Pat. no.
Age (years)
Sex
Primary NET site
Previous treatments
Ki-67
SUVmax 68Ga-DOTATATE
SUVmax 68Ga-DOTATOC
1
49
Male
Foregut (gastric)
Surgery, SIRT, PRRT
30
11.1
13.8
2
77
Female
Midgut
Surgery, chemotherapy
5
25.5
29.2
3
70
Male
Midgut
Chemotherapy
<1
17.8
26.2
4
62
Female
Midgut (appendiceal)
Surgery, chemotherapy, PRRT
5
8.5
12.3
5
72
Male
Midgut (cecal)
Surgery
<1
24.1
30.0
6
72
Male
Midgut (duodenal)
Surgery
N.a.
7.4
10.7
7
65
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
<2
13.8
18.4
8
79
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, chemotherapy, interferon alpha, PRRT
N.a.
18.2
21.1
9
58
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
5
19.1
12.3
10
61
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery
1
10.3
14.5
11
57
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Somatostatin analogs, PRRT
1
15.6
30.2
12
46
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
<2
15.6
32.4
13
69
Female
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, SIRT
40
28.0
12.9
14
54
Male
Midgut (ileal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs, PRRT, chemoembolization
<1
17.0
12.1
15
70
Male
Midgut (ileocecal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs, PRRT
<1
11.2
15.5
16
81
Male
Midgut (ileocecal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
<2
10.3
10.1
17
71
Male
Midgut (jejunal)
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
10
28.2
22.2
18
66
Male
Midgut (jejunal)
None
<1
9.9
12.0
19
48
Female
Pancreas
Surgery, somatostatin analogs
<2
6.8
6.9
20
59
Male
Pancreas
None
30
20.0
28.1
21
46
Male
Pancreas
Surgery (metastases), chemotherapy, PRRT
3
27.0
33.8
22
56
Female
Pancreas
Surgery, chemotherapy, SIRT, TACE, PRRT
10
18.9
20.0
23
55
Female
Pancreas
PRRT
5
20.0
25.5
24
67
Male
Pancreas
Surgery
5
16.4
21.5
25
66
Male
Pancreas
Surgery
5
12.8
18.1
26
53
Male
Pancreatic gastrinoma
Surgery
<1
13.8
46.6
27
50
Male
Pancreatic insulinoma
Somatostatin analogs
N.a.
30.2
60.5
Table 2
Scan parameters
Scan parameter | 68Ga-DOTATATE | 68Ga-DOTATOC | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range | |
Uptake time (min) | 56 | 32 | 24–161 | 68 | 32 | 29–162 |
Activity per dose (MBq) | 102 | 13 | 60–123 | 88 | 16 | 52–111 |
Specific activity (MBq/nmol) | 48.9 | 24.1 | 16.0–95.6 | 41 | 20.6 | 10.9–81 |
Peptide per dose (μg) | 6 | 3 | 2–13 | 6 | 3 | 2–12 |
3.1 Regional and Lesional Analyses
Fifty-one regions (excluding the composite region “lymph nodes”) were found positive with both 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC (Table 3). There was no discrepant region. On average three positive regions were found per patient with each of the imaging procedures. There was no significant difference between the two imaging procedures regarding the number of detected regions per patient or the number of patients with at least one lesion within one of the eight regions (including the composite region “lymph nodes”) (Table 4).
Table 3
Regional analyses: positive regions per patient
Pat. no. (n = 20) | Regions positive* | |
---|---|---|
68Ga-DOTATATE | 68Ga-DOTATOC | |
1 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 3 | 3 |
4 | 4 | 4 |
5 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 1 | 1 |
9 | 2 | 2 |
10 | 2 | 2 |
11 | 2 | 2 |
12 | 2 | 2 |
14 | 1 | 1 |
15 | 2 | 2 |
17 | 2 | 2 |
18 | 4 | 4 |
19 | 2 | 2 |
21 | 4 | 4 |
22 | 1 | 1 |
23 | 5 | 5 |
24 | 6 | 6 |
25 | 3 | 3 |
26 | 2 | 2 |
Sum | 51 | 51 |
Mean | 3 | 3 |
Table 4
Regional analyses: lesions per region
Region | Number of patients | |
---|---|---|
68Ga-DOTATATE | 68Ga-DOTATOC | |
Head/neck | 1 | 1 |
Mediastinum | 6 | 6 |
Lung | 1 | 1 |
Liver | 17 | 17 |
Pancreas | 5 | 5 |
Abdomen/pelvis | 14 | 14 |
Bone | 7 | 7 |
Lymph nodes* | 15 | 15 |
Within the defined regions (excluding the composite region “lymph nodes”) 174 lesions were detected with 68Ga-DOTATATE versus 179 lesions with 68Ga-DOTATOC (versus Table 5). The difference was significant (p = 0.043). The five lesions that were detected additionally with 68Ga-DOTATOC were found in five patients and were distributed among the following regions: “liver” (two patients), “pancreas,” “abdomen/pelvis,” and “bone.” On average 8.7 lesions were found per patient with 68Ga-DOTATATE versus 9.0 lesions with 68Ga-DOTATOC. There was no significant difference between the two imaging procedures in lesion detection with respect to tumor grading or tumor origin (foregut, midgut, pancreas).
Table 5
Regional analyses: lesions per patient