Ultrasound imaging in space flight

50


Ultrasound imaging in space flight



Throughout the 5 decades of human space flight, the space medical support systems provided for onboard treatment of minor medical events and evacuation of the seriously ill or injured to Earth. In the absence of adequate objective information, however, it may be difficult to weigh the risks of onboard management against those of emergency return. A case of substantial trauma or illness would pose a serious challenge even to the most advanced human space flight program—the International Space Station (ISS). Failure of treatment onboard and evacuation with adverse outcome being the worst developments, unnecessary return to Earth is also a major problem because of its enormous financial and programmatic costs.


Between the 1970s and mid-1990s, eight different ultrasound imagers were flown on National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Russian spacecraft and successfully operated for research purposes. These successes justified the installation of the first permanent ultrasound system (HDI-5000, ATL/Philips, Andover, MA) for the ISS Human Research Facility (2002). After serving for 10 years, the ISS Ultrasound-1was replaced by a new unit with advanced research and clinical capabilities (Figure 50-1).



Significant efforts were needed before space-based ultrasound imaging could be recognized for clinical use, with no medical expertise onboard and little evidence on the imaging representations of disease in microgravity.1 The successful implementation of clinical ultrasound in space flight is a great testament to the essential universality and versatility of ultrasound imaging. We hope this chapter will motivate more physicians to seek and promote imaging solutions in their areas of practice.



Scope of diagnostic ultrasound in space


Ultrasound imaging is uniformly recognized as a highly accurate and nearly universal diagnostic tool in myriad conditions; a diverse variety of those, such as urolithiasis; eye, abdominal, and soft tissue trauma; pneumothorax; localized infections; and complications of toxic inhalation, have been encountered in space or are believed to be more likely to occur in space flight conditions.


The health care system of a spacecraft heavily depends on communications and remote provision of specialized expertise; the mere presence of technology onboard is insufficient. A medical procedure may be conducted by crew members without assistance (e.g., periodic health evaluation), with assistance drawn from onboard computers (e.g., a laboratory test), or using telemedicine mechanisms (most procedures requiring specialized expertise). Although ultrasound technology is permanently available, the crew is trained only in equipment operation; specific imaging guidance is provided in real time by ground-based experts using “privatized” video downlink and a private voice connection.


Space medicine depends on ultrasound imaging more than most other clinical disciplines because of the absence of other diagnostic imaging modalities and the operational nature of the setting with limited resources and the very limited ability to safely and quickly evacuate the ill or injured crew member. Depending on the clinical and operational circumstances, a focused diagnostic examination in space with a single binary clinical question (emergency medicine model) can evolve into a broader, multitarget assessment and monitoring (critical care model) or into a comprehensive and specific imaging application (radiology model). The current medical requirements for the International Space Station foresee a possibility of advanced life support of a seriously ill or injured crew member for up to 72 hours, which, regardless of the initial offending factors, essentially includes close monitoring of the hemodynamic parameters, pulmonary physiology, airway management, intracranial pressure, and so forth, without the trained personnel and resources taken for granted in any terrestrial hospital. Therefore space medicine experts have great interest in both established and emerging ultrasound applications, and they monitor the recently accelerating implementation of bedside ultrasound approaches and techniques in terrestrial emergency medicine and intensive care.



Implications of microgravity



Patient and operator positioning


In the absence of gravity, the patient must often be physically restrained by using elastic cords or fabric belts to ensure positional stability; in general, the mutual positioning of the operator, patient, and imaging hardware must be globally compatible with the medical equipment setup for emergency medical treatment and life support activities. Thus a seriously ill patient would be scanned on the special electrically isolated restraint system designed for advanced life support procedures (Figure 50-2). The operator should also be restrained in a comfortable and sustainable position to consistently exert a contact force on the transducer and have both hands available for the imaging procedure.



Self-scanning is also possible with minimal foot restraint, except for patients in distress or when a more experienced operator is available. Furthermore, some crews use creative ways of positioning in microgravity for specific applications (Figure 50-3).




Normal and pathologic anatomy


In the lack of gravity, the position of an object or the shape and distribution of a fluid collection are determined by the combined effect of weaker physical forces, such as properties of the fluid; surface interaction forces; tissue and organ compliance; random pressure fluctuations and gradients, such as peristalsis; and small accelerations. The absence of gravity may thus require significant modifications of imaging techniques as well as data interpretation. A terrestrial “gold standard” imaging procedure may not work in microgravity, whereas a previously unexplored technique may be the method of choice. Animal models of internal bleeding2–4 in simulated microgravity strongly suggest high diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography if performed and interpreted using microgravity-based evidence and considerations. Intrathoracic hemorrhage and pneumothorax, maxillary sinusitis, lung abscess, ileus with dilatated bowel loops, and urinary calculi are examples of the many imaging situations influenced by the gravity vector or its absence.


Tags:
Mar 8, 2016 | Posted by in ULTRASONOGRAPHY | Comments Off on Ultrasound imaging in space flight

Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access