Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Head and Neck Infections




This article discusses the use of MR imaging in various acute infectious diseases of the head and neck, with particular emphasis on situations where MR imaging provides additional information that can significantly impact treatment decisions and outcomes. MR imaging findings of various disease processes are discussed, based on the head and neck compartments from which they originate. Specifically, infectious entities of the orbit, paranasal sinuses, pharynx, oral cavity (including periodontal disease), salivary glands, temporal bone, and lymph nodes are described in detail.


Key points








  • The severity of head and neck infections can often be ascertained from the clinical history and physical examination.



  • In some sinus and periorbital infections, MR imaging is crucial for identifying spread of infection into the orbital and intracranial compartments and helps to guide management.



  • MR imaging is unsurpassed in its ability to identify and evaluate complications of middle ear and temporal bone infections.



  • MR imaging detects osteomyelitis and is useful to differentiate osteomyelitis from acute bone infarction in the setting of sickle cell disease.



  • MR imaging is an invaluable tool to pinpoint the exact origin and extent of retropharyngeal and prevertebral infections and to identify possible associated complications.






Introduction


Acute head and neck infections can evolve as slowly progressive smoldering processes, or advance as rapidly debilitating entities with clinical consequences that can often be life threatening. The clinical presentation of the infectious process in question varies depending on the specific head and neck compartment that is primarily affected. The severity and aggressive nature of the disease process can usually be sufficiently elucidated though the clinical examination and history.


Imaging is often relied upon to assist in the evaluation of the anatomic extent of the acute infection and to identify any pertinent complications that could contribute to patient morbidity and mortality if left unidentified and untreated. Although computed tomography (CT) is the first-line modality in the acute setting of many uncomplicated infectious processes, MR imaging is the modality of choice in examining the exact scope of certain complicated infections owing to its superior delineation of soft tissue contrast, particularly when intracranial complications are suspected. MR imaging is unquestionably the modality of choice for high-resolution evaluation of multiple entities including facial neuritis, optic neuritis, labyrinthitis, petrous apicitis, and acute osteomyelitis. MR imaging is also a valuable tool to evaluate the bone marrow and differentiate between entities such as osteomyelitis and bone infarct. MR imaging also detects vascular complications caused by acute infections, such as sinus venous thrombosis. The ability to identify these dreaded complications and drastically influence clinical management confirms the utility of MR imaging in the evaluation of acute head and neck infections.


This article discusses the use of MR imaging in various acute infectious diseases of the head and neck, with particular emphasis on situations where MR imaging provides additional information that can significantly impact treatment decisions and outcomes. MR imaging findings of various disease processes are discussed, based on the head and neck compartments from which they originate. Specifically, infectious entities of the orbit, paranasal sinuses, pharynx, oral cavity (including periodontal disease), salivary glands, temporal bone, and lymph nodes are described in detail.




Introduction


Acute head and neck infections can evolve as slowly progressive smoldering processes, or advance as rapidly debilitating entities with clinical consequences that can often be life threatening. The clinical presentation of the infectious process in question varies depending on the specific head and neck compartment that is primarily affected. The severity and aggressive nature of the disease process can usually be sufficiently elucidated though the clinical examination and history.


Imaging is often relied upon to assist in the evaluation of the anatomic extent of the acute infection and to identify any pertinent complications that could contribute to patient morbidity and mortality if left unidentified and untreated. Although computed tomography (CT) is the first-line modality in the acute setting of many uncomplicated infectious processes, MR imaging is the modality of choice in examining the exact scope of certain complicated infections owing to its superior delineation of soft tissue contrast, particularly when intracranial complications are suspected. MR imaging is unquestionably the modality of choice for high-resolution evaluation of multiple entities including facial neuritis, optic neuritis, labyrinthitis, petrous apicitis, and acute osteomyelitis. MR imaging is also a valuable tool to evaluate the bone marrow and differentiate between entities such as osteomyelitis and bone infarct. MR imaging also detects vascular complications caused by acute infections, such as sinus venous thrombosis. The ability to identify these dreaded complications and drastically influence clinical management confirms the utility of MR imaging in the evaluation of acute head and neck infections.


This article discusses the use of MR imaging in various acute infectious diseases of the head and neck, with particular emphasis on situations where MR imaging provides additional information that can significantly impact treatment decisions and outcomes. MR imaging findings of various disease processes are discussed, based on the head and neck compartments from which they originate. Specifically, infectious entities of the orbit, paranasal sinuses, pharynx, oral cavity (including periodontal disease), salivary glands, temporal bone, and lymph nodes are described in detail.




Orbits


Periorbital and Orbital Infections


The orbital septum is the anatomic landmark that distinguishes the periorbital (preseptal) tissues from the orbit proper (postseptal tissues). The orbital septum is a thin membranous sheet extending from the orbital periosteum. Superiorly, it inserts and blends with the aponeurosis of the levator palpebrae superioris, and inferiorly it blends with the tarsal plates. This structure is not readily demonstrated on imaging, but it serves as a barrier to posterior spread of infections from the periorbital tissues into the orbit proper.


Periorbital cellulitis typically occurs secondary to a nearby sinonasal, facial, or dental infection that spreads to involve the periorbital tissues. Local trauma may also serve as an etiology. Typical presenting symptoms include pain, eyelid swelling and erythema, conjunctivitis, and fever. On MR imaging, periorbital cellulitis usually manifests as edema, soft tissue swelling, and diffuse periorbital soft tissue enhancement. A loculated abscess within the periorbital or surrounding facial soft tissues may also be present.


In contrast, orbital cellulitis usually results as a complication of adjacent paranasal sinusitis ( Fig. 1 ) and occasionally from a dental infection. Embedded posttraumatic foreign bodies can also contribute to this process. Typical presenting symptoms are similar to periorbital cellulitis, with the addition of proptosis as a predominant feature. Orbital cellulitis is associated with an increased risk of devastating neurologic sequelae, including ophthalmic vein thrombosis, venous sinus thrombosis, mycotic aneurysm, meningitis, and intracranial abscess. Thus, identifying an infection in the orbit is of paramount importance to help guide management and prevent poor outcomes.




Fig. 1


Frontal sinusitis complicated by orbital cellulitis. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted image ( A ) demonstrates complete opacification of the frontal sinuses ( white arrowheads ). There is a focal region of dehiscence involving the lateral wall of the right frontal sinus with absence of the usual T2 dark cortical signal ( white arrow ). The sinus debris extends through this defect into the right superior orbit ( black arrowhead ). Axial T2-weighted image ( B ) at an adjacent level shows a rounded T2 hyperintense collection in the region of the right superior orbit ( black arrowhead ). Axial post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted image ( C ) shows peripheral enhancement of the fluid collection, compatible with a subperiosteal abscess. There is inflammation in the adjacent soft tissues, seen as the adjacent asymmetric enhancement ( black arrowheads ) and extensive mucosal enhancement within the frontal sinuses ( white arrowheads ). Coronal post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted image ( D ) through the orbits shows the extensive inflammatory change within the superior right orbit resulting in mass effect with downward displacement of the inflamed, thickened, and enhancing right superior rectus muscle ( white arrowhead ). The subperiosteal abscess is seen as the non-enhancing round collection adjacent to the orbital roof ( white arrow ).


The MR imaging findings of orbital cellulitis include fat stranding and rim-enhancing abscess formation, which can be intraconal or extraconal (often subperiosteal) and edema and abnormal enhancement of the extraocular muscles. Noninfectious conditions, including idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (“pseudotumor”; Fig. 2 ), and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease can mimic this infection. Grave’s ophthalmopathy is also a differential consideration, but can be differentiated by noting the classic sparing of the tendinous insertions.




Fig. 2


Orbital pseudotumor with posterior scleritis. Coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted image ( A ) demonstrates extensive heterogeneous signal abnormality and infiltration involving the right orbit, resulting in right proptosis ( white arrowhead ). The infiltrative lesion surrounds the extraocular muscles ( white arrows ), which are asymmetrically thickened relative to the left. Coronal post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted image ( B ) demonstrates extensive enhancement of the orbital soft tissues, abnormal enlargement and enhancement of the extraocular muscles ( black arrowheads ), and enhancement of the optic nerve sheath. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted image ( C ) demonstrates thickening of the posterior sclera ( white arrows ). Abnormal signal in the right retrobulbar region ( black arrows ) and periorbital soft tissues ( white arrowhead ) results in right proptosis. Corresponding enhancement of the thickened posterior sclera ( black arrows ), as well as of the orbital and periorbital soft tissues ( arrowheads ), is seen on the axial fat-suppressed post-contrast T1-weighted image ( D ).


Treatment of orbital cellulitis typically involves hospital admission with administration of intravenous antibiotics and possible drainage of loculated orbital collections, if present. In contrast, uncomplicated periorbital cellulitis can be treated on an outpatient basis with oral antibiotics.


Of note, dacryocystitis is an infection that results from obstruction of the medial nasolacrimal duct that can be complicated by periorbital and, rarely, orbital cellulitis. Infection from Streptococcus pneumoniae accounts for almost 25% of the cases, although other microorganisms from the Streptococcus and Staphylococcus families can also be responsible. Typical clinical presentation involves focal swelling along the medial canthus, conjunctivitis, and purulent drainage. MR imaging may demonstrate a dilated fluid-filled lacrimal sac along the medial canthus with peripheral rim enhancement on postcontrast images. When clinical assessment is limited owing to concurrent periorbital and orbital cellulitis, the value of MR imaging is its ability to accurately depict these complications. Treatment may be either medical or surgical, depending on patient symptomatology and the presence of associated complications.




Paranasal sinuses


Bacterial Infection


A variety of organisms have been implicated as causes of acute and chronic sinusitis, including S pneumoniae and other Streptococcus strains, Staphylococcus aureus , Moraxella catarrhalis , Pseudomonas species, particularly in immunosuppressed and diabetics, and anaerobic bacteria. Differentiating between acute and chronic sinusitis can only be made by considering the timeframe during which it has been present. Inflammation of the paranasal sinus mucosa present for fewer than 4 weeks is defined as acute sinusitis, whereas chronic sinusitis refers to disease that is present for longer than 12 weeks. Both entities clinically present with nasal congestion, purulent discharge, headache, maxillary and dental pain, and reduced sense of taste or smell.


Imaging is not typically necessary to diagnose sinusitis, particularly in the acute phase. Although CT is the first-line modality, MR imaging can be performed when intracranial or intraorbital complications are suspected clinically. MR imaging is sensitive in identifying inflammation of the paranasal sinus mucosa. Although the diagnosis of sinusitis should not be based solely on imaging findings, greater than 4 mm of sinus mucosal thickening suggests a greater likelihood of sinusitis. Findings that increase the diagnostic confidence of acute sinusitis include the presence of air–fluid levels or complete fluid opacification of one or more of the paranasal sinuses. If there is an underlying obstructing tumor, fluid-sensitive sequences can be useful in demonstrating the relatively hypointense mass adjacent to hyperintense inflamed sinus mucosa and fluid. In the chronic stage of sinusitis, much of the sinus fluid becomes inspissated with an increase in protein concentration. As a result, fluid signal on T1-weighted images, which is initially hypointense, becomes hyperintense, and signal on T2-weighted images becomes progressively darker.


Sinus infection may result in orbital and intracranial complications owing to their proximity to the sinonasal cavities (see Fig. 1 ). Approximately 3% of patients with sinusitis (especially ethmoid sinusitis) can develop orbital complications, particularly in children or young adults. Orbital complications, including periorbital/orbital cellulitis or subperiosteal abscess formation, are well depicted on MR imaging (described in greater detail in the Orbits section). Orbital complications are much more common than intracranial complications.


Neurologic complications, including meningitis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, and subperiosteal and intracranial abscesses, can also be readily identified with MR images. Pott’s puffy tumor is a complication of sinusitis characterized by subperiosteal abscess and osteomyelitis of the frontal bone, resulting from spread of infection beyond the confines of the sinus into the surrounding bone via infectious thrombophlebitis of penetrating valveless emissary veins. On clinical examination, this entity presents as a fluctuant mass overlying the eyebrow. MR imaging is not only useful in demonstrating the extent of osteomyelitis, subperiosteal abscess, and surrounding soft tissue inflammation, but more valuable in identifying intracranial complications such as intraaxial or extraaxial abscess ( Fig. 3 ), or venous sinus thrombosis.




Fig. 3


Pott’s puffy tumor. Axial fat-suppressed FLAIR image ( A ) demonstrates a heterogeneous collection in the extracranial frontal soft tissue ( white arrows ) in a 17 year old boy with left-sided sinusitis ( white arrowhead in B ). The collection demonstrates peripheral enhancement ( white arrows ) on post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images ( C ) and diffusion restriction ( white arrows , D and E ), consistent with an abscess. Associated intracranial complications are seen, including a peripherally enhancing subdural empyema ( black arrows , C–F ), and meningitis, characterized by abnormal leptomeningeal signal and enhancement overlying the cerebellar folia and within the interpeduncular cistern ( white arrows , B and F ).


Fungal Infection


Fungal sinusitis can be classified into two groups: noninvasive and invasive. The noninvasive category is further classified into allergic fungal sinusitis and mycetoma (fungus ball). Both subtypes of the noninvasive category are characterized by disease involvement that is limited to the lumen of the affected sinus without penetration past the mucosa, and is seen typically in immunocompetent patients.


Allergic fungal sinusitis is the most common form of fungal sinusitis, and typically occurs in younger patients with a history of atopy, asthma, nasal polyposis, and aspirin intolerance. Aspergillus species are commonly responsible for allergic fungal sinusitis. Patients present with complaints of chronic nasal congestion and headaches. Characteristic MR imaging findings ( Fig. 4 ) include near complete sinus opacification of multiple sinuses with T2-hypointense material owing to its low water and high protein content and the high concentration of paramagnetic substances.




Fig. 4


Allergic fungal sinusitis. Axial CT image ( A ) shows complete opacification of the both maxillary sinuses ( white arrows ) with high density debris and mucosal thickening. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted ( B ) and post-contrast T1-weighted ( C ) images demonstrate corresponding submucosal edema, mucosal thickening and enhancement in the bilateral maxillary sinuses ( white arrows ). Note the low signal filling the central maxillary sinuses bilaterally. The low signal on T1 and T2-weighted images is secondary to a combination of proteinaceous mucus and concentration of heavy metals such as iron, manganese, and magnesium.


Mycetoma is characterized by the presence of a fungus ball limited to the cavity of an affected sinus and is also most commonly secondary to Aspergillus species. Clinical symptoms are usually minimal. Characteristic MR imaging findings include an intraluminal mass that is usually T1 and T2 hypointense owing to lack of water content, with scattered areas of susceptibility artifact secondary to calcification and paramagnetic substances such as manganese, iron, and magnesium. Usually, a single sinus is involved, most commonly the maxillary sinus ( Fig. 5 ), followed by the sphenoid sinus.




Fig. 5


Mycetoma. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted ( A ) and gradient echo ( B ) images show mucosal thickening within the right maxillary sinus ( black arrowhead ). Note the lobulated T2 hypointense lesion within the central right maxillary sinus with heterogeneous signal on gradient echo image ( white arrows ), representing a fungus ball (mycetoma), which could be easily mistaken for air on T2-weighted images.


Invasive fungal sinusitis is characterized by spread of disease beyond the mucosa, with invasion of penetrating vessels that allows the infection to infiltrate into the surrounding osseous structures, orbital, and intracranial compartments ( Fig. 6 ). Acute invasive fungal sinusitis is a rapidly progressive and deteriorating infection with a 50% to 80% fatality rate, most often afflicting immunocompromised and poorly controlled diabetic patients. Zygomycetes such as Rhizopus and Mucor are the organisms classically involved in this form of sinusitis. In addition to the usual symptoms of sinusitis, invasive fungal sinusitis often presents with neurologic symptoms including cranial nerve impairment, seizures, mental status changes, coma, proptosis, and visual field defects secondary to intracranial and orbital invasion. Chronic invasive fungal sinusitis differs from its acute counterpart in that it progresses slowly over the course of months to years. Characteristic MR imaging findings of invasive fungal sinusitis include unilateral erosive/destructive changes of the osseous walls of the affected sinuses with extension into the orbit and brain, resulting in orbital cellulitis, cranial nerve impairment, and cavernous sinus thrombosis. Internal carotid artery invasion may cause occlusion or pseudoaneurysm formation, with an associated increased risk of cerebral infarct and hemorrhage.




Fig. 6


Invasive fungal sinusitis. Axial post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images ( A and B ) through the maxillary sinuses demonstrate partial opacification and mucosal thickening within the left maxillary sinus with mild associated enhancement ( asterisks ). Asymmetric enhancement within the left retroantral fat ( white arrow , A ) is consistent with infiltration. There is spread of the infection into the adjacent soft tissues, with asymmetric enhancement within the left medial and lateral pterygoid muscles ( black arrows , B ) and left pterygoid plate ( black arrowhead , B ). Compare with the normal pterygoid plate on the right. Pathology revealed invasive mucormycosis.

( Courtesy of Yoshimi Anzai, MD, MPH, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.)




Salivary glands


Sialadenitis


Sialadenitis refers to infection or inflammation of the salivary glands ( Fig. 7 ). Viral sialadenitis, often secondary to mumps infection from paramyxovirus, is more common and typically presents as bilateral parotitis ( Fig. 8 ). Acute bacterial causes, most commonly Staphylococcus or Streptococcus species, usually present unilaterally and occur in elderly, debilitated, or postoperative dehydrated patients. Sialolithiasis is a major risk factor for development of bacterial sialadenitis ( Fig. 9 ), and most commonly affects the submandibular glands, possibly as result of increased viscosity of submandibular secretions. Thus, the submandibular glands are most commonly affected by bacterial sialadenitis. Oral cavity or floor of mouth malignancy may also cause outflow duct obstruction and associated inflammation of the affected salivary gland ( Fig. 10 ). Typical presentation involves swelling and pain or focal tenderness. In the case of bacterial sialadenitis associated with an obstructing sialolith, pain can often be exacerbated by activities that stimulate saliva production (“salivary colic”).




Fig. 7


Sialadenitis. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted image ( A ) demonstrates asymmetric enlargement and increased signal of the right submandibular gland ( white arrow ) relative to the normal appearing left submandibular gland. There are surrounding enlarged level IB lymph nodes ( white arrowheads ), likely reactive. Homogeneous avid enhancement is seen on the axial and coronal post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images ( white arrows , B and C ). Although minimal dilatation of the intraglandular duct is seen, there is no evidence of extraglandular ductal dilation, or focal region of signal void to suggest a sialolith as etiology for this process.



Fig. 8


Parotitis. Axial and coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted images ( A and B ) demonstrate asymmetric enlargement and increased signal involving the entire right parotid gland ( white arrow ). There is associated diffuse hypointense signal seen on the axial T1-weighted image ( white arrow , C ), in comparison to the fatty left parotid gland. Imaging features are consistent with diffuse inflammation of the right parotid gland.



Fig. 9


Sialadenitis of the right submandibular gland with an obstructing sialolith. Axial ( A ) and coronal ( B ) post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images demonstrate asymmetric enhancement and enlargement of the right submandibular gland relative to the left ( black arrows ), consistent with sialoadenitis. Note the ovoid signal void in the region of the submandibular duct, consistent with an obstructing stone ( black arrowhead ).



Fig. 10


Dilated submandibular ducts secondary to obstruction by infiltrating gingival squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Axial pre-contrast T1-weighted image ( A ) shows hypointense gingival mass ( white arrows ) eroding through the mandibular symphysis into the floor of the mouth. Axial T2-weighted image ( B ) and axial post-contrast T1-weighted image ( C ) show dilation of the bilateral submandibular ducts right more pronounced than left ( black arrowheads ), secondary to obstruction by the aforementioned floor of mouth tumor ( white arrows ) which demonstrates mild enhancement.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 18, 2017 | Posted by in MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | Comments Off on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Head and Neck Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access