13 Assessment of the thoracic aorta is integral to evaluation of the cardiovascular system during cardiac CT. Changes in the structure and function of the thoracic aorta may significantly impact left ventricular function, coronary blood flow, and cerebral and peripheral circulation. Although dedicated coronary CT angiography (CTA) will not image the aortic arch, a complete interpretation of every cardiac CT should comment on the presence of thoracic aortic disease in visualized portions of the aorta. For patients in whom more complete evaluation of the aorta is desired, the electrocardiogrphic (ECG)-gated examination is easily extended from the aortic arch down through the diaphragm. Aortic anomalies, variants, aneurysmal disease, dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are clearly defined by ECG-gated CTA. This information allows the clinician to evaluate thoroughly aortic disease, stratify risk and prognosis, target medical therapy, plan endovascular and surgical interventions, and assess follow-up. Changes on serial assessment of the thoracic aorta can identify patients at increased risk for adverse outcome. Patients with rapid progression of disease over time may warrant more aggressive risk factor modification; blood pressure control; or early, timely surgical intervention. Finally, follow-up imaging after surgical intervention on the heart and thoracic aorta is essential for the early detection and treatment of complications and progression of disease. The thoracic aorta is divided into five segments: aortic root, ascending aorta, proximal aortic arch, distal aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta (Fig. 13.1A). The aortic root is the cylindrical segment of aorta from the ventriculoaortic junction to the sinotubular junction, which contains the aortic valve, the aortic annulus, and the sinuses of Valsalva (see Fig. 3.1). The three aortic root sinuses or sinuses of Valsalva are functionally identical. The left and right coronary arteries normally arise from ostia in the left and right sinuses, respectively. The third, posterior, sinus is normally without a coronary origin and is termed the noncoronary sinus. The semilunar attachments of the aortic valve cusps form the hemodynamic junction between the left ventricle and the aorta. Structures distal to this boundary are exposed to arterial pressure; structures proximal to this boundary are subject to ventricular pressure. This relationship becomes more important in interpreting anatomic and physiologic changes in diseases affecting the aortic root. The attachments of the aortic valve cusps to the aortic wall are not planar, but rather crown-like, from the top of the commissures at the level of the sinotubular junction to the nadir of the cusps in the left ventricular outflow tract.1 Because of this anatomy, significant dilation of the aorta at the sinotubular junction leads to loss of valvular support with aortic valve incompetence.1,2 Understanding this mechanism of aortic insufficiency is essential to understanding changes in the aortic valve from diseases such as aortic dissection and annuloaortic ectasia. Aortic root size measurements are made at the annulus (nadir of the aortic leaflets), at the midpoint of the sinuses of Valsalva, and at the sinotubular junction (Figs. 13.1C,D). Assessing these dimensions allows accurate serial comparison of changes in aortic root size and defines the root morphology to allow disease classification and to plan surgical intervention.1,3,4 The size of the normal aortic root is related to body size, height, and sex. Aortic root size changes with age and with hypertension.4–6 Enlargement of the aortic root may lead to significant aortic valvular regurgitation in patients with hypertension, collagen vascular diseases (such as Marfan syndrome or Ehler-Danlos syndrome), and aortic dissection through loss of valve support and central aortic insufficiency. The normal diameter of the adult aorta just above the sinotubular junction averages 3.6 cm (range, 2.4–4.7 cm).7,8 The ascending aorta extends from the sinotubular junction to the origin of the innominate artery. The average diameter of the adult ascending aorta is 3.5 cm (range, 2.2–4.7 cm).8 A diameter greater than 4.0 cm is generally classified as aneurysmal (Figs. 13.1D,E). The aortic arch begins at the origin of the right innominate artery and ends at the attachment of the ligamentum arteriosum. The proximal arch extends from the origin of the right innominate artery to the origin of the left subclavian artery and includes the origin of the left common carotid artery. The distal arch, called the aortic isthmus, includes the aorta from the origin of the left subclavian artery to the ligamentum arteriosum. The distal aortic arch may be slightly narrower than the proximal descending thoracic aorta, particularly in infants and children. The descending thoracic aorta begins distal to the ligamentum arteriosum and extends to the aortic hiatus of the diaphragm. Its proximal portion may appear slightly dilated and is thus termed the aortic spindle. The mid-descending thoracic aorta has an average diameter of 2.5 cm (range, 1.6–3.7 cm). The distal descending thoracic aorta above the diaphragm has an average diameter of 2.4 cm (range, 1.4–3.3 cm).7,8 The unique properties and anatomic relationships of the ligamentum arteriosum may create radiographic appearances that mimic thoracic aortic disease states. The ductus diverticulum is a focal, convex bulge on the undersurface of the isthmic region of the aortic arch (Fig. 13.2). This bulge is commonly thought to arise from the remnant of the ductus arteriosum, although some have theorized its presence as a vestige of the embryonic right dorsal aortic root.9 The importance of this structure is differentiating its appearance from the presence of a post-traumatic or atherosclerotic pseudo-aneurysm in this location (Figs. 13.19 and 13.20). The ductus diverticulum may be differentiated from an aortic pseudo-aneurysm by its smooth margins and symmetric appearance. Pseudocoarctation of the aorta may occur when the aorta elongates and kinks in this location resulting from tethering of the aorta at the ligamentum arteriosum. The appearance of the aorta in pseudocoarctation is similar to true coarctation, but the absence of collateral circulation readily differentiates the two states. Three sequential arterial branches arise from the aortic arch. The right innominate (brachiocephalic) artery arises first and is the largest, giving rise to the right subclavian and right common carotid arteries. The left common carotid artery arises next and is typically the smallest artery of the great vessels. The left subclavian artery branches next, arising from the distal arch posteriorly. The standard branching pattern is seen overall in about 70% of individuals.10 The most common variation is a combined origin of the innomi-nate and left common carotid arteries in about 10 to 13% of individuals, often termed a bovine aortic arch. The term bovine aortic arch is actually a misnomer because the branching pattern in cattle has a single trunk that splits into all the great vessels. In about 5% of the population, the left vertebral artery arises as a separate branch directly from the aorta, between the left common carotid artery and the left subclavian artery.10 Congenital anomalies of the aorta and branching pattern of the great vessels may present as isolated anomalies or in association with other congenital cardiac malformations. Definition of the aortic malformation is based on the position and caliber of the aortic arch and its branches, the descending aorta, and the ductus or ligamentum arteriosum. Vascular rings are unusual congenital abnormalities in which the anomalous configuration of the arch or associated vessels forms a complete ring surrounding the trachea and esophagus and may result in symptoms related to compression. Vascular rings result from malformations of the primarily paired aortic arch or branching pulmonary arteries during embryogenesis. The two most common types of complete vascular rings are double aortic arch (Fig. 13.3) and right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery (Fig. 13.4), comprising 85 to 95% of vascular rings. Double aortic arch results from a persistence of the embryologic double aortic arch with right and left arches arising from the ascending aorta and rejoining posteriorly after giving rise to their respective carotid and subclavian arteries. In the right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery, a left ligamentum arteriosum may connect the aberrant subclavian artery to the left pulmonary artery to complete the ring. Two other complete vascular rings that are extremely rare (<1%) include the right aortic arch with mirror-image branching and a left ligamentum arteriosum (Fig. 13.5) and left aortic arch with an aberrant retroesophageal right subclavian artery (Fig. 13.6), right-sided descending aorta, and right ligamentum arteriosum.11 In infants and children, compression of the trachea and esophagus from vascular rings frequently cause symptoms of respiratory distress, recurrent pneumonia, bronchitis, stridor, and poor intake.12 Related vascular anomalies involving arch vessels that do not form a complete ring may produce similar symptoms from compression of the trachea or esophagus or may remain asymptomatic.12 A right aortic arch crosses the mediastinum to the right of the trachea and esophagus and occurs in 0.1% of adults.13,14 Right aortic arch anomalies include right aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery; right aortic arch with mirror image branching; and right aortic arch with isolated left subclavian artery arising from the left pulmonary artery. Of these, only the right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery is likely to be a source of symptomatic tracheal–esophageal compression. Right aortic arch with mirror-image branching has a high likelihood of association with other forms of complex congenital heart disease but is not usually itself a cause of symptoms.14 Isolated left subclavian artery is a rare cause of upper extremity ischemia. Vascular rings are rare in adults. In one series of vascular rings first diagnosed in adults, the most common anomaly was double aortic arch (46%) (Fig. 13.3), followed by right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and ligamentum arteriosum (30%) (Fig. 13.4). Only two thirds of adults in this report were symptomatic at diagnosis. Dysphagia and respiratory symptoms were the predominant presenting symptom in adults.15–17 Exercise-induced dilatation of the aortic arch and age-dependent changes in thoracic compliance have been proposed as potential mechanisms of new-onset symptoms in the adult-diagnosed vascular ring patient.15,16 Symptomatic vascular rings require operative intervention. CTA is the ideal imaging modality to assess vascular rings. Three-dimensional reconstruction with and without volume rendering defines the morphology of the great vessels and their topography in relation to the adjacent soft tissue structures and allows pre-operative planning for surgical intervention. CT offers significant advantage over echocardiography in the delineation of the great vessels to the adjacent esophagus, trachea, and bronchi for surgical planning as well.11 Aneurysms of the thoracic aorta are most common in the ascending portion (Fig. 13.7). Whereas atherosclerosis is a common cause of all thoracic aortic aneurysms, this cause is rare for isolated ascending aortic aneurysms. The mechanism for isolated ascending aortic aneurysms is likely based on a genetic or acquired weakness in the aortic wall that renders these patients susceptible to hemodynamic-induced enlargement with time. Cystic medial degeneration is the most common cause of isolated ascending aortic aneurysm disease. In many patients, cystic medial degeneration may be the result of susceptibilities from genetic disorders such as Marfan syndrome, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, familial aneurysm disease, bicuspid aortic valve disease, or the inflammatory processes of infectious or noninfectious aortitis, including syphilis and Takayasu arteritis. Up to one third of cases are idiopathic with acceleration of the normal aging processes of elastic fiber fragmentation and smooth cell necrosis for unknown reasons.18 Idiopathic cystic medial degeneration may represent an undefined susceptibility for accelerated degeneration in response to risk factors such as smoking and hypertension. Marfan syndrome, a common inherited connective tissue disease caused by deficiency of the matrix protein fibrillin-1, affects the ocular, skeletal, and cardiovascular system.19,20 Patients with Marfan syndrome demonstrate accelerated aneurysm growth and tend to dissect and rupture at smaller sizes, especially in patients with a family history of early complications and death. The average age of death for untreated patients with Marfan syndrome is 32 years, with aortic root complications implicated in 60 to 80% of deaths from acute heart failure, acute aortic dissection, and aortic rupture.21 The classic aneurysm features in Marfan syndrome include a pear-shaped aneurysmal ascending aorta with smooth tapering to a normal aortic arch and has been termed annuloaortic ectasia. This condition is characterized by dilated sinuses of Valsalva with effacement of the sinotubular junction (Fig. 13.8). Bicuspid aortic valve disease is the most common cardiac congenital anomaly, occurring in up to 2.0% of the population in the United States. Bicuspid aortic valve patients have an intrinsic smooth muscle abnormality that predisposes them to higher rates of cystic medial degeneration and ascending aortic enlargement and dissection.22 These patients have an increased incidence of both aortic root enlargement and ascending aortic aneurysms independent of the function of their bicuspid valves, age, body size, and hypertension.6,22 Patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and aneurysmal dilation of the ascending aorta should be considered for earlier surgery because of the intrinsic weakness of the aorta (Fig. 13.9). Syphilitic aortitis causes destruction of the aortic media with loss of elastic and smooth muscle fibers and subintimal scarring. These changes lead to aortic dilatation and aneurysms. The most common site of a syphilitic thoracic aneurysm is the ascending thoracic aorta, followed by the aortic arch, proximal descending thoracic aorta, and distal descending thoracic aorta. Sinus of Valsalva involvement is rare and usually asymmetric. Despite infrequent sinus involvement, syphilitic aortitis may be associated with narrowing of the coronary ostia due to subintimal scarring with myocardial ischemia.23 The goal of surgical intervention on asymptomatic patients with aortic dilatation is to prevent rupture (Fig. 13.10) and aortic dissection (Figs. 13.11 and 13.12). In persons younger than 60 years, an ascending aortic diameter greater than 4 cm and a descending aortic diameter greater than 3 cm indicates dilatation; a diameter greater than 1.5 times the expected normal diameter is defined as a thoracic aortic aneurysm.24 The diameter of an aneurysm strongly correlates with the risk of rupture or dissection, but there is not a clear consensus of an absolute size indication for elective surgical repair in ascending aortic aneurysms.20 The Yale group reported rupture or dissection at a median size of 5.9 cm in the ascending aorta and 7.2 cm in the descending aorta with yearly rates of rupture or dissection about 7% and death 12% at or above these sizes.19,20 On the basis of these data, the traditional threshold for elective surgical therapy in good-risk candidates has been 5.5 cm for ascending aortic aneurysms. To improve risk stratification, some centers have advocated using cross-sectional area with indexing to body size. Although volume measurements have been advanced by some as the best estimate of the risk of rupture, there are no adequate natural history data for this approach.24 Others have suggested the use of ratios of measured to expected size based on the body surface area and age, adjusted according to the underlying etiology.25 The rate of expansion is also an important consideration in thoracic aneurysm disease. In a large longitudinal study, the average rate of growth for all thoracic aneurysms was found to be 0.12 cm per year.19 Longitudinal studies of the rate of expansion have reported greater rates of expansion in the descending aorta with Marfan syndrome, chronic dissection, and bicuspid valve disease.26 Growth at a rate of greater than 1.0 cm per year is a widely accepted indication for surgical intervention.25 The individual benefit–risk assessment for intervention is based on the patient’s composite risk of rupture and dissection as a function of size, rate of growth, etiology, associated disease, and surgical risk. Size thresholds for intervention in individual patients are adjusted for underlying etiology, recent rate of growth, and family history of complications. Patients with Marfan syndrome, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, familial aneurysms, and chronic dissection all likely benefit from earlier intervention. Patients with bicuspid aortic valves may be at increased risk and may warrant early surgical treatment.6,27 Preoperative CTA of the aorta is essential for surgical planning. Accurate assessment of aortic root size, rate of change, morphology of the aortic valve leaflets, and distal extent of the ascending aortic aneurysm is critical to plan the appropriate operation. Further presurgical assessment includes the presence of concomitant coronary disease, aortic valvular stenosis, and regurgitation and the status of the mitral valve. In patients with large aneurysms and effacement of the sinotubular junction, measurements of the aortic root diameter may be misleading. In these cases, assessing the cephalad displacement of the coronary ostia provides a measure of the integrity of the sinuses of Valsalva and the aortic root (Fig. 13.13). Assessing whether aortic regurgitation is related to the valve itself or to loss of sinotubular support (as seen in annuloaortic ectasia) is important when considering root preservation and valve-sparing techniques. Ascending aortic aneurysms with normal sinuses and a normal aortic annulus may be treated with replacement of the ascending aorta from the sinotubular ridge to the origin of the innominate artery using a simple tube graft. If the aortic valve is diseased, a standard aortic valve replacement may be performed. In patients with marked effacement of the sinotubular junction and cephalad displacement of the coronary ostia, the aortic root should be replaced as a part of the index procedure. Patients with Marfan syndrome with significant dilatation of the aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysm should undergo replacement of both the aorta and root because of the high frequency of subsequent root-related complications and death. This approach involves replacing the ascending aorta and root with a valve conduit, and reimplantation of the coronary arteries into the neosinuses. Involvement of the sinuses of Valsalva in non-Marfan syndrome patients may be treated with valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction techniques or replacement of the aortic valve and reimplantation of the coronary arteries. In patients with extensive disease involving the arch or descending thoracic aorta, additional procedures such as arch replacement and “elephant trunk” procedures may be performed under the same deep hypothermic circulatory arrest to treat all diseased aortic tissue and plan for additional future procedures. Novel approaches to treating aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic disease simultaneously through combined open surgery and endovascular stent graft deployment are currently under development.28 All patients who have undergone thoracic aortic surgery should have long-term follow-up with repeat imaging. Because complete resection of aortic tissue is not feasible and residual aortic tissue is often not normal, patients are at risk for the subsequent aortic dissection, aneurysmal degeneration, and pseudoaneurysm formation. Routine scheduled surveillance CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is ideal for monitoring disease progression and for early detection of complications to avoid the increased morbidity and mortality of emergency reoperation. Patients at increased risk of reoperation, such as those with Marfan syndrome, familial aneurysms, or dissections, require more frequent follow-up.
Thoracic Aorta
Normal Anatomy of the Aorta
Thoracic Aorta: Normal Variants
Congenital Anomalies of the Aorta and the Great Vessels
Aneurysmal Disease of the Ascending Aorta
Aneurysm Size
Growth
The Influence of Etiology
Surgical Planning
Follow-up
Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm