Congenital Heart Disease



Congenital Heart Disease


Robert W. W. Biederman



The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to evaluate congenital heart disease (CHD) has revolutionized the study and practice of CHD. It is almost as if CMR was developed primarily to assess CHD, with advantages for simple and complex, embryologically disparate disease processes in, typically younger, sick patients. Aspects that are ideal for this population include noninvasive, nonionizing radiation; no obligate need for contrast; ability to quantitate in highly accurate and reproducible manner both flow and velocity; visualization of ventriculoarterial conduits; assessing relationships between vascular structures that are typically not seen well on x-ray angiography; lack of requirement of acoustic window; and ability to visualize in any plane (see Fig. 14-1).

Hemodynamic assessment in a noninvasive manner is a key advantage that has been well recognized for detection and quantification of stenotic jets. Jets are characterized in terms of peak and mean gradient, and the temporal relationship of the jet to cardiac events can be assessed in a manner analogous to echocardiography, except that it can be done in an inherently three-dimensional manner. True quantitation of regurgitant jets, however, is not something that any other technique offers. CMR, through phase velocity mapping (PVM) allows calculation of the amount of blood flow crossing a selected plane, independent of relative orientation (see Fig. 14-2). For example, the same quantitation procedure can be performed in the setting of one valve possessing both a systolic stenotic jet and a diastolic regurgitant jet.

The ability to quantitate intracardiac shunts is well performed by CMR. Conventionally, echocardiographic measures cannot quantitate shunts well, and when attempted, these approaches are reliant on estimating velocity time integrals, which inherently assume that a parabolic flow is present. Similar arguments apply to the assessment of shunts in the catheterization suite where thermistor methods suffer in the presence of regurgitant lesions, whereas oximetry measurements suffer from a lack of specificity when there is >6% change in oxygen saturation levels. Fundamentally, this limits the ability to detect small shunts, which, although they may not be clinically significant, can become significant over time.

Typically, the CMR patient has been referred from a prior imaging modality in which the diagnosis was unclear. At our institution, echocardiography is the most often used test, followed by x-ray imaging and lastly, computed tomography (CT). Clarification of the disease process, relating an observation to the great vessels, evaluation of situs, evaluations of potential ventriculoarterial connection or intracardiac shunts are usually the indications to consider CMR (see Fig. 14-3).

A wide range of CMR imaging sequences are useful for patients with CHD. For a strategy that permits large amount information to be gleaned in a short time, to allow interpretation and permitting flexible planning, the double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence has proved to be very robust. When images are acquired in an axial view, anatomic relationships can be determined in a rapid manner, because the body is most commonly considered in this orientation. Relating the great vessels to the ventricles is easily performed in this plane, as is establishing the general relationships that exist between the atria and the ventricles, and additionally, some intracardiac communications can be assessed. The coronal view albeit less traditional, because it is not obtainable by conventional image modalities, reveals anatomic relationships in a superb manner, serving to delineate vascular and myocardial structures effectively in three dimensions (3D), when relating the series of 2D planes.

Defining situs is relatively easy when image quality is high. Situs solitus is the normal position, with the morphologic thin, smooth walled right atrium (RA) with its broad-based appendage and crista terminalis positioned to the right of the left atrium (LA), with its thin, miterlike, LA appendage. When reversed, the condition is referred
to as situs inversus, and when ambiguous, it is referred to as atrial isomerism. This latter condition is associated with the visceral heterotaxy syndromes (see Fig. 14-4). Describing bronchial anatomy to identify the right and left bronchi is also quite helpful, especially when the lung isomerism is present. Right isomerism is associated with asplenia, whereas left isomerism is associated with polysplenia. Each condition has many associated atrioventricular (AV) connections. See Chapter 7 for more details.






FIGURE 14-1 Top panels show a limited region maximum intensity projection (MIP) (left). A steady state free precession (SSFP) (right) image acquired in the coronal projection at the level of the superior vena cava (SVC) demonstrates a confluence of the right upper and middle right pulmonary veins entering into the SVC/high right atrial (RA) junction. The lower panel images show a 3D surface rendition (left panel) of the magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the defect, demonstrating in the surface reconstructed view manually timed for the main pulmonary artery. The right panel shows the “broken ring” sign depicted by the arrow as the classic axial image that is diagnostic of a communication between the SVC and RA with a defect in the posterior inner atrial system. Images relate to case study 1.






FIGURE 14-2 A selected multislice steady state free precession (SSFP) sequence and a four-chamber view of an ostium secundum defect (far left and left) with phase velocity mapping (PVM) set low to a Venc of 50 cm/second shown in the left-to-right and anterior-to-posterior direction (right and far right) demonstrating the “Doppler-like” capability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with PVM. Quantitation was also performed to noninvasively determine the intracardiac shunt (Qp:Qs). Images relate to case study 2.







FIGURE 14-3 Transthoracic imaging just before near simultaneous opacification of the right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) chambers by saline contrast (left). Middle image shows a single steady state free precession (SSFP) slice hinting at anomalous connection to the left upper pulmonary vein (LUPV)and confirmed by a temporal acquired maximum intensity projection (MIP) (arrows) (right). SVC, superior vena cava. Images relate to case study 3. (Best seen on DVD.)

Evaluation of pulmonary vein drainage is exceptionally well defined by CMR, as many combinations and anatomic normal variants are increasingly being recognized as clinically important (see Fig. 14-5). The axial plane generally allows recognition of the insertion point of the veins into the posterior LA. Usually, acquisition of a coronal plane permits unequivocal detection of the veins, and more importantly, when aberrant drainage is suspected, this plane permits delineation of a number of insertions into other vascular territories, including infradiaphragmatic drainage, which is generally not detectable by other imaging modalities. In many cases in which right ventricular (RV) dilation is present, as seen on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and despite referral for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in which, “all four pulmonary veins are identified and enter into LACMR often detects a third right pulmonary vein (expected in many cases due to the smaller right middle pulmonary vein position that can be mistaken for the right lower pulmonary vein or right upper pulmonary vein). In these cases, often a sinus venosum defect is seen on axial DIR images, which easily detects a “broken ring sign” in which the posterior superior vena cava (SVC) is not completely closed and a defect is seen where the right upper pulmonary vein drains into the junction between the SVC and RA (see Fig. 14-1). Anomalous return, either partial in adults, or total in young children has been quite well described by CMR.






FIGURE 14-4 Double inversion recovery (DIR) on left with steady state free precession (SSFP) in coronal projections demonstrating the heterotaxy syndrome. IVC, inferior vena cava; SVC, superior vena cava; RA, right atrium. Images relate to case study 4.

Jun 7, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING | Comments Off on Congenital Heart Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access