


Image stage IV (displaced cartilage, undisplaced bone fragment):



–   completely loose fragment at the detachment site, usually surrounded by fluid


Image stage V (displaced cartilage and bone fragment):



–   dislocation of the fragment


–   increasing bony flattening of the osteochondral defect



Keywords


knee joint, ischemic disease, posttraumatic lesion, osteochondritis dissecans, osteonecrosis


Role of Imaging



Image primary detection of lesion


Image demonstration of extent and severity of cartilage damage


Image demonstration of intra-articular loose bodies


Image evaluation of viability and subchondral stability


Image evaluation of condition of surrounding bone


Localization


Image ca. three-quarters on the medial surface of medial femoral condyle


Image ca. one-tenth on the weight-bearing surface of the medial femoral condyle


Image ca. one-tenth on the weight-bearing surface of the lateral femoral condyle


Image clearly less frequent in other regions of the femoral condyles or patella


Image SONK is more common on weight-bearing surfaces of the medial femoral condyle while osteochondritis dissecans is more common on its non-weight-bearing surfaces


Clinical Signs


Image long asymptomatic


Image signs of impingement of intra-articular loose body


Image possible painful limitation of motion


Image swelling


Image possible effusion


Image early arthritis


Diagnostic Evaluation (Figs. 2.82.10)


Image (→ method of choice)


Recommended Radiography Projections


Image standard projections:



–   AP projection


–   lateral projection, mediolateral roentgen ray path


–   surveillance


Image special projections (depending on fracture localization):



–   Tunnel view/Notch view to demonstrate intercondylar fossa and eminence


–   axial projection of the patella


–   “defilée” views (axial projection with knee bent 30°, 60°, 90°) of the patella to demonstrate the patellofemoral joint


–   45° oblique views for better evaluation of the tibial plateau and proximal fibula


Image conventional tomography:



–   almost entirely replaced by multi-slice CT and 2-D/3-D reconstructions and MRI


Findings


Image stage I:



–   no visible change


Image stage II:



–   usually no visible change


–   possibly more or less circumscribed, demarcating osteopenia, sclerotic margin


Image stage III:



–   beginning subchondral lucency between fragment and osteochondral defect


–   sclerosis of the fragment


–   beginning disruption in subchondral bone


–   cyst formation adjacent to the osteochondral lesion


Image stage IV:



–   increasing subchondral lucency between fragment and osteochondral lesion


–   complete disruption in subchondral bone


Image stage V:



–   intra-articular loose bodies, empty osteochondral lesion


–   secondary degeneration


Jan 17, 2016 | Posted by in MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING | Comments Off on Traumatic Disorders

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access