Tumours of the central nervous system

Chapter 30 Tumours of the central nervous system




Chapter contents



Introduction







Clinical features – presentation of brain tumours






Principles of management










High-grade gliomas 






Low-grade gliomas









Ependymoma (intracranial)








Primary CNS lymphoma











Germinoma








Medulloblastoma




Meningioma









Pituitary tumours









Craniopharyngioma









Vestibular (acoustic) schwannoma









Chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base








Spinal cord tumours – primary










Cerebral metastases







Further reading



Introduction


Primary tumours of the central nervous system (CNS) are relatively uncommon, accounting for only 2% of cancer deaths. However, the effect on the individual with a primary CNS tumour is frequently devastating, and brain tumours lead, on average, to a greater loss of life per patient than any other adult tumour. Primary CNS tumours affect patients of all ages, from childhood to old age, with a rising incidence from middle age onwards. In childhood, they are the commonest solid tumours (as opposed to leukaemias). The overall annual incidence is around 7 per 100   000 population, giving approximately 4400 people newly diagnosed with a brain tumour in the UK each year.


There is a huge range in outcome for patients with primary CNS tumours, from almost guaranteed cure in some conditions (e.g. germinoma) to almost guaranteed fatality in others (e.g. glioblastoma (GBM)). For patients with CNS tumours, a holistic approach is always required and, for many, involvement of the palliative care services is highly desirable. For many patients, driving is forbidden after the diagnosis of brain tumour (see below).



Tumour types


Overall, about 80% of CNS tumours are primary and 20% secondary. However, the proportions depend exactly on how the patient population is gathered. In our centre, approximately 200 new CNS cases are seen per year, and only 6% are due to metastases. The latter patients are generally seen and looked after by the site-specific specialist teams, based on the tissue of origin.


The major types of primary tumour are given in Table 30.1, and the percentages of these tumour types in our own practice are shown in Figure 30.1. The majority of tumours (58%) are gliomas (Figure 30.1). Of the gliomas, two-thirds are glioblastomas (Figure 30.2), making this the most common type of primary CNS tumour in adults. Gliomas in general, and glioblastomas, in particular, are devastating tumours, and therefore consume much of the energy and resources of the neuro-oncology unit. Although gliomas represent the major diagnosis of primary brain tumours, over a third of new referrals are for other tumour types, so appropriate attention also needs to be directed towards those.


Table 30.1 A simplified classification of the major categories of brain tumour






Intrinsic tumours (i.e. those arising within the brain substance)



Extrinsic tumours of the brain covering


Meningioma


Other tumours



Cerebral metastases


Notes:





Gliomas are graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 classification, on a scale of I to IV, where IV is the most malignant. Grade I and grade II gliomas together are termed low-grade gliomas. Grade I tumours are more typical of childhood but occasionally occur in adults. Grade III and grade IV tumours together constitute high-grade gliomas. Grade III tumours may also be called ‘anaplastic’ and grade IV gliomas are known as ‘glioblastomas’.


Gliomas arise from astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, cells which nourish and support neurons. Primary tumours of neurons alone are extremely uncommon, though they do exist (e.g. neurocytoma). There is a surprising large range of very rare tumours within the brain, but apart from those mentioned explicitly in Table 30.1, and described below, their overall management and outcome can generally be inferred from the grade of the tumour.


The male to female ratio for gliomas is 1.4 to 1. Meningiomas are commoner in females than males, in the ratio of 2:1, which is unusual in oncology. There are only two definite aetiological factors for the development of brain tumours: exposure to ionizing radiation and genetic predisposition. Genetic syndromes include Li-Fraumeni syndrome, neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, Gorlin’s syndrome and ataxia-telangiectasia. These syndromes may account for 1–2% of brain tumours. They are normally easily identifiable, and many of the cases present in childhood. Other genetic factors may play a part but as yet are ill understood. Mobile phones and electricity power lines have been proposed as predisposing factors, but good evidence exists that these do not influence risk.


Secondary CNS metastases may arise from primary tumours at almost any site. However, certain cancers have a propensity to metastasize to the brain. Lung cancer accounts for 60% of metastases, followed by breast (15%). Other tumours causing metastases include kidney, colon, melanoma, pancreas, and ovary. Metastases are usually multiple but occasionally can be solitary. The majority (85%) develops in the cerebrum.



Anatomy of the CNS


Anatomy is the key to understanding the presentation of neurological tumours, their spread, and concepts about treatment, particularly with radiotherapy and surgery.



Anatomy of the brain




The major structures of the brain


Figure 30.3 shows the outside of the brain to explain the nomenclature of the principal lobes. In right-handed patients, the left hemisphere is almost invariably dominant.



The frontal lobe is very large, extending back to the central sulcus, which divides it from the parietal lobe. The motor cortex sits immediately in front of the central sulcus. More anteriorly, the frontal lobe is responsible for intellect, motivation and emotional response. Damage to the frontal lobes can affect intellectual performance, including reasoning, memory, the initiation of activity and insight. The medial frontal lobe is particularly important for these activities and damage to both medial frontal lobes is extremely destructive to the intellect. The motor speech centre (Broca’s area) lies in the dominant frontal lobe (see Figure 30.3).


The parietal lobe extends from the central sulcus posteriorly onto the occipital lobe, and is also large. The parietal lobe has large areas which are silent, with no obvious functional activity. Immediately behind the central sulcus is the sensorimotor cortex, which deals predominantly with reception of sensory information. In reality, there are other areas adjacent to both motor and sensory cortices which support those functions.


At the most posterior part of the cerebral hemisphere is the occipital cortex, which deals with central processing of visual information. The optic radiation connects the optic tracts to the occipital cortex, and runs through the temporal and parietal lobes to arrive at its destination. Tumours lying along that pathway can therefore affect vision.


Inferiorly and laterally, with its tip in the middle cranial fossa, lies the temporal lobe. The medial part is involved in short-term memory. In the dominant hemisphere, the temporal lobe is the location for one of the speech centres, the auditory cortex.


The pons and medulla together form the brainstem. These have processing functions, important functional centres such as the respiratory centre, and also carry all motor and sensory information between the cerebral cortex and spinal cord (Figures 30.3 and 30.4). Even small lesions within the brainstem have very severe neurological effects. The function of the cerebellum is the subconscious control of movement. Damage to the cerebellum therefore leads to ataxia and other difficulties with coordinated movement.



The lobes of the brain communicate by extensive pathways made up of white matter. These run from front to back, side to side, and up and down through the brain. Tumours which spread through white matter tracts (especially the gliomas) therefore have access to pathways which can allow them to spread extensively. The corpus callosum (see Figure 30.4) is the major route of side to side communication between the two cerebral hemispheres. High-grade gliomas lying medially in the hemisphere often involve this structure, which allows spread into the opposite hemisphere.


Functional imaging, especially using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has demonstrated that damage to particular areas of the brain, for example the motor cortex, can lead to some function being taken over by other areas, provided that the rate of damage is slow. In the adult, this can occur in only a modest way, but can explain why, in some circumstances, patients do not lose all the neurological function that would be expected.



Anatomy of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways and hydrocephalus


The major cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) structures are shown in Figure 30.5. CSF is produced by the choroid plexus within the two lateral ventricles, and flows into the third ventricle anteriorly through the foramen of Munro (Figure 30.5). CSF exits the third ventricle posteriorly through the aqueduct, and flows into the fourth ventricle. From there, CSF leaves the fourth ventricle through three foramina (the foramina of Luschka laterally and the foramen of Magendie in the midline) to surround the outside of the brain. A small amount also passes down the central canal in the spinal cord. CSF is actively absorbed by the arachnoid granulations which protrude into the major venous sinuses, especially the superior sagittal sinus at the vertex of the skull. The CSF canals are lined by ependymal cells, from which ependymomas arise. These tumours are therefore related in space to the ventricular system.



Disturbance in the flow or absorption of CSF causes hydrocephalus. Obstruction of the flow before the exit foramina in the fourth ventricle leads to ‘obstructive’ hydrocephalus. Obstruction of the arachnoid granulations leads to ‘communicating’ hydrocephalus.


In neuro-oncology, tumours most commonly cause obstructive hydrocephalus. This is normally the result of obstruction in the fourth ventricle, by tumours growing in or around the ventricle (such as medulloblastoma or ependymoma), or within the cerebellum (most commonly metastases). The next most common location for obstruction is the aqueduct, from compression by tumour in adjacent brain or the pineal gland. More proximal obstruction can also occur at the foramen of Munro, usually from infiltrative high-grade glioma, causing hydrocephalus in one or both lateral ventricles.


Communicating hydrocephalus can be caused directly by tumour, when extensive meningeal involvement occurs. This is almost always metastatic (most commonly from breast cancer), and it is rare. A commoner cause of communicating hydrocephalus in neuro-oncology practice, is blood in the CSF, resulting from surgery or a spontaneous bleed directly from a tumour. Blood can occlude the pores in the arachnoid granulations. Often this resolves spontaneously but, occasionally, a CSF shunt (such as a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt) must be inserted. Infection is also a cause, through the same mechanism.



Anatomy of the skull and meninges


The skull itself is divided into three fossae. The frontal fossa contains the frontal lobe; the middle cranial fossa contains the temporal lobe; the posterior cranial fossa contains the cerebellum. The cerebellum is divided from the rest of the cranial contents by the tentorium cerebelli (‘tent’), except for an aperture through which the brainstem passes. The two cerebral hemispheres are divided by the falx cerebri. These two structures are composed of layers of tough meninges, and are designed to ‘damp’ movements of the brain which might otherwise be damaging to the delicate brain substance. They are relatively rigid. The falx and tentorium cannot be infiltrated by gliomas, and so present efficient barriers to their spread. Meningiomas, on the other hand, can spread along their surface, and their potential direction of spread can be appreciated by understanding this anatomy.


The meninges consist of three layers. The outer dura mater (usually known simply as dura) is a tough membrane, which acts like a periosteum; it is the part visible on imaging, and forms the falx and tent. Below and closely applied to the dura is the arachnoid mater. Below this lies the pia mater, a thin delicate layer which covers every surface and fold of the brain substance. In some places, there is a space (the subarachnoid space) between the arachnoid and pia, crossed by thin strands with a cobweb-like appearance (hence the origin of the name arachnoid). The dura lines the whole cranial cavity, including the skull base. In some areas, the dura splits to form venous channels, such as the superior sagittal sinus, and the cavernous sinuses. It also forms two important folds, the tentorium cerebelli and the falx cerebri, which are continuous with the dura covering the skull vault and skull base.



Clinical features – presentation of brain tumours


Presenting symptoms and signs of CNS tumours are characteristic; patients may present with one or more classes of symptoms, as follows.







Principles of management


Although most patients come to oncology with a definitive diagnosis, it is important for oncologists to contribute to the multidisciplinary management of CNS patients.




Performance status in the treatment decision


Performance status is an important predictor of outcome, including survival, particularly for patients with glioma (Table 30.2). It also indicates how well the patient is likely to tolerate treatment. This is an important factor when recommending a treatment program. The choice can be between radical, palliative, or active supportive care. For patients with disabling neurology, especially those with GBM, supportive care may be the most appropriate option.


Table 30.2 WHO performance status and Glasgow coma scale (GCS).





The WHO Performance Status is useful in assessing patient capabilities, especially with respect to activities of daily living. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a measure of conscious level.




















































































WHO performance status
0 = Able to carry out all normal activity without restriction
1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work
2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work; up and about >50% of waking hours
3 = Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours
4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry out any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Eyes open Spontaneously 4
  To speech 3
  To stimulus 2
  None 1
Best verbal response Orientated 5
  Confused 4
  Inappropriate words 3
  Incomprehensible 2
  None 1
Best motor response Obeys commands 6
  Localize stimulus 5
  Flexion – withdrawal 4
  Flexion – abnormal 3
  Extension 2
  No response 1
Best score    15    
Worst    3    



Principles of radiotherapy planning for CNS tumours


The fundamental principles of radiotherapy (RT) planning and treatment delivery apply to CNS tumours. These include accurate and reproducible immobilization, high quality imaging to localize the tumour and critical normal structures, three-dimensional conformal or intensity modulated planning, and high precision treatment delivery.


Immobilization devices include Perspex or thermoplastic beam direction shells or, where a higher precision is required, a relocatable stereotactic head frame. The optimal position for the patient depends on the location of the tumour, and on the immobilization devices available. A supine position is more comfortable for the patient. Using couch extensions, such as an ‘S’ frame or a relocatable stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) head frame, allows treatment of posterior lesions with the patient supine. With a Perspex or thermoplastic shell, patients with posterior lesions need to be treated prone, to allow appropriate beam directions without collision with the couch. The exception is for palliative RT, using parallel-opposed lateral fields, where the patient can be positioned supine. For craniospinal axis treatment, a prone treatment position allows palpation of the spine and accurate visualization of matching field junctions. There is no role for lateral shells, which are unstable and uncomfortable. Shells should be cut out to improve skin sparing.


Most planning is based on CT, because this delivers exact patient geometry and position without distortion, and because CT density is required for accurate dosimetry calculation. Preferably, intravenous contrast should be used because this enhances discrimination of the target. Although this changes the CT numbers slightly, dosimetry is affected by 1% or less. In most circumstances, tumours are less well demonstrated on CT than on MRI, and MRI should be considered an essential modality for planning. Typically, MRI does not have to be performed in the treatment position, provided suitable image coregistration software is available. The correct choice of MRI sequence must be made, in order to optimize definition of the tumour. However, CT and MRI are complementary. While MRI is in general the better modality for showing tumour, CT is extremely useful to determine the extent of bone involvement, or the extent of a non-invasive tumour which is limited by bone. In the next few years, additional imaging is likely to be incorporated into planning, especially for gliomas. This includes newer MR sequences (such as diffusion weighted and diffusion tensor imaging), MR spectroscopy and PET (positron emission tomography) imaging. In some meningiomas that have been completely resected, coregistration with the preoperative MRI may be helpful in determining the location of the tumour and possible spread.


The definitions of gross tumour volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) as outlined in ICRU 83 should be used for planning purposes. Imaging shows the extent of the GTV; historical data are used to define a CTV margin around it, which is typically the same in all patients with the same condition. The PTV margin is designed to account for uncertainties in planning and treatment, and has systematic (i.e. ‘treatment preparation’) and random (i.e. ‘treatment delivery’) elements. The margin should be added based on the recipe formula outlined the British Institute of Radiology 2003 report ‘Geometric Uncertainties in Radiotherapy’, and incorporated into ICRU 83.


Conformal radiotherapy should be considered standard practice, because this limits dose to normal tissues. There is reasonable evidence that this in turn reduces complications in patients treated for CNS tumours, by reducing the volume of tissue, especially brain, receiving a high dose, or avoiding exposure to sensitive structures, such as the hypothalamus and pituitary gland (conformal avoidance). Eye lens doses should be estimated with thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) for future reference. On-treatment portal films or images should be used to confirm positioning for radical treatments.



Normal tissue tolerance to radiotherapy


Normal tissue tolerance is an important concept. It embodies both the risk of a complication and also the severity of its effect on the patient. The relevance also depends on the clinical setting: a higher risk of normal tissue damage might be accepted in a patient with a highly malignant tumour requiring a high RT dose who has only a low chance of long-term survival, than is reasonable in a patients with a benign tumour. The dose that is considered safe may therefore vary from one condition to another.


There is almost certainly a volume effect in normal tissue tolerance of CNS structures, as in other parts of the body. This means that the larger the volume irradiated, the lower the safe dose. The CNS is also particularly sensitive to the dose per fraction, and many of the dose-fractionation schedules used are designed to take advantage of this. Many of the data on tolerance in the CNS are based on literature reports which predate the use of modern imaging, especially MRI. Tolerance doses are thus far from absolute.


Tolerance of the brain itself (to avoid necrosis) is in the region of 54–60   Gy in approximately 30 fractions, depending on volume treated and dose per fraction. A volume effect also exists for intellectual damage. Using 3D conformal RT, intellectual damage in adults is uncommon with doses up to 54   Gy in 30 fractions. The brainstem is said to have a slightly lower tolerance than brain substance, approximately 54   Gy in 30 fractions (or 55   Gy in 33 fractions). The optic nerves and chiasm are also thought to be more sensitive than brain parenchyma. For benign tumours in this region, a dose of 45    Gy in 25 fractions to 50   Gy in 30 fractions should be safe, with a risk of blindness which is virtually zero.


The pituitary gland and hypothalamus have a much lower tolerance for hormonal dysfunction. There is probably little effect for doses under 20–24   Gy, but adults in whom these structures receive 40–60   Gy have a significant long-term risk of hypothalamic–pituitary axis dysfunction.


The lacrimal gland shows reduced tear output after doses over about 20   Gy (similar to salivary glands). The lens of the eye should not develop cataract after doses less than 5–6   Gy, spread out over 30 fractions. There is a 50% risk of cataract after a dose of 15   Gy. The middle and inner ears are also sensitive structures but in adults recover in most patients after doses up to 60   Gy. The risk of permanent alopecia depends on the dose to the hair follicles in the dermis. The risk is very low with doses below 10–15   Gy, but 50% of patients will develop permanent alopecia after 43   Gy (in 30 fractions) to the scalp. This dose is difficult to estimate routinely because the hair follicles normally fall within the build-up region.


The spinal cord has a tolerance of approximately 50   Gy in 30 fractions (equivalent to 46   Gy at 2   Gy per fraction). This may be a conservative (i.e. safe) estimate and, in some circumstances, higher doses may be appropriate, such as for GBM of the spinal cord.





Mar 7, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Tumours of the central nervous system

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access