Inhibition of mTOR in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive Tract



Fig. 8.1
Upstream activation of the mTOR signaling pathway and consequences of mTORC1 inhibition using everolimus in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors





Illustrations






  • Genetic diseases associated with the development of digestive neuroendocrine tumors.
Neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract are usually sporadic but can arise in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and more rarely in other syndromes, including von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) syndrome and tuberous sclerosis. MEN1 is a tumor suppressor gene that, when mutated in the germline, predisposes to MEN1 syndrome. Biallelic inactivation of the MEN1 (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) gene, usually through a mutation in one allele coupled with the loss of the remaining wild-type allele, occurs with pancreatic NET. Mutations affecting VHL, NF1, and TSC1 genes are associated with an increased risk of developing malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with von Hippel–Lindau disease, type 1 neurofibromatosis, and tuberous sclerosis syndromes, respectively.

Hereditary forms of neuroendocrine tumors have highlighted the crucial role of genes regulating hypoxia signaling. In von Hippel–Lindau disease, loss of pVHL protein function, which usually tags the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) for proteasomal degradation, results in nuclear accumulation of HIF1α, yielding increased transcription of a number of hypoxia-inducible genes, such as CA-9 and GLUT-1 (glucose transporter 1). In type 1 neurofibromatosis and tuberous sclerosis syndromes, HIF-1α is indirectly activated through mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), due to loss of function of NF1 and TSC1 genes. Of note, such cases of familial pNET are acknowledged to be associated with adverse outcome as compared to MEN1 tumors.


References



1.

Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, Petersen GM (2008) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol 19:1727–1733PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


2.

Yao JC et al (2008) One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26(18):3063–3072PubMedCrossRef


3.

Ballian N, Loeffler AG, Rajamanickam V, Norstedt PA, Weber SM, Cho CS (2009) A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. HPB 11:422–428 (Oxford)PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


4.

Knigge U, Hansen CP, Stadil F (2008) Interventional treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. Surgeon 6:232–239PubMedCrossRef


5.

Modlin IM, Pavel M, Kidd M, Gustafsson BI (2010) Somatostatin analogues in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumours. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31:169–188PubMed


6.

Rinke A et al (2009) Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol 27:4656–4663PubMedCrossRef


7.

Moertel CG, Hanley JA, Johnson LA (1980) Streptozocin alone compared with streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 303:1189–1194PubMedCrossRef


8.

Moertel CG, Lefkopoulo M, Lipsitz S, Hahn RG, Klaassen D (1992) Streptozocin– doxorubicin, streptozocin–fluorouracil, or chlorozotocin in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 326:519–523PubMedCrossRef

Oct 28, 2016 | Posted by in NEUROLOGICAL IMAGING | Comments Off on Inhibition of mTOR in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive Tract

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access