Upper limb

13
Upper limb


Table 13.1 Summary of parameters







































































































































































































































































































1.5 T 3 T
SE SE
Short TE Min–30 ms Short TE Min–15 ms
Long TE 70 ms+ Long TE 70 ms+
Short TR 600–800 ms Short TR 600–900 ms
Long TR 2000 ms+ Long TR 2000 ms+
FSE FSE
Short TE Min–20 ms Short TE Min–15 ms
Long TE 90 ms+ Long TE 90 ms+
Short TR 400–600 ms Short TR 600–900 ms
Long TR 4000 ms+ Long TR 4000 ms+
Short TEL 2–6 Short TEL 2–6
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
IR T1 IR T1
Short TE Min–20 ms Short TE Min–20 ms
Long TR 3000 ms+ Long TR 300 ms+
TI 200–600 ms TI Short or null time of tissue
Short ETL 2–6 Short ETL 2–6
STIR STIR
Long TE 60 ms+ Long TE 60 ms+
Long TR 3000 ms+ Long TR 3000 ms+
Short TI 100–175 ms Short TI 210 ms
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
FLAIR FLAIR
Long TE 80 ms+ Long TE 80 ms+
Long TR 9000 ms+ Long TR 9000 ms + (TR at least 4 × TI)
Long TI 1700–2500 ms (depending on TR) Long TI 1700–2500 ms (depending on TR)
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
Coherent GRE Coherent GRE
Long TE 15 ms+ Long TE 15 ms+
Short TR <50 ms Short TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–50° Flip angle 20–50°
Incoherent GRE Incoherent GRE
Short TE Minimum Short TE Minimum
Short TR <50 ms Short TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–50° Flip angle 20–50°
Balanced GRE Balanced GRE
TE Minimum TE Minimum
TR Minimum TR Minimum
Flip angle >40° Flip angle >40°
SSFP SSFP
TE 10–15 ms TE 10–15 ms
TR <50 ms TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–40° Flip angle 20–40°
Slice thickness 2D Slice thickness 3D
Thin 2–4 mm Thin <1 mm
Medium 5–6 mm Thick >3 mm
Thick 8 mm
FOV Matrix
Small <18 cm Coarse 256 × 128/256 × 192
Medium 18–30 cm Medium 256 × 256/512 × 256
Large >30 cm Fine 512 × 512


Very fine >1024 × 1024
NEX/NSA Slice number 3D
Short 1 Small <32
Medium 2–3 Medium 64
Multiple >4 Large >128
PC-MRA 2D and 3D TOF-MRA 2D
TE Minimum TE Minimum
TR 25–33 ms TR 28–45 ms
Flip angle 30° Flip angle 40–60°
VENC venous 20–40 cm/s
VENC arterial 60 cm/s TOF-MRA 3D


TE Minimum


TR 25–50 ms


Flip angle 20–30°

The figures given are for 1.5 T and 3 T systems. Parameters are dependent on field strength and may need adjustment for very low or very high field systems.


Shoulder


Basic anatomy (Figure 13.1)

c13-fig-0001

Figure 13.1 Anterior view of the right shoulder showing bony structures and main ligaments.


Common indications



  • Evaluation of shoulder pain
  • Diagnosis of impingement syndrome
  • Suspected rotator cuff tear
  • Evaluation of recurrent dislocation (instability, subluxation, dislocation)
  • Hill–Sachs lesion, Bankart lesion, labrum lesion
  • Frozen shoulder syndrome

Equipment



  • Dedicated shoulder coil or flexible surface coil
  • Immobilization pads and straps
  • Earplugs/headphones

Patient positioning


The patient lies supine with the arms resting comfortably by the side. Slide the patient across the table to bring the shoulder under examination as close as possible to the centre of the bore. Relax the shoulder to remove any upward ‘hunching’. The arm to be examined is strapped to the patient, with the thumb up (neutral position) and padded so that the humerus is horizontal. Place the coil to cover the humeral head and the anatomy superior and medial to it. If a surface or flexible coil is used, care must be taken to ensure that the flat surface of the coil is parallel to the Z axis when it is placed over the humeral head (Figure 1.1). Centre the FOV on the middle of the glenohumeral joint. Patient and coil immobilization are essential for a good result. If possible, instruct the patient to breathe abdominally rather than with the thorax and place sandbags on the upper chest. This reduces movement artefact. Instruct the patient not to move the hand during sequences. The patient is positioned so that the longitudinal alignment light and the horizontal alignment light pass through the shoulder joint.


Suggested protocol


Axial/coronal incoherent (spoiled) GRE/SE/FSE T1


Acts as a localizer if three-plane localization is unavailable and ensures that there is adequate signal return from the whole joint. Medium slices/gaps are prescribed relative to the horizontal alignment light so that the supraspinatus muscle is included in the image.


Axial localizer: I 0 mm to S 25 mm


Axial SE/FSE T2 or coherent GRE T2* (Figure 13.2)

c13-fig-0002

Figure 13.2 Axial GRE T2*-weighted image of the shoulder showing normal appearances.


Thin slices/gaps are prescribed from the top of the acromio-clavicular joint to below the inferior edge of the glenoid (Figure 13.3). The bicipital groove on the lateral aspect of the humerus to the distal supraspinatus muscle is included in the image. The axial projection displays joint cartilage and glenoid labrum, intra-osseous changes associated with Hills–Sachs deformity, and the condition of muscles and tendons of the rotator cuff.

c13-fig-0003

Figure 13.3 Axial GRE T2*-weighted image showing slice prescription boundaries and orientation for axial imaging of the shoulder.


Coronal/oblique SE/FSE T1 (Figure 13.4)

c13-fig-0004

Figure 13.4 Coronal/oblique T1-weighted FSE through the shoulder.


Thin slices/gaps are prescribed from the infra-spinatus posteriorly to the supraspinatus anteriorly and angled parallel to the supraspinatus muscle (Figures 13.5 and 13.6). This is best seen on a superior axial view, but coverage is easier to assess on an axial image through the lower third of the humeral head. The superior edge of the acromion to the inferior aspect of the subscapularis muscle (about 1 cm below the lower edge of the glenoid), and the deltoid muscle laterally, and the distal third of the supraspinatus muscle medially are included on the image.

c13-fig-0005

Figure 13.5 Axial SE T1-weighted localizer of the shoulder showing the angle of the supraspinatus muscle.

c13-fig-0006

Figure 13.6 Axial Oblique T1-weighed image showing slice prescription boundaries and orientation for coronal oblique imaging of the shoulder


Coronal/oblique SE/FSE T2 +/− tissue suppression (Figures 13.7 and 13.8)

c13-fig-0007

Figure 13.7 Coronal/oblique FSE T2-weighted image with tissue suppression.

c13-fig-0008

Figure 13.8 Coronal/oblique FSE T2-weighted image.


Slice prescription as for coronal/oblique T1.


Fat-suppressed T2-weighted images clearly display muscle tears, trabecular injury, joint fluid and tendon tears. If SE is used, tissue suppression may not be necessary. On most systems, the level of fat suppression is adjustable. Reducing the level of fat suppression improves SNR.


Axial SE/FSE/oblique T1+ tissue suppression


Thin slices/gap are prescribed from the top of the acromio-clavicular joint to below the inferior edge of the glenoid


Additional sequences


Sagittal/oblique SE/FSE T1


As for coronal/oblique T1, except slices are prescribed from medial to the glenoid cavity to the bicipital groove laterally. The area from the distal portion of the joint capsule to the superior border of the acromion is included in the image (Figure 13.9).

c13-fig-0009

Figure 13.9 Coronal/oblique GRE T2-weighted image showing slice prescription boundaries and orientation for sagittal imaging of the shoulder.


Sagittal/oblique/axial FSE PD/T2 +/– tissue suppression


This sequence provides a combination of anatomical display, tendon assessment, display of joint cartilage and sensitivity to trabecular damage.


3D FSE with variable refocused flip angle PD or T2 contrast +/– tissue suppression


This sequence provides 3D visualization of tendon assessment and joint cartilage and is very sensitive to trabecular damage.


3D GRE T2* BGE/GRE


This sequence provides a 3D visualization and a better detection of the joint cartilage lesions.


MR arthrography (Figures 13.10 and 13.11)

c13-fig-0010

Figure 13.10 Coronal/oblique T1-weighted arthrogram.

c13-fig-0011

Figure 13.11 Axial T1-weighted arthrogram.


The intra-articular use of gadolinium (MR arthrography) is used to diagnose rotator cuff tears, glenoid labral disruption, bicipital tendon and chondral defects. The technique usually involves injecting a very dilute solution of contrast in saline (1:100) or a very weak concentration of gadolinium into the joint capsule under fluoroscopic control followed by conventional MR imaging. Alternatively, saline injection followed by fat-suppressed T2-weighted FSE sequences, or examining the joint after prolonged exercise to exacerbate a joint effusion, may be effective.


Sequences after arthrography:



  • axial/oblique T1 + tissue suppression
  • coronal/oblique T2 + tissue suppression
  • coronal/oblique PD + tissue suppression
  • coronal/oblique T1 + tissue suppression
  • sagittal/oblique T2 + tissue suppression
  • 3D T1 FS: FSE or GRE with isotropic voxels can be used instead of conventional 2D FSE.

Image optimization


Technical issues


The TE influences the signal of the muscle in musculoskeletal imaging. A very long TE produces T2-weighted images in which muscle is hypo-intense. The SNR is therefore reduced, but fluid detection is improved. Tissue suppression techniques can also be used to enhance the signal from fluid even further; however, larger voxels may be required to compensate for the inherent drop in SNR. By choosing a moderate TE, muscle still retains signal (a grey-level intensity) and the images are PD weighted. The SNR is however higher, and the spatial resolution can be better than a T2-weighted image. This kind of contrast is used to detect fluid and retain an anatomical image. Tissue suppression techniques are recommended with this kind of weighting because signal from fluid is reduced. Cartilage lesions can be better detected when TE is high (at least 30–40 ms) because the signal from normal cartilage decreases.


The SNR of the shoulder is largely dependent on the quality and type of coil used. Generally, dedicated shoulder coils return a much higher and more uniform signal than a surface coil, and therefore, the technique is adapted accordingly. If using a dedicated coil, thin slice thickness and higher matrices can be used to achieve the necessary spatial resolution without unduly lengthening the scan time. If the signal not high enough, some resolution may have to be sacrificed in order to maintain the SNR and keep the scan time within reasonable limits. Newly developed surface coils, with a high number of coil elements, can be configurated as high performance shoulder coils. However, spatial resolution is the key to accuracy in shoulder imaging, and the resolution must be as high as possible (pixel size below 0.8 mm). SE and FSE are usually the sequences of choice, but coherent GRE and STIR are useful to visualize joint fluid. STIR may provide better results than fat-suppressed FSE if magnet shimming is suboptimal.


Artefact problems


If possible, instruct the patient to breathe abdominally rather than with the thorax, and place sandbags on the upper chest. This reduces movement artefact from breathing. Spatial pre-saturation pulses (bands) placed I and medial to the shoulder under investigation are usually very effective at reducing phase ghosting from breathing and flow from the subclavian vessels. GMN also minimizes flow artefact, but as it increases the signal in vessels and the minimum TE, it is not usually beneficial in T1-weighted sequences. However, GMN effectively increases the contrast of synovial fluid in T2- and T2*-weighted images. The use of propeller k-space filling techniques is also beneficial. In coronal/oblique and axial imaging, the FOV is offset so that the centre of the shoulder is in the centre of the image. Additional shimming may be required if tissue suppression techniques are used as fat suppression may not be homogeneous for all the patients.


For high degrees of obliquity (>45°) some systems automatically swap the direction of the phase and frequency axes and, because this can cause severe aliasing problems, antialiasing software is required. Moreover, because a coronal oblique prescription is not a coronal oblique acquisition but a sagittal/oblique acquisition, some systems alter the presented orientation and the anatomical markers (a right shoulder could look like a left). The same problems can arise in sagittal/oblique imaging. To avoid these problems, position the patient in slight rotation with the scapula parallel to the table. If this is not possible, check the direction of phase encoding for every oblique scan prescription, and use anatomical markers in sagittal/oblique images to confirm the scanner’s labelling of anterior and posterior. To minimize aliasing, phase encoding should run A–P on axials and sagittal/obliques, and S–I on the coronal/obliques. Alternatively, spatial pre-saturation pulses can be positioned to minimize artefact from the medial edges of the coil.


A phenomenon known as the ‘magic angle’ causes increased signal intensity in tendons in short TE sequences when tendons are orientated at an angle of 55° to the main field. Normally, tendons produce little or no signal on conventional MRI sequences because tendons consist of parallel ordered bundles of collagen fibres. This structural anisotropy causes a local static magnetic field which, when superimposed on to the static field, increases spin–spin interactions and therefore shortens T2 relaxation rates so much that the tendon has a low signal intensity.


However, the rate at which spin dephasing is increased is proportional to the angle between the main field and the long axis of the tendon. Because of this relationship, additional spin dephasing caused by the structural anisotropy of tendons decreases to 0 when this angle is 55°. Therefore, at this angle, the T2 relaxation time increases, causing a high signal intensity when using short TEs. The increased signal can mimic pathology such as tendonitis in normal tendons. It is seen in many tendons especially supraspinatus and Achilles tendons as well as in the wrist. The magic angle effect can be eliminated by repositioning the tendon or by increasing the TE above 60 ms (but not too high as signal from muscle reduces with very long TEs.).


Patient considerations


Ensure that the patient is comfortable and well informed of the procedure. Due to excessively loud gradient noise associated with some sequences, earplugs or headphones must always be provided to prevent hearing impairment. Padding should be placed to prevent the patient’s skin from coming in direct contact with the scanner bore and be placed in any area in which the patient’s body may form a ‘conductive loop’. Also it is important that there is no direct contact with the skin and the surface coil (insert pads). Provide all cooperative patients with the ‘Patient Alert’ squeeze bulb. Inform the patient that you are close to him/her in the operator room, and also in direct communication.


Contrast usage

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 10, 2016 | Posted by in MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | Comments Off on Upper limb

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access