Parameters and trade-offs

2
Parameters and trade-offs


Introduction


This section refers mainly to the Technical issues subheading discussed under the Image optimization heading considered for each examination in Part 2. Only a brief overview is provided here. For a more detailed explanation, please refer to Chapter 4 of MRI in Practice or an equivalent text.


The main considerations of image quality are:



  • SNR
  • contrast to noise ratio (CNR)
  • spatial resolution
  • scan time

Each factor is controlled by certain parameters, and each ‘trades off’ against the other (see later in Table 2.2). This section summarizes the parameters available and the trade-offs involved. Suggested parameters are outlined in Table 2.1, which can be found here and at the beginning of each anatomical region in Part 2. The parameters given should be universally acceptable on most systems. However, weighting parameters in particular are field strength dependent, and therefore, some modification may be required if you are operating at extremely low or high field strengths.


Table 2.1 Summary of parameters





































































































































































































































































































1.5 T 3 T
SE SE
Short TE Min–30 ms Short TE Min–15 ms
Long TE 70 ms+ Long TE 70 ms+
Short TR 600–800 ms Short TR 600–900 ms
Long TR 2000 ms+ Long TR 2000 ms+
FSE FSE
Short TE Min–20 ms Short TE Min–15 ms
Long TE 90 ms+ Long TE 90 ms+
Short TR 400–600 ms Short TR 600–900 ms
Long TR 4000 ms+ Long TR 4000 ms+
Short TEL 2–6 Short TEL 2–6
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
IR T1 IR T1
Short TE Min–20 ms Short TE Min–20 ms
Long TR 3000 ms+ Long TR 300 ms+
TI 200–600 ms TI Short or null time of tissue
Short ETL 2–6 Short ETL 2–6
STIR STIR
Long TE 60 ms+ Long TE 60 ms+
Long TR 3000 ms+ Long TR 3000 ms+
Short TI 100–175 ms Short TI 210 ms
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
FLAIR FLAIR
Long TE 80 ms+ Long TE 80 ms+
Long TR 9000 ms+ Long TR 9000 ms + (TR at least 4 × TI)
Long TI 1700–2500 ms (depending on TR) Long TI 1700–2500 ms (depending on TR)
Long ETL 16+ Long ETL 16+
Coherent GRE Coherent GRE
Long TE 15 ms+ Long TE 15 ms+
Short TR <50 ms Short TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–50° Flip angle 20–50°
Incoherent GRE Incoherent GRE
Short TE Minimum Short TE Minimum
Short TR <50 ms Short TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–50° Flip angle 20–50°
Balanced GRE Balanced GRE
TE Minimum TE Minimum
TR Minimum TR Minimum
Flip angle >40° Flip angle >40°
SSFP SSFP
TE 10–15 ms TE 10–15 ms
TR <50 ms TR <50 ms
Flip angle 20–40° Flip angle 20–40°
Slice thickness 2D Slice thickness 3D
Thin 2–4 mm Thin <1 mm
Medium 5–6 mm Thick >3 mm
Thick 8 mm
FOV Matrix
Small <18 cm Coarse 256 × 128 / 256 × 192
Medium 18–30 cm Medium 256 × 256 / 512 × 256
Large >30 cm Fine 512 × 512


Very fine >1024 × 1024
NEX/NSA Slice number 3D
Short 1 Small <32
Medium 2–3 Medium 64
Multiple >4 Large >128
PC-MRA 2D and 3D TOF-MRA 2D
TE Minimum TE Minimum
TR 25–33 ms TR 28–45 ms
Flip angle 30° Flip angle 40–60°
VENC venous 20–40 cm/s TOF-MRA 3D
VENC arterial 20–40 cm/s60 cm/s TE Minimum


TR 25–50 ms


Flip angle 20–30°

The figures given are for 1.5 T and 3 T systems. Parameters are dependent on field strength and may need adjustment for very low or very high field systems.


Table 2.2 Parameters and their trade-offs




















Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 10, 2016 | Posted by in MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | Comments Off on Parameters and trade-offs

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
Parameter Advantages Disadvantages
TR increased (up to 2000 ms in SE) Increased SNRIncreased number of slices per acquisition Increased scan timeDecreased T1 weighting
TR decreased (below 2000 ms in SE) Decreased scan timeIncreased T1 weighting Decreased SNRDecreased number of slices per acquisition
TE increased Increased T2 weighting Decreased SNR