Multimodal Nanoparticles



Fig. 1
Schematic representation of commonly used nanoparticle-based PET/MRI and SPECT/MRI probes




Table 1
Physical properties of nanoparticle-based PET/MRI probes






















































































































































































































































Nanoparticle

MRI component

PET component

Chelator

Core size (nm)

Hydrodynamic diameter (nm)

r 1 (mM–1s–1)

r 2 (mM–1s–1)

Application

Ref.

124I-Gd3N@C80

Gd3+

124I




70


Tumor

[21]

64Cu-NOTA-Au-IONP-Affibody

Iron oxide

64Cu

NOTA

~10

24.4 ± 2.0


143.2 (7T)

Tumor

[43]

*As-SPION@PAA

Iron oxide

71,72,74As


~10

21


93.8 (4.7T)

Lymph node

[44]

Magh-1-PNPs-NODA

Iron oxide

68Ga

NODA

8-12

44-55

0.5

182 (1.5T)

Pancreatic cancer

[45]

MDIO-64Cu-DOTA

Iron oxide

64Cu

DOTA

7-8

62.7

16.8

83.9 (1.4T)

Atherosclerotic plaques

[38]

SDIO-DO3A

Iron oxide

64Cu

DO3A

5.9

~60

14

72 (1.4T)

Atherosclerotic plaques

[46]

Gd3+/Yb3+/Er3+ doped NaYF4

Gd3+

18F


22 × 19

28.2

0.40 (3T)


Nonspecific

[47]

NOTA-OA-IONP

Iron oxide

68Ga

NOTA

<15

66.3 ± 31.0


157 (4.7T)

Tumor

[48]

cRGD-SPIO

Iron oxide

64Cu

NOTA

~10

68


101.9 (4.7T)

Tumor

[49]

68Ga-SPIONs

Iron oxide

68Ga



30



Sentinel lymph node

[50]

Fe3O4@Al(OH)3

Iron oxide

18F



21

4.9

121.9 (3T)

Nonspecific

[51]

MnFe2O4@Al(OH)3

Mn doped iron oxide

18F



21

8.2

20.1 (3T)

Nonspecific

[51]

Co0.16Fe2.84O4@NaYF4

Iron oxide

18F


10.3

44

5

102 (3T)

Sentinel lymph node (passive)

[13]

89Zr-Feraheme

Iron oxide

89Zr


5-10

18.1



Nonspecific

[39]

69Ge-SPION@PEG

Iron oxide

69Ge


10

23


93.8 (4.7T)

Lymph node (passive)

[36]

Gd3+/64Cu2+-DTPA-MSNs

Gd3+

64Cu

DTPA

150

250 ± 76

17.6 (1.4T)


Nonspecific

[22]

89Zr-ferumoxytol

Iron oxide

89Zr

desferrioxamine


17-35


89 (0.47T)

Lymph nodes

[52]

PEMs

Iron oxide

64Cu

DOTA

100 (5 nm for single core)

140 ± 7

2.15

265 (1.4T)

Tumor (passive)

[53]

68GaNHFCNP

Iron oxide

68Ga

NOTA

15.3




Target cancer cell though charge

[37]

AGuIX

Gd3+

68Ga

NODA (68Ga), DOTA (Gd)


2.5 ± 0.1

10.3

13.4 (1.4T)

Nonspecific

[20]


MSN mesoporous silica nanoparticles, PEM positron emitting magnetic nanoconstructs



Table 2
Physical properties of the reported nanoparticle-based SPECT/MRI probes


































































































































































































































































































Nanoparticle

MRI component

SPECT component

Chelator

Core size (nm)

Hydrodynamic diameter (nm)

r 1 (mM–1s–1)

r 2 (mM–1s–1)

Application

Ref.

[59Fe]-SPIONs

Iron oxide

59Fe


5.0 ± 1.5

17 ± 6


97 ± 3

Nonspecific

[34]

111In-doped iron oxide

Iron oxide

111In


7.7

37.3



Nonspecific

[33]

99mTc-LBA-SPION

Iron oxide

99mTc

DTPA

12




Human hepatoblastoma

[17]

99mTc-NBRh1

Iron oxide

99mTc



160.8 ± 1.3



Tumor

[28]

99mTc-USPION-RGD

Iron oxide

99mTc

DTPA

3.5 ± 1.2

10

8.2

20.1

Tumor

[14]

99mTc-AF-SPIONs

Iron oxide

99mTc


11 ± 2




Lymph nodes (passive)

[27]

99mTc-DTPA-USPIO-Annexin V

Iron oxide

99mTc

DTPA

3-5


8.2

20.1

Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques

[15]

cRGD-conjugated IO-NPs

Iron oxide

99mTc


10 ± 2

~200



Tumor

[12]

177Lu-trastuzumab-iron oxide

Iron oxide

177Lu

DOTA

9.0 ± 0.5

41 ± 15



Tumor

[35]

99mTc-Au–Fe3O4 core-shell NPs

Iron oxide

99mTc


7.9 ± 0.4

11



Nonspecific

[25]

99mTc-Au–Fe3O4 dumbbell-like NPs

Iron oxide

99mTc


26.1 ± 1.6

35



Nonspecific

[25]

Radiolabled PEGylated SPIO

Iron oxide

111In, 14C, 59Fe

DTPA

15

40 ± 7



Nonspecific

[54]

Fe3O4–3H11- 125I

Iron oxide

125I



33.5



Tumor

[16]

99mTc-MNP

Iron oxide

99mTc






Nonspecific

[55]

125I-cRGD-USPIO

Iron oxide

125I



51.3



Breast cancer

[30]

131I-hVEGF siRNA/SilenceMag

Iron oxide

131I






Hepatocellular carcinoma

[31]

Fe3O4-Ag125I heterodimers

Iron oxide

125I


14 (Fe3O4)

9 (Ag125I)

 
139.8

Nonspecific

[41]

RGD-liposomes

Gd3+

111In

 
182

2.7

16.2

(6.3 T)

Tumor

[19]

99mTc-DPA-ale-Endorem

Iron oxide

99mTc

DPA

5

106 ± 60


26

(9.4 T)

Nonspecific

[24]

99mTc-SPIONs

Iron oxide

99mTc


11

18



Sentinel lymph node (passive)

[23]

111In-mAbMB-SPIONs

Iron oxide

111In

DTPA

15.6

76.6

0.59

468.57

Tumor

[32]

111In-liposomes

Gd3+

111In



110.4–131.3



Tumor

[18]

99mTc-USPIO-bevacizumab

Iron oxide

99mTc

DTPA

<20




Hepatocellular carcinoma

[26]

125I-fSiO4@SPIOs

Iron oxide

125I


6

20


165

(1.41 T)

Stem cell tracking

[29]


DPA dipicolylamine, LBA lactobionic acid



2.1 Iron Oxide-Based Imaging Probes


Iron oxide nanoparticles (maghemite γ-Fe2O3 or magnetite Fe3O4) are commonly used platforms for constructing multimodal probes for PET/MR and SPECT/MR imaging because of their unique magnetic and biological properties. Iron oxide nanoparticles, in general, have an excellent biocompatibility profile at concentration ranges suitable for most diagnostic applications (0.1–10 μg/mL) because iron taken up by the liver and spleen is metabolized and joins the physiological iron pool. However, concerns for cytotoxicity could arise when concentrations of 100 μg/mL of iron oxide nanoparticles are exceeded [10] and adverse reactions such as hypotension and back pain have been reported for some formulations [11]. Besides biocompatibility, the large surface-to-volume ratio for iron oxide nanoparticles has been attractive for development of targeted agents. In addition, self-heating of these nanoparticles in the presence of alternating magnetic fields could facilitate controlled drug release or cytolysis of tumor cells [12], which has spurred interest in developing these magnetic nanoparticles as therapeutic agents for tumor treatments.

The synthetic designs of recently reported PET/MRI and SPECT/MRI nanoparticle-based multimodal probes are heavily dependent on the proposed usage of these probes in vivo. Some properties can be engineered into the core of the nanoparticle itself, and preparation of the iron oxide nanoparticles under controlled conditions (concentration of precursors, temperature, and solvent system) can modulate core properties (composition, hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity, and shape). These properties of the core have been tailored to influence the biodistribution, blood circulation half-life, and magnetic anisotropy. For example, incorporation of cation dopants into the core of iron oxide nanoparticles can alter magnetic anisotropy and can provide additional imaging capability such as fluorescent imaging. Cui et al. developed hybrid inorganic composites and their variants: Fe3O4@NaYF4 core/shell nanoparticles, and bisphosphonate polyethylene glycol (BP-PEG)-coated Co0.16Fe2.84O4@NaYF4(Yb,Er)-BP-PEG and Fe3O4@NaYF4(Yb,Tm)-BP-PEG nanoparticles. These nanocomposites contained different lanthanide cation dopants Yb (sensitizer), Er, or Tm in NaYF4 shell for up-conversion fluorescence, and Co incorporated in the Fe3O4 core to adjust the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles [13]. Up-conversion fluorescence (emission of light at a shorter wavelength than the excitation wavelength) with emission peaks at 700 and 800 nm was observed for Fe3O4@NaYF4(Yb,Tm)-BP-PEG nanocomposites while emission signals centered at 525, 550, and 650 nm were obtained for Co0.16Fe2.84O4@NaYF4(Yb,Er)-BP-PEG nanoparticles upon excitation with a 980-nm laser. The high affinity of NaYF4 for [18F-fluoride] and the ability of bisphosphonate moiety to chelate 99mTc and 64Cu radiometals facilitated multimodal PET/MR/optical or SPECT/MR/optical imaging.

Surface modifications to introduce reactive moieties on the surface of the nanoparticles are often implemented. This includes attachment of chelators of MRI-active metals (e.g., Gd3+ and Mn2+) and radiometals for multimodal imaging; addition of ligands that allow targeting; conjugation with fluorescent dyes enabling optical imaging; and loading with drugs for delivery. The surface functionalization of reported SPECT/MRI and PET/MRI probes typically involves modification of the surface with abundant –NH2 or –COOH groups for conjugation using any number of conjugation chemistries. For example, the –NH2 groups in the common coating material poly(ethylene glycol) 2-aminoethyl ether acetic acid (NH2-PEG-COOH) can be activated by m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl ester (sulfo-MBS) for subsequent functionalization with targeting groups through a thiol-maleimide linkage [14] (Scheme 1). A structural derivative of PEG, COOH-PEG-COOH, can be conjugated to amine-terminated ligands such as phospholipid-binding Annexin V [15], an anti-gastric cancer monoclonal antibody 3H11 [16], by activating the –COOH groups via NHS-based biolinkers such as 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)/sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide (sulfo-NHS). The –COOH of carboxymethyl dextran on the iron oxide nanoparticle surfaces can be conjugated to chelators or targeting ligands using EDC/NHS via carbodiimide coupling chemistry. Similarly, EDC/NHS chemistry can be used to conjugate asiologlycoprotein-targeted lactobionic acid to the free amine groups of dopamine [17].

A337746_1_En_10_Sch1_HTML.gif


Scheme 1
Crosslinking strategies used in multimodal nanoparticle-based SPECT/MRI and PET/MRI probes for surface functionalization and subsequent ligand attachment


2.2 Non Iron Oxide-Based Imaging Probes


Liposomes have long been used as carriers for gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents. They are spherical vesicles composed of a bilayer of phospholipids with an aqueous interior [18]. By encapsulating large amounts of gadolinium ions, liposome-based nanoprobes have much higher longitudinal and transverse relaxivities compared with single molecule gadolinium chelates. The ability to accommodate different components (both lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds) makes the liposome an interesting vehicle for combined multimodal imaging and drug delivery systems. For example, de Vries et al. reported a multimodal liposome probe (182 nm in diameter) carrying gadolinium chelates, 111In chelates, rhodamine dye, and tumor-targeted cyclic RGD peptides (Fig. 2) [19]. The liposomes were prepared by the widely used thin film hydration method, where a thin lipid film is hydrated using buffer or other aqueous solutions to form the liposome. A biocompatible polymer coating, polyethylene glycol (PEG), was added to offer improved in vivo stability and blood half-life. In addition to SPECT/MRI dual modality imaging and SPECT-based quantification, the liposome cargo allowed in vitro and in vivo determination of local/cellular concentrations of gadolinium (given that the ratio of gadolinium to radionuclide of the probe was known), and permitted calculation of relaxivities in biological environments. A similar liposomal nanoprobe targeted to tumors using the RGD peptide and the neuropeptide substance P (binds to neurokinin-1 receptor), however, revealed only moderate tumor uptake and no additive effect of dual-targeting approach [18]. These findings suggest that the liposome-based probes have potential for further targeting optimization.
Jun 18, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL RADIOLOGY | Comments Off on Multimodal Nanoparticles

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access